Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The ultimate secret of free energy: Split the postive AND the negative

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Thanks

    Thanks Lamare for sharing this information.


    Originally posted by lamare View Post
    Hi all,

    I am currently uploading some audio files I got my hands on some time ago to my web server:



    It says "Please help share", so here you go:
    Bestandsoverzicht van /audio/Open_Mind_with_Bill_Jenkins/

    It will probably take a couple of hours before the whole thing is complete, so you may have to check back later...

    Enjoy!

    Comment


    • #92
      PDF File Updates

      I'll update my pdf files on the three topics every two weeks as long as the 3 threads are active:

      Gray Replication
      Stan Meyers Secret Preventing Electrolysis
      Ultimate Secret of Free Energy Split the Positive & Negative

      Comment


      • #93
        Some food for thought:

        Sheldan Nidle: Galactic Federation Update [08/26/2008] | GalacticMessages.com

        You see, this universe it quite unlike what your cosmologists picture it to be. Rather, it is a living holographic image composed of endless Love and the infinite Light emanating from the Creator. It is under the directives, or divine decrees, of the divine plan. It is what generates matter, and it forges itself into the immense miracles that are physicality. When you realize this you can see why only a spiritual science matters; the rest is mere educated speculation.

        When you traverse this galaxy you observe phenomena that are beyond belief! We give many of the most beautiful objects names which seem to correspond to what they are. We look forward to seeing what your experiences will be and what you will name them. The divine forces acting in physicality arise from electro-holograms forged by the Divine. As you begin to learn about this you can see how interdimensional energies constantly interact according to the divine plan. You discover how rotation creates vortexes; then you perceive that these vortexes come together based on the energy of mutual attraction shaped by these attractors. Gravity is another force formed out of these attractions and becomes something beyond the relativity theories of your Einstein or the mechanistic formulae of your Newton. It takes on the essential electrical and holographic nature of physicality. We replicate these phenomena in our propulsion systems and in the teleporters found aboard our ships.

        What your science is starting to discover is that most of the anomalies that are punching holes in their respective areas of science are guides to a science of consciousness. This is leading to a paradigm that takes the nature of consciousness into account. In effect, your science is back in the time of Newton, figuratively speaking. Too much in too many fields of science no longer makes sense, and a total rethink is becoming mandatory. As we watch this we are happy to see the openness of many of your young investigators. They are proving that an ‘unseen hand’ is in effect and needs to be qualified in a whole new way. You need to look beyond the religiously inspired ‘Big Bang’ theory, the confused world of subatomic physics, and even the mumbo-jumbo realm that is genetics. Out of this confusion are arising the preliminaries for a new science that is much like our own. Our science goes beyond your present knowledge and is predicated on a true concept of consciousness.
        Last edited by lamare; 09-08-2010, 10:34 AM.

        Comment


        • #94
          Could you check this out.

          Turtur pdf : http://www.wbabin.net/physics/turtur1e.pdf Figure 4.

          The weakening of the field is because it halves as it travels due to dispursion of the field going out from the center. This halving is a natural phenomina. Geometry (radius diffraction of the field) is what causes the weakening of just two references. Like point a: inner radia and point b: outer radia. when they are compared it seems that the field is weakening but if we take multiple reading on the outside it would actually add up to the whole.
          If this field is actually what happens for example in a carona discharge then the file would behave much like a Tesla device radiating in a branching fashion.

          I think if you didn't know that there is a dielectric sea in which everything resides and is motivated by the static potential of charges to form connections one would always miss the target. This sea has density and it is what gives the void separation or a way to reference one point in space to another like Tesla found out and have a difference between those two points. Otherwise it would all be one value and nothing would move at all.
          Turtur gives it a good shot at understanding this concept but forgets a few key components to flesh it out fully.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
            Turtur pdf : http://www.wbabin.net/physics/turtur1e.pdf Figure 4.

            The weakening of the field is because it halves as it travels due to dispursion of the field going out from the center. This halving is a natural phenomina. Geometry (radius diffraction of the field) is what causes the weakening of just two references. Like point a: inner radia and point b: outer radia. when they are compared it seems that the field is weakening but if we take multiple reading on the outside it would actually add up to the whole.
            If this field is actually what happens for example in a carona discharge then the file would behave much like a Tesla device radiating in a branching fashion.

            I think if you didn't know that there is a dielectric sea in which everything resides and is motivated by the static potential of charges to form connections one would always miss the target. This sea has density and it is what gives the void separation or a way to reference one point in space to another like Tesla found out and have a difference between those two points. Otherwise it would all be one value and nothing would move at all.
            Turtur gives it a good shot at understanding this concept but forgets a few key components to flesh it out fully.
            This is what Turtur says in the same document:
            The spherical shell has enhanced its volume, but the field strength within this moving shell has been reduced (in accordance with Coulomb’s law). If the empty space would allow the field energy just to pass by, the amount of energy within the outer shell should be the same as the amount of energy within the inner shell. We want to check this and we will find that this is not the case.
            And that is what this is all about. It is not about the weakening of the field strength due to the propagation. That is totally what you expect. What you don't expect is that energy is being lost to the vacuum! In other words: it should "add up to the whole" but it doesn't!!!
            Last edited by lamare; 09-08-2010, 12:57 PM.

            Comment


            • #96
              No it is all about the total of the network once it is established to carry the potential from the center to the outer radia. It has nothing to do with a mysterious anything. If one did not know about the dielectric that forms our space once would make errors just like this.
              The dielectric is why the field can be established. It is why there is motion and it is why energy propagates. It isn't disappearing anywhere. If that was the case then this whole universe would be slowing down and we all know now that it isn't. In fact it seems to be gaining potential like a run away train. As it moves from material or matter to the the outer radia it is not being destroyed or diverted to an imaginairy realm. It leeches into the back ground charge level thru the balance mechanism of the natural process. This event raises the basic charge level across the board and hence why we are speeding up. Although this adding is like a raindrop to the vast sea in which we float, it would take forever or seem like forever to get any appreciable measurement. Like on the order of millions of years.
              If the Vacuum was leeching energy from the field then the night would truely be black. The vacuum is only the base of the energy of the universe. It's base charge. The natural energy that nature uses to perform her tricks of the trade. It is nothing but the lowest potential of it all. That base of course changes as the universe gains potential. A sliding scale if you would. True negative in other words. But there is no negative. Negative in the static realm is only a direction of attraction and not charge value. Static is always positive and then within reference to two points attains direction of flow via the comparrison of those points, a geometric result.
              If this concept was not true then Tesla was completely wrong for which I hardly believe. I truely believe Tesla knew more about this then anyone in our whole history.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
                The dielectric is why the field can be established. It is why there is motion and it is why energy propagates. It isn't disappearing anywhere. [...] If the Vacuum was leeching energy from the field then the night would truely be black.
                That is also what Turtur is saying, eventually. He calculates that the electric field looses energy during propagation. Of course that is not dissapearing, it is converted to some other form of energy. And since charge carriers emit static electric field energy, that energy must come from somewhere.

                So, in essence: the propagating field looses energy to the dielectric, the charge carriers take energy from the dielectric and emit that in the form of an electric field. So, it's a zero sum game eventually.

                However, to me the most important conclusion is: the electric field *is* an energy source one can utilize.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Study Guide Query for this Thread

                  If anyone is interested, I think we should assemble a study guide for this thread and the other two accompanying threads, Gray Replication & Stan Meyers Secret Preventing Electrolysis. Anyway, if someone wants to be part of this they will need to help with the process. There are a lot of loose ends that need to be brought together and a whole lot of material that needs to be studied and summarized in a short brief. This will be a much easier task if it is a group effort. Is anyone else interested in doing this?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Gray Circuit Malfunction

                    There is another thread entitled, "Gray Circuit Malfunction", that you also should look at because Lamare has added some important data to that thread that concerns this one. I'll make a pdf file of the important parts of that thread later.

                    Comment


                    • Gray Circuit Malfunction Thread PDF File

                      I am attaching a pdf file of the Gray Circuit Malfunction thread. There is some pertinent information in it that pertains to what we are talking about here.
                      Last edited by Slovenia; 09-22-2010, 11:33 AM.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Slovenia View Post
                        If anyone is interested, I think we should assemble a study guide for this thread and the other two accompanying threads, Gray Replication & Stan Meyers Secret Preventing Electrolysis. Anyway, if someone wants to be part of this they will need to help with the process. There are a lot of loose ends that need to be brought together and a whole lot of material that needs to be studied and summarized in a short brief. This will be a much easier task if it is a group effort. Is anyone else interested in doing this?
                        How about editing the article over at peswiki? I intended that to become the result of all our efforts...

                        Update: I have updated the article with some more on Puharich:
                        Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki
                        Last edited by lamare; 09-09-2010, 10:22 AM.

                        Comment


                        • Editing

                          Hi Lamare,

                          I've been studying that article at PESWiki and editing it. Except for a very few persons, most guys are not helping out on this project and I'm starting to lose interest in helping some of them. Thank you for all your input and hard work on this!!! You have shared a lot.

                          Best Regards,
                          Slovenia


                          Originally posted by lamare View Post
                          How about editing the article over at peswiki? I intended that to become the result of all our efforts...

                          Update: I have updated the article with some more on Puharich:
                          Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Slovenia View Post
                            Hi Lamare,

                            I've been studying that article at PESWiki and editing it. Except for a very few persons, most guys are not helping out on this project and I'm starting to lose interest in helping some of them. Thank you for all your input and hard work on this!!! You have shared a lot.

                            Best Regards,
                            Slovenia
                            Hi Slovenia,

                            Don't be too hard on them. Most persons do this as a hobby, as do I, and it takes a while to get all this straight in your head, because it is really different from the way everyone is used to do electrical engineering. Everyone uses the Newtonian kind of model, which is fine for most applications, while this gets into the dirty details. The same dirty details you meet when you design HF transmitters and the like. And there are relatively not that many people that know how this works, HF stuff is usually kept away from as fas as possible by most engineers, because it is so unpredictable and challengeing.

                            Comment


                            • Encouragement

                              Hi Lamare,

                              Thanks!! I needed your encouragement. You are always an inspiration to me.

                              Best Regards,
                              Slovenia


                              Originally posted by lamare View Post
                              Hi Slovenia,

                              Don't be too hard on them. Most persons do this as a hobby, as do I, and it takes a while to get all this straight in your head, because it is really different from the way everyone is used to do electrical engineering. Everyone uses the Newtonian kind of model, which is fine for most applications, while this gets into the dirty details. The same dirty details you meet when you design HF transmitters and the like. And there are relatively not that many people that know how this works, HF stuff is usually kept away from as fas as possible by most engineers, because it is so unpredictable and challengeing.

                              Comment


                              • I am confused.

                                Originally posted by lamare View Post
                                That is also what Turtur is saying, eventually. He calculates that the electric field looses energy during propagation. Of course that is not dissapearing, it is converted to some other form of energy. And since charge carriers emit static electric field energy, that energy must come from somewhere.

                                So, in essence: the propagating field looses energy to the dielectric, the charge carriers take energy from the dielectric and emit that in the form of an electric field. So, it's a zero sum game eventually.

                                However, to me the most important conclusion is: the electric field *is* an energy source one can utilize.

                                First you say that I am correct then establish that Turtur is saying the same thing.

                                Lets look at figure 4 again but this time go in the opposite direction (inwards). Based from the constricting of the fields going from the outside radius inwards what would the results be? A massive gain of charge? Yes. Why would I come to that conclusion well it is all perspective and surface area of the radius of each circle. When one emits outward the field disperses over time because the radius is getting bigger and bigger. When we focus the field inwards it in fact gains potential and consequently energy. Now how could this be? This is Tesla's secret. Same mass but different surface area based on it's radius in relation to the inner surface. This only works with potential and it's carrier, the dielectric medium. The other component of real charges, that flow much like oil and water, are attracted to the potential and ride the wakes of the dielectric medium twords the center gaining in force because they have to compress into thicker bands of force to maintain the geometric structure of the self organizing energy field. This field has structure that mirrors high voltage electrical emissions but on a lower scale. Meaning that in it's natural state it would want to expand and return to a balance of space or the environment. This expansion could be thought of as a spider like web. When a potential is supplied those radial connections are attracted more to each other and they form separations that band together. Although I am simplifying this process to a large extent, meaning it is finer then I could describe, the process is the key here. One would also have to understand we are really looking at a slice of the whole in mine or Turtur's descriptions. Think of it as a pom pom.
                                A complex interaction based on geometry, fractals and static laws.

                                In the case of electricity I really am starting to understand about polarity and how it works with our systems. Especially when they describe flow or the current. Now it is thought that the flow in from the + positive to the - negative. Thats because the negative doesn't exist. It is a flow from a more positive to a less positive on a sliding scale based on the back ground charge level. I have not made my mind up as to what does this but I am trying to remember that if the dielectric medium itself have a geometry behind it, real form, then that form would carry through on all that is based on that medium that created division in our universe. Lets say thats a Sierpinski triangle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia in form. Look at section "Analogues in higher dimensions" One might see that the forms are the same but the flow would be quite different if the surfaces were charged statically. This might be a good spot to look for polarity in charges. With one being the positive or the other being negative. It is the organization of that structure that is giving the appearance of a positive and negative based on the direction of flow through that structure. Like I said I'm still on the fence about that.
                                There is a lot that I have not touched on yet and can not give a qualified answer to. But I am slowly working it out and to tell you the truth it seems to be fitting together like a puzzle. The whole picture is getting more and more defined as I go and it gets easier to fit the next piece from that clearer vision.

                                In our traditional electronics it is always thought that the energy is supplied by us. Well what if all we were supplying is the ability to maintain the potential to draw real charges into our circuit. It can be proofed by the fact that we need to have shielding on our units to make the charges more quiet and not contain background noise. We do not need to worry about lack of charges because I believe that they are not in short supply given the dimensions of our current reality. This has to deal with resolution of the network even at our current capability to view those dimensions. This resolution is quiet finite even at our furthest capability to see. A mere millimeter of space cubed would have more then enough charges to facilitate any circuitry we could devise, just to give you an example. The dimensions of the dielectric is so fine that it acts like a fluid as well. It flows from higher ground to lowest.
                                Now in our circuits we use metals to conduct the energy into our circuits. These metals are much like iron in the reaction to a magnetic source and can be substituted with the electrical equivalent. At one point (the source) it's potential energizes the whole route and we can change that flow by merely putting things into the way of that flow where we want a restriction of that flow or reflection of the flow. Those are just two examples of all our components we currently have. The charges enter the wires or pathways being attracted to the potential we are providing and get pulled into the vacuum through the components and back to the potential pump we have created (battery or source) to cause a magnetic like interaction with the material we are using to conduct through. Although these materials all have different values and effects in doing so.

                                Take Aluminum for example. Tesla really like Aluminum and he thought it was the most astounding metal of the time. Astounding because it does not react with magnetic fields like other metals. The reaction is much different then other non exotic metals.

                                I'll leave you with that to chew on...
                                Last edited by Jbignes5; 09-09-2010, 01:12 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X