Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Don't Kill Dipole

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • If you read anything...

    Try this on for size. This is Tesla's own words. From:

    "On Light and Other High Frequency Phenomena"

    "ON PHENOMENA PRODUCED BY ELECTROSTATIC FORCE

    The first class of effects I intend to show you are effects produced by electrostatic force. It is the force which governs the motion of the atoms, which causes them to collide and develop the life-sustaining energy of heat and light, and which causes them to aggregate in an infinite variety of ways, according to Nature's fanciful designs, and to form all these wondrous structures we perceive around us; it is, in fact, if our present views be true, the most important force for us to consider in. Nature. As the term electrostatic might imply a steady electric condition, it should be remarked, that in these experiments the force is not constant, but varies at a rate which may be considered moderate, about one million times a second, or thereabouts. This enables me to produce many effects which are not producible with an unvarying force.

    When two conducting bodies are insulated and electrified, we say that an electrostatic force is acting between them. This force manifests itself in attractions, repulsions and stresses in the bodies and space or medium without. So great may be the strain exerted in the air, or whatever separates the two conducting bodies, that it may break down, and we observe sparks or bundles of light or streamers, as they are called. These streamers form abundantly when the force through the air is rapidly varying. I will illustrate this action of electrostatic force in a novel experiment in which I will employ the induction coil before referred to. The coil is contained in a trough filled with oil, and placed under the table. The two ends of .the secondary wire pass through the two thick columns of hard rubber which protrude to solve height above the table. It is necessary to insulate the ends or terminals of the secondary heavily with hard rubber, because even dry wood is by far ton poor an insulator for these currents of enormous potential differences. On one of the terminals of the coil, I ,have placed a large sphere of sheet brass, which is connected to a larger insulated brass plate, in order to enable me to perform the experiments under conditions, which, as you will see, are more suitable for this experiment. I now set the coil to work and approach the free terminal with a metallic object held in my hand, this simply to avoid burns As I approach the metallic object to a distance of eight or tell inches, a torrent of furious sparks breaks forth from the end of the secondary wire, which passes through the rubber column. The sparks cease when the metal in my hand touches the wire. My arm is now traversed by a powerful electric current, vibrating at about the rate of one million times a second. All around me the electrostatic force makes itself felt, and the air molecules and particles of dust flying about are acted upon and are hammering violently against my body. So great is this agitation of the particles, that when the lights are turned out you may see streams of feeble light appear on some parts of my body. When such a streamer breaks out on any part of the body, it produces a sensation like the pricking of a needle. Were the potentials sufficiently high and the frequency of the vibration rather low, the skin would probably be ruptured under the tremendous strain, and the blood would rush out with great force in the form of fine spray or jet so thin as to be invisible, just as oil will when placed on the positive terminal of a Holtz machine. The breaking through of the skin though it may seem impossible at first, would perhaps occur, by reason of the tissues finder the skin being incomparably better conducting. This, at least, appears plausible, judging from some observations.

    I can make these streams of light visible to all, by touching with the metallic object one of the terminals as before, and approaching my free hand to the brass sphere, which is connected to the second terminal of the coil. As the hand is approached, the air between it and the sphere, or in the immediate neighborhood, is more violently agitated, and you see streams of light now break forth from my finger tips and from the whole hand (Fig. 5/169). Were I to approach the hand closer, powerful sparks would jump from the brass sphere to my hand, which might be injurious. The streamers offer no particular inconvenience, except that in the ends of the finger tips a burning sensation is felt. They should not be confounded with those produced by an influence machine, because in many respects they behave differently. I have attached the brass sphere and plate to one of the terminals in order to prevent the formation of visible streamers on that terminal, also in order to prevent sparks from jumping at a considerable distance. Besides, the attachment is favorable for the working of the coil.

    The streams of light which you have observed issuing from my hand are due to a potential of about 200,000 volts, alternating in rather irregular intervals, sometimes like a million times a second. A vibration of the same amplitude, but four times as fast, to maintain which over 3,000,000 volts would be required, would be mare than sufficient to envelop my body in a complete sheet of flame. But this flame would not burn me up; quite contrarily, the probability is ,that I would not be injured in the least. Yet a hundredth part of that energy, otherwise directed; would be amply sufficient to kill a person.

    The amount of energy which may thus be passed into the body of a person depends on the frequency and potential of the currents, and by making both of these very great, a vast amount of energy may be passed into the body without causing any discomfort, except perhaps, in the arm, which is traversed by a true conduction current. The reason why no pain in the body is felt, and no injurious effect noted, is that everywhere, if a current be imagined to flow through the body, the direction of its flow would be at right angles to the surface; hence the body of the experimenter offers an enormous section to the current, and the density is very small, with the exception of the arm, perhaps, where the density may be considerable. Lout if only a small fraction of that energy would be applied in such a way that a current would traverse the body in the same manner as a low frequency current, a shock would be received which might be fatal. A direct or low frequency alternating current is fatal, I think, principally because its distribution through the body is not uniform, as it must divide itself in minute streamlets of great density, whereby some organs are vitally injured. That such a process occurs I have not the least doubt, though no evidence might apparently exist, or be found upon examination. The surest to injure and destroy life, is a continuous current, but the most painful is an alternating current of very low frequency. The expression of these views, which are the result of long continued experiment and observation, both with steady and varying currents, is elicited by the interest which is at present taken in this subject, and by the manifestly erroneous ideas which are daily propounded in journals on this subject.

    I may illustrate an effect of the electrostatic force by another striking experiment, but before, I must call your attention to one or two facts. I have said before, that whet; the medium between two oppositely electrified bodies is strained beyond a certain limit it gives way and, stated in popular language, the opposite electric charges unite and neutralize each other. This breaking down of the medium occurs principally when the force acting between the bodies is steady, or varies at a moderate rate. Were the variation sufficiently rapid, such a destructive break would not occur, no matter how great the force, for all the energy would be spent in radiation, convection and mechanical and chemical action. Thus the spark length, or greatest distance which a spark will jump between the electrified bodies is the smaller, the greater the variation or time rate of change. But this rule may be taken to be true only in a general way, when comparing rates which are widely different.

    I will show you by an experiment the difference in the effect produced by a rapidly varying and a steady or moderately varying force. I have here two large circular brass plates p p (Fig. 6a and Fig. 6b), supported on movable insulating stands on the table, connected to the ends of the secondary of a coil similar to the one used before. I place the plates ten or twelve inches apart and set the coil to work. You see the whole space between the plates, nearly two cubic feet, filled with uniform light, Fig. 6a. This light is due to the streamers you have seen in the first experiment, which are now much more intense. I have already pointed out the importance of these streamers in commercial apparatus and their still greater importance in some purely scientific investigations, Often they are to weak to be visible, but they always exist, consuming energy and modifying the action of .the apparatus. When intense, as they are at present, they produce ozone in great quantity, and also, as Professor Crookes has pointed out, nitrous acid. So quick is the chemical action that if a coil, such as this one, is worked for a very long time it will make the atmosphere of a small room unbearable, for the eyes and throat are attacked. But when moderately produced, the streamers refresh the atmosphere wonderfully, like a thunder-storm, and exercises unquestionably a beneficial effect.

    In this experiment the force acting between the plates changes in intensity and direction at a very rapid rate. I will now make the rate of change per unit time much smaller. This I effect by rendering the discharges through the primary of the induction coil less frequent, and also by diminishing the rapidity of the vibration in the secondary. The former result is conveniently secured by lowering the E. M. F. over the air gap in the primary circuit, the latter by approaching the two brass plates to a distance of about three or four inches. When the coil is set to work, you see no streamers or light between the plates, yet the medium between them is under a tremendous strain. I still further augment the strain by raising the E. M. F. in the primary circuit, and soon you see the air give away and the hall is illuminated by a shower of brilliant and noisy sparks, Fig. 6b. These sparks could be produced also with unvarying force; they have been for many years a familiar phenomenon, though they were usually obtained from an entirely different apparatus. In describing these two phenomena so radically different in appearance, I have advisedly spoken of a "force" acting between the plates. It would be in accordance with the accepted views to say, that there was an "alternating E. M. F.", acting between the plates. This term is quite proper and applicable in all cases where there is evidence of at least a possibility of an essential inter-dependence of the electric state of the plates, or electric action in their neighborhood. But if the plates were removed to an infinite distance, or if at a finite distance, there is no probability or necessity whatever for such dependence. I prefer to use the term "electrostatic force," and to say that such a force is acting around each plate or electrified insulated body in general. There is an inconvenience in usin this expression as the term incidentally, means a steady electric condition; but a proper nomenclature will eventually settle this difficulty."

    This is just a small percentage of information out there. There are very telling statements made from Tesla that can rock yours or any true truth seekers world.
    Last edited by Jbignes5; 10-19-2010, 12:57 PM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by lamare View Post
      Good to hear I'm being missed.

      Just for all clarity: I don't feel like anyone is stealing anything from me. We are all working for the single goal of providing mankind with the technology that has been stolen from us, because Tesla had all this stuff figured out years ago. So, all I try to do is share what I know or think to know, so everyone that feels like it can work further on it any way he or she may like. Do whatever you like, I have released all my stuff as open source exactly because I want people to be able to do with my stuff whatever they like.

      And then some day, some one will come up with something working. When that happens, it would be my greatest pleasure if my article would turn out to be correct and/or would help to convince scientists there really is something to this stuff, so they can no longer pull the "perpetuum mobile" card to ridicule serious inventors.

      The reason I have not been here for a while is because I tend to attach too much to a certain subject and then forget about everything else, which means that other things I have to do have not been done yet. So, when I thought I was at a point the principles were more or less clear, I decided it was time for a break. That's all. Looks like there are some interesting posts here I will check out, but I don't want to get drawn into this too much at the moment.

      So, just continue doing what you like and make sure to have some fun! We'll get there when the time is right..

      Yes All for one idea, one moment of clear thought and simplicity.

      I certainly agree with you on the obsession twords this puzzle. I tend to focus too much time on it myself and my partner in life tries to remind me of that fact. She is a great gal.

      I will be sticking to this until I find the way. I am glad you are here even if it isn't all the time a small amount of like thinking goes a long ways.

      Comment


      • Passion - obsession ? Well organized mass confusion? Controlled destructive feedback seems to be the goal.
        ________
        LATINJANNE
        Last edited by dragon; 05-11-2011, 10:55 AM.

        Comment


        • Wow

          Wow Rebus57, you have my full undivided attention!! I was even farther off on this Tesla stuff than I thought I was. Thanks for sharing all of this good information.

          Originally posted by Rebus57 View Post
          P.I.E., E.I.R. this is the first thing most people are taught in basic electronic's. Now let's have some fun. I needed to decide on size ,(electrically), so I ran a few number's and came up with, if it operate's at 4000 v and tube's and conductor's are sized for 30 amps, 4000X30=120,000 watt's, now this wattage can be used to figure final output amps at final output volt's 120,000w/120v=1000 amps. I figure Tesla's at 50,000w was also 120v this is 416+ amps, 50000w/746w(or 1 hp)=67hp. For his high voltage end I figure 2000v @ 25 amps because the insulation at the time topped out about that also current was managable. Now if we try to up our output voltage say to 277v (1 leg of 480 3 ph) we get 120000w/277v=433 amps WOW looks like mine will be 120v output. Why do you need to charge a battery ? With 1000a @ 120v available from a briefcase size device I don't see the need. Of course an isolation transformer can be used on output and device connected where your electric meter used to be, they most likley will try to stop us with "jammers" so don't be suprised by that, I expect it. also this could be built into every appliance so no cord is needed. Now for frequency. When Tesla first began experimenting with transmission he had real problems, seems the signal would not leave the tower (he was using lower freq) even raising the voltage only made it worse, all it would do is build up and back up into his equipment starting as he put it "numurous fires". This he could not explain. Undeterred he continued on gradually raising frequencies (and putting out fires) until finally he was at a high enough frequency that the effect was not very bad almost none. At this point is where he thought he won against nature and could use this range to transmit his power. In step's the controlling powers and he is shut out and down. Now Moray and friends have found some of Tesla's stuff talking about the harder he pushed on the atmosphere the harder it pushed back, I believe this is where this all started, of course the Moray device was primarily designed as a medical device so it used the beneficial freq. but they were too high and the counter emf from an inductive load would shut the device down, also I don't think his device had a trigger cir. it ran at the freq. of the headwaters. I read where Tesla visited Moray's lab and looked at and discussed the device before he made his. I believe Tesla used lower frequency's because when you push just a little they push back a lot. Tesla's was also a variable freq. output for motor speed control. The signal they were picking up was most likley found during Tesla's Colorado Spring's quest. Speaking of signal NO the tuning cir is not sensitive the signal itself might be kind of weak so we don't want to upset it or make it mad at us. Did someone say seperation? Yes you are right the CC Rod must be a distance from the headwaters to prevent the rod's field from blocking signal to headwaters. This is why the "two meter farily thick rod" was on the back of the car and not on the box. This could have been part of the problem with Moray's all the pics of his device show a long wire being used instead of a rod. P.S. Working on a new plan for schematics thank's for your patience, Rebus57

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Altair View Post
            I think this circuit is just a standard voltage booster.
            It can light up the bulbs brighter, at the expense of higher current draw from the battery.
            Usually, there is a diode between the collector of the transistor and the capacitor, but not absolutely necessary.
            Oh, no my friend. This is a *very* interesting circuit if I understand this right. I don't have any sound on this PC so I can't hear anything the guy may say, put from what I see this guy does not use two separate coils, but a transformer, so his schematic is a bit off.

            The coils in his transformer form one series resonance circuit along with the load, so you get the whole thing into one single resonance mode. The battery only has to deliver some power to keep the resonance going, but the current going trough the load never ends up in the battery circuitry, so no killing of the dipole.

            Very, very interesting little toy! Well done!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
              Splitting the positive is just that. How many components does electricity have? 2 so far in my honest opinion. One of potential and one of movement. The potential part is self explanatory Potential=Voltage, Movement=Current. Well this also can be look at like real components as well. Where Voltage(potential)=static. Static=potential on a surface area.
              Your post here was interesting to read. However, I think in fact there is no static potential. What we think of being potential is in fact a movement of even smaller particles we used to call ether. So, voltage is a measurement for the amount ether flowing around a certain surface area, which is much like a wing of an earoplane. It has a certain lift you could call "potential" but the actual force that creates the lift is a dynamic one caused by the movement of air around the wing.

              Comment


              • Thought's on Frequency

                I've been thinking again (and we all know how dangerous that can be), even though we are using ELF to run crystal device (headwaters), when signal goes through the CC Tube breakbown gap it will most likley be a higher frequency due to the rapid interaction between opposing forces, of course it will always have the underlying harmonic of the origional signal in there somewhere. This should put the cloud around CC Rod at a more friendly frequency. That Tesla illumination stuff is something else! Good Stuff, you know he proposed a theory of putting towers around the perimeter of a city and create a "sheet dome" of light so at night no street lights are needed and no dark alley's, cool, use a dimmer make it adjustable. The man liked towers. Last more on the ferrite's, these are behaving like the CC Rod, they are ringing at the same frequency as the crystal device causing atmosphere around them to give us a small amount of "controlled destructive feedback", (I love that), which give's us enough current for our CC Tube operation and to run control circuit. This stuff will make your head explode, ya'll are right about this stuff being all consuming I guess it goes with the territory Tesla was all consumed almost to the point of being hermit like. This is why only a few times a year I can get into the zone and work on this stuff it is all consuming. With more people working on it maby more will get done world wide. Thanks for your time, Rebus57

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
                  MISLED! We are too arrogant to admit that we could have been wrong this whole time. By we I mean the establishment. There are whole industries based off of the mistakes or errors in judgement and they rely on the fact that they have the facts. Well based off what they know they indeed have the facts as it applies to that industry. They then apply those facts to the area of everything else and then are confused when it doesn't fit correctly. In fact after the confusion sets in they shun it because it makes their own facts not so fact based. They will never admit that they are wrong about this because that would loosen the grip that they have on us.

                  You are not in fact ignorant but deceived into thinking that you are. It would be ignorance if you chose to ignore the truth once presented to you and I do not see that from anyone that is open to my discoveries.

                  Re education is a hard process because we become complacent in the fact that what we thought we knew was correct in every instance and we relied on that notion.

                  Oh yeah, we have been misled. The establishment still doesn't understand what gravity is, while in actual fact it is an electric phenomenon. There are standing longitudinal electric waves that are nothing but the flow of ether. Posted on that before. They still believe in SantaStein and then they are baffled when their sattelites run into an area with a higher ether pressure they didn't account for:

                  Mystery force in space baffles NASA

                  Mystery force in space baffles NASA

                  A force in space is hindering the journey of a NASA spacecraft.
                  A force in space is hindering the journey of a NASA spacecraft.

                  Scientists have been baffled by a mysterious phenomenon that has prevented the craft from moving further into outer space.

                  Described as a force that defies all laws of nature, they have said gravity laws may eventually need to be changed.

                  Defying all previously-known theories about the universe, the strange force that gently pushes spacecraft away from outer space was discovered last year when the spacecraft Pioneer 10 was stopped in its path by the unknown phenomenon.

                  Researchers for NASA have said the force could be a totally new phenomenon that does not fall under familiar titles such as gravity or electromagnetic power.

                  A tangible scientific explanation has not been put forward for the fact that the Pioneer 10 left the solar system to start its voyage in a space where there is no solar radiation or planets to attract it toward their orbits.

                  Pioneer 10, which travels more than one million kilometres per day, started slowing down in an area where it is not supposed to meet any obstacles.

                  Pioneer 10 is the first spacecraft to have taken close photos of Jupiter, which it passed in 1973.

                  In 1978, it traveled towards Pluto and reached it in 1983.

                  It then left for a region called the Asteroid Belt, which is occupied by several irregular-shaped minor planets.

                  The spacecraft, which is currently 11 billion kilometers away from earth, now only travels at 25 centimetres every day, going backwards.
                  Oh boy, what a mystery.

                  It comes down to this: Einstein was wrong because Morgan didn't want us to have free energy, so they crippled the Maxwell equations which describe the electromagnetic fields by postulating that EM fields must be caused by charge carriers, pieces of matter, while we *know* it's the fields that cause the matter and not the other way around. And so we can't have an electric field without charge carriers, we can't have longitudinal electric waves and we need some freaking coordinate transform known as the Lorentz transform to be able to "generalize" these freaked up versions of the Maxwell equations. So, the good old ether theory went down the drain and now we get mysterious forces that are perfectly explainable with straight simple ether theory. What a joke!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by lamare View Post
                    Your post here was interesting to read. However, I think in fact there is no static potential. What we think of being potential is in fact a movement of even smaller particles we used to call ether. So, voltage is a measurement for the amount ether flowing around a certain surface area, which is much like a wing of an earoplane. It has a certain lift you could call "potential" but the actual force that creates the lift is a dynamic one caused by the movement of air around the wing.
                    Oh I agree but we are going beyond many's ability to handle such information. To suffice it to say me and you know how the finer elements work but to the layman they would just get confused by those additional facts.

                    I wanted it to be simple to handle for the other guys and gals so I chose potential. In of itself potential in all references is just a reflection of the source. It has a reach based on the density of the charges in the source and the density of the surrounding medium of aether. This reach is the smaller particles forming fine structures out of the chaotic sea that all matter resides. kinda how iron orients itself when exposed to a magnetic field which is a different beast all together but is a good analogy.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
                      It that to scale of the larger ones? Also what is it made of? From my studies on the Great Pyramids they were actually capacitors. More in the lines of a laden jar but the outside material was just dielectric.
                      Very interesting if you connect the dots towards anti gravity, the Biefeld Brown effect:

                      The story of the Lifter Project by Jean-Louis Naudin
                      The Lifter is an asymmetrical capacitor which uses High Voltage ( > 20KV ) to produce a thrust.
                      Ether*Physics

                      Summary: The forces of magnetism, electricity, and gravity are simply different types of perturbations in a single field that permeates the universe and comprises the fabric of existence.
                      “Everything is flux” – Heraclitus


                      Changes in ether pressure over some distance creates gravitational forces just as gradients in air pressure create wind, and so masses attract each other. Ether pressure also determines the local rate of time and scale of space. Gravitational force fields are equivalently time rate gradients. The lower the pressure, the slower the rate of time and more reduced the scale of space. Therefore time and space as we know them are ultimately generated by the very masses occupying this universe.


                      Since electric fields are accelerative flows in the ether, a diverging or converging electric field has within it a compressive or expansive ether component. Negative charges like electrons exhibit a slight antigravitational effect, and positive charges like protons a gravitational effect. When positive and negative charges are kept close but apart, there exists a gravitational imbalance between them and the entire thing will experience a net force towards the positive pole, as demonstrated in the Biefeld-Brown effect. Maximizing intensity and nonlinearity in the electric field increases the effect. Ether pressure also influences the natural spacing between electric charges and can thus be measured indirectly by measuring charge density.
                      So, if you can create anti gravity with an asymetric capacitor, which basically means creating a difference in ether pressure and thus a flow of ether, me thinks you can also use that principle the other way around. If you have an inflow of ether, which causes what we call gravity, you should be able to somehow charge an asymetric capacitor using this inflowing ether, right?

                      So, if you would make an asymetric capacitor shaped as a pyramid.....



                      Hmm. This Montalk site seems interesting: Fringe knowledge for beginners:
                      http://www.montalk.net/book
                      Last edited by lamare; 10-19-2010, 08:12 PM.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
                        Oh I agree but we are going beyond many's ability to handle such information. To suffice it to say me and you know how the finer elements work but to the layman they would just get confused by those additional facts.

                        I wanted it to be simple to handle for the other guys and gals so I chose potential. In of itself potential in all references is just a reflection of the source. It has a reach based on the density of the charges in the source and the density of the surrounding medium of aether. This reach is the smaller particles forming fine structures out of the chaotic sea that all matter resides. kinda how iron orients itself when exposed to a magnetic field which is a different beast all together but is a good analogy.
                        Well, we do have a bit of a problem then, because the free energy is to be found in the flowing ether, as Tesla said years ago:
                        Nikola Tesla - Wikiquote

                        Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic! If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic — and this we know it is, for certain — then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.
                        In that sense, the frozen waterfall anology is what matters here. A frozen waterfall (static) won't turn the wheel of your watermill, while a flowing waterfall will and thus give you free energy....

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
                          I just wanted to say again that there are two components of any electrical phenomina we can see. One is an initiator (Voltage) and the other is the answer or resultant push back from the environment. We supply one and the other comes from the environment. One has to realize this process for what it is. For ever action there is an equal but opposite reaction when dealing with the environment. When we initiate a potential to be exposed to the environment the environment reacts with an equal but different push back. This push back is with the opposite component of electricity. There are only two.
                          Coming back to the frozen waterfall analogy: voltage, potential is not a static force. In my article I explain that with my fandoor analogy.

                          Consider a closed cylinder with a piston. If you move the piston into the cylinder, gass pressure will build up which pushes the piston back.

                          Now take that same piston and move it in front of a blowing fan. Then you get the same kind of force, only cause by a *dynamic* force, wind blowing agains the piston.

                          That is what we have here. If you have a potential difference, a voltage, we think in terms of static forces, but in actual fact the force that makes your charges move and thus causes a current to flow is dynamic, it's like wind moving trough the air.

                          So, the trick is to take that blowing wind from your power source, your voltage source, and divert the part you're not using to do useful work somewhere else. So, you want to use your voltage source to cause charge carriers to move such that they don't end up in your voltage source.

                          The TROS circuit posted here appears to be just about one of the simplest ways to do just that:

                          YouTube - TROS - "bemf"

                          You create a current trough your load that cannot reach your battery. You use the "wind" created by your battery to move charge carriers around that do not reach your battery...

                          This circuit has some interesting similarities with what Meyer, Puharich and Gray were doing: get a coil into resonance such that you don't have to pay for the current that goes trough the load. This circuit drives the coil into resonance using a different technique, but you still have the load current going *outside* of your driving circuitry!!!!!

                          And while it looks at first sight that it may be less efficient in terms of COP, as long as the COP is well above 1, who cares???
                          Last edited by lamare; 10-19-2010, 08:53 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Think of it like this.

                            Originally posted by lamare View Post
                            Your post here was interesting to read. However, I think in fact there is no static potential. What we think of being potential is in fact a movement of even smaller particles we used to call ether. So, voltage is a measurement for the amount ether flowing around a certain surface area, which is much like a wing of an earoplane. It has a certain lift you could call "potential" but the actual force that creates the lift is a dynamic one caused by the movement of air around the wing.
                            No static potential? Care to explain the leyden jar then?

                            Comment


                            • Better Pics from Rebus57

                              Rebus57 Additional Information

                              This project is still under construction/ development. Several years ago I built a prototype to prove the basic theory and hardware, (conversion element switching tube), function and both proved positive results but were not right for final device so it was taken apart to use some parts for final design. Please note a few changes made that have not yet made it into the drawing, first the bobbin coils on ferrite cores are reduced to only three per core a center primary and a secondary at each end, all wound with one turn spacing,(about 31t ea.). Second, breakdown gaps will be 1/4 in. (.250) diameter hollow spheres. Third, I settled in on 1/4 in. dia. X 6.000 long ferrites for 100 HZ, (material). Finally FREE ENERGY SHOULD BE FREE please do not offer for sale this stuff. My goal all along this project has been to build it with easily available parts and materials so anyone with basic tools and skills can be successful in their build. Thanks again for the interest, Rebus57








                              Last edited by Slovenia; 10-20-2010, 02:33 AM.

                              Comment


                              • Those are much better, very clear ! Thanks Rebus57 and Slovania for posting them.
                                ________
                                IPAD ACCESSORIES
                                Last edited by dragon; 05-11-2011, 10:56 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X