Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Faraday paradox [SOLVED?]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Faraday paradox [SOLVED?]

    Hi,
    I think I solved the Faraday paradox?

    illustration is below,

    The A-filed surrounding the wire feeding the current is in reaction to the A-filed the magnet is emitting.
    On one side the magnet's A-filed is likewise as the wire's A-filed (repulsion)
    On the other it's the opposite direction (attraction)
    Thus resulting in net torque

    The lines however do cut the wire on one place.

    I leave as an exercise for the readers to find where


    Best regards,
    Stevan C.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by StevanC; 09-16-2010, 09:11 AM. Reason: the picture didn't attach?

  • #2
    Due to INCREDIBLE interest...



    here more pictures...

    Stevan C.
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #3
      It took me a while to realize that the magnets rotate due to the outside stationary circuit not the disc attached to said magnet unlike most of the Internet wants us to believe. But the story only starts there, because it won't change the fact of counter emf or counter torque.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by broli View Post
        It took me a while to realize that the magnets rotate due to the outside stationary circuit not the disc attached to said magnet unlike most of the Internet wants us to believe. But the story only starts there, because it won't change the fact of counter emf or counter torque.
        Hi broli,
        that's not the problem at all IMHO

        the problem is how to wind a more efficent motor than the model we are exploring?

        And I think I just opened a can of worms here


        Stevan C.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think I solved the Faraday paradox?
          I think you've somewhat missed the bus here. This was actually solved long ago!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Farrah Day View Post
            I think you've somewhat missed the bus here. This was actually solved long ago!
            Farradh Day,
            have You a link to support this opinion?

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm sure you will be able to google it.

              I've read about this a long time ago. If memory serves me right, it was a paradox at the time due to a certain element of the phenomenon not being taken into consideration, or being overlooked. I think it was a conflict between a Faraday Law and the Lorentz force. I'm sure however that it was satisfactorily resolved. But, perhaps I'm in error and it has since been un-resolved.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Farrah Day View Post
                I'm sure you will be able to google it.

                I've read about this a long time ago. If memory serves me right, it was a paradox at the time due to a certain element of the phenomenon not being taken into consideration, or being overlooked. I think it was a conflict between a Faraday Law and the Lorentz force. I'm sure however that it was satisfactorily resolved. But, perhaps I'm in error and it has since been un-resolved.
                Ain't that jusr marvelous ?
                Now could You possibly "Google it out", as I apparently was not able to do so?

                Or is it un-resloved (yet)?

                Anyhow I'm here to make an attempt (by effort) to put an end to it.
                In the end it is the 21.st century, a high time for it to get finally solved?
                Or we can't?


                Stevan C.
                P.S.
                how we know we did it?
                We ultimately should devise a way to make it run on higher voltages and lower ampere draws while pertaining the commutator less operation.
                And eventual AG would be welcome too...
                Last edited by StevanC; 09-21-2010, 08:05 AM. Reason: typos... :(

                Comment

                Working...
                X