Tweet
Originally posted by Rakarskiy
View Post
-
that’s OK… You don’t have to take me seriously… This is a work in progress… a collective endeavor! -
Wait a minute!Originally posted by Rakarskiy View Post
Doesn’t Tesla stayed in his patterns that it’s possible to run a two phase motor twice as fast or half as fast as a generator ate an AC generator producing a single phase?
So why would it be a problem to have a two phase motor run off of a four phase power supply? It would simply run at a different speed either twice as fast or twice as slow depending on how the logic satisfies this condition I don’t know which since I’m still new to this but a quick glance makes it look like it’s not an impossibility to couple two different phases between power generation and power consumption if their difference are whole multiples of each other…?
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
All that is needed to conceptually understand the Ammann device is three things: Kit Carson‘s electrostatic rotary device, an iron coil to translate the production of electrostatic force of Kit Carson‘s device into electromagnetism to complete the process of producing electricity, and a prime mover to replace the electric motor of the Kit Carson device with a suitable replacement which is capable of receiving input from our environment — weak as they may be.Comment
-
The following links are intended to be viewed or listened in sequential order…
https://vinyasi.podbean.com/e/conver...sion-part-two/
https://vinyasi.podbean.com/e/person...ive-evolution/
https://vinyasi.podbean.com/e/condit...c-transistors/
Schematic TikTok video of Tesla’s 1931 Pierce-Arrow upgrade of the Ammann brother’s 1921 Cosmic Atmospheric Generator…
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZPR3dTmxb/
https://vinyasi.podbean.com/e/reduci...essurizing-it/Comment
-
In conclusion, this is why a copper based transmission line or house wiring can receive the transmission of this energy from an Ammann device or a Pierce-Arrow version but not be able to make use of it without being processed through its reception coming through an iron conductive medium instead of copper. This causes the copper medium of reception (aka, conventional transmission lines and house wiring) to become energetically confused and disrupted causing the power which copper wiring already possess plus the power that the copper based wiring is receiving becomes useless making it look like you’re stealing energy from the power grid rather than merely contributing to it and disrupting it at the same time!
An alternative to AC power predicated on the oscillation and accentuation of back EMFComment
-
The alternation of inductive impedance
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Aeme...=iphone&ia=web
Or search for the following three terms using your favorite search engine…
site:emediapress.com plasma ignitionComment
-
We modify the DC conventional ideology of current flow and we superimpose its simultaneous split to travel in opposite directions at the same time labeling one flow north monopolar magnetism and the opposite direction becomes south monopolar magnetism. This is Edward Leedskalnin's view of magnetism.
Then we apply the concept of the alternation of current, contributed by Nikola Tesla, to this situation by alternating both bidirectional simultaneous flows of south pole and north pole monopolar magnetic fields. Although this looks confusing, it gives us a ripe opportunity to manipulate the prime mover without changing the value of the prime mover.
Instead, we apply the alternation of the restrictive force of reactive impedance per half cycle upon this confusing situation and modify that restrictive force by self compounding it in order to squeeze the flow of current per half cycle resulting in the magnification of the flow of current during each subsequent (alternate) half cycle.
I wish to believe, or I choose to believe(!), that this is what the Ammann brothers did in 1921 and this is what Nikola Tesla did 10 years later to achieve over unity by the amplification of power at a cost which is less than the cost of the prime mover -- which in both cases amounts to no more than the cost of energy which is already prevalent in the environment capable of powering a crystal radio design which was prevalent a century ago (1 part per billionth or 1 part per trillionth of a watt).
It is far easier to manipulate the accumulation of reactance, overtime, than it is to manipulate the real power emanating from a prime member. This is why Gabriel Kron could perform such magical feats of reducing or increasing energy without actually doing so.
This is because our perception of energetic reality is predicated upon the lens of perception imposed upon our perception of electrical energy by electrical reactance ALL of the TIME (whether we appreciate this fact or not!).
This is why the conservation of energy is not a lie so much as it is irrelevant to any discussion of the topic of that colloquialism known as “free energy” because reactance trumps energy in all cases and without exception. In other words, energy has to bend its proverbial knee and humble itself before it’s master because it is a slave to electrical reactance.
We cannot have the output of energy without some input of energy, but we cannot have over unity without the manipulation of electrical reactance. This makes perpetual motion possible (and devices predicated upon this principle) so long as the gains made by electrical reactance are greater than the losses due to entropy.
The modification of our perception of power via electrical reactanceComment
Comment