Don Smith A review...

[med.3012]

at the moment i am doing a lots of experiments, the overall power is proportional with the frequency of pulsed DC TOWARD L1, i am looking for an easy circuit can provide a quick DC PULSE without effecting the source power .. maybe marx generator will help ? any idea is welcome !

[AetherScientist]

at the moment i am doing a lots of experiments, the overall power is proportional with the frequency of pulsed DC TOWARD L1, i am looking for an easy circuit can provide a quick DC PULSE without effecting the source power .. maybe marx generator will help ? any idea is welcome !

Do you refer to reflectance? I mean reflectance is when you connect a load in the output, the input is affected. When reflectance is blocked and you connect something in the output, the input is not affected. Do you refer to that?

[AetherScientist]

Important parameter to check

@all
I won't be here for some weeks, but If you build the RLC resonant circuit (transmitter and receiver), you must check that when connecting a load in the output the input is not affected.

Ok, this could be a little bit confusing and I explain why and what you must check.

As you know, if you build the circuit correctly and you tune it correctly you should put a load in the L2 and the load must work. Ok, you can think... no overunity here and you will be partially right. Smith said that in those circuits the input is not affected when you connect the load in the receiver.

So... what to check? As you know, capacitors and inductors don't consume watts in AC because they consume reactive energy (wattless energy). So, if you connect a load in the output of the L2 (receiver) you must check that energy in the L1 (emitter) is reactive. If energy in the L1 is real power, then the load on the L2 affects the input. If the circuit is correct built then the LC #1 uses reactive power and the LC #2 uses real power. You would be using energy in both circuits #1 and #2 but only real power in the receiver and reactive in the emitter.

See you in some weeks guys.

[med.3012]

Do you refer to reflectance? I mean reflectance is when you connect a load in the output, the input is affected. When reflectance is blocked and you connect something in the output, the input is not affected. Do you refer to that?

yes i need something like that, if the output is connected to something a coil in our example the input is still high so you ensure you have a speedy DC pulses ..

[med.3012]

@all
I won't be here for some weeks, but If you build the RLC resonant circuit (transmitter and receiver), you must check that when connecting a load in the output the input is not affected.

Ok, this could be a little bit confusing and I explain why and what you must check.

As you know, if you build the circuit correctly and you tune it correctly you should put a load in the L2 and the load must work. Ok, you can think... no overunity here and you will be partially right. Smith said that in those circuits the input is not affected when you connect the load in the receiver.

So... what to check? As you know, capacitors and inductors don't consume watts in AC because they consume reactive energy (wattless energy). So, if you connect a load in the output of the L2 (receiver) you must check that energy in the L1 (emitter) is reactive. If energy in the L1 is real power, then the load on the L2 affects the input. If the circuit is correct built then the LC #1 uses reactive power and the LC #2 uses real power. You would be using energy in both circuits #1 and #2 but only real power in the receiver and reactive in the emitter.

See you in some weeks guys.

see you too and thanks for your nice coming

[med.3012]

just to clarify the things ... the source power can build its high voltage even if the load is there so the process of generating a DC pulses is not affected .

[BroMikey]

@all
I won't be here for some weeks, but If you build the RLC resonant circuit (transmitter and receiver), you must check that when connecting a load in the output the input is not affected.

Ok, this could be a little bit confusing and I explain why and what you must check.

As you know, if you build the circuit correctly and you tune it correctly you should put a load in the L2 and the load must work. Ok, you can think... no overunity here and you will be partially right. Smith said that in those circuits the input is not affected when you connect the load in the receiver.

So... what to check? As you know, capacitors and inductors don't consume watts in AC because they consume reactive energy (wattless energy). So, if you connect a load in the output of the L2 (receiver) you must check that energy in the L1 (emitter) is reactive. If energy in the L1 is real power, then the load on the L2 affects the input. If the circuit is correct built then the LC #1 uses reactive power and the LC #2 uses real power. You would be using energy in both circuits #1 and #2 but only real power in the receiver and reactive in the emitter.

See you in some weeks guys.

Thanks, I agree

This is always a good reminder, people don't think about that enough.
This concept is starting to become more known in the minds of
technicians yet we forget.

I hope your trip away brings good things.

In almost any Tesla coil video I have watched on the web for
the past 15 years always shows the power going up in both.

That is if they even show you a meter of any kind because of the
fear of losing their meter to a HV run away. Well even an amp meter
is rarely shown from old video's.

They did not hook up to a scope either because of the scare of
ruining it with HV. Since we have grown up as free energy
experimenters, we are learning ways to choke off the creeping
exotic gas so we may see our phase relationship.

Thanks for the reminder, I just watched the D.S. video's again in
Dec 2014 and this is what he says.

If you do find a video of a Tesla coil operating with an amp meter
on it the primary draw current will climb as excessive power demands
rise. Forcing these tune-able circuits into heavy load conditions
will indeed bring about a 1:1 relationship at some point.

What DON did was tune as you say for a phase angle shift while
in resonance that pumps energy around the transmitters circuit.
As an example of reactive power THANE HEINS has devoted much
time to showing how 3 coils can be tuned for a phase relation
where the input power and output power are 90 degrees out of
phase.

This means that most conventional thinkers with great abilities
are tuning their coils in phase because they don't know any better.
It is this group of conventional techy's that we have to work with
as they are able to work all of the tools.

When the people finally do catch on to what you are saying this
field with begin to change very rapidly.

I have learned it takes a delicate balance to keep the transmission
winding reactive without over drawing power off the secondaries but
once this condition is reached you may load the secondary from
0-10 within the design range.

Even the most advanced have stated that they tried it and it is
impossible. This includes everyone who has ever come to this
forum and all other forums on the web since the internet began.

I have never heard any well known name say they have it working.

Yet DON SMITH did it. And I believe he did.

What does that tell us? It tells us we are beginners all.

It's a sweet deal, nobody is better than the next guy so we may
learn from what we may consider the lesser. We are all able to
contribute and will be handicapped without them.

[med.3012]

It's a sweet deal, nobody is better than the next guy so we may
learn from what we may consider the lesser. We are all able to
contribute and will be handicapped without them.

hi BroMikey !

i agree with you

[med.3012]

just to add something here about the input /output ... the E-TBC treat the L2 coil in different way, this mean L2 outside isn't similar with inside, in the first case lenz's law may affect the work principle of the E-TBC... you have a closed circuit outside the device , in the second case if L2 coil is inside this device the things will be changed ( i stated this in my thread )-- some friends did some test show this-- at the moment i am working on enhancing the device so more work is needed in the high voltage module** i need some hardware**

[med.3012]

HI ilandtan !


hope you are doing fine, if you have further questions please ask !

[med.3012]

Hello everyone !


i would like to see some comments, replicators is needed at this moment so more idea will be clear, anyone interested can post here or in my thread ,

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...lained-15.html

without real and serious replicators it's not easy for me to post or show more information ... this technology need to be understood, we have to talk about electrical safety, technical problems encountered so more people will learn or add something useful for all to us !

i hope my message is understood

[ilandtan]

HI ilandtan !


hope you are doing fine, if you have further questions please ask !

Hi Med,

Thanks, I do have a question. Is the radiant energy circuit that has all the diodes facing the same way referred to as a "plug"? How does it work?

Thanks!

[med.3012]

Hi Med,

Thanks, I do have a question. Is the radiant energy circuit that has all the diodes facing the same way referred to as a "plug"? How does it work?

Thanks!

you are welcome! at the moment I'm moving to the old thread :

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...lained-16.html

i try to keep all the information in just one place, it's not easy to reply your question because i have difficulties in the diodes, i burned 26 diodes plus the capacitor i do the test with, i am lucky because it didn't exploded


as you know it's not easy to use a diode bridge with this kind of power ( i did this test but the power is low using a normal bridge ) so the option here is to use two diodes as in the following drawing or using a single diode ( i did a special test using a single diode and the power increased ... i tried another arrangement so i'm still studying it )






in this arrangement we are using electron spin separation mechanism to gather the power, we have to provide a kind of equilibrium to collect this power, the green way in the above drawing is what i think it's the behavior of this power .

[ilandtan]

Thanks Med for the picture.

I want to say that I think I should say right off, that I have my doubts about doing these DS designs, with no real clear path to have current gain. I have read and looked over videos, but I want to do a sanity check here and ask: Is there anybody on this forum who has experienced any unexpected gain in the production of increased power? Even on a small scale?

We know we can push up voltage by creating coil couplings through induction, but do we have any intuition that we will gain more power at the output? Or do we know we have more reactive power at the output, but we just can't turn it into electro motive force?

Please indulge your thoughts.

[med.3012]

Thanks Med for the picture.

I want to say that I think I should say right off, that I have my doubts about doing these DS designs, with no real clear path to have current gain. I have read and looked over videos, but I want to do a sanity check here and ask: Is there anybody on this forum who has experienced any unexpected gain in the production of increased power? Even on a small scale?

We know we can push up voltage by creating coil couplings through induction, but do we have any intuition that we will gain more power at the output? Or do we know we have more reactive power at the output, but we just can't turn it into electro motive force?

Please indulge your thoughts.

thanks my friend !


i am working with these designs since 4 years ... i started exactly in 2012, i am a bit late because there are a lots of experienced researchers in this field, but i spent thousands of hours working and thinking about this device, i feel it's a duty..

i never expected to understand some very important fact about electricity like now, but the more you learn the more you know that you still don't know everything... more question appears but the answers will come since you are still learning ... i have a vision this is why i am not in doubt, i was able to light a bulb with 100w/220 v as a result of about 4 years of work... ok i am still working under unity since no surplus in power until now but the causes of under unity in my system is understood now.. to be clear 90% of problems is over now.

i was asking for replicators in this forum but no one is interested, i can't explain the efforts i did and i am still doing in this subject but in return i see something like lethargy... except a very few interesting people here, for them i will continue uncovering my ideas,

about your question, yes some people achieved a small gain in power using DS design, i heard about 30W gain, about the problem of reactive power don't worry about that, if you want to achieve real active power just use the mixed E-TBC !!!

this device will open a new energetic door, this is why i was talking about safety especially when working with the capacitor banks...

patience is needed in this field, collaboration is also important, i can't assure at this moment my design will give a surplus of power, i just see this light inside my mind ...

good night !