The ultimate secret of free energy: Split the postive AND the negative

[lamare]

@lamare,

Please please take a look at Benitez patents:

Posted these at my website: Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Patents/Benitez/

Enjoy!

[Slovenia]

Cut Some Slack Please!!

Hi Raui,

I think we should cut Lamare a great deal of slack on this thread. He is an electrical engineer with much knowledge which he is freely sharing with all of us. He has spent a lot of time researching which is apparent from all of his posts and I think we should be very grateful to him for what he has shared with us. He is a great man who deserves a little respect I think. He knows things many of us just don't know and/or understand and yet he still shares with us unlike many others here who don't share and/or care about us.

Let's not kill the goose that laid the golden egg as they say in US.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

Just out of curiosity have you built any of these devices yet? I think you'll earn a lot more cred if you 'put your money where your mouth is' as they say.
Raui

[nilrehob]

Posted these at my website: Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Patents/Benitez/

Enjoy!

[Jbignes5]

A little more information.

Since I started to read Tesla's descriptions of his experiments little he says does not make sense to me. Here is a nice explanation of something he observed while working in Colorado Springs.

"Tesla's New Discovery" by Nikola Tesla

Although the difference in the capacitance of a wire suspended at a fixed distance above the ground does give this result I am not sure that it wouldn't alter a system unless it's design was so tight as to allow or filter this variation out.

It could be that is exactly what Moray did with his device. He picked up the change and used a natural amplifier (treated crystal) to boost the variation enough to enact a change or provide enough of a swing to drive his device like a quasi crystal radio set. This would drive his setup much like the crystal radio drives the ear piece that is part of the circuit for free.

Although I do believe what Tesla is saying from seeing with my own eyes I don't think the direction he was looking was the source. This of course was the time that he was looking in an outward direction. From my studies I think it was the impacts of the charges rushing into our central source. I would assume that everyone would agree that our atmosphere is very very dynamic? Well this has to be related to the density of the charges changing as it flows twords our source.

I only have one more component to explain at this point and that is magnets. I have found out that after the process of sintering a magnet the internal structure is of a crytaline nature.

Reference:

Neodymium magnet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Again a crystal reference hmmm most curious.

It seems to me that all a magnet is, is a crystal infused with other crytaline components of different density to form diode like connections withing it's micro structure. This in itself causes the external diectric component to line up in what we call lines of force. Each line of force repelling the other they spread evenly around the structure or as evenly as possibly can be done with a dynamic medium it resides in (dielectric). I don't know for sure about the dielectric lines having charges as a component but it sure makes sense.

If we look at iron filings when exposed to a magnetic source we see that the forms it makes are not as dynamic as we would expect. And it can be proofed by the simple experiment of holding a coil in any orientation from the magnet and it does in fact not produce a voltage. This must mean that these lines are typically not motive in a circular fashion. Once established in the forming of the magnets they are usually inert in that sense and is evident by the motion we have to give to a coil or the magnet for it to either strip or add charges to the wire. Remember that I am thinking that the charges are heavy but not heavy enough to be pulled or added to the lines that the gather around. But when the lines cut a conductor they have the ability to strip or add charges to the wire netting the wire a + or - charge without interfering with the lines but only in the slightest of ways. These lines move but not in the way one would think. It is a spongy mass of these lines. And they are very very dynamic in that sense. Even when a line gets a dielectric negative it has plenty to reform the line in an instant of time.
Ok so I have the fundamental operation down and need to figure out why there are two poles. The only thing that leads me to believe that these are two fundamental particles or Dielectric is because of the direction of the examples of the Sierpinski triangle I referenced earlier. If there was a beginning event of great energetic release whatever the form the you subscribe to you will have to agree that it would have made all kinds of sized particles as well. This would have to be true because thats what we see when we explode things on our scale. Given that we can conclude that these fundamental particles form in different sizes as well. This makes the reference I gave earlier about the triangle more weight when compared to traditional theories. It also might explain why the south pole when compared to the north pole has different strengths in a magnet. With the south being the weakest or less capable of having additional charges because of lack of space, these particles carry the basic charges in it's structure that bind it together and since there is more physical structure when compared to the increased surface area of the northpole particle to the south pole it has less capability to ferry charges. As to the level of difference between the the two I can not say. I don't have the sensitive equipment to measure this.

If Harimein is right about the shape of the apple he shows there is direct correlation to the field a magnet exhibits. Except for the motion he shows I believe that in a magnet there is no motion but that is because the mechanism that drives the lines to be stable (solid Structure of the magnet) and the charges bound to those lines in a steady state only capable of holding so much line and so much charge that gathers around those lines.

If we again look at the components of the magnet we indeed find that Iron is a crystaline structure. Hmmm...

Reference:

"Single crystal of pure iron"

Iron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[lamare]

Lamare
Seeing as how you have a duke aroo goin on.
something came up today that you [and all]should see
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ecrets-48.html
Post 1435

Chet

I uploaded the whole thing here:
Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Aether%20Vortex%20Energy%20Converter/

Thanks!

[lamare]

This topic was started and boy is it a good way to see the pathways.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...discharge.html

With the voltage potential being the attractor of the medium and the thin blue lines are actually what I suspect is the charges flowing twords the high potential.

These are just beautiful.

Wow! I like these

[Jbignes5]

Wow! I like these

It does intrigue me to see the action of the discharges as they are called. And it led me to believe that when this field of both dielectric and charges form they flow in an reaction counter action mode. I also thought that they(charges) get picked up in the invisible portions of the streamer and gain intensity as the charges run into other slower(larger) charges preceding it. This has two effects. One of actually slowing that charge down while it gain in intensity and the other that it has more drag on the surrounding influences. I have postulated that the charges slow because they are gaining in density and can effect more of an area and likewise to the area affecting them. But I am somewhat hesitant to lock that view in because if the charges gain in density then the pull that gets asserted on them gets greater you would think.
It could be that the emissions that are emitted both light and dielectric are splash over from charges hitting the now denser charges and a portion of the charges get flung away in a backwards direction. It could explain the fork like extensions of the discharges.
I am thinking that in higher potentials you get the discharge because the transporters in matter have a set capability to transmit charges. This causes a backup like effect or slow drain effect in plumbing. It could also be that it is from the method of excitation of the matter. A back and forth movement over rides the conduits ability to channel that much and it has no where to go but away. Kinda like the process of making smaller wires. Some a drawn through a die that strips some of the material away and makes the wire smaller.

The really interesting picture is the plate ones. Man it really gives you a different view on the event and shows the density of the charges and sorta how the flow goes on a whole view. You can plainly see the lines and the flow twords those lines in those.

Take picture 4. There is a lot to see in this picture. try to let your eyes relax and look at the left knob. There is a semi bright shell about 1 inch from the surface of that knob on the left. This I believe is a charge shell or charged filled boundry. Like a water surface around the knob. I suspect the charges circulate in that medium around the knob but I haven't figure the dynamics of that flow yet. If you look around the petals as I like to call them the tips have finger like conduits of the dielectric medium with a light charge on them. This is a much better picture of what I see in my mind of what surrounds all matter, just on a very light scale. This also makes me believe that this might even be an accurate picture of an atom. With the networks connecting outwards making new connections to it's neighbor. The knob cap in the photo could be the matter surrounding the internal charges of the material and if I can suggest that the matter is flaky like snow and is statically attracted to the internal charges. This causes a layering effect that overlap each other forming the round appearance when we look at super HD picture of atoms. This creates a pathway around the whole atoms real structure that causes charges passing around the flaky matter in varying densities and pathways. So if we looked at a charge entering the atom through the top roadway traveling twords the matter which is the knob. It then enters the matter slightly but has to swing 90 degrees to travel around the outside of the matters flakes and out the bottom or maybe somewhere before and continue away from the atom. This is the same process that we call gravity when looked at from the scale of the earth. But our earth has distinct ins and outs and they are called poles. Take the scale and back it down to the atom. If the earth has inward rushing charges all falling in slow(outer atmosphere) to fast(near atmosphere) speeds tword the center charge or potential then the same action must be the same on the smaller scales. The charges from the earth rain down constantly going through matter having to go around the matter and exit. This little deviation is the force we call gravity. It should be based on the speed of those charges when it hits the matter and that should determine it's standing weight and the strength of pull on the matter as well.

A few references:
Scanning electron microscope - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is what we can see atm... Try looking at the ice crystals. What looks to be solid is actually flaky and layered up close.
Research News: Debut of TEAM 0.5, the World's Best Microscope Pay attention to the section of "New vistas in the realm of the small" Nice gold what? Crystals.. hmmm

I hope you understand this concept. If not ask away.. I would really like your input here guys....

Just a poke at the established status quo.

Science@Berkeley Lab: Looking Toward TeV - Where Cosmology and Particle Physics Meet

They have it all backwards and then wonder why they can not make the connections or unify the whole lot. They make all these words to explain what they don't understand and then try to learn their secrets. They ask if they ever will find the unifying factor and it is starring them right in the face. Blind they are..

[lamare]

I hope you understand this concept. If not ask away.. I would really like your input here guys....

At this moment, it's hard for me to follow you, but let me give you a few references you may like. Yesterday, I read this article. Very interesting:

Free Energy, Gravity and the Aether 10/18/97

My research and discoveries have led me to characterize the aether as follows:

* 1. A superfluidic particulate medium which pervades all space.
* 2. A medium, which in its various modes, is the building block of the physical universe.
* 3. A medium, which, in one of its modes, is responsible for gravity and inertia.
* 4. A medium which is controllable by our mind and can be manipulated my our thoughts.
* 5. A medium which can be controlled by geometric shapes.

There's also an intriguing story in there about how Tibettan munks managed to perform levitation using nothing but sound.

More in this direction:
The nature of Charge - Paul Stowe
An Overview of the Concept of Attenuation [Pushing] Gravity (Paul Stowe) - Mountain Man's News Archive
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...uum_charge.pdf
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf

And Eric Dollard also said some things on discharges:
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_...n%28OCR%29.pdf
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_...om%20Brown.pdf

I'm sure you'll like these.

Update: The book Dollard mentions on Tesla can be found here:
[Projekat Rastko] John J. O'Neill: Prodigal Genius - The Life of Nikola Tesla (1944)

[Slovenia]

PESWIKI Document

Don't forget to check out Lamare's peswiki file too. He has taken a lot of information from the energetic threads and added it to that one document. It's a fantastic read. The link to the document is:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

[Jbignes5]

Hmm the nature of charge is an interesting read. I like the concepts execpt for the fact that charge in his view is unity. Well charges can unify it takes momentum to do that. That is because they are separate in the medium that they flow in. Charges are merely movement contained. Like you have suggested earlier it is a grouping of the medium itself that forms a unit. When anything in the medium groups or flows into itself like that charge, it creates a division of that scale of the particle or size. It filters out unlike sizes of those particles thru this action or flow. The medium can flow because this medium has continuity of scales or sizes. Lets take water for example. That condensed medium has a flow no matter how small the scale you look and the further you look, you will always see smaller particulates moving within those flows. Also the further you look into this medium of water the further that two particles flowing in that medium can influence another particle through proximity to the other particle. Now it can appear that they are connected by that medium and that connection is a bidirectional connection. These connections are formed by the medium as is is much smaller then the now huge displacement of that medium. I'm sure that as your scale or view changes yet again that there is a finer particles flowing in between each particle from the previous scale. This is the fractal you reference. The one thing that I'm trying to understand now is just how far does that fractal go.

Over 50 years ago we thought that the light microscope was that limit to the fractal but it turned out that there were other ways to view particles and even atoms outside our capability to view them with that technology at the time. As our view has been changing and becoming more in focus we are finding out that our old "laws" don't fit so well because they were of course a pure postulation of what we could see. Our view of this world below our own is showing us that we are in error but we are not correcting our official view on that.

All matter in this and the much smaller universes forms on the boundries between flows of the medium. These areas are eddy points between these flows. Matter then condenses or divides the medium and takes on that shape of the little area that it divides between all those flows. This turns it into a flake of matter or kinda a diamond shape. This matter is a division and that division has divisions of its own as well. Matter is neutral at that level and acts much like iron does when exposed to a magnetic field. As more matter lines up between two flows it statically attracts through the rest of that matter and is usually called cling. At that point matter is easily disturbed and is very loosely bound by the division it creates in that space. This can be akin to how islands of sand react to the flow that goes over it and cuts it over time. As time goes on the sand mass seems to change. It is sort of the same process but on a much smaller scale and the flows are surrounding the matter so the dynamics change. It is the same concept but the ratios of sand or matter are in reverse. Meaning the medium is the largest and the matter is the smallest ratios.

I was thinking yesterday after I wrote about the waves you reference and how matter should have a wave signature. If these charges that enter the outer shells of the atom or gross matter (skin effect) filter out of the layered matter then it would have that unique signature of that filter. The charges follow the same squirting when collided effect that I mentioned before ,as evident by the corona discharges pictures. As they travel around the flakes and out that the matter are merely flakes and form a pattern. That would make squirts of parts of the charges that are traveling into the matter filter out in between the flakes and that just might be the fields that designate what that matter is. This squirting would have a characteristic signature that is unique to that matter. This could be proofed by the sound and salt experiment that has been used to show self organizing properties of sound when acting on the shape of the salt they used on the vibrating plate. This will allow like signatures to better operate with another like atom and they hold together more tightly then if another matter with a different signature would. When two different signatures are loosely connected it might not separate and get swallowed up by the additional formations of gross matter. This would be an impurity.

I am having a problem with the last part. What I am seeing in my head is not what I am trying to relate. It is hard for me to accurately describe that picture I am seeing. I am refining the last part as I find more examples in the larger to back that up and you will have to bear with me on this refining process.

[lamare]

Electrical Engineer claims breaktrough in free energy research

Electrical Engineer claims breakthrough in free energy research | Before It's News

Please click this up and twitter...

[Jetijs]

Don't forget to check out Lamare's peswiki file too. He has taken a lot of information from the energetic threads and added it to that one document. It's a fantastic read. The link to the document is:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

Fantastic read indeed. Thanks Lamare

[lamare]

Fantastic read indeed. Thanks Lamare

Thanks a lot Jetijs, this means a lot to me, coming from you.

I have added a new section to my article about how to control the resonance mode of the driving coils: Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

[Jbignes5]

Another obscure reference to ponder.

If we go with the idea that there is an underlying medium, we must also go with the idea that like a turntable that medium is moving or spinning or visa versa. If we take a small ball and drop it onto the surface of the turn table (medium of the universe) and observer that the ball starts to rotate and fly outwards from the center of that disk. In this case the medium is the disk and it should be moving with all matter spinning or rolling on top of that medium.

If you remember that the medium is not directly connected to matter or has flexible connection (virtual) we can see that there would be a slip of the matter as it gets rotated by the medium it is on or in. It could also be postulated that these connections will link and bind to the rotating links of threads when combined with the idea that the magnetic field is oriented 90 degrees from the dielectric field and could be responsible for these threads. This is also based on the idea that the disk in this case is of the dielectric components of all movement in the universe.

This action could also be manifested in the real as what we call a black hole. When junctions of these twisting conduits that links all collections of real masses grow to such a level that they collect matter and energy through a complex drag system. The additional charges it does drag into the connection gets extracted from the matter and sucked into the conduit to the next node or junction. They appear to be connected because they are really connected. But I think this connection which first forms in the center of our universe is all connected to the arms that are rotating in two directions at a time. Like revolving spoke on a wheel. Weather or not we can figure out is the driving of this rotation starts in the extremities of the medium or from the center the process is clear when you look at the action of our universe.

Now you are asking well how does these lines of force or dielectric medium do what they do and spins two ways. Well the medium has two actions one of supplying the rotation and one of moving in a spiral on that disk. This is done by the mere shape of that fundamental particle that gives this invisible realm its ability to enact force on the real. A pyramidal crystaline particle. It gives so many action at once that it can hold itself together like a string of pearls does. Replace the pearls with pyramids and you will start to see my point. Lets say they were magnetic pyramids and used the same dynamics of magnetics but of a monpolistic nature. Just from the shape wh have a difference of magnetic emissions of the shape itself. When stacked end to tip they grow stronger and hold together with relative ease but if one was to twist the pyramid on the end of the string it would motivate the rest of the string to twist albeit in a delayed fashion. Also if one tries to bend the string it would have elastic tensions now and will tend to go back to it's original relaxed state. When two like strings are brought together they would parallel themselves to a relaxed state also.

What happens when a string has a good mix of different sized dielectric pyramids. Well branching is now possible. This is what I like to call a density change and usually self organizes within the length of the string. Branching has two factors that I can tell. Previous conduit capability and availability of the proper sized pyramid at that area. If not enough form or get pulled into the string from what is available at that location it will create two threads but of smaller thickness. This is all governed by this pyramidal shape and the fundamental composition of the particle which I am assuming is a crystal because of the ability of the crystal to channel only voltage when struck. This voltage is the guiding light to charges. Which are fundamentally made up of other smaller medium like particles but with order and never ending movement.

This kinda looks like string theory to me but there is a slight diffence in that the strings (conduits) or loops (charges) also have a disorganized condition or commonly what I refer to the medium in general. This also leads me to believe that charges have two modes to travel in space. On their own accord following a path designated by the larger particles (field,weak) and in the particle itself (current, strong) if they are in fact just geometric shells of a pyramid this would permit the ideas. The pyramid I suggested is actually a Sierpinski triangle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If we look in the section of, Analogues in higher dimensions, We find that proof. The particle has an huge surface area with tons of space to allow charges to collect and be sheltered from the flow of the particle in the finner medium. It is self generating from that flow and easily exchangeable with the density that it is flowing in. I think that the blue pyramid is actually the shot of the charges that are in the red pyramid but there is still some doubt in my head as to that conclusion.

If one wants to look at experimental evidence of the ability of the conduits to exchange a spin to another unconnected body all one needs to look at is this:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ini-motor.html


By using one magnet or drive magnet they can drive many many satalite magnets. This driving mechanism is has very little interaction to the main speed of the drive magnet. I have to admit that this was the first time I cam to the conclusion that there has to be a tether or conduit being formed from the rotation of the drive magnet. Once established it does have limits to drive the outer satalite mags but the loss isn't a big one as far as I can tell. When pulsing the drive coil it strongly reacts to the drive magnet and then twists the conduits that are established to the satalites imparting the twist movement to the satalite mags.

So to sum up my theory on this whole process what happens on the natural front is much different then what we concluded and have used this last 100-150 years. The cost of the natural process is near nil because that process is being driven by a fractal stacking of much larger processes already in motion for the mere value of the potential of the one true source.

When people talk about the vortex it is only a byproduct of the actual event driving that vortex. These twisted conduits are the reason for that vortex and the vortex is just the eddy of those conduits. These eddies are organized by the flow of the conduits from wide end (outer,further) to small end (inner,closer) to the driving source. In the case of the coupled magnets by the tether the magnets would be the drain and the vortex the swirl in the aether with the conduit connection being the connection in between two sources. I believe that we have only seen the vortex because thats all that we can observe in the real form but it is not what drives the machine we think of as nature.

Please read the whole document contained here and you will have an understanding of just how much Tesla saw...

"Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination"

[sebosfato]

check this
YouTube - Magnet effect on pulsed current .m4v