Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suppression document and YouTube

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The guy at M.I.T. who did the successful demonstration of LANL/LENR on Jan. 31 2011 (along with Dr. Mitchell Swartz)... Professor Peter L. Hagelstein

    Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT

    Below, this is the guy who was seen in the famous Sixty Minutes program segment "Cold Fusion is Hot Again"... Dr. Robert Duncan Vice Chancellor for Research at University of Missouri.

    University of Missouri | Office of Research | Vice Chancellor for Research

    I want to thank these people for their courage and integrity. In Dr. Duncan's case, he was with the large majority of the scientific world in condemning LENR in the past. He admitted he was wrong, then promoted the science..

    And both these men have put their careers on the line.

    This just in: It is reported that just within the last 3 days, a billionaire has pledged $5.5 million to M.U. specifically for LANL/LENR research... undoubtedly as a direct result of Dr. Duncan's public calling for more research.

    The times they are a changin'. Let's hope they don't take too long.

    Comment


    • Our 3 year experiment on Facebook for grass roots activism in alternative energy was doing OK (and the "Photos" area serves as a record and testament to dozens of ignored and suppressed technologies), until FB re-set the "Groups"... and overnight we went from about 5,000 members to 8

      So if you were a Member of "The Free Energy Facebook Group", you will need to re-join it to get the feeds.

      https://www.facebook.com/groups/55551307954/

      Unfortunately our "Discussion" area is gone, and some good polite debates with skeptics and information was lost there. But the rest is intact.

      It is certainly not ideal, it is essentially all they will allow us to have there (and there are constant "shenanigans" going on with it). But it does exist, and it has opened some minds to different possibilities regarding energy

      Comment


      • Lol, this one is actually kinda funny.

        Japanese researchers invent gun that silences speech | The Extinction Protocol: 2012 and beyond

        A gun that blocks "unwanted" public speech.

        Here's the challenge: This looks at first, to be fairly easy to counter. After all noise cancellation technology is 30 years old now and well understood. It should be possible to invent and Open Source a counter for it.

        Actually it is probably easy enough to ignore, it relies on one little quirk of the mind. Carrying sound protection (like used at a firing range) around with you is one method i guess, and training yourself, sort of like a harmony singer, to ignore tones and not follow, should be another.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ashtweth View Post
          Thanks man Craig makes great Vids. Please check this Jib,
          Patent Office
          Refresh

          ALL info plus a method to begin class action and mandates is posted there with new info. Any thing needed there let me know guys

          Ash
          Hi Asweth,

          would like to introduce myself:
          My name is Navneet and i have been an active Researcher in the Radiant Electricity area. i have replicated Stan Meyer's WFC (Both Water Fuel Cell and Spark-Plug replacement(Injector) , E.V Gray effect , Bedini
          Patents ect. will post some of my Replication photos soon would like to be a faculty in your BOCAF unversity.
          more later,
          bye for now,
          Best Regards,
          Navneet.

          Comment


          • I recommend you go to Panacea and use their contact page there. He may see this but there's no telling.

            _______________________________________

            Remember those amazing videos that Howard Johnson and the professor at Virginia Tech (Dr. Gerhard Beyer) did together called "Discovering Magnetism" Magnetic Gates"? There were 2 ten minute parts to it, and it showed their magnetic 3-D mapping project. Well, i noticed yesterday that they had been removed on YouTube.

            Luckily i had them saved so i put them up at our Free Energy Facebook Group.

            https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=2762523064881

            https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=2762574546168

            Comment


            • HI Navneet/Jib and ALL

              Thank you my friend and thanks Jib.Been VERY busy guys, will be for the next 5 months doing R and D for all, the newsletter is due out this month, we had to relocate and more fun things.

              Jib, thanks for the new facebook dont underestimate it, check out Avaaz what they did, look at this
              Avaaz - Highlights

              YEP...Imagine as many signatures as they have in FREE energy or our facebook page, ever seen what they did?Look at that ****e man, they have done more than the UN!

              Avaaz empowers millions of people from all walks of life to take action on pressing global, regional and national issues, from corruption and poverty to conflict and climate change. Our model of internet organising allows thousands of individual efforts, however small, to be rapidly combined into a powerful collective force. (Read about results on the Highlights page.)

              The Avaaz community campaigns in 15 languages, served by a core team on 6 continents and thousands of volunteers. We take action -- signing petitions, funding media campaigns and direct actions, emailing, calling and lobbying governments, and organizing "offline" protests and events -- to ensure that the views and values of the world's people inform the decisions that affect us all.


              WE NEED TO GET THE FREE ENERGY FACE BOOK THEMES INTO AVAAZ MODE.OR THEM INCLUDING OURS? Jib whatta think? Ill plug the new facebook bro, please send to Andrew if you can will post it in the newsletter.

              Just check their accomplishments please to see what i am saying.
              Still her but really busy guys.

              Ash

              Comment


              • Guys, i just had to add, you know that Avaaz through mere internet signatures, has made government(s) enact new laws that they requested even the UN?
                The latest one is in India

                anti-corruption law, drafted by civil society not politicians.
                SEE MY POINT NOW? Any volunteers that want to help the merge into Avaaz with ideas or help structure the activism pages please contact us,


                Ash

                EDIT BTW
                THE AVAAZ MOVEMENT:
                13,658,326
                members worldwide
                Last edited by ashtweth; 03-13-2012, 04:10 AM.

                Comment


                • I like it, a lot, thanks m8. Yes we can lobby them to add alternative energy to their list of causes.

                  Comment


                  • Very nice thread!!

                    by the way.. Wiki Leaks, is a fake. why?

                    1- it appears in the news

                    2- the information that reveals, are very small things (you are not going to see 9/11 truth in wikileaks)

                    3- the guy that leaked more info to wikileaks, was an option for nomination for the peace nobel price. (in the news!!)

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by alvarohn View Post
                      Very nice thread!!

                      by the way.. Wiki Leaks, is a fake. why?

                      Wikileaks is may a controverse Issue, and its may never clear, whom it did help.
                      But they leaked Inforamtions about 9/11, there was a Cable about some Servers what did shut down, when they did and with what Error Messages. They also said, they did not leak any Informations yet and did keep some back.
                      I did also see, that the Mediaguys tried its best, to let it looks like, its all is no surprising at all and they have Wikileaks on her Side. Some Papers did fight about the exclusive rights. A good Way too, to dont leak anything, or leak it at 'your' Time, what you dont want to see from the Informations.

                      At the other Side, figure, you are the Guy, what has a lot explosive Material on his Hand, what would you release from it, even, when you do not have a perspective on a reward from what you do, and when you release to much importend information, you can face a 'deadly Accident'.
                      After all, you see what did happen to Assange, now he got a lawsuit for Raping, where you see that it is more or less bogus, even the History from the Process is actually very suspicious. And if he would enter the US, i am sure, that he wont be hailed as a national Hero
                      Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                      Comment


                      • When considering if something is "dis-info" or not, the main consideration should be this:

                        What is the damage it does to the prestige and credibility of the status quo?

                        In this, so far Wikileaks has done a lot to damage the credibility of the US (especially the "state department"; the "foreign office" of the US that appears to never actually succeed in Diplomacy... and only seems to know the use of force as a solution).

                        The Bradley Manning information was very damaging. In case anyone forgot what that was about, here is an excellent video on it (best i've seen so far). Viewer discretion is advised, the event in Iraq that showed war crimes by US helicopter gunners, is a horror. And make no mistake: Deliberately targeting wounded and those trying to help them, IS a war crime.

                        Why so damaging? Among other things, it showed what the US has tried very hard to keep from us... the true face and horror of war. We never see these things in the mainstream media. It is ironic, that war reporting was a lot more widespread, and honest, back in World War Two. Now, we are not even allowed to see the coffins of dead Servicemen and women on TV ... because we might take a moment to wonder what the hell we are doing there.

                        Bradley Manning Heads for Trial; No One Charged for Murdered Civilians - YouTube

                        Comment


                        • HOW COULD AT&T HAVE CREATED THE TRANSISTOR SO QUICKLY IN 1947 WITHOUT THE INPUT OF ALIEN TECHNOLOGY?

                          Lecture given by Jack Shulman, President of the American Computer Company, to The Global Sciences Congress, Florida, 1999.


                          Hi, I'm Jack Shulman. I'm the head of the American Computer Company. American Computer Company is part of the Technology International Group and Bell North America group of companies. I'm also one of the owners of the group of companies. I've been in the computer industry for about 28 or 29 years. I've worked for IBM as a professional services management consultant. I worked on the development of the personal computer in 1978 for FIT (Fashion Institute of Technology) and Simplicity Patterns, later adopted by IBM. I developed something called the "pattern creator". That's where we got the term "PC". Prior to that, I'd developed what you might call the first windowing operating system in 1975 for Citibank, and before that there were earlier versions I did for a company called Vydec. I'm a serious computer person - very, very serious - and also someone who's not generally inclined to leap to great predispositions about any unusual subject.

                          Well, as it turns out, a few years ago I got my dose of reality. It was in the form of a visit from a friend of mine. When I was very young I'd got involved in technology, partly by virtue of the influence of a friend's father. I grew up in central New Jersey, which is around where AT&T and Bell Labs originated, and my friend's father was the head of Bell Labs. I ended up at a private school and ended up living at the household of the head of Bell Labs, going to that private school and going to college with his son as a roommate, and I kind of grew up around the various projects at Bell Laboratories in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

                          I'd always held out that AT&T was this rather magnificent institution. Anybody here worked for AT&T in the past? So, you know when I say Bell Labs research, I'm speaking Holy Grail; and in certain parts of the defence community and in government I'm also speaking Holy Grail. Anyone here realise that AT&T and Bell Laboratories ran our nuclear arsenal for 45 years? Anybody who knows that, raise your hand. Not a one of you. I didn't really even know until a little bit later in my career, but I knew something strange was going on because it always seemed to me that AT&T always had what it needed to make innovations in technology, and subsequently such technology would migrate to an IBM or a Sarnoff Research or to an RCA.

                          And I could never really figure out, in the course of my young life, who were these magnificent, incredible scientists, other than that I frequently met them...like a fellow by the name of William Shockley. He was quite a frequent friend to Jack Morton's household, and I knew him, and I knew some of the other folks that he knew, like a fellow by the name of - well, I guess not too many people would know him - Bob Noyce, and Jack Kilby who was an acquaintance of theirs, and so forth. These names, if you've ever worked for AT&T or in the electronics industry, are also Holy Grail names. These are Mount Rushmores of the technology industry. Jack Kilby is credited with the invention of the integrated circuit.

                          I was rather shocked when, about late 1995, a dear friend came to me. He was at one time one of the very well known generals in the Pentagon, a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and is now a consultant. I'd known him a very long time through the Morton family and Bell and when working for IBM. He asked me to analyse some documents that he had in his possession. He showed me some pictures. I kind of turned up my nose. I said, "I don't believe this." He suggested they were pictures of an alien craft. I said to him, "Well, why do you come to me and ask me this?" "Because there are some documents that fell into my possession that I would also like you to see, that go beyond these drawings, these pictures, these photographs, that describe some technology; and I would like you to analyse this technology and make a determination for me of the veracity of these documents, help me to authenticate them." I said, "Fine. I don't believe this is real. I'm skeptical. I don't believe in aliens, I don't believe in UFOs, I don't believe in any of that." And he said, "Okay, well, I'd still want you to take a look at them, Jack." And I agreed.
                          The rest of the story...

                          Comment


                          • Not sure why you posted that in this thread, but whatever.

                            Many believe that T. Henry Moray had the first germanium diodes, in the 1930's. I do know that Shockley and his team spent enough time working on semiconductors... they just didn't come out of "nowhere" one day. As for the laser, the power of harnessing photons is easy enough to deduce (Jules Verne wrote about it), and people theorized about the properties of coherent light a long time before a device was built.
                            _________________________


                            By my count, this is the 3rd announcement of solar PV ready for manufacture greater than 20% Efficiency that we have seen this year (and although we heard about it from universities and other labs for decades now, they were always prototypes or proposed systems, only this year are we seeing it realized).

                            So it would appear the speculated "20% efficient" limit for suppression of solar PV would be over (lol or a new limit set). If this is so, it it probably because of the dissemination of the thread topic information here by many of us across the web. They can only get away with this stuff in the dark; and suppressing solar is just too "over the top", to obvious, to plausibly explain or defend.

                            Suntech Power Sets Records in PV Efficiency and Performance | Solar Feeds

                            And if some think it is absurd to claim they suppressed solar PV, i would mention that all one needs to do, is look at how the media and politicians focuses on one small solar manufacturer, who's stock was deliberately manipulated into failure (and who received loans less than 1% the money that goes to oil and coal corps in free corporate welfare every year), and how that is used as an excuse to ignore and discard ALL alternative energy. Now THAT is really absurd, lol.... but it is exactly what we see being tried.

                            They are running scared: Germany produces 17 gigawatts from solar PV, nearly all of it decentralized.. from homeowners and small business. And Germany spent less to do this in incentives, than we gave corps who are the most profitable in history, and that pay very little in tax. The amount of solar PV in this country doubled in 2011 .

                            Comment


                            • 80-90% efficient solar panels

                              Steve,

                              This is supposed to be 80-90% efficient.

                              Alvin Marks - Lepcon& Lumeloid -- 90% efficient solar-electric power conversion -- articeles & patents

                              I have a friend that was a Berkley physicist that knew Alvin Marks and said this was real. If true, I'm sure it could be produced for even less than what they anticipated back then. At that time they quoted 4 cents per kwh from this technology.
                              Sincerely,
                              Aaron Murakami

                              Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                              Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                              RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                              Comment


                              • Lumeloid

                                I never checked until now but just found this:
                                Solar Energy Company - Polar-solar.com

                                All based on Alvin Mark's work. Not sure what they're looking for or what it would take to make this technology available. 80-90% efficient solar panels that are cheap to produce is extremely disruptive.
                                Sincerely,
                                Aaron Murakami

                                Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                                Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                                RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X