Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Hi folks, I got this from OU from an individual called 'quantum goody'. It seems like it could work, only way to know is build it. Though it is different than Tom B. meg or parallel path in that it does not have the permanent magnet flux split between two paths that include the primary pulse drive coil in that path, which I think makes it unique. Here is a quote from quantum goody.
The key to this device is that the permeability must be over 400, 600 or higher is even better and even more efficient.
The input coil is DC pulsed on 50% or less duty cycle.
The time the input coil is on you take the power out on coil 1 & 2.
(One could not use coil 1 & 2 and instead just take the power back out of the input coil during flyback, but I chose to use coil 1 & 2 for input isolation reasons and avoid ground loop issue).
Then when the input coil is off you take the power out on coil 3 & 4.
The input coil field strength will need to be 25% to 100% of the magnet strength, depending on the coil design, more then 100% coil field strength matching level to magnet strength would make device less efficient, therefore the efficiency is a like bell curve.
The # of coil turns will need to be related to the magnetic inductance equivalence (ie. the magnetic XL value related to the coil XL values to determine mutual inductance values and frequency and turn ratio).
Another aspect to this device is that the output power can never be more then the magnet strength so there is a limit to the output power, if put in too little input power it will be less efficient and if put too much input power it will be less efficient. And the input coil field strength value worst case will be 100% of the magnetic strength and at best case around 25% of the magnetic strength depending on frequency and other factors. however through some calculating it appears the coil input field strength average is around 50% of the magnetic strength, but further testing is needed to see if that is correct or not. Even when the input coil field strength is 100% (equal) the magnet field strength it appears that the total output energy is still near 200% of the input energy.
I hope I was able to explain it well enough to be generally understood.
Thanks for your time and I hope someone can do something with it.
Just maybe the answer was blowing in the wind all these decades...
Peace and Love to All
The input coil is DC pulsed on 50% or less duty cycle.
The time the input coil is on you take the power out on coil 1 & 2.
(One could not use coil 1 & 2 and instead just take the power back out of the input coil during flyback, but I chose to use coil 1 & 2 for input isolation reasons and avoid ground loop issue).
Then when the input coil is off you take the power out on coil 3 & 4.
The input coil field strength will need to be 25% to 100% of the magnet strength, depending on the coil design, more then 100% coil field strength matching level to magnet strength would make device less efficient, therefore the efficiency is a like bell curve.
The # of coil turns will need to be related to the magnetic inductance equivalence (ie. the magnetic XL value related to the coil XL values to determine mutual inductance values and frequency and turn ratio).
Another aspect to this device is that the output power can never be more then the magnet strength so there is a limit to the output power, if put in too little input power it will be less efficient and if put too much input power it will be less efficient. And the input coil field strength value worst case will be 100% of the magnetic strength and at best case around 25% of the magnetic strength depending on frequency and other factors. however through some calculating it appears the coil input field strength average is around 50% of the magnetic strength, but further testing is needed to see if that is correct or not. Even when the input coil field strength is 100% (equal) the magnet field strength it appears that the total output energy is still near 200% of the input energy.
I hope I was able to explain it well enough to be generally understood.
Thanks for your time and I hope someone can do something with it.
Just maybe the answer was blowing in the wind all these decades...
Peace and Love to All
peace love light
Tyson
Comment