Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Peace Maker

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Peace Maker



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    Hi folks, I got this from OU from an individual called 'quantum goody'. It seems like it could work, only way to know is build it. Though it is different than Tom B. meg or parallel path in that it does not have the permanent magnet flux split between two paths that include the primary pulse drive coil in that path, which I think makes it unique. Here is a quote from quantum goody.
    The key to this device is that the permeability must be over 400, 600 or higher is even better and even more efficient.
    The input coil is DC pulsed on 50% or less duty cycle.
    The time the input coil is on you take the power out on coil 1 & 2.
    (One could not use coil 1 & 2 and instead just take the power back out of the input coil during flyback, but I chose to use coil 1 & 2 for input isolation reasons and avoid ground loop issue).
    Then when the input coil is off you take the power out on coil 3 & 4.
    The input coil field strength will need to be 25% to 100% of the magnet strength, depending on the coil design, more then 100% coil field strength matching level to magnet strength would make device less efficient, therefore the efficiency is a like bell curve.
    The # of coil turns will need to be related to the magnetic inductance equivalence (ie. the magnetic XL value related to the coil XL values to determine mutual inductance values and frequency and turn ratio).
    Another aspect to this device is that the output power can never be more then the magnet strength so there is a limit to the output power, if put in too little input power it will be less efficient and if put too much input power it will be less efficient. And the input coil field strength value worst case will be 100% of the magnetic strength and at best case around 25% of the magnetic strength depending on frequency and other factors. however through some calculating it appears the coil input field strength average is around 50% of the magnetic strength, but further testing is needed to see if that is correct or not. Even when the input coil field strength is 100% (equal) the magnet field strength it appears that the total output energy is still near 200% of the input energy.
    I hope I was able to explain it well enough to be generally understood.
    Thanks for your time and I hope someone can do something with it.
    Just maybe the answer was blowing in the wind all these decades...
    Peace and Love to All
    Let me know what you folks think of this design.
    peace love light
    Tyson

  • #2
    To all:

    No one care to give an opinion on this design? I'm curious to know what some of you more experienced experimenters would think.

    Here is a link to the post over at OU.
    Link: The Peace Maker

    Sincerely,
    truesearch

    Comment


    • #3
      I think it's a sure deal. At least it will be because even if it doesn't work then you'll still have yourself a nice piece of '60's art
      There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm not sure if the orientation of this is going to be significant but I heard something about the original peace sign was flipped upside down to what we use now(?)
        Keep your mind on the aether www.PathsToSucceed.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi future pather, yes i am aware of the peace symbol being the other way, probably meant to be arms in air at an angle.
          Though at the end of the day, all the hijacking of geometry and symbolism by the lower consciousness beings on or off or in between this world, matters not. What matters is ones intent.
          As far as this device, it shouldn't matter.
          peace love light
          Tyson

          Comment

          Working...
          X