Electricity's Watson Machine

[John_K]

Dear Aaron,
I have been working non stop for 36 hours on my REAL WATSON MACHINE.

The only material I did not have was soft iron laminate, I salvages large transformers and obtain enough material to continue my experiment.

It may be too early to claim victory, but with my own eyes, I have seen Excess Energy. I have a lot of sketch, pics to illustrate but my writing is terrible, most can not read it.

I am simply asking for someone to help me illustrate my findings so that others may replicate and see for themselves.

If you hadn't shot your credibility to pieces already, people might be taking you more seriously and be more willing to help you.

I'm sure you posted that you had already solved the Watson machine. The way I understand it, is you are back-pedaling and scrambling to get a working machine. The way I see there are only 2 people that have figured out the Watson machine - James Watson and the inventor, John Bedini.

One of them demonstrated it last weekend.

The "schematic" you posted is of a G-field that won't work the way you posted it. Although, I'd be more than happy to eat crow - medium rare please.

Do yourself a favour and cut the BS. We ain't that stupid...


John K.

[miki02131]

It may be too early to claim victory, but with my own eyes, I have seen Excess Energy. I have a lot of sketch, pics to illustrate but my writing is terrible, most can not read it.

I am simply asking for someone to help me illustrate my findings so that others may replicate and see for themselves.

I might be able to help you out. However, unlike you I think neither the Watson machine nor any other machine is the answer to what you're looking for. The answer is and has always been in the "SOURCE".

I also think you shouldn't keep forcing Bedini or any other inventor for an answer they may not have. The answer is and has always been in the clarity and understanding of the SOURCE.

Bedini may not have the answer as Zero-point and Vacuum Sources are pipe-dreams but he gives you something important to carry on. He shows you how to build simple motors, chargers, and generators. These alone will not give you what you're looking for. What you're looking for is in the Source.

With the knowledge you've just acquired, here is best approach, taking into account our means and resources, to get off the grid right way:

1- Choose the two two sources that are currently available to all: Sun and Win.

2- Use and adapt your knowledge at building generators and chargers to take advantage of the above sources.

3- Build two 3KW win generators.

4- Assemble 1KW of cheap Solar cells.

5- Used batteries or other means to store the energy.

6- Enjoy and help others build their own real free energy system.

Miki Out.

[John_Bedini]

The Watson Answer

Electricity,
The mystery is none as it is right in front of you. I will give it to you again.

The machine requires one DC motor, 555 timer circuit for pulses to chop the DC motor, one mono pole energizer and one large mass weight wheel. the two signals are out of phase from each other. and a capacitor tuned to the energizer. That is the mystery. other then that some simple wiring, you wont do it on a small scale. As I said it is right in front of your eyes. It's the way you think about it.

On a big scale it's very easy to work on. simple logic the bigger the generator section is the slower you must turn it. since it is not a conventional generator you must store the charge before you discharge
the capacitors to the batteries. If the timing is right the batteries charge right up to full.

It's your own mind stopping you from success as your own mind understands what your intentions are, that is what is stopping you.
All your questions have been answered for years. Very easy to see that once the machine works we will never here of you again.

Why jump to the monster machine when the oldie watson is still a mystery?

[Mark]

Electricity,
The mystery is none as it is right in front of you. I will give it to you again.

The machine requires one DC motor, 555 timer circuit for pulses to chop the DC motor, one mono pole energizer and one large mass weight wheel. the two signals are out of phase from each other. and a capacitor tuned to the energizer. That is the mystery. other then that some simple wiring, you wont do it on a small scale. As I said it is right in front of your eyes. It's the way you think about it.

On a big scale it's very easy to work on. simple logic the bigger the generator section is the slower you must turn it. since it is not a conventional generator you must store the charge before you discharge
the capacitors to the batteries. If the timing is right the batteries charge right up to full.

It's your own mind stopping you from success as your own mind understands what your intentions are, that is what is stopping you.
All your questions have been answered for years. Very easy to see that once the machine works we will never here of you again.

Do you mean: take a regular SG and drive it with a motor. Use a 555 pulse circuit to split the input power to the motor and to power the SG. Then you have some decent torque and can add a bunch of generator coils. Use the output of the SG to charge one battery bank and the output from the generator coils with a dump circuit to charge the input battery.

Or are you saying to build an SG and use a 555 circuit to to dump the stored energy back to the front, like in your FEG book? Just build it on a bigger scale? Please be more specific so even a simpleton like me can understand.

Thanks, Mark

[John_Bedini]

Answer to Watson Machine

Electricity,
Here is the problem, Your mixing up oranges and apples here.
Your all over the board. I can say that your not focused on one project. Greg Watson is no further along on any of this, just the same thing over and over, let's see make it charge up batteries with it. Post it on YouTube working. It makes no difference what Jean has reported here, not practical for home generation, just a toy.
John B

[John_Bedini]

The Answer to the Watson Machine

Mark,
The Monopole is already broken into pulses, so why do you need the timer, you do not.

I said it's the size to do what you want. The big coils the mass weight and collecting the energy in the capacitor that is it.
John B

Do you mean: take a regular SG and drive it with a motor. Use a 555 pulse circuit to split the input power to the motor and to power the SG. Then you have some decent torque and can add a bunch of generator coils. Use the output of the SG to charge one battery bank and the output from the generator coils with a dump circuit to charge the input battery.

Or are you saying to build an SG and use a 555 circuit to to dump the stored energy back to the front, like in your FEG book? Just build it on a bigger scale? Please be more specific so even a simpleton like me can understand.

Thanks, Mark

[Mark]

Mark,
The Monopole is already broken into pulses, so why do you need the timer, you do not.

I said it's the size to do what you want. The big coils the mass weight and collecting the energy in the capacitor that is it.
John B

So I just need to use a smaller 7ah battery with the older 3 pole kit I bought from Rick then. The gear kit was not available yet when I purchased the kit so I'll purchase that also. Will I need to use generator coils also or just store and dump the output from the SG? Is using a reed switch with magnet on the gear the easiest way to back charge the input battery?

Thanks John
Mark

[thedude]

Was being sarcastic. :P

TheDude was right this is an interesting thread.

Just to be clear, as i'm sure you understood Aussie, I'd hoped to relay a sacastic sentiment in my first post. :P Not to be insulting to Electricity, but he has denigrated many threads on these forums with unfounded hype. He has been insulting to its members on several threads. He has threatened to use illegal and underhanded methods of distruption to affect these forums as well.

Besides, does Aaron really want to deal with DOS attack?, like you can lock down a forum, get real auto proxy floods is boring, then you guys can't reach this site.

Anyway, I'm just different. I don't have to be like u guys, heck thats hella boring.

Aaron might like to share his IP address in Hawaii so we can alert his ISP of possible issues we might encounter. Aaron please log it for future reference, I would be very interested in participating in providing counter measures.

Aside from the fact that John Bedini is posting here and others are discussiong the real device, this thread is of little significance to me at all. I was hoping that it would occupy Electricity enough to keep him from distrupting other discussions, but that doesn't seem to be the case. :P

Electricity and I have already had a couple of PMs and I bear him no ill will, so long as he does not affect the real work that we are all trying to do. He has recently PM'd me in search of info regarding this device as well. I let him get under my skin once, and now i will not allow that to happen again.

Don't let him distrupt us in any way.
Love and Light.

[Turion]

I'm so excited to see The Man posting here. John, when it comes to trying to follow your direction there are some of us, especially those who are beginners who, when you say "jump" will not even bother to say "how high?" We'll just jump and worry about how high later. I for one will do my very best to follow EVERY direction exactly. My monopole is built and running. My next step is to tune it and then connect the charging coil to something, lilacs capacitor. Will be ordering the timing wheel kit asap.

[wrtner]

Electricity,
The mystery is none as it is right in front of you.
The machine requires one DC motor...

For some reason, I wonder: Does it matter if the motor has brushes or
is brushless?

[Turion]

Gosh, it seems like WEEKS since Electricity, who said he had discovered the secret to the Watson Machine ALREADY and was going to post it right here on this very site dedicated to his amazing discovery.

Why are you keeping this from us? You yourself said how important it was that this information be shared with all mankind. Why are you keeping it so secret?

Wait...could it possibly be because you DON'T have the answer and are full of B*O*L*O*G*N*A????? Or maybe you are waiting for Peter's DVD to come out so you can claim what he has to say as your own. What a waste of our time.

[nenergy]

others are building

Gosh, it seems like WEEKS since Electricity, who said he had discovered the secret to the Watson Machine ALREADY and was going to post it right here on this very site dedicated to his amazing discovery.

Why are you keeping this from us? You yourself said how important it was that this information be shared with all mankind. Why are you keeping it so secret?

Wait...could it possibly be because you DON'T have the answer and are full of B*O*L*O*G*N*A????? Or maybe you are waiting for Peter's DVD to come out so you can claim what he has to say as your own. What a waste of our time.

found this post from Ted Ewert.

Hi Tyson,
That pulsed flywheel setup was used primarily to demonstrate the motor modification I used. I was exploring the effects claimed by Chas Campbell and Lawrence Tseung.
It was an interesting experiment but I didn't get as far along as I would have liked. I bought a cheap alternator to test the power output, which didn't work well at all. Then I started to research efficient generators, which took me down a whole new path. Suffice it to say that I never did make it back to finish that experiment.
I think a pulsed flywheel, while in resonance, can exhibit some very interesting properties. Perhaps this was one of the aspects of the Watson machine that contributed to it's alleged success.
I also built a Watson machine replica. It was the one in Bearden's book "Free Energy generation" which claims you'll have more energy than you know what to do with. What a bunch of hogwash that book is. Like the rest of his books, it's filled with convoluted doublespeak and doesn't reveal anything remotely useful to the serious energy researcher.
As usual, Bedini doesn't offer any theory as to how the Watson machine should work either, which is key to it's successful design and operation. Just putting the pieces together isn't enough, as many unsuccessful replications will attest to.
With what I know now, I would have a much better chance of getting the machine to work. There are more than a couple of subtle aspects that need to be paid close attention to: Motor type and voltage, generator impedance, flywheel resonance, timing, duty cycle and battery impedance are just a few of the variables. It would take a while to get all that stuff dialed in.
Anyway, Sorry I couldn't be of more help. Interesting stuff though.

Ted

[Jiffycoil]

What does Ted Ewert's work have to do with Electricity's claims?

[wrtner]

Originally Posted by Ted Ewert
Hi Tyson,
"That pulsed flywheel setup was used primarily to demonstrate the motor modification I used. I was exploring the effects claimed by Chas Campbell and Lawrence Tseung.
It was an interesting experiment but I didn't get as far along as I would have liked. I bought a cheap alternator to test the power output..."

Obviously, an alternator can be used for testing energy out but
don't forget that the Bedini/Watson concept does not use a traditional
alternator but rather what John Bedinin calls an "energiser".

[Turion]

No Electricity. Just a big fizzle.