Lockridge Device - Peter Lindemann

[FRC]

Yes

I had a brief conversation with Armagdn03 but only discussed the basic principals and not details. The coils he used showed no evidence of overunity as I expected but that is not needed for what I think it is doing. He is going to think about what I discussed with him and get back to me. We do need more information as to how to repeat his tests and I am sure he will let us know what we need to know in due time.

1 what is the primary number of turns ?
2 what is the size of the wire?
3 what is the secondary number of turns?
4 what is the size of the wire?
5 Is the secondary coil open circuit, shorted or in an LC circuit?
6 what is the number of turns on the third coil?
7 what is the size of the wire?
8 does placing a core in the coils have an effect?
9 etc etc...

Yes we need all these answers.

George

[mbrownn]

I had a brief conversation with Armagdn03 but only discussed the basic principals and not details. The coils he used showed no evidence of overunity as I expected but that is not needed for what I think it is doing. He is going to think about what I discussed with him and get back to me. We do need more information as to how to repeat his tests and I am sure he will let us know what we need to know in due time.

1 what is the primary number of turns ?
2 what is the size of the wire?
3 what is the secondary number of turns?
4 what is the size of the wire?
5 Is the secondary coil open circuit, shorted or in an LC circuit?
6 what is the number of turns on the third coil?
7 what is the size of the wire?
8 does placing a core in the coils have an effect?
9 etc etc...

[garrypm]

@all

Seeing as Armagdn03 has not been back to provide detail on the video, could
anyone give me a clue as to where to wire up the seconday (long Tesla) coil.

Also, how many layers do you think the 1st primary has?

Thanks, Garry

[mbrownn]

Could the way these Caps are connected explian how the Lockridge design utilises its capacitors
SELF CHARGING and ACCELERATING potential free energy motor generator - YouTube!

I don't think so but I am not being negative here.

First I am going to say that this device in the video is very interesting and appears to have the potential to be overunity although I am not saying that it is.

I think the Lockridge device worked in a different way using a resonant LC circuit of some type.

The principal of fast acting capacitors is a part of the Lockridge device and that is why it had a purpose built capacitor on it.

The principal of the stargate motor is making the motor hyper efficient by increasing the intensity of the magnetic field in the motor by the use of neo magnets placed on the outside. This could be relevant to the Lockridge device because we have a coil placed around the motor and this coil could be arranged it poles causing the same effect. This could also be the reason for the splits in the case, so this stargate motor should not be dismissed as a possible Lockridge type device.

Now lets have a look at the principal here. The motor torque is produced by the current passing through the coil and its force is limited by the gap between the rotor and stator and the intensity of the magnetic field as well as the efficiency losses. Now if we improve any of these parameters, we have a more efficient motor. I explained in a post on another thread how it is possible to produce an overunity motor using pulse width modulation once the true efficiency of the motor goes above 80% http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post177655

If this stargate motor is run on PWM at the right frequency and pulse duration I am sure he will be getting more interesting results.

[braden]

Could this explain the role of the Lockridge capacitors

Could the way these Caps are connected explian how the Lockridge design utilises its capacitors
SELF CHARGING and ACCELERATING potential free energy motor generator - YouTube!

[garrypm]

I am the creator of that video, if you have any questions go ahead and shoot!

May we please have some detail on the coils - diameter, length, # of turns, wire size.

I would welcome the chance to replicate this experiment.

What, if any, connections are made to the Tesla-like secondary ?

I note the second primary is 3 layers and the power supply/controller is the
signal generator. What voltage is the light bulb?

Many Thanks, Garry

[mbrownn]

I think its a coil. Take a look at aviso,s car I think his coil must be the same

[FRC]

Thanks mbrown and Armagdn03

Thanks mbrown for clarifying what Peter's intent was. And thank you Armagdn03
for your great video demonstrating that this does work. I was unclear about the
center shaft (or was it also a coil) that the two coils were wrapped around. Is it
not possible to place the resonant coil vertically over the top of a base coil. The
resonant coil would have to have a larger circumference, but I thought I saw this method being used elsewhere.

George

[mbrownn]

I haven't really studied the Lockridge device to have a solid understanding of it myself. I just proposed something that I thought might be of interest. I posed the question because there is an underlying theme to free energy that not all seem to be aware of yet. It was a question to get people thinking about where it might be happening in many of these devices being studied.

Dave

keep posing those questions, that is what makes us think to come up with an answer. I will have to study dollard more.

[Web000x]

I thought you gave us one possible explanation to your last question. I am glad that mbrown has brought a new invigoration to this thread with the resonance angle. Your previous post Web000x seemed to propose a probable confirmation of that view. The original Lockridge device was in fact utilizing resonance. Somehow this was missed or over looked and it took mbrown to bring it to our attention. Thanks again mbrown.

George

I haven't really studied the Lockridge device to have a solid understanding of it myself. I just proposed something that I thought might be of interest. I posed the question because there is an underlying theme to free energy that not all seem to be aware of yet. It was a question to get people thinking about where it might be happening in many of these devices being studied.

Dave

[mbrownn]

I am the creator of that video, if you have any questions go ahead and shoot!

Yes lots of questions first do you have skype?

[mbrownn]

Resonance seems to be the theme in a lot of the threads around here lately.
Peter Davey, Donald Smith, and here with mbrown's approach. I like Webooox's
observation about the original Lockridge device. Like JB noted a while back, what
was being done on this thread was much different than the original device was.
But if we can get the desired outcome it does not really matter how it is done as
long as it works.

George

Yes I agree but now I understand why Peter went this direction, its the ampere turns and eliminating BEMF. With a resonant circuit you get a gain in volts but you are current limited, without a means to convert that power into low voltage high current you are left with the problem that Peter was trying to solve. A normal transformer will rob the power from a resonant circuit but if this video I linked to is correct the solution is here.

Although the original device was star wound and used for the switching, the motor part was probably unmodified. We can get round this by putting an external commutator or a PWM circuit and use a standard motor.

My plan is to take a standard motor and externally switch it by some method but I could not see the way to make the high energy oscillations into low voltage high current without killing the oscillation. I was thinking that I would have to completely rewind a motor to make it run on low current but then I looked at this video fun with lcs - YouTube Is this the answer? Come on guys, give me your thoughts.

My gut told me it was the trifilar coil all along.

[Armagdn03]

For those that have been following my work on the Lockridge trifilar coil you will know that I believe it to be the device that allows an off the shelf motor to work in the circuit. This video shows exactly what I am looking for. It transfers high current at low volts from a coil that is oscillating in high frequency high voltage resonance without killing the oscillation. It is also interesting to note that the motors inductance does not have any effect on the circuit either.

I recommend you spend some time studying this for sure. fun with lcs - YouTube.

Is it the break through, I'm not sure, but it looks like it may be

I am the creator of that video, if you have any questions go ahead and shoot!

[mbrownn]

mbrownn,

I have an idea about the Lockridge device. It may be way off mark, but it is right in line with Eric Dollard, Steinmetz, and a Russian paper titled "Concerning the Excitation of Electrical Waves Through Parameter Changes" (translated).

The case of the Lockridge generator had two slits cut down the side. This effectively isolates the two section of the generator. As the magnetic field is rotating, the saturation of the iron of each section begins to happen at twice the frequency or harmonics thereof (depending on the number of poles). This saturation causes a change in reactance. Mr. Dollard seems to think that energy synthesis happens via parameter changes at harmonic frequencies.

Read Charles Steinmetz's book "Theory and Calculation of Alternating Current Phenomena" 1900 Edition, chapter XXI "Reaction Machines" for more info. Not all editions have this chapter so it must be 1900 ed.

Again, just something that I have been thinking about and wanted to share,

Dave

To be honest I don't know enough about Dollard to comment but If the motor does run on AC you are correct but I am not sure it does. An AC motor requires the lamination to reduce the eddy currents but in a DC motor it is less Iron losses. In an AC motor these losses could be halved by running on pulsed DC and reduced much more in a DC motor, that is one reason why I think the motor was DC or pulsed DC.

[FRC]

Web000x

P.S. Those references to Steinmetz, Dollard, and the Russian Paper that I gave are not mathematical speculation. All three sources have conclusions based off of experimentation. There seems to be a common theme to where the energy is coming from. Parameter variation at harmonics of the fundamental frequency... How is the Lockridge device exhibiting a harmonic parametric function?

I thought you gave us one possible explanation to your last question. I am glad that mbrown has brought a new invigoration to this thread with the resonance angle. Your previous post Web000x seemed to propose a probable confirmation of that view. The original Lockridge device was in fact utilizing resonance. Somehow this was missed or over looked and it took mbrown to bring it to our attention. Thanks again mbrown.

George