Don Smith A review...

[AetherScientist]

thanks so much MorningStar, i can read these very important info :


When more force is produced in one direction than another, a portion of that force can be used to sustain the original force and the remainder can be put to useful purposes perpetually (p. 7 of translation).
An unlimited source of cheap electric energy can be developed by these established principles, but mankind has been kept in the Dark Ages by later scientists who were not familiar with the whole treatise. A careful reading of Helmholtz's paper shows he mistakenly included inductive and magnetic energy with faulty assumptions and a disregard for works by Ampere and Faraday.

This overlooked energy source can be harnessed by knowing that inductive energy is not conveyed by magnetic lines of force but by directional photon energy, as in radio broadcasting and receiving. If the Princeton experiment had produced an oscillating output, it could have been transformed directly into electric power, as in a common transformer. The practical conversion of oscillating LME energy had been discovered serendipitously nearly a century ago, but no one could explain why it worked before Levitronics.

I remember to see that when using a special single line transmission line the corona effect gets reduced drastically. So it seems that using 1 wire in the high voltage lines it's possible to reduce the corona effect.

I think corona effect makes the fluorescent lights to light. No corona effect no fluorescent lighting. I say this about Barbat system.

[AetherScientist]

[AetherScientist]

MorningStar, med.3012

I am seeing that D.Smith and W.Barbat systems are almost the same thing. They have a lot of similarities.

[med.3012]

MorningStar, med.3012

I am seeing that D.Smith and W.Barbat systems are almost the same thing. They have a lot of similarities.

Hello everyone ,

i am comparing John Bedini charging system with the mixed E-TBC , the first image show the bright strong light ( i did something like that myself )



the current appear after the radiant discharge :



comparing these photo with the mixed E-TBC discharge we have both phenomena appear at the same time... in cold electricity the voltage is the equivalent of electric current, so it's normal to have the bright light in the negative leg of the capacitor, i think there's a possibility to enhance this electric current by inserting the resistance in parallel with this system.. !? what do you think ?

[AetherScientist]

med.3012 thanks for the interest.
I have also a lot of questions and I am trying to give answer to your questions. The problem now is that we have a lot of unsolved questions and I don't know the answer.

At the moment I am researching the possibility about how to generate some antennas to absorb background energy. We have discussed in this thread very interesting points and I have extracted some useful ideas.

Just an observation between Smith and Barbat.

[med.3012]

Thanks you AetherScientist for the effort you do, most over energy device are linked together, understanding something may give a solution to another problem, i have a theory about radiant voltage and current and how they are linked together. i think radiant current exist perpendicular with radiant voltage so it's not strange to see radiant discharge in phase with electric current, i think i have to do some experiments.

[med.3012]

Hello everyone , hi John !

welcome back! just add something here, changing the capacitor that feed the mixed E-TBC with 10 NF each instead of 20 NF increase the performance of the system the, output power in the capacitor increased, still further enhancement is needed.

[John.K1]

What about if you replicate this effect again and again and use dozens of small solar panels to absorb that light and transform it into DC?

Hi, with the number of bulbs the light intensity goes down. Also, fluorescent light is very weak for solar panel. My sone just created a small robot toy running on solar panel. No chance get it running under fluorescent lamp. Small halogen spot light makes it running fine.

[John.K1]

Hi Med. How r u doing?
Yep, wasn't here for while. Working on many thinks at the same time. Working on two channel tuning device. It will find the most best combination of input frquencies and duty cycles. It will collect the ojtput data and evaluate. I am writing it in Java. 2Ch signal genetator control is done. Now have to read and analyse data from scope. When finish, I will upload it to Rapsbery pi2 and make it stand alone tuning tool. can use it to tune ETBC for best supply frequency(ies) Once u have frequency,you also know what tuning cap size to attach.

[med.3012]

Hi Med. How r u doing?
Yep, wasn't here for while. Working on many thinks at the same time. Working on two channel tuning device. It will find the most best combination of input frquencies and duty cycles. It will collect the ojtput data and evaluate. I am writing it in Java. 2Ch signal genetator control is done. Now have to read and analyse data from scope. When finish, I will upload it to Rapsbery pi2 and make it stand alone tuning tool. can use it to tune ETBC for best supply frequency(ies) Once u have frequency,you also know what tuning cap size to attach.

Hi !

nice to see you, everything is fine, look forward to see you work , i have some advancement using the mixed E-TBC , the scope gave me a strange signal when testing the oscillation, i got a square waves from it i don't know if i made an error ! so i am still thinking about tuning this device !

ok see you later ! keep in touch

[AetherScientist]

Hello med.3012
I am researching here.

[med.3012]

Hello med.3012
I am researching here.

hello AetherScientist,

take your time, we could talk later,

[Jeff Pearson]

https://www.google.com/patents/US1702771
Amplifying transformer. Smith device?
I think the capacitor on one half of L2 performs the same function as opposite wound coils??

[ilandtan]

Do we work together?

I have never posted before, but I have noticed, a similar situation on these forums, that mirrors work. We have a technical goal, and many brilliant engineers, all span different experience levels and it seems, some have even accomplished the technical goal in the past. The problem with a forum structure, is that the more outspoken contributors dominate the dialog, and the other engineers don't have the same pieces, to assemble sub components to validate function. What is quite possible is that we are are all building are own burgers, and few will turn out a Big Mac, some of us don't even agree we are building a Big Mac.(Sorry for food reference ..LOL). So as a believer in Agile methods let me start by vomiting assumptions, and it might be all wrong, but I assume I will be corrected, and do not fear that. My goal is to start a common point. My requirements are to have a successful, reproducible build that we can all walk away from and say: I did it.

So what is it?

• Assumption 1: Build an over-unity Don Smith Device
• Assumption 2: We all agree to work on the same device
• Assumption 3: We establish a project manager to keep on project, and to summarize progression, enumerate the pain points
• Assumption 4: We post actual schematics, and actual component values.
• Assumption 5: We agree to help each other because we trying to evolve from the (Futile that Tesla himself Lost) information hoarding patent seeking get rich mentality that has crippled our minds, and chained us to the grid.

I think we should start here, because otherwise the information will tend to be a free for all like the internet, and you have to sift for the needle in a haystack. I have seen the Don Smith topic rise and bubble up, I don't believe any of them produced the assumed above.

Respectfully,

XRIX

[med.3012]

Thanks ilandtan


i agree with you, but it's not easy to arrange the work in these forums, a lots of people want a working prototype to tell you succeeded even though if the idea is correct, in my side i believe that the ideas is the most important part in this science, if the idea is understood the problem encountered will be understood also, finally building a device will be a mere question of time.


3 or 4 serious researchers can make a big difference, even working outside the forum will be a good option !


Regards.