Exciters = OU from Mass = semiconductors

[Goldfinder]

To all you would be OUO researchers:
Mass is aether trapped in a vortex. See - Besant and Leadbetter, Lucas and Bergman, Global Scaling, Stowe, and others. The only truly stable particles are the electron and the proton. The next most stable particle is the neutron which decays in seconds to an electron and proton. The neutron is obviously a proton and electron pressured together within the nucleus. The rest of the particle soup are just transitory decays of the initial stable particles.

Electric fields are stresses in the field, Gravity is GRAD E, and magnetic fields are vortexes in the aether. EM energy are synchronous moving electric and magnetic fields.

The proton and electron are resonant structures and tuned into the standing scalar waves as well as an infinitude of others. See Global Scaling. These structures of mass are already sustained and supported by the gravitational/scalar standing waves that run the universe. They are tapping the aether directly.

Stifflers exciter is creating a disturbance in the aether and then taps this disturbance. So how does the tap work?

After playing with the exciter and plowing through the tons of videos and associated work there is a great scarcity of anything other more variation of these circuits and no real discussion on HOW they are tapping the ZPE/aether/whatever.

It looks to me in my limited background that the AV plug is really where the secret lies. The other thing is the transistor itself which seems to be limited to certain special ones. So what is common to AV plugs and transistors besides wire and containers - answer - semiconductor material...

It reminds me when I was at Lockheed back in the 1960s. One of techs I who worked in the semi lab said they had been testing a transistor that put out energy with no inputs and it had gotten classified TS very quickly. He wouldn't discuss it further.

When I met Dr. T. Henry Moray back on the early 1960s he showed me the progression of his radiant energy discoveries and how he went from giant Tesla towers outside his lab to a box that would fit into the trunk of a car to tap the aetheric forces that put out 100 KW. However, he stated that his greatest discovery was the use of semi conductor material. He was actually the first inventor to build a transistor and the device was stolen by Bell Labs.

Space has this seething energy blazing through it. Various estimates go as high as 100 KW per cubic centimeter. The Dr. Stiffler exciters and other similar circuits tickle this standing wave field creating a disturbance in the aether and then trap the disturbance. Why not tap the seething field of energy directly? If the Lockheed free energy transistor and Dr. Moray's cryptic statement have some weight it looks to me the way to go. Not being a semiconductor expert (yes I have a number of the college courses on the material) maybe there is someone out there in lala land that could contribute.

So if anyone else wants to contribute to this thread - lets have it !

Goldfinder
BTW mass particles, the whole of the periodic table are resonant structures in the aether.

[b4FreeEnergy]

Hi Goldfinder,

It reminds me when I was at Lockheed back in the 1960s. One of techs I who worked in the semi lab said they had been testing a transistor that put out energy with no inputs and it had gotten classified TS very quickly. He wouldn't discuss it further.

One of your colleagues back in the sixties told you something about a transistor generating energy with no inputs!!?? You actually could look that man in the eyes and let him go home without telling you something more about this? If one of my colleagues tells me something like that he doesn’t leave! Can’t you still reach him, contact him and get some more info? What happened with that technology meanwhile? The more I read, the more I’m convinced all the technology we ever need is already there for a long time but it’s simply not allowed to be used.

When I met Dr. T. Henry Moray back on the early 1960s he showed me the progression of his radiant energy discoveries and how he went from giant Tesla towers outside his lab to a box that would fit into the trunk of a car to tap the aetheric forces that put out 100 KW. However, he stated that his greatest discovery was the use of semi conductor material. He was actually the first inventor to build a transistor and the device was stolen by Bell Labs.

You actually met Henry Moray. Did you have a demonstration of his device? He apparently already had the technology to supply every house in the world with an independent energy source and today in 2010 we can’t even redo what he did. (At least most of us can't) You got my full attention but what exactly is it you want to accomplish with this thread? You have more information you could release?

Indeed let’s have it!

Cheers,
B

[Goldfinder]

the thread is a quest

the transistor question:
The tech who related the transistor story to me was under a strict Top Secret umbrella. Obvious you haven't worked in the black world of compartmented military intelligent system. There was no way the tech would reveal anything else and it was pointless to try and pry it out of him.

Moray question:
From the way Dr. Moray related the discovery of the transistor it seemed he was hinting that it was part of the overall radiant energy device he had invented. It is fairly well known, at least in certain circles, that Dr. Brown with his nuclear battery had a free energy device and it used nuclear electron radiators built into a semiconductor material.

The Dr. Stiffler exciter with its solid state converters (i.e. the diodes) of perturbations in the aether into excess energy leads me to believe that the basic semiconductor effect that uses doped materials i.e. donors and receptors quite possibly could be used as a direct converter of the ZPE into usable power, possibly without the exciter part.

What I propose is an analysis of some possible way that doped materials could be used in this fashion. Since this is supposed to be an "open forum" then maybe some of you or other who are lurkers on this forum would come forward and spill the beans so to speak. There is also the possibility that some discussion in this area can churn up a few ideas that we could test. the Dr. Stiffler exciter may be a good test bed to test some of these ideas.

There is too much evidence that there have been quite a number of energy devices that pulled useful energy out of the vacuum of space. AND that most of these devices have been suppressed. Yes, the technology has already been developed and only used privately. Those of us working on discovering these devices are really in a re-discovery mode. And I hope are willing to share any real discoveries made. The only way this technology keeps getting suppressed is the inventor dreams of becoming vastly rich and keeps the ideas to himself, thinks he can get patents, etc., and suppression is easy as there is a single point to stop. If many have the methods then suppression becomes very difficult if not impossible.

I have seen a few OUO devices. A few of my scientific friends whom I trust to know what they are doing have also seen them. I have also test a number of supposed OU devices and most of the inventors were fooling themselves for various reasons. If you are of the orthodox school and all you can do is deride and poke fun and be part of suppression group don't apply. If you have some good thought in this vein lets hear them.

Goldfinder

[lamare]

Stifflers exciter is creating a disturbance in the aether and then taps this disturbance. So how does the tap work?

After playing with the exciter and plowing through the tons of videos and associated work there is a great scarcity of anything other more variation of these circuits and no real discussion on HOW they are tapping the ZPE/aether/whatever.

You may want to check out my article:
Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

And my posts here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post115135
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post115219

Grtz,

-- Arend --

[Farmhand]

These may be interesting to some-


I'm attempting to decifer some of the text in this document starting with the part in the box at the bottom, it all about energy in mass "natures way".

Here's another,


another, if you could keep this thing on the ground it would be a pretty good generator?


This is part of a radio interview transcript Lj is long john the interveiwer and OTC is otis T. Carr.

L.J. - What charges this battery?

O.T.C. - This starts out electrochemically the same as other batteries, but we do have a regenerating system that is very unique. We are able here, the first time to our knowledge, to use atmospheric electricity as a recharging system. This is done as a part of operational principal of the craft.

L.J. You say you use atmospheric electricity. What happens when you use the atmospheric and there isn't any atmosphere?

O.T.C. - We have electrochemical systems to provide us with all the energy that we need and have a regenerating system in the manner of a regenerative coil that recharges this battery, in the same manner that the storage battery in the automobile is recharged now, by a generator.

L.J. - What you have done is made the first perpetual motion machine.

O.T.C. - There is nothing perpetual about our machine. The energies which cause it to operate are perpetual. You cannot destroy matter, you cannot destroy energy. Molecular flow is perpetual and has been proven in the laboratory. It has been proven that electricity itself is immortal. When we take away resistance we can set up a spark of electricity and it will continue to operate, therefore we have perpetual energy. No machine that we can conceive of made by man would be perpetual, but it is free energy. It's self energizing and as long as all parts function and do not wear out this is truly a self energizing machine.

I don't know what to make of this stuff it seems relevent somehow, maybe.

Otis worked with/for Nikola Tesla personally. Or so he claimed.

Regards

[conradphd]

the transistor question:
The tech who related the transistor story to me was under a strict Top Secret umbrella. Obvious you haven't worked in the black world of compartmented military intelligent system. There was no way the tech would reveal anything else and it was pointless to try and pry it out of him.

Moray question:
From the way Dr. Moray related the discovery of the transistor it seemed he was hinting that it was part of the overall radiant energy device he had invented. It is fairly well known, at least in certain circles, that Dr. Brown with his nuclear battery had a free energy device and it used nuclear electron radiators built into a semiconductor material.

The Dr. Stiffler exciter with its solid state converters (i.e. the diodes) of perturbations in the aether into excess energy leads me to believe that the basic semiconductor effect that uses doped materials i.e. donors and receptors quite possibly could be used as a direct converter of the ZPE into usable power, possibly without the exciter part.

What I propose is an analysis of some possible way that doped materials could be used in this fashion. Since this is supposed to be an "open forum" then maybe some of you or other who are lurkers on this forum would come forward and spill the beans so to speak. There is also the possibility that some discussion in this area can churn up a few ideas that we could test. the Dr. Stiffler exciter may be a good test bed to test some of these ideas.

There is too much evidence that there have been quite a number of energy devices that pulled useful energy out of the vacuum of space. AND that most of these devices have been suppressed. Yes, the technology has already been developed and only used privately. Those of us working on discovering these devices are really in a re-discovery mode. And I hope are willing to share any real discoveries made. The only way this technology keeps getting suppressed is the inventor dreams of becoming vastly rich and keeps the ideas to himself, thinks he can get patents, etc., and suppression is easy as there is a single point to stop. If many have the methods then suppression becomes very difficult if not impossible.

I have seen a few OUO devices. A few of my scientific friends whom I trust to know what they are doing have also seen them. I have also test a number of supposed OU devices and most of the inventors were fooling themselves for various reasons. If you are of the orthodox school and all you can do is deride and poke fun and be part of suppression group don't apply. If you have some good thought in this vein lets hear them.

Goldfinder

*Goldfinder
You will learn quickly that working in the public forum that science is wanting and all of mankind's frustrations reign. The true dedicated lurkers are and will remain lurkers. Vanity along with disruption and misdirection will prevail. Indeed public work in this area is more effective at suppression than any blak ops directive.

[lamare]

To all you would be OUO researchers:
Mass is aether trapped in a vortex. See - Besant and Leadbetter, Lucas and Bergman, Global Scaling, Stowe, and others. The only truly stable particles are the electron and the proton. The next most stable particle is the neutron which decays in seconds to an electron and proton. The neutron is obviously a proton and electron pressured together within the nucleus. The rest of the particle soup are just transitory decays of the initial stable particles.

Electric fields are stresses in the field, Gravity is GRAD E, and magnetic fields are vortexes in the aether. EM energy are synchronous moving electric and magnetic fields.

That is so right! Except for the electron and proton being "real particles". These are EM waves, vortices in the ether, as well. And that is why the Maxwell equations are wrong. Particles are caused by the fields and not the other way around. And that is why Einstein's relativity theory is also wrong:
Dr Charles Kenneth Thornhill
http://etherphysics.net/CKT4.pdf

Ever wondered why Victor Schauberger, expert in water (vortices, etc) was involved with secret flying saucer programs?

See my posts here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108545
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108576
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108591

It reminds me when I was at Lockheed back in the 1960s. One of techs I who worked in the semi lab said they had been testing a transistor that put out energy with no inputs and it had gotten classified TS very quickly. He wouldn't discuss it further.

When I met Dr. T. Henry Moray back on the early 1960s he showed me the progression of his radiant energy discoveries and how he went from giant Tesla towers outside his lab to a box that would fit into the trunk of a car to tap the aetheric forces that put out 100 KW. However, he stated that his greatest discovery was the use of semi conductor material. He was actually the first inventor to build a transistor and the device was stolen by Bell Labs.

Space has this seething energy blazing through it. Various estimates go as high as 100 KW per cubic centimeter. The Dr. Stiffler exciters and other similar circuits tickle this standing wave field creating a disturbance in the aether and then trap the disturbance. Why not tap the seething field of energy directly? If the Lockheed free energy transistor and Dr. Moray's cryptic statement have some weight it looks to me the way to go. Not being a semiconductor expert (yes I have a number of the college courses on the material) maybe there is someone out there in lala land that could contribute.

So if anyone else wants to contribute to this thread - lets have it !

Goldfinder
BTW mass particles, the whole of the periodic table are resonant structures in the aether.

I think they key is in resonance and especially the resonance mode you choose. I think what Moray did with a semiconductor, if he indeed invented a transistor, is to replace the old fashioned spark gap oscillator with a transistor based one, exactly as you do with exciter circuits. One of the main differences between spark gap oscillators and transistor oscillators is that you need a separate feedback circuit. You can check my earlier posts referred to in this thread about some examples how to do this in the case of the Kapagen device.

The energy is in the electric field itself because it is a dynamic force (flowing waterfall) and not a static (frozen waterfall) force, as explained by Tom Bearden and calculated by Prof. Turtur. See my article at Pes for the details.

[Farmhand]

This is the only part so far I can get word for word.

" All mass is formed by a contraction of the electric poles of the generative cones of energy to the point of north of it's gravicative center and by an expansion of the contours of the radiative cones untill they disapear in the plane of the equator."

Wow thats the most way out thing i have ever typed.

Does that make sense I think it might.

[DrStiffler]

That is so right! Except for the electron and proton being "real particles". These are EM waves, vortices in the ether, as well. And that is why the Maxwell equations are wrong. Particles are caused by the fields and not the other way around. And that is why Einstein's relativity theory is also wrong:
Dr Charles Kenneth Thornhill
http://etherphysics.net/CKT4.pdf

Ever wondered why Victor Schauberger, expert in water (vortices, etc) was involved with secret flying saucer programs?

See my posts here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108545
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108576
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post108591



I think they key is in resonance and especially the resonance mode you choose. I think what Moray did with a semiconductor, if he indeed invented a transistor, is to replace the old fashioned spark gap oscillator with a transistor based one, exactly as you do with exciter circuits. One of the main differences between spark gap oscillators and transistor oscillators is that you need a separate feedback circuit. You can check my earlier posts referred to in this thread about some examples how to do this in the case of the Kapagen device.

The energy is in the electric field itself because it is a dynamic force (flowing waterfall) and not a static (frozen waterfall) force, as explained by Tom Bearden and calculated by Prof. Turtur. See my article at Pes for the details.

What quantitative information can you point us to that shows oscillators of near standard configuration will exhibit excess or (capture) of energy? Anecdotal information is far from quantitatively convincing. A differentiation between oscillations in more or less standard form, so called exciters and my SEC Exciters are worlds apart. Indeed if you do a simple power calculation of input energy alone one can see that the so called exciters are running at less than or around 50%, of course this is indeed far from a scientific statement as who has measured output in even a marginally acceptable way?

As Conrad said, doubtful that 'Goldfinder' will obtain his answers in a public forum.

[Zooty]

Is there a specific brand of MPSA06 that is required for the exciter to work properly? I can get ON SEMI and MOTOROLA.

[lamare]

What quantitative information can you point us to that shows oscillators of near standard configuration will exhibit excess or (capture) of energy? Anecdotal information is far from quantitatively convincing. A differentiation between oscillations in more or less standard form, so called exciters and my SEC Exciters are worlds apart. Indeed if you do a simple power calculation of input energy alone one can see that the so called exciters are running at less than or around 50%, of course this is indeed far from a scientific statement as who has measured output in even a marginally acceptable way?

As Conrad said, doubtful that 'Goldfinder' will obtain his answers in a public forum.

Quantitative information is hard to get by, but Naudin's simulation of LMD/TEM waves shows OU in the transmission line:
The L.M.D./T.E.M.Test

As far as I can tell, the essential difference between more or less standard exciters and the SEC exciter is the wide spectrum generated by the SEC exciter, which causes the coils to resonate at multiple higher harmonics at the same time. And that occurs because the transistor is basically either "open" or "closed", which appears to be similar to what a spark gap does.

Furthermore, Prof. Turtur showed, IMHO without a shadow of a doubt, that there is energy in the electric field and that this energy originates somehow from the active vacuum, because otherwise charged particles should be loosing mass, because they emit energy in the shape of an electric field and a magnetic field as well:
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/turtur1e.pdf

His basic analysis consists of nothing more then a volume integration of the electric field by Coulombs law, spreading at a constant speed c. So, IMHO, it is very hard to argue the fact that the electric field emitted by each and every charge carrier in the Universe contains energy. Energy which is free for the taking.

So, when you create a dipole, you have created an energy source, which pours out energy in the shape of an electric field, as long as the dipole stays where it is. Bearden explained how this works and also that normal, closed loop circuits use half of the energy supplied by the dipole to kill this dipole, this energy source. So, all you need to to in order to get more energy out of the dipole is find a way to do that without killing it.

IMHO, using standing waves (resonance) of higher harmonics is one of the ways to do that, because within a coil resonating at a higher harmonic, you have multiple dipoles pouring out electric energy, while you have to drive only one of them yourself, because the current you have to put in (which kills your source dipole costing you energy) to drive it, you only put in at the terminals and not to the other dipoles in the coil. To me, that explains why my exciter drew less current when I used higher harmonics:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post65723
http://www.energeticforum.com/65723-post1045.html

I wrapped the power leads a couple of times trough a ring-core (from an old PC PS) and attached an amp meter in the power line, connected between the PS and the ring core. It appeared to measure the current normally, which varied from about 20 mA to 60 mA. I haven't written anything down on the current measurements, but it appeared the current would be less, the higher the oscillation frequency and it appeared also to become less, once the coil was loaded with a TL tube.

Once again, no hard numbers, but to me more and more pieces of the puzzle drop into place when I analyse various systems using these theories.

So, I may not be there yet, and I may still miss some important pieces of the puzzle, but one day I will get the the puzzle complete. And that will be the day 'Goldfinder' will obtain his answers in public on the internet.

[conradphd]

Quantitative information is hard to get by, but Naudin's simulation of LMD/TEM waves shows OU in the transmission line:
The L.M.D./T.E.M.Test

As far as I can tell, the essential difference between more or less standard exciters and the SEC exciter is the wide spectrum generated by the SEC exciter, which causes the coils to resonate at multiple higher harmonics at the same time. And that occurs because the transistor is basically either "open" or "closed", which appears to be similar to what a spark gap does.

Furthermore, Prof. Turtur showed, IMHO without a shadow of a doubt, that there is energy in the electric field and that this energy originates somehow from the active vacuum, because otherwise charged particles should be loosing mass, because they emit energy in the shape of an electric field and a magnetic field as well:
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/turtur1e.pdf

His basic analysis consists of nothing more then a volume integration of the electric field by Coulombs law, spreading at a constant speed c. So, IMHO, it is very hard to argue the fact that the electric field emitted by each and every charge carrier in the Universe contains energy. Energy which is free for the taking.

So, when you create a dipole, you have created an energy source, which pours out energy in the shape of an electric field, as long as the dipole stays where it is. Bearden explained how this works and also that normal, closed loop circuits use half of the energy supplied by the dipole to kill this dipole, this energy source. So, all you need to to in order to get more energy out of the dipole is find a way to do that without killing it.

IMHO, using standing waves (resonance) of higher harmonics is one of the ways to do that, because within a coil resonating at a higher harmonic, you have multiple dipoles pouring out electric energy, while you have to drive only one of them yourself, because the current you have to put in (which kills your source dipole costing you energy) to drive it, you only put in at the terminals and not to the other dipoles in the coil. To me, that explains why my exciter drew less current when I used higher harmonics:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post65723
http://www.energeticforum.com/65723-post1045.html



Once again, no hard numbers, but to me more and more pieces of the puzzle drop into place when I analyse various systems using these theories.

So, I may not be there yet, and I may still miss some important pieces of the puzzle, but one day I will get the the puzzle complete. And that will be the day 'Goldfinder' will obtain his answers in public on the internet.

So, IMHO, it is very hard to argue the fact that the electric field emitted by each and every charge carrier in the Universe contains energy. Energy which is free for the taking.

I can only assume this statement was not meant as it is stated and I will wait for my retort until you reread it. The statement in its present context would be a dire condition for the universe.

Conrad

[lamare]

So, IMHO, it is very hard to argue the fact that the electric field emitted by each and every charge carrier in the Universe contains energy. Energy which is free for the taking.

I can only assume this statement was not meant as it is stated and I will wait for my retort until you reread it. The statement in its present context would be a dire condition for the universe.

Conrad

I have re-read it, and I don't spot any error. Let me point you to Prof. Turtur's conclusions, as I quoted him in my article over at Pes, cause that's what I meant to repeat in one sentence:

Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

If electrostatic fields propagate with the speed of light, they transport energy, because they have a certain energy density. It should be possible to trace this transport of energy if is really existing. That this is really the case can be seen even with a simple example regarding a point charge, as will be done on the following pages. When we trace this energy, we come to situation, which looks paradox at the very first glance, but the paradox can be dissolved, introducing a circulation of energy. This is also demonstrated on the following pages.

The first aspect of the mentioned paradox regards the emission of energy at all. If a point charge (for instance an elementary charge) exists since a given moment in time, it emits electric field and field’s energy from the time of its birth without any alteration of its mass. The volume of the space filled with this field increases permanently during time and with it the total energy of the field. But from where does this “new energy” originate? For the charged particle does not alter its mass (and thus its energy), the “new energy” can not originate from the particle itself. This means: The charged particle has to be permanently supplied with energy from somewhere. The situation is also possible for particles, which are in contact with nothing else but only with the vacuum. The consequence is obvious: The particle can be supplied with energy only from the vacuum. This sounds paradox, so it can be regarded as the first aspect of the mentioned paradox. But it is logically consequent, and so we will have to solve it later.

[...]

Important is the conclusion, which can be found with logical consequence:
On the one hand the vacuum (= the space) permanently supplies the charge with energy (first paradox aspect), which the charge (as the field source) converts into field energy and emits it in the shape of a field. On the other hand the vacuum (= the space) permanently takes energy away from the propagating field, this means, that space gets back its energy from field during the propagation of the field. This indicates that there should be some energy inside the “empty” space, which we now can understand as a part of the vacuum-energy. In section 3, we will understand this energy more detailed.

But even now, we can come to the statement:
During time, the field of every electric charge (field source) increases. Nevertheless the space (in the present work the expressions “space” and “vacuum” are use as synonyms) causes a permanent circulation of energy, supplying charges with energy and taking back this energy during the propagation of the fields. This is the circulation of energy, which gave the title for present section 2.2.

This leads us to a new aspect of vacuum-energy:
The circulating energy (of the electric field) is at least a part of the vacuum-energy. We found its existence and its conversion as well as its flow. On the basis of this understanding it should be possible to extract at least a part of this circulating energy from the vacuum – in section 4 a description is given of a possible method how to extract such energy from the vacuum.

This piece by Turtur is nothing less then a rock-solid theoretical foundation of where free energy is to be found: in the electric field emitted by each and every charge carrier in the Universe. And this is no violation of any law of conservation of energy, because the charge converts the energy it emits from some other form of energy, known by various names as ZPE, virtual paricle flux, dirac sea, etc.

[sebosfato]

To all you would be OUO researchers:
Mass is aether trapped in a vortex. See - Besant and Leadbetter, Lucas and Bergman, Global Scaling, Stowe, and others. The only truly stable particles are the electron and the proton. The next most stable particle is the neutron which decays in seconds to an electron and proton. The neutron is obviously a proton and electron pressured together within the nucleus. The rest of the particle soup are just transitory decays of the initial stable particles.

Electric fields are stresses in the field, Gravity is GRAD E, and magnetic fields are vortexes in the aether. EM energy are synchronous moving electric and magnetic fields.

The proton and electron are resonant structures and tuned into the standing scalar waves as well as an infinitude of others. See Global Scaling. These structures of mass are already sustained and supported by the gravitational/scalar standing waves that run the universe. They are tapping the aether directly.

Stifflers exciter is creating a disturbance in the aether and then taps this disturbance. So how does the tap work?

After playing with the exciter and plowing through the tons of videos and associated work there is a great scarcity of anything other more variation of these circuits and no real discussion on HOW they are tapping the ZPE/aether/whatever.

It looks to me in my limited background that the AV plug is really where the secret lies. The other thing is the transistor itself which seems to be limited to certain special ones. So what is common to AV plugs and transistors besides wire and containers - answer - semiconductor material...

It reminds me when I was at Lockheed back in the 1960s. One of techs I who worked in the semi lab said they had been testing a transistor that put out energy with no inputs and it had gotten classified TS very quickly. He wouldn't discuss it further.

When I met Dr. T. Henry Moray back on the early 1960s he showed me the progression of his radiant energy discoveries and how he went from giant Tesla towers outside his lab to a box that would fit into the trunk of a car to tap the aetheric forces that put out 100 KW. However, he stated that his greatest discovery was the use of semi conductor material. He was actually the first inventor to build a transistor and the device was stolen by Bell Labs.

Space has this seething energy blazing through it. Various estimates go as high as 100 KW per cubic centimeter. The Dr. Stiffler exciters and other similar circuits tickle this standing wave field creating a disturbance in the aether and then trap the disturbance. Why not tap the seething field of energy directly? If the Lockheed free energy transistor and Dr. Moray's cryptic statement have some weight it looks to me the way to go. Not being a semiconductor expert (yes I have a number of the college courses on the material) maybe there is someone out there in lala land that could contribute.

So if anyone else wants to contribute to this thread - lets have it !

Goldfinder
BTW mass particles, the whole of the periodic table are resonant structures in the aether.

Hello

Thats because semiconductors can block an electric field of contrary polarity. Thus it can be used to only allow electric field in one direction while blocking it to reverse. Than it can be used to block electrons. Tesla discovered this in 1890 already using electrolytic condensers. However today we have semiconductors witch withstand many kWh witch are very small. When you see a tesla capacitor it is not aways a capacitor. Yes thats what i'm saying. Thats why no one was able to unlock the secret. It has to do with the principle i posted in my thread. Read think about and you can understand.

[quantumuppercut]

Two years ago I found an NPN transistor from a really old TV. It can stop current better than anything I found in radio shack these days. It puzzles me quite a bit. Transistor quality go down with time?