Captret Destroys Capacitors

[DrStiffler]

Here is a test if anyone is serious about putting all doubt about the Captret to rest.

FACT: Normally during operation, the commercial EC cathod and Case are at the same potential coupled by the cap electrolyte. Which means they are not isolated or open as one often think.

Now the test:

1- Build a homemade EC and make sure the electrolyte is not in contact with the Can. Use some insolator to isolate them from within.

2- Build a captret using your newly built homemade Cap.

3- Conclusion all captret effects would have disapeared. If you observe any "captret effect", then Captret has done the impossible.

Miki Out.

@miki02131

Hey if you have nothing intelligent to say stay off of this thread and play in your own 'pointless' thread.

It take no intelligence to be impressed by no intelligence.

[Inquorate]

@Jbignes5
Okay I guess it's time that we bring out all the 'Truth' here. For some reason, either because no one has cared to look or they flat out will not admit it, but, I published a link to my work in late 2008 and early 2009 on this method of utilizing capacitors.

ESEG - Exciter Stimulated Energy Generation

(granted a stupid name because you don't generate energy)

The short of it is I and a number of associates, many that post on this forum, have hundreds of hours devoted to this exploration. I can categorically state you folks have not even scratched the surface and have no real idea of where to go with it.

Now I will say we are able to substantiate by load testing that we did indeed get some worthwhile results, but not the Captret way, low and behold it might require a special EXCITER configuration.

You see I feel that if someone points you to the fact that just (maybe?) you came up with the same idea as what has been explored and documented by someone else, that at the very least you could admit that. God you all jump to tell me that I am only doing what Tesla did (hi folks).

Well this in a nut shell explains why I no longer share real progress here, why should anyone, who really listens and cares a tinker anyway? It's all about getting hits and a following is it not?, vanity, fame or build some internet credential to woo the troops?

to crowd: "you are all individuals!"
crowd: "yes, we are all individuals!"

aah, i've missed this place..

"follow the gourd!"
"no, follow the sandal!"

*chuckles*

ps even if the captret works, what is it's utility? What does it do? It's neither here nor there, imo.

[miki02131]

@Stiffler,

First of all this is not your thread. You didn't start it last time I checked. Secondly, as if the crackpot ideas you're spreading are not proof enough you were never and will never be intelligent. My points are only pointless only to idiots like you.

Miki Out.

[dragon]

It seems to me we are all focused on a single goal - energy. All in different directions. Personally I came here to learn anything and everything I can. I realize that finding the "holy grail" of energy devices on a public forum is a shot in the dark but there are a lot of knowledgeable people here that we can all learn from if they are willing to share or at least point us in the right direction.

I highly doubt the "Captret" is this device... it won't heat my house, provide electric or power my car. To dwell on it - argue over it seems a very huge waste of time. Gaining a volt over a 24 hour period ( or not ) doesn't relate to a useful device.

With the impending inflation soon before us where food and energy ( intricately integrated ) will be growing to an outrageous cost, it would seem we could spend our time on things that would have a real impact.
________
LadiDi

[ibpointless2]

Why so serious?

[miki02131]

@Aaron or any moderator,

Who gives the right to that filthy con artist by the name of Stiffler to disrespect everyone posting on these forums? Please, do me a favor and ask the con man not to address my posts anymore. He will never be able to set foot where I have been. He will never be able to come close to where I am right now. Ask the snake oil salesman to stay away from my posts. He is not my type and will never be. Therefore, I don't want hear his tirade anymore.

Maybe the crackpot craps he is selling people on the internet is not paying off? This might explain why he is turning to attacking other people anytime he gets a chance.

Miki Out.

[CosmicFarmer]

Wah Wah Wah Wahhh.
Bunch of BABIES.
This is an attack thread, plain and simple. It has been derailed by agent provocateurs and egos.

If you care to watch my captret video which shows captrets that have been used for about a half a week without damage, click here YouTube - The Captret

And please quit screaming for daddy. The admin is not going to tell other people who to address or is going to designate anyone as security officer. Jeez, I've seen children with more maturity then the posters in this forum.

[Jbignes5]

I am guessing here.

I don't rightly know why this was started but I too am very concerned that we who actually do research and experiments are being told that it will destroy the capacitor or short out and destroy the battery.

The facts are this: The Batteries that are being used are "Dead" Batteries. The caps were mostly reused or recycled from dead equipment. The experiment was designed to look into a very specific effect that resonates with my current Theories and my research. The effects were of a capacitor being able to apply a signal to the load and the battery at the same time. I now believe this is a resonant effect between the device battery and load. This allows for a condition where it changes the operation of the devices we are using. Resistors now operate as a pressure valve instead of a converter into heat. The Electrolytic cap becomes the container of potential. My newest experiment has duplicated the effect with multiple kinds of caps and multiple values of caps and retains the effect we are seeing without using the caps in a non correct way. I again state that I have corrected the failure of the caps by simulating the process with multiple caps of different designs. I have addressed the issue of danger and hence fixed the issue of this thread!

Can we please focus on the experiment at hand and stop all this bs. We have tons to learn from this experiment and we need all the bright minds on this forum to focus on the experiment that want to help out with this.

If you are like the opponents or the Author of this thread then please be advised that the issue was fixed and the "captret" Experiment has moved on to explore new avenues. I would appreciate that the Author of this thread take this thread and request to the admin to delete the thread because it does nothing to further this community to focus on the issue at hand. It was only meant to discredit the experiment as being rubbish and not worth looking into before they had or knew the intentions of the original authors request for help in figuring out this effect he had saw. The "Captret" of the first configuration was only to investigate the effects that were being reported and we knew full well that we were not using the Electrolytic in the correct fashion but now that it is I respectfully ask that this thread be removed because it shows only the bad aspect of this community and not the good.

Somehow a Good man and his helper has degraded his good standing with this community for unknown intentions. He has tarnished all the good work by being vindictive and self absorbed. He attacks others based on credentials and then assumes that credentials are what makes a good idea. If that was the case then a lot of good inventions or even discoveries would be lost if we ignored them based on those credentials of the originator.

Although this effect was investigated on the capacitor it was not investigated fully. Obviously anyone can see that the accuser missed aspects of this device and pushed it to the side as being non essential to investigate fully. He missed the opportunity and someone picked up on that opportunity when it presented itself again. It is the credo of this forum to replicate and look deeper into subjects that might not have been fully investigated. That is why this forum is so full of posts. We encourage others to educate themselves and then when they do this happens.

This will be my last post in this thread. I have more then enough on my plate then to listen to the ramblings of a person who thinks they know it all just because they have a piece of paper stating they know it all. I have my paper also but I do not throw it around like it was the end all of knowledge. In my case I changed my focus and went in the direction of computer Technician. I did forget a lot of fundamental keys to the "electronics" Tech aspect of my education but in my new career I found a new aspect of looking at problems. Dealing with tough computer problems honed my skills to better approach problems when I started to look into the electronics aspect of my research I am doing now.

When I am wrong I am very apt to say so. I hope the author and mentor of that author would return the same.

Good luck,
Jbignes5

[nilrehob]

to crowd: "you are all individuals!"
crowd: "yes, we are all individuals!"

aah, i've missed this place..

"follow the gourd!"
"no, follow the sandal!"

BTW, Inquorate, where are the pictures of Your circuits?
The links doesn't seem work anymore, do they?

/Hob

[conradphd]

Good Paper from Princeton U.

For the people that can do the simple math, here is a paper from Princeton that can be applied to seeing nothing new in the Captret thing.

Pretty much allows a full view that nothing exists here.

http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mc...es/twocaps.pdf