The ultimate secret of free energy: Split the postive AND the negative

[Jbignes5]

Nice example of current.

You are using current and voltage. What we are talking about is only using voltage to form channels for ambient charges or current to flow through. It is what we refer to splitting the positive. But it is a good example of magnetic induction. The magnet raises the potential to a higher level. Now try this one. Have parallel rings with identical setups like you have. Only put a magnet in boost mode on one ring. Then hook a load in between the two halves of that parallel circuits.

Anyone care to guess what will happen? Would the load see a potential difference? Would the amp draw go higher?

Let me know it would be an excellent experiment.

When one splits the voltage from the current the voltage becomes like a vacuum. It makes it very hungry for the charges flow or current and will attract the charges like creating a depression in the space around it. This is like what happens in nature when a low pressure moves across the face of the earth. This low pressure has an abundance of the dielectric in it and has a lower amount of charges in it due to the high dielectric count. This causes the charge heavy areas to flood in a bit from the edges causing a movement from high to low. This is also what is responsible for wind and our weather patterns. Specifically storm activity. With the eye of that being the inlet to a great conduit of charges flowing twords the earth. As the conduit gets bigger it attaches to our core and gets a small spin from it. Giving it great destructive power from it. Of course the sun has a bit with it also but I think that would be obvious. Take from that what you will.

[greenliving]

Welcome, my friend.

You are here because you chose to be here, by whatever reason. Good!

Apparantly, you are looking for some answers. So, here you gotta make a choice.

If you want to know the theoretic foundation to how this stuff works, go here:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

If you want to get your hands dirty and get something working, then go straight to the jackpot, and find your way frome here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post109152
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post109533
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108949
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post109013
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post109080

But don't expect a complete schematic or working prototype made by me, or anything like that. You see, I'm just not good at doing that. But I did my homework and you can follow my tracks here and check everything yourself. So, as a qualified Electrical Engineer, I have analysed this stuff and I am fully convinced I found the working principle. So, that would be the secret of Gray, Meyer and Puharich, which originally came from none less than Nikola Tesla. Quite a gift, but it is not my invention or anything. Because of my background I was simply able to finally put the pieces of the puzzle together, so we now know how this stuff is supposed to work, in principle. It's up to humanity to make use of that and you can do that any way you like. No strings attached, no new patents. However, the now expired patents and other information left to us by these three inventors give you all the information you need to fill in the gaps.

So, if you're into the hardware and want to make Tesla's dream come true, the links on top is where you wanna go.

However, if you want to know why Einstein's General Relativity should go to the trash can, what gravity is, or want to know what the Universe really is like, you're welcome to join in for a very interesting ride. If you are in for an adventure, just scroll down, and join in on this thread together with the others that are here. There already are some nice easter eggs to discover, and just like you, I have no idea where this will eventually go. We will just have to wait and see what happens.

So, the choice is yours. And of course, you can also leave right away, if you like.

What I posted here, is really what I think is the truth. However, that is my truth the way I see/saw it at the moment of posting and as you will see, my "truth" changes along my way whenever I find something new to account for. And that's also my motivation for doing this. I just want to know the truth, which is like an oniun. There's always something new to discover, which maybe just what makes life worthwhile. So, take nothing for granted. I cannot decide for you what your truth is like. That's completely up to you to decide, because we have all been given the freedom of choice. So, just go ahead and see what you like and what not.

And most of all: make sure you have some fun on whatever road you choose to go!

If you're curious: this would be my idea of having some fun:
The hack reality howto

Have a nice day, and happy hunting for your truth!



-- Arend Lammertink -- September 1st, 2010.

Oh, one more thing. If you want to do something and have some time to spare, please do consider editing this page:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki


So, if you really want to follow my track, this is where/how things started to come in the right direction, but there were still quite some loose ends and mistakes:

--: August 26th, 2010 :--

Hi all,

Yesterday, I re-analysed Gray's system:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108329

As you can see in the reduced schematic ( http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...ay_circuit.pdf ) he feeds HF, HV sharp spikes trough two capacitors to the coil to energize. Because of the shape of the spike (fast rising edge, slow falling edge), the capacitor basically functions as a diode, beside coupling the energy trough to the load circuits.

Then I realized that you need to have two identical coils in series if you ever want to be able to induce a useable force in the coils, because otherwise the pulses will cancel each other out.

So far, so good.

Continueing in this line of thinking, the Avramenko plug used by Dr. Stiffler came to mind. If we add this all up, we finally get the ultimate secret to free (electric) energy:

Split the positive AND the negative

Given Bearden's "don't kill the dipole" as explained in my article (under construction) Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki it is clear that in terms of energy, you can manipulate the electric field for free. So, if you at some point in a circuit are able to pick up the electric field, without drawing current, you can do that for free.

That means if you design your load such that it is completely balanced, you can do what Gray dit much more elegantly. As Stiffler shows in some of his experiments, the AV (Avramenko) plug is a perfect method of "splitting the positive and the negative" in Gray's terms. So, then you basically get to use both edges of the powering signal, albeit that you have do direct them to separate loads.

Putting all this together, it is a matter of feeding a high frequency pulse train trough an AV plug, trough (small) couple capacitors to the oppozing terminals of 4 identical impedances, which can be coils, capacitors, basically anything, including WFC elements. See the attached schematic.

What happens is that the positive edge gets fed trough the capacitors to the positive terminals of Z1 and Z2 in sync and the negative edge gets fed trough the capacitors to the negative terminals of Z3 and Z4 in sync. Hence splitting the positive AND the negative.

If Zx are all power coils with a self resonance frequency of say 5 kHz and the frequency of the pulses is, say 1 MHz, and the voltage of the pulse train is, say 1 V, that means you get 1 kV of real power at the positive terminals of Z1 and Z2 within 1 millisecond, without drawing any current from the "power" line, because it takes relatively a considerable amount of time before the pulses can travel trough the coil, so we get a sort of "step charging" effect inside the coils.

So, if you want to experiment with this: BE CAREFUL. This is an expansion of the basic principle Gray used and he did add his "safety spark gaps" for a reason. If you feed 10 MHz, 10 V pulses to 4 identical coils this way, you are looking at 100 kV worth of power within 1 miillesecond... In other words: this gives you an awesome amount of power!!!




Update: I think the principle can also be used at much lower frequencies if you connect the negative terminals of Z1 and Z2 and the positive terminals of Z3 and Z4 all to signal ground. After all, the net current going trough there is zero, as is the net current coming from the signal wire (which is why this works). Then you should be able to get results with relatively low frequencies, like several kHz for coils or even 10s of Hz for charging capacitors or batteries. What is important is that all impedances are the same. Use identical components for all of them.


Update 2: There's a couple of inconsistences in this post, but the basic principe is correct. Turns out that Z1 and Z2 cannot be capacitors. So, just read on, investigate the material, the links, etc. and you will not be disappointed.


Update 3: Turns out there were quite a few loose ends in what I posted here. So, if you want to go straight to the jackpot, go here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108949
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post109013

Wow. This is a very interesting information. Imagine if you can do this. You'll have free energy. Thanks for sharing this information.

[DrStiffler]

Electrical Engineer claims breakthrough in free energy research | Before It's News

Please click this up and twitter...

@lamare
Your idea of modulation was tried a few years back (see the diagram). It was less complicated on balanced coils and did not require an AGC. It proved a concept bu was limited by the design to a few watts.

[Slovenia]

Thanks

DrStiffler,

Thanks for sharing the circuit.

Your site, www.drstiffler.com, is no longer up. Do you have another site where that information can be accessed? Thanks.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

@lamare
Your idea of modulation was tried a few years back (see the diagram). It was less complicated on balanced coils and did not require an AGC. It proved a concept bu was limited by the design to a few watts.

[Jbignes5]

Thats because there is a little confusion.

Lets look at the statement. "Split the positive". Does it say negative? Nope. Literally when you look at voltage and potentials there are two components of a positive. The positive voltage and then comes the positive current. Those are the two components of splitting the positive. If one can use the potential and cause a flow twords it then split the current away before that positive voltage balances with the current that is flowing into it then you would be splitting the positive.

It is this very concept that Tesla uses. When Tesla said radiant energy remember he knew little of the medium, he meant potential moves the current twords the conductor that radiated the voltage.

I am betting that the Tesla switch is proof of that concept. It was the result that someone bet him he couldn't get a current flow form from two positive or negative potentials.

[DrStiffler]

DrStiffler,

Thanks for sharing the circuit.

Your site, www.drstiffler.com, is no longer up. Do you have another site where that information can be accessed? Thanks.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

Stiffler Scientific

[Slovenia]

Thanks!!

Thanks Dr.!!

Stiffler Scientific

[Jbignes5]

A reference of interest.

Just read this.. Hmmm...

Magnetic Portals Connect Earth to the Sun - NASA Science

[lamare]

nvisser posted an interesting document over here:

Some of you might find this document interesting.
I always wondered how it could be used and it looks like this is it.

This is definately an interesting read and food for thought. Uploaded a pdf version here:
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Mat...ers_of_Phi.pdf

Is the Phi distribution of frequencies/wavelengths analogous
to the growth patterns of trees and other living things... because it is optimal for
accumulating and translating energy from across the frequency spectrum? This
question led to a brainstorm which resulted in the following illustration of what
living things might be doing, and what we might need to do to construct a
"coherer" of PHI-related frequencies and energies

[Jbignes5]

Yes. Yes. Yes.

Phi is an intrinsic part of the equation. Life in fact grows for matter either being attracted to the source or grown around the source branches.

Lets take a seed for instance. It has the solid engine part(matter) and the essence of the source as well locked into that complex configuration. This essence is the fractal but in a smaller form. It could be that it is the exact starting point that gets modified as it grows. This growth is determined on the collection of matter to build on the frame work of the essence.

If you look back to the plate 4 of the corona discharge one can see that in fact if matter formed around the lines then it would in fact be a flower and it is guided by that invisible lines that reach outward from the tips.

I am leaning twords this fractal being a 3d fractal and hence why a plant grows the way that it does from each maturity level it passes.

The problem is that we age. This aging is due to the cells ability to reproduce itself or the inability to reproduce without errors. like a fax machine the fractal gets error prone after billions of times reproducing itself. This is due to a natural process called environmental conditioning. Meaning you are a product of your environment. It is a feedback to the self and reflects the environment that the subject grows in.

I would assume the effect of the environment also effects long lines of generations as well. If one looked back in history to the earliest man there would be a major difference in our fractal code. With theirs being the purest non effected code that might hold keys to longevity or clues as to what we need to fix in our code from all the fractal errors. Just as much as we should be able to rejuvinate our youth we should be able to rollback the evolutionary clock and return to the days of 600 year lifespans that were said to be had by the oldest in the bible. Since they were the beginning in the fractal they would have had the most purest of code.

This goes way out of the spectrum of this thread though.

[lamare]

@lamare
Your idea of modulation was tried a few years back (see the diagram). It was less complicated on balanced coils and did not require an AGC. It proved a concept bu was limited by the design to a few watts.

Just been on a little quest trying to figure out your circuit. Found the little fellow over at your site, which has some more info, so now I understand the circuit. You are not so much modulating the oscillator around M1, but switching the load on and off using the 555, while Cp is being charged during "off" time...

[DrStiffler]

Just been on a little quest trying to figure out your circuit. Found the little fellow over at your site, which has some more info, so now I understand the circuit. You are not so much modulating the oscillator around M1, but switching the load on and off using the 555, while Cp is being charged during "off" time...

@lamare
Incorrect, (partial). Yes the load is being switched, but what is the effect of RLC on a tuned circuit? Change R and Q changes and it is hard to avoid a change in C as a result. The circuit is both switching the load and frequency modulation the output. Not as simple as you might think.

[Jbignes5]

Lamare and others...

I wanted to touch on the positive and negative potentials again.

When we have a potential it must be related to another position or reference point. But it does not change the fact that all potentials are in fact positive. But when we reference a potential to another position we must designate the relationship between the two.

Now some people have taken this simple method of comparison and made it that there are negative potentials or it can be seen as a negative particle. That is not entirely correct. Lets look at the entire scale of temperatures for example.

We know that there is a spot called absolute zero. This absolute means it can not go any further down on the scale. Lets relate that to the absolute negative or the lowest charge level of a particle that is actually a +. If the particle looses any more it would fall apart and stop adhering to itself. Was it truely negative, Absolutely not. But it would be considered negative based on the scale if another particle or reference point was related to.

When we look at particles in the ambient environment they can be considered negative based on a comparison that the particle is lower in charge then the ambient environment. The ambient being the base from what we are comparing to the particle. Does that make the particle negative. Well no.

This little problem of looking at the reference points and not completely understanding the method of reference points is making us determine there is actually a negative value for that particle when it is actually all positive charges. When we separate two points from each other yes they have specific values when referenced to each other but it does not mean there is a difference in the actual single point.

This is exactly why I always try to relate to the binding charges inside of matter. With the matter being a static shield of some kind only passing the potential of the inside charges to the outside environment. This allows shells of charges to self organize based on the available charges in the environment to the internal potential provided through the static shielding of matter. This shielding is not perfect though and has well established connections to the outside environment in it's natural state. We can inject more charge into the internal charges through those connections but they have a resistance to that and can act very strangely when you do compared to the laxed state they normally reside in. This event is called excited state or being energized.

When comparing two references we should not change the scale we are using. Meaning that even if the negative is less then the positive it is still a positive potential when referenced to something lower. There should not be a distinction between the two other then the relationship on the same scale.

[Jbignes5]

A few notes about the oil transformer.

One note of interest that I have had an ah ha moment over is the design is a big layden jar. With the internal conductors or transformer guts being the tap of the static charge potential that gets tossed on it from the traditional layden jar and spark gap setup. This setup is made to be able to move the static potential in such a way that the antennas through surface area differences attract charges in between those antennas.

This transformer needs to be built and extensively tested as I am gonna do myself. Others need to join in this experiment as well. I am fully convinced this is the motivator unit he used to move massive amounts of charges into the system and used the real power of that movement to induce movement in his load.

I am in the process of trying to figure out the voltages needed to run a smaller version of this transformer if that is possible. One problem I see is the warning that going beyond the limits of the wire used in the transformer could be explosive as per his experiments with exploding wires with very high tensions of voltage. This means that there might be limits to when this effect starts to happen and that dictates the thickness of the material as well.

I think that if we understand the nature of this process and we could see all the disadvantages like has been provided that we could make an effective bypass if it goes out of tolerance. Although I think he used two collection and one broadcaster antenna from his pierce arrow car we can conclude that he did include this bypass in his design. Tubes were used in the switching mechanism to do this. As to how I don't know but I do know it involved a diode tube to protect the source. It would then have to have some sort of bypass antenna that it could throw the extra charges into to radiate them back into the collection process.

If anyone has any ideas to the tube setup I would be grateful to have some input here. Although I don't have extensive experience with tubes I am quickly learning about tubes and how they operate. I can see why he needed to use them..

There are some clues to the tubes that he did get. Although they give us a direction I don't know how much of that is the truth and what is thought to have happened. The source of the report is quite credible in my honest opinion.

[Slovenia]

PESwiki Document

Lamare,

Your PESwiki doc is looking very very nice!! There is a lot of information there to digest.

Best Regards,
Slovenia