Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cross Field Capacitor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    I have been absent. Apologies. I used tap water with a small small amount of salt for conductivity. I am still very curious as to the ionic path and distribution throughout the conductive solution. How does conductivity affect the internal workings of capacitors and inductors? what happens when we run a current through the core of an inductor orthogonal to its windings? Last I hear even the Mr. Dollard whom I respect very much had similar questions.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Armagdn03 View Post
      And here is a mind blowing statement given to us as a response to Erfinder by John Bedini concerning Floyd Sweet

      Armagdn03.
      That is how you would do it, Erfinder is right in what he is saying but you want to self bias this from the pulse and he is correct with the statement untwisted wires. Now I'm going to say something I should not. Floyd Sweet was privileged to work with the Germans after WW2.

      He pulled this trick on me with the VTA except I caught him and was booted out he only made it look like he condition the magnets . The Germans already had developed, kept away from the people rotating mag amps and Sweet worked on them. ( He was an electromagnetic expert in this field)

      It was funny to me when I would go over to Sweet's place with the coils I wound for him and when I would leave it would be working the next day. I asked him to remove the 100 watt power Amplifier and he refused so I left then was asked to never return by Tom Bearden, Tom did not know as I never told him.

      Tom even brought one over to me to test away from Foyd's house where it was working before Tom left to have it tested. Floyd went nuts when Tom told him he was testing this at my shop. It did not work.

      So what ever GE had knowalage of , Floyd knew How, but I can make this machine work either way. Erfinder is right and should continue to experiment with this. The Germans already had over unity devices and were using them and the Mag Amp was at the root of that.

      So the Vacuum Triode Amplifier used a mag amp as the core of its operating principle!
      Armagdn03,

      Taking the advice of John Bedini in that post, I continued to experiment with this and when I found the proper coil to coil relation (demonstrated by John Bedini), and utilized the proper pulse based bias (the biasing is a parameter variation on the inductance of the coil, the "Reactor" materialized.

      The reactor is simply an inductor which is driven into a condition I call "Infinite Frequency - Resonant Self Oscillation". In this condition the coil is generating an infinite number of harmonic frequencies, these nested frequencies all sum and generate a perfect square wave. All of the nested frequencies share a common fundamental, and this fundamental is dictated by the rotor speed in mechanical systems (the fields are operating at super high frequency, but the mechanical device is operating at a controllable frequency). To get a perfect square the harmonic train of frequencies must be approaching infinity, at this insane frequency of operation, the inductance of the coil for all intents and purposes no longer exists and the coil behaves as if it is a frequency based infinitely variable capacitance.

      It is well known that the capacitance and inductance of an inductor has a direct relation to the frequency that the coil is operating at, that being said, under the proper conditions if the coil is properly referencing itself and the environment, the capacity of the inductor can be raised many orders of magnitude over its measured (calculated) static value. This is the mechanism for high COP (my opinion...completely speculative.) This method allows your circuit cohere to more of the disturbances taking place around the circuit, its been suggested in the aforementioned patent, that there is 10^13 energy flowing around our circuits which is not being tapped. This is how you tap it. From here it can be understood that all EMF based devices are high COP devices when their reaction cross section is increased, in this case the reaction cross section is a reference to the coils capacitance....now Tesla's patented bifilar coil has a true circuit to function in.

      It is my opinion that this is what John Bedini and Tom Bearden were referring to in the patent when they made the statement regarding manipulating the reaction cross section of the power EMF circuit.

      So my friend, in the end, you were right parameter variation on the capacitance side is way better, thankfully, we don't need high voltages nor do we need to generate the high frequencies, the latter is a self governing function inherent in a properly configured system.

      Regards
      Last edited by erfinder; 09-12-2013, 10:46 AM.

      Comment


      • #48
        @Erfinder
        The reactor is simply an inductor which is driven into a condition I call "Infinite Frequency - Resonant Self Oscillation". In this condition the coil is generating an infinite number of harmonic frequencies, these nested frequencies all sum and generate a perfect square wave. All of the nested frequencies share a common fundamental, and this fundamental is dictated by the rotor speed in mechanical systems (the fields are operating at super high frequency, but the mechanical device is operating at a controllable frequency). To get a perfect square the harmonic train of frequencies must be approaching infinity, at this insane frequency of operation, the inductance of the coil for all intents and purposes no longer exists and the coil behaves as if it is a frequency based infinitely variable capacitance.
        That was an awesome description
        Sometimes it's hard to describe what we know and see in the proper context. I have had the feeling of what you have described for a very long time and we see this technology hidden in many devices.

        In retrospect it is not difficult to understand the principal however we have to accept that energy in the form of oscillations is the norm. We have to accept that the conception of dead and empty space is a false construct.

        Now if I wanted to concentrate energy I would not utilize one individual wavelength as we have always done. I would want to cover a massive spectrum absorbing a very small amount from each thus the apparent change per unit may be small but the summation large. Which leads us to a concept alluded to by Moray, there may be a universal beat which all forces march in time to. It may be that if we induce change over a broad spectrum in a coherent manner we may access the fundamental beat note which governs all others.
        Very interesting

        AC

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Allcanadian View Post
          @Erfinder
          In retrospect it is not difficult to understand the principal however we have to accept that energy in the form of oscillations is the norm. We have to accept that the conception of dead and empty space is a false construct.
          AC
          Energy in the form of oscillations is the norm...this is true, however, how many circuits are designed so that "self oscillations" are allowed to manifest? Allow me to clarify what I mean regarding self oscillation, a simple circuit oscillating at high frequency isn't what I'm talking about. Present day systems are designed so that the potentials appear to move from one end of the conductor to the other, this in my opinion isn't how the fields move. The fields move from space towards the inner most regions of the conductor and from the inner most regions back towards space. Coils in a device should be configured to accommodate this, presently they are not. Coils should be arranged so that the location where two coils join, produces either a positive or negative node. This we just don't see!

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by erfinder View Post
            Armagdn03,

            Taking the advice of John Bedini in that post, I continued to experiment with this and when I found the proper coil to coil relation (demonstrated by John Bedini), and utilized the proper pulse based bias (the biasing is a parameter variation on the inductance of the coil, the "Reactor" materialized.

            The reactor is simply an inductor which is driven into a condition I call "Infinite Frequency - Resonant Self Oscillation". In this condition the coil is generating an infinite number of harmonic frequencies, these nested frequencies all sum and generate a perfect square wave. All of the nested frequencies share a common fundamental, and this fundamental is dictated by the rotor speed in mechanical systems (the fields are operating at super high frequency, but the mechanical device is operating at a controllable frequency). To get a perfect square the harmonic train of frequencies must be approaching infinity, at this insane frequency of operation, the inductance of the coil for all intents and purposes no longer exists and the coil behaves as if it is a frequency based infinitely variable capacitance.

            It is well known that the capacitance and inductance of an inductor has a direct relation to the frequency that the coil is operating at, that being said, under the proper conditions if the coil is properly referencing itself and the environment, the capacity of the inductor can be raised many orders of magnitude over its measured (calculated) static value. This is the mechanism for high COP (my opinion...completely speculative.) This method allows your circuit cohere to more of the disturbances taking place around the circuit, its been suggested in the aforementioned patent, that there is 10^13 energy flowing around our circuits which is not being tapped. This is how you tap it. From here it can be understood that all EMF based devices are high COP devices when their reaction cross section is increased, in this case the reaction cross section is a reference to the coils capacitance....now Tesla's patented bifilar coil has a true circuit to function in.

            It is my opinion that this is what John Bedini and Tom Bearden were referring to in the patent when they made the statement regarding manipulating the reaction cross section of the power EMF circuit.

            So my friend, in the end, you were right parameter variation on the capacitance side is way better, thankfully, we don't need high voltages nor do we need to generate the high frequencies, the latter is a self governing function inherent in a properly configured system.

            Regards

            I have such a transformer oscillator. The biasing element involves a saturable inductor coil such that it imparts a second order harmonic imposed on the first. This then creates its own second order and they "infinitely combine" until the physical characteristics of the setup attenuate further harmonic bifurcation. Essentially a self oscillating transformer whose frequency of oscillation is governed by the characteristics of the core rather than the coils and caps attached. You are spot on in my opinion.

            Comment


            • #51
              Good to see you back Armagdn03. Thanks erfinder for that info and Allcanadian too. These sound like exciting concepts if I can wrap my head around all of it. Maybe this is related to how the TPU also works (if it really does) since it uses 3 frequencies combined which may likely produce a lot of harmonics if the starting frequencies are carefully chosen. It all sounds very good but I'm trying to imagine how to put it into a build that can demonstrate this. I think that may be beyond my abilities at present.
              There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

              Comment


              • #52
                Perhaps deceptive. Dare I say two. One frequency inserted one quarter wavelength appart in a full wave guide
                .. "resonant properties of ring circuits" by tischer. Plus a second. Two of the same separated in time, plus a "third". What would you choose the "third" to be?

                Comment


                • #53
                  Or for the second "third" rotate the ring

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    ....off topic
                    Last edited by straggl3r; 03-23-2024, 01:13 AM.
                    Invention Secrecy Act: https://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/...s/?page_id=983
                    https://web.archive.org/web/20101108...recy_2010.html

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X