I have over a dozen free energy devices in my home! How many do you have?

[quantumuppercut]

CFT- (Collapsing Field Technology) - Updated 2008

I'll turn on the DC signal in the primary coil windings for just an instant, and then turn it off.
In the secondary there is a flux linkage following of the primary signal that is some 90% of the input power.


But we can recover also, the secondary's field collapse for an additional 90% of input power.


Thus, any transformer secondary will produce about 180% of the input power in this mode, with a gradually applied quarter sine or sawtooth wave shape. input DC signal.


But wait, we are throwing recoverable power away in the primary coil winding's field collapse. By applying the DC power input signal and then , when the input power is cut off, switch the primary winding's field collapse to the output also, the primary field collapse contributes at least another 90% to the output, for a grand total of about 270% gain, in this design.


Thoughts?????

Circuits??????

hi bobo36us,

This is exactly what I have in my schematic.http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post123314

The accumulation and collapsing of secondary is 200% ideal total + recovery of 100% ideal for 300% ideal energy. However, I don't think you can collect energy from the secondary by inductive coupling method. Besides that, there is a maximum amount of energy you can recover if you pulse your coil longer than certain time constant. This 200% ideal energy is also so fast at short pulse that it's hard for the diode to follow. There is also much radiation leakage. I agree with you 99.9%.

QU

[magnetO]

No I have not done it yet but I'm sure it is easy enough and I will try as soon as I find any decent DC motor.

Happy New Year to Everyone!

Hi boguslaw,
Hi sebosfato,

2 ˝ years ago I converted a bigger 12V starter motor into an Alexander-Motor-Generator. I then had very little idea of the topic. Anyway, I took a thinner magnet wire and reduced the number of DC rotor windings. For the now unfilled slot parts, I added the (secondary) AC windings. Not sure anymore about the ratio of number DC windings to number AC windings. The stator stayed unchanged. When DC voltage was applied to the motor, the AC windings made voltage. When loading the AC windings from 0 to some load to more load up to short cut, there was no significant change in behaviour of the DC motor. It only speeded a little tiny bit up. So, I SUPPOSE there is no influence from the secondary to the primary. I did NOT made any measuring!

More then 2 years ago and forgotten……… . Until yesterday.

If my two favourite projects fail, I will go back to the Alexander-Motor-Generator.

Best regards
magneto

[sebosfato]

Happy New Year to Everyone!

Hi boguslaw,
Hi sebosfato,

2 ˝ years ago I converted a bigger 12V starter motor into an Alexander-Motor-Generator. I then had very little idea of the topic. Anyway, I took a thinner magnet wire and reduced the number of DC rotor windings. For the now unfilled slot parts, I added the (secondary) AC windings. Not sure anymore about the ratio of number DC windings to number AC windings. The stator stayed unchanged. When DC voltage was applied to the motor, the AC windings made voltage. When loading the AC windings from 0 to some load to more load up to short cut, there was no significant change in behaviour of the DC motor. It only speeded a little tiny bit up. So, I SUPPOSE there is no influence from the secondary to the primary. I did NOT made any measuring!

More then 2 years ago and forgotten……… . Until yesterday.

If my two favourite projects fail, I will go back to the Alexander-Motor-Generator.

Best regards
magneto

Nice... any idea of the power input and the load? Not even approximately?

It seemed to me a very good idea.

[Peter Lindemann]

Possible Solution

Happy New Year to Everyone!

Hi boguslaw,
Hi sebosfato,

2 ˝ years ago I converted a bigger 12V starter motor into an Alexander-Motor-Generator. I then had very little idea of the topic. Anyway, I took a thinner magnet wire and reduced the number of DC rotor windings. For the now unfilled slot parts, I added the (secondary) AC windings. Not sure anymore about the ratio of number DC windings to number AC windings. The stator stayed unchanged. When DC voltage was applied to the motor, the AC windings made voltage. When loading the AC windings from 0 to some load to more load up to short cut, there was no significant change in behavior of the DC motor. It only speeded a little tiny bit up. So, I SUPPOSE there is no influence from the secondary to the primary. I did NOT made any measuring!

More then 2 years ago and forgotten……… . Until yesterday.

If my two favorite projects fail, I will go back to the Alexander-Motor-Generator.

Best regards
magneto

Dear Magneto,

The Alexander Machine has been an enigma for decades. When the topic came up in the Lockridge thread, this was my reply (in Post #134):

In 1983 I was living in Santa Barbara California and working with Bruce DePalma. When the Alexander patent first surfaced, Bruce called him on the phone, as he was in Pasadena. Alexander said he wanted $250,000 for a demonstration of the machine. When DePalma said he could raise the money quickly, Alexander said, "in that case, the price just went up!". The phone call ended shortly thereafter.

A number of people in DePalma's circles built units but none of the attempts to replicate Alexander's stated energy gains ever proved out.

The bottom line is, running the machine in the standard motor and generator modes produces conventional behaviors.

No one has EVER reported success in replicating this machine.

With what we know now, it MAY be possible to get this method working, but FIRST we have to prove out the POWER GAIN mechanism in running the motor with short, high voltage, high current pulses.

However, from what you have just said, you may have stumbled into the solution. I have always believed that the Alexander Machine was real, but that important details were missing from the patent. I am very interested to hear more about your experiment from two years ago. Specifically,

1) what was your winding configuration?
2) did you add slip-rings for the AC output?
3) did the stator have two poles or four?
4) did the current draw of the input change much during loading of the AC output?

The more specific details you can give us the better.

Thanks for reporting on your experiment!!!!!

Peter

[magnetO]

Specifically,

1) what was your winding configuration?
2) did you add slip-rings for the AC output?
3) did the stator have two poles or four?
4) did the current draw of the input change much during loading of the AC output?

The more specific details you can give us the better.

Hi Peter,

It is a 4-pole motor (2 pole pairs). The stator iron is not laminated. The rotor had 23 slots (if I remember right) with 2 bars (rods) for the lower and 2 bars upper coil winding. All bars (rods) were removed. Instead, only a total of 2 bars were installed with a thinner cross-section. The free fraction of the slots has now been filled with a (thin) magnetic wire (AC winding) in parallel with the DC winding untill the slots were filled up. The winding pattern was (if I remember right):

23-6-12-18-1-7-13-19-2-8-14-...
***************

Of course, did I take the ends of the AC wire-winding to a slip ring pair.

To the DC motor probably 6..7..8V were applied. I could not make more speed (increasing the DC voltage), because unfortunately, the slip rings are not exactly concentric. So that the brushes would have lost the contact at higher rpm.

At around 8V, the DC motor made several hundred rpms and a equivalent noise. The (secondary) AC winding stayed open. The power consumption in all, with the 2 slide bearings and the commutator, probably was 20(?)..30(?)W.

When I loaded the AC winding or shorted it out, I could hear that the noise of the engine went up a little bit, it became a little bit more frequent.

I thought, "Interesting!"

As I said, no measurements were ever made.


Best regards
magnetO

[Peter Lindemann]

Thank You!

MagnetO,

Thanks for the details. I am beginning to think that you may have already built the machine we have been looking for. How difficult would it be to bring this machine back out and do some measurements on a test run.

I realize the speed problem with the eccentric slip rings, so it will have to be a slow speed test. Never the less, a simple set of instruments to measure the input voltage and current and RPM, allowing the AC output to drive a resistive load (drawing unity power factor) with volt and amp meters on the load. Then periodically short out the AC load and measure the changes in RPM and input current.

If the system can be loaded with little change to the input speed and current, then the structure is correct, even if the speed is limited.

Is this something you would be willing to do and report your findings here?

Peter

[redrichie]

Dr. Lindemann,
I was not sure where to post this so i havent yet. And it may have been discussed in another thread I am not sure. But I have been retrofitting my Bedini Monopole to attempt the Large Wheel. I have a quadfilar coil with core that sticks out the bottom like John has. I remembered another thread some time ago where a user had done something similar to this and put a "piggy-back" induction coil on the extended core end. My induction coil is a small spool single filar coil of prob no more than 150ft of 23ga wire. After reading in the Ferris wheel thread about shorting one of the coil windings to itself to lower the inductance I decided to give it a go.
Upon shorting it on the running system there were semi-large blue sparks that popped at connection. Then the current draw went down over 50mA. and the wheel sped up as well. charging actually seemed to be faster. If I put my scope lead to this coil it has almost identical wave form as the rest of the Bedini circuit, but the spikes are noticeably higher.Or I can put this piggy-back through a bridge into a cap and run a small load with no losses to the original system. If you arent too busy could you explain the sparking of this coil.
Im sorry if this is a little long winded. But in a current thread by member Zooty titled SSG modification anomaly, I put one winding of a small Bifilar coil in series to the charge battery. The other winding of the bifilar i can generate over 200V AC. Put through a bridge I can run a small load from this mod. With it, current draw decreases slightly again, and there is not any decrease in speed or charging to the system. I know this is not directly related to this thread, and I apologize BOBO. The only reason I put it here was Peter mentioned shorting the coil. If I need to post this elsewhere like in the SSG mod thread I will.

[Peter Lindemann]

Wrong Thread - Off Topic Here

Dr. Lindemann,
I was not sure where to post this so i havent yet. And it may have been discussed in another thread I am not sure. But I have been retrofitting my Bedini Monopole to attempt the Large Wheel. I have a quadfilar coil with core that sticks out the bottom like John has. I remembered another thread some time ago where a user had done something similar to this and put a "piggy-back" induction coil on the extended core end. My induction coil is a small spool single filar coil of prob no more than 150ft of 23ga wire. After reading in the Ferris wheel thread about shorting one of the coil windings to itself to lower the inductance I decided to give it a go.
Upon shorting it on the running system there were semi-large blue sparks that popped at connection. Then the current draw went down over 50mA. and the wheel sped up as well. charging actually seemed to be faster. If I put my scope lead to this coil it has almost identical wave form as the rest of the Bedini circuit, but the spikes are noticeably higher.Or I can put this piggy-back through a bridge into a cap and run a small load with no losses to the original system. If you arent too busy could you explain the sparking of this coil.
Im sorry if this is a little long winded. But in a current thread by member Zooty titled SSG modification anomaly, I put one winding of a small Bifilar coil in series to the charge battery. The other winding of the bifilar i can generate over 200V AC. Put through a bridge I can run a small load from this mod. With it, current draw decreases slightly again, and there is not any decrease in speed or charging to the system. I know this is not directly related to this thread, and I apologize BOBO. The only reason I put it here was Peter mentioned shorting the coil. If I need to post this elsewhere like in the SSG mod thread I will.

Redrichie,

You ask a good question, but it is way off topic here. You should ask John this question in the Ferris Wheel thread.

Peter

[magnetO]

Is this something you would be willing to do and report your findings here?

Hi,

thanks to the posting from boguslaw, I was reminded of the Alexander-Motor-Generator and my conversion of it.

The object is probably 'stored' at the bottom of a 'treasure heap' in the basement of the workshop of a friend. (He NEVER throws anything away. That is not always positive. But in this case it is).

Since the wokshop is not heated, it will still take some weeks before restarting research.

But, yes, the measurements on the Alexander-engine will be done after wintertime in spring.

Best regards
magnetO

[boguslaw]

Hi,

thanks to the posting from boguslaw, I was reminded of the Alexander-Motor-Generator and my conversion of it.

The object is probably 'stored' at the bottom of a 'treasure heap' in the basement of the workshop of a friend. (He NEVER throws anything away. That is not always positive. But in this case it is).

Since the wokshop is not heated, it will still take some weeks before restarting research.

But, yes, the measurements on the Alexander-engine will be done after wintertime in spring.

Best regards
magnetO

It reminds me my situation. I have converted small garage room into a "lab" but it's not heated and working there when there is zero Celsius degrees is a extreme adventure
I'm now quite sure that those devices are very close related to each other :
Hubbard generator, Hendershot motor,D'Angelo motor, Alexander motor