Don't Kill Dipole

[Slovenia]

Videos

Jbignes5,

The videos are awesome.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

[Slovenia]

Jumping The Gun

Something has been bothering me. Once we've solved this don't kill the dipole problem and have new working circuits and motors that fit this criteria, are we going to have to replace all our pre-existing electrical machines such as but not limited to washers and dryers, televisions, computers, motors of all types and the list goes on, with new devices that meet the criteria or will we be able to have our own free energy type generator in each of our homes that will enable us to run all these obsolete machines without having to replace them? Ideally I know it would be our ultimate goal to have all electrical equipment running more efficiently with the new technology but it would be very expensive to have to replace all these goods now. If we're not paying for the electricity because the power source is our personal equipment we don't really care if the machines we are already using waste electricity or not.

Also, there may be a way to use only minimal electricity from the power company to start up our equipment and then once it's running it won't need any more input electricity. We might be able to have some master device in our house that works like this in lieu of having a free energy generator.

I know I'm jumping the gun here, but I have been plagued by this question for to long.

My goal is to get off the grid completely and that is what I am shooting for.

[Jbignes5]

Something has been bothering me. Once we've solved this don't kill the dipole problem and have new working circuits and motors that fit this criteria, are we going to have to replace all our pre-existing electrical machines such as but not limited to washers and dryers, televisions, computers, motors of all types and the list goes on, with new devices that meet the criteria or will we be able to have our own free energy type generator in each of our homes that will enable us to run all these obsolete machines without having to replace them? Ideally I know it would be our ultimate goal to have all electrical equipment running more efficiently with the new technology but it would be very expensive to have to replace all these goods now. If we're not paying for the electricity because the power source is our personal equipment we don't really care if the machines we are already using waste electricity or not.

Also, there may be a way to use only minimal electricity from the power company to start up our equipment and then once it's running it won't need any more input electricity. We might be able to have some master device in our house that works like this in lieu of having a free energy generator.

I know I'm jumping the gun here, but I have been plagued by this question for to long.

My goal is to get off the grid completely and that is what I am shooting for.

Actually this energy is very very convertable. We can use it in it's normal mode or convert it to conventional electricity so we will only need a converter that would be built into this machine that generates from this new source. All one would need to do is have the grid come and disconnect us and walla hook it up to the existing box where the grid used to hook to and you are in business...

[RAMSET]

Slovenia
Thank you for starting this thread,and for your honesty about your skills and understanding!

I will share this link elsewhere ,this harvesting from the Dipole is "tricky" business .
@Jbignes5
Thank you for sharing your Knowledge!
I have a few quick movies to share [with schematics] that I would appreciate Your comments on
[a compilation from "Forest" at OU forum}

YouTube - MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor

YouTube - Capacitor charge via motor and diode

YouTube - Free Electrical Energy 2

The idea being , vid # 1 shows the "effect" .Can we use the motor in vid #2 to do what the man in #3 is doing to "Harvest" [Trick the Dipole]??

Simple circuits to try??

Chet

[Jbignes5]

Let me first submit this.

Check this video out and at 2:07 we see that they indeed knew about the grid that is under matter and space.

YouTube - The Pyramid Code - Ep4 - The Empowered Human part 1/5

You want to pay attention to the bowl that the person is holding. This six sided shape in the grid is most fundamental especially when water freezes. If you look at snow flakes you will see that six sided shape in the middle. I believe this is a snap shot of the network amplified by fractal growth of the water as it freezes.

This means that they indeed knew about the grid that underlies all matter and space.

[Jbignes5]

hmmm

Slovenia
Thank you for starting this thread,and for your honesty about your skills and understanding!

I will share this link elsewhere ,this harvesting from the Dipole is "tricky" business .
@Jbignes5
Thank you for sharing your Knowledge!
I have a few quick movies to share [with schematics] that I would appreciate Your comments on
[a compilation from "Forest" at OU forum}

YouTube - MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor

YouTube - Capacitor charge via motor and diode

YouTube - Free Electrical Energy 2

The idea being , vid # 1 shows the "effect" .Can we use the motor in vid #2 to do what the man in #3 is doing to "Harvest" [Trick the Dipole]??

Simple circuits to try??

Chet

The second vid only runs down because all his piping (wires) are leaking the charges away. If he had used statically shielded wires I bet it would have lasted quite some time.

Let me think more about what you proposed. I need to watch the videos a few more times. And the first video was what got me started into looking into statics so...


Ok upon a further review of the process in the third video it seems to me that the potential stored in the cap can be discharged faster hence pulling in more charges from the environment into the system causing an apparent higher charge to flow through the spark gap. But this is a rehash of what we have been saying all along. Caps will always be able to put out more in less time because the battery is a steady state device and the cap is a transitional one. Remember that in it's construction the battery is long and steady on it's potential and the cap can thrust it out a lot faster then the battery. This difference makes it appear that the battery is not capable of doing the same time compression of the pulse. It's like comparing a water pump with a certain psi over time to a super compressed water balloon. they contain the same stuff inside but the method of storage is different. One is designed for steady output and the other is a mere container that is capable of huge bursts. This analogy might not be the best but it is the best I can give atm.

Capacitors are just leyden jars. When designed properly they have the ability to hold more to be used in burst mode in the most efficient manner possible. Although they can be used to smooth a batteries output as well they have higher abilities to supply the biggest bang for you buck or input. It is this bang we should be interested in in combination with the ability to hold a charge for extended amounts of time in a separate part of the circuit.

Try this: design a coil that is resonant by using full wave half wave or one quarter wave. Feedd that to a leyden jar or cap then have that discharge into a larger leyden jar for use as a storage tank to provide potential over a long time. This is the process Tesla and other have used. It works. The trick is to not use or deplete the storage bank and to utilize the potential only of that storage bank. How do we do that Well one wire would be sufficient to do that Right? If your system is designed correctly then it will not deplete the storage cap and then all one would need to do is maintain that potential if your system is leaky.

[dragon]

Is that motor an AC or DC motor? I just put a quick circuit together using a DC motor and it works fine as a generator lighting the LED's but won't allow the motor to run or continue. An AC motor on the other hand, which I don't have, may work.....

Anyone know what motor he was using?
________
DRUG TESTING KIT

[Slovenia]

Very Exciting

Wow, this is very exciting.

Actually this energy is very very convertable. We can use it in it's normal mode or convert it to conventional electricity so we will only need a converter that would be built into this machine that generates from this new source. All one would need to do is have the grid come and disconnect us and walla hook it up to the existing box where the grid used to hook to and you are in business...

[dragon]

__________________________________________________ ______________
"Try this: design a coil that is resonant by using full wave half wave or one quarter wave. Feedd that to a leyden jar or cap then have that discharge into a larger leyden jar for use as a storage tank to provide potential over a long time. This is the process Tesla and other have used. It works. The trick is to not use or deplete the storage bank and to utilize the potential only of that storage bank. How do we do that Well one wire would be sufficient to do that Right? If your system is designed correctly then it will not deplete the storage cap and then all one would need to do is maintain that potential if your system is leaky."
__________________________________________________ _______________

You sort of lost me here... so the main charge cap is discharged into a large layden jar... the one wire circuit from the layden jar to drive a load, so the main cap discharge into the layden jar would be at resonance also correct? Or is this simply a static fill creating a potential? If it's just a static potential how can you draw energy from it without depleting it?
________
Smoking Rehab Forums

[Jbignes5]

__________________________________________________ ______________
"Try this: design a coil that is resonant by using full wave half wave or one quarter wave. Feedd that to a leyden jar or cap then have that discharge into a larger leyden jar for use as a storage tank to provide potential over a long time. This is the process Tesla and other have used. It works. The trick is to not use or deplete the storage bank and to utilize the potential only of that storage bank. How do we do that Well one wire would be sufficient to do that Right? If your system is designed correctly then it will not deplete the storage cap and then all one would need to do is maintain that potential if your system is leaky."
__________________________________________________ _______________

You sort of lost me here... so the main charge cap is discharged into a large layden jar... the one wire circuit from the layden jar to drive a load, so the main cap discharge into the layden jar would be at resonance also correct? Or is this simply a static fill creating a potential? If it's just a static potential how can you draw energy from it without depleting it?

Excellent Questions. Thank you for asking them.

Remember that leyden jar and cap can be switched. Meaning that I can say leyden jar and capacitor could be substituted and mean the same thing.

So for ease of understanding I will use capacitor from now on. So we have a cap pulsing into a larger cap maintaining the potential of that storage (source) cap. We then use the Tesla one wire method from the storage cap to provide that potential without discharging the source potential and connect that to our load. We can then attach a plate to the second part or out of the load and have a potential difference. Would you agree that a body of metal suspended via a dielectric would have a lower potential then the high potential of our source? Well this is how we utilize this kind of a setup. But I am thinking that we need an external link to get useful energy to play in our systems. This would be an in and an out for energy to cycle into and our of our load. Seeing that diodes offer such a source to emit the attractor for energy external to our load that would have to be included. So Source then diode then antenna. we also connect the load to the antenna to draw or use the charges attracted to the antenna through our load and out another antenna to complete the flow. This would not draw from our source but use it as the attractor of external charges to enter our system. The load would be self sustaining in this method as long as it was completely controlled and no leaks were had between the source and load. All for the price of setting up a near perfect source.

This near perfect source I would think would be much like the ark of the covenant that is accounted for in the tales from the bible. This arc was filled with manna <- the bread of life. This Bread is actually a condensation of gold. The perfect conductors that are condensed out of gold or more importantly called white powder of gold or Ormus. This if one did some research is thought of as a super conductor. Housed in a container which is filled with this substance would be considered a super conducting capacitor.Covered with gold to form the ground or ambient plate one could draw from the source any amount of potential that one needed between the source of nothing or absolute zero and the ambient energy of the environment to form a potential difference that could be use most passively. We would of course have to make sure that this did not short out. Great care should be taken to make sure we did not do so because if it did all the power of the difference would cause great destruction that would not be stoppable. The story that comes to mind about this event would be the roaming of Moses in the bible after stealing the ark and following of the ark to the promise land. It took 40 years of them waiting for the capacitor to move to the right spot on the earth where this natural energy flow was the greatest and the capacitor settled down in the highest concentration for that cap to center itself. In the right circumstances if we had the capacitor in an area that was being amplified that difference would be so extreme that huge amounts of source could be utilized. I think this is what the builders of the Pyramids did. They used the amplified energy and had the ark to charge it up and use it.

Through cunning we can devise a method to simulate our current system much like the earlier example that I showed with the variable static capacitor. All a static charge is, is an abundance or lack of charges on a surface. It is very simple if you understand there is only one polarity or lack of that polarity that causes flow in nature between two points. A capacitor is a great way to provide a source and manipulate that source to flow in one direction them switch to another direction causing a movement in the flow in a back and forth nature. That would be the AC approach. A dc approach would be to provide a source and somehow extract or divert the attracted charges or energy before the source has a way to balance with the incoming energy from the environment.

A Dc approach would be harder to do but not when you use vacuum tubes as this allows one to manipulate higher voltages or potentials with little input. I believe this is where Tesla got his greatest effects. DC source in this context means a static non oscillating source. It would be easier to maintain a source if you just had to top it off when it got low or lower in potential. kinda like the buckets filled with water and connected by a small slot down each side of the buckets. if you took some out of the left one the right one would flow into the one on the left till it balanced out. The same principle could maintain the source as it gets depleted in the same method. This is with potential only and not real charges. This is the source or well that we will create a flow with.

Now I talked about a network before and I think that would be a good topic for the next post... So any more questions.

Pardon me for going off topic a bit to the questions posed. My mind tends to not organize these concepts and they tend to spill out in a disorganized method. This is exactly why I need to be here. Someone needs to take these and stick them in their rightful order as I am unable to do this at this point. My mind is racing with all kinds of ideas and revelations from what I research. If I could get someone to take all this and start grouping them together in the related order then it might make more sense to you who are not privy to my understanding.

Energy that we are talking about here is all around us.

[dragon]

Wow !

Absolutely clear ! Thank you. The only other question that comes to mind right now would be when you stated "suspended via a dielectric" I'm not clear on what you meant...

While contemplating how to create a varied potential I ended up with an idea to drive a pulse motor while shuttling energy back and forth. I don't know if it would actually work, I believe it might. Basically a rotary tesla switch with only the central cap being pulse charged.... see drawing. I don't know if it would be needed to add a pulse to the secondary caps now and then but I suspect you might which could be done through a BEMF on a bifilar winding. Might be an interesting motor in any case...
________
Uggs

[Slovenia]

Thanks Ramset (Chet)

Hi Ramset,

Your very welcome. I'm glad to be of help to you and the others.

Thank you for your appreciation!!!

Best Regards,
Slovenia

Slovenia
Thank you for starting this thread,and for your honesty about your skills and understanding!

I will share this link elsewhere ,this harvesting from the Dipole is "tricky" business .

Chet

[Slovenia]

Nice Drawing Dragon

Hi Dragon,

Thanks so much for sharing the drawing. It's terrific stuff.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

Absolutely clear ! Thank you. The only other question that comes to mind right now would be when you stated "suspended via a dielectric" I'm not clear on what you meant...

While contemplating how to create a varied potential I ended up with an idea to drive a pulse motor while shuttling energy back and forth. I don't know if it would actually work, I believe it might. Basically a rotary tesla switch with only the central cap being pulse charged.... see drawing. I don't know if it would be needed to add a pulse to the secondary caps now and then but I suspect you might which could be done through a BEMF on a bifilar winding. Might be an interesting motor in any case...

[Slovenia]

Thanks!!

Hi Jbignes5,

I didn't make this connection before. Thank you very much for clarifying this. You are making a very good tutorial indeed.

My electrical knowledge was so poor I didn't see it before.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

Well it is very appropriate here. Isn't that what we are talking about. Establishing a positive source then keeping that source separate from our load. That is what we are doing. Remember voltage and charges are positive but completely separate in the natural sense. Voltage is our source which attracts positive charges to our source. If we then design a way to peel off the charges before it gets to the source then we have split the positive!

It was right in front of you the whole time!

[Slovenia]

pdf file of this thread

I'm going to put together a pdf file of this thread. We definitely don't need anything happening to this information.