Geral Celente has predicted a major alternative energy breakthrough

[bugler]

Celente - 2011...The Make It Or Break It Year

"We predicted a major alternative energy breakthrough (beyond wind/solar/bio-fuel/geothermal) that could become a socioeconomic/geopolitical game changer. Prestigious science journals are buzzing about developments that may constitute that breakthrough."

[gravityblock]

Here's a good place to start looking.

GB

[Farmhand]

Here's a good place to start looking.

GB

Hi GB,

I stated watching the first video,

seattle4truth Movie about Frank Z and Planck's constant, but the guy said
a couple of things that threw me, right off the bat.

I was willing to overlook when he said "Anti-Gravity" but then he
said "Einstein". Each to thier own I guess.

He also said we need to understand these things if we want get off this rock.
I don't understand why anyone would want to leave this planet.
Could somebody explain the reasons to leave Earth ?

Seeya.

[gravityblock]

Hi GB,

I stated watching the first video,

seattle4truth Movie about Frank Z and Planck's constant, but the guy said
a couple of things that threw me, right off the bat.

I was willing to overlook when he said "Anti-Gravity" but then he
said "Einstein". Each to thier own I guess.

He also said we need to understand these things if we want get off this rock.
I don't understand why anyone would want to leave this planet.
Could somebody explain the reasons to leave Earth ?

Seeya.

Condemnation before investigation is folly. If he used the term "gravity modification" instead of anti-gravity, would that make a difference? People seem to get hang up with certain terms. If he said, "The Copenhagen interpretation of the quantum world" is wrong, instead of saying "Einstein", would that make a difference? If he used the term, "low energy nucleur reactions (LENR)", instead of cold fusion, does this change anything? If you haven't read the papers or watched the entire series, then your opinion is based on pre-conceived ideas.

I don't think there is any theory, book, documentary, etc. where I agree with "everything" about it, but to throw it completely out doesn't make much sense either, especially if it's due to certain terms being used. Did you forget you don't live in a "perfect world", where everything should conform to your way of thinking or ideas? Let's just throw everything out on that basis alone. This is the mentality I see everywhere. We need to change our way of thinking.

GB

[Farmhand]

Hi GB, I didn't make any judgement except to say it threw me. Thats all. I didn't say it was all wrong or anything to that effect. I didn't get far enough to see the gut's of the first video. The thing that actually threw me the most was the wanting to get off this rock part. I wanna stay here, and clean the place up a bit.

I also stated that I didn't understand why people would want to leave Earth.
But that question is still unanswered.

Is there a reason we should want to leave Earth ?

I don't point to a banana and call it an apple while still expecting people to still take me seriously. In fact I couldn't care any less if people took me seriously or not. Thats not important. What is important we both agree on. And that is people have to change the way they think. Well they don't "have" to, but it would help.

I merely made a comment that when he said those things it threw me. And I don't have time to listen to hours and hours of stuff, (which the each to thier own comment was about).

I didn't mean any offence, think of it as constructive critisism.

Regards

[Farmhand]

Celente -*2011...The Make It Or Break It Year

"We predicted a major alternative energy breakthrough (beyond wind/solar/bio-fuel/geothermal) that could become a socioeconomic/geopolitical game changer. Prestigious science journals are buzzing about developments that may constitute that breakthrough."

Hi Bugler, I believe there is a breakthrough coming. Just what that is will be interesting to find out. Funnily enough I think it will be a breakthrough of a revealing nature rather than a breakthrough of any new principals discovered lately.

Cheers

[gravityblock]

I didn't mean any offence, think of it as constructive critisism.

It's not constructive critisism when it could keep others from taking a serious hard look at it.

GB

[142857]

farmhand

The sun is presumably not an eternal energy supply and will go critical one day.....

That in it's self is reason enough to figure out how to get off this rock.

quite simply, the continued existance of humanity, beyond the habitability of this planet.

You could clean it up all you want, it could be a proverbial utopia....but...it won't be inahbitable forever.

[Farmhand]

Well I could have said nothing. Did it occur to you that many people may already be put off by those things, it's just that I stuck my neck out and said it ?

If nobody said it people's opinions would not be known.

Does the video tell me how to generate Gravity ?

Or does it explain why I should want to leave Earth ?

Now I am confused, which is a regular occurance i'll admit. I didn't say I didn't watch it or wasn't going to either. I have no doubt there is some very interesting and important information in the video's.

But the start of the video put me off, sorry but I had to say it again. That happens when we are truthfull.

That is what happened. I do intend to try to watch them, when i get time.
I would have made the time, but the begining threw me, if that is not constructive critisism then i'm not sitting here typing at my computer.

Cheers

[Farmhand]

farmhand

The sun is presumably not an eternal energy supply and will go critical one day.....

That in it's self is reason enough to figure out how to get off this rock.

quite simply, the continued existance of humanity, beyond the habitability of this planet.

You could clean it up all you want, it could be a proverbial utopia....but...it won't be inahbitable forever.

Hi 142857, Where will you go ?

I don't think you will find any planets that are like Earth and full of life, which have a natural place for you and the othe 6 billion people on Earth.

Don't you realise it would take and inter-steller craft almost the size of The Earth itself to take us all ?

How would that work ? In a roundabout way.

Cheers

[142857]

so you say, just don't try...and when the world dies so does mankind?

you don't need to get 6 billion peeps to another planet to help ensure the continuation of humanity.

However if you just decide to stay you do ensure the demise of mankind.


would you have told columbus not to worry about it? Just stay home? You'll never find anywhere as nice as england and if you did, how would you get people there?

[Farmhand]

so you say, just don't try...and when the world dies so does mankind?

you don't need to get 6 billion peeps to another planet to help ensure the continuation of humanity.

However if you just decide to stay you do ensure the demise of mankind.


would you have told columbus not to worry about it? Just stay home? You'll never find anywhere as nice as england and if you did, how would you get people there?

Well I don't really want to get into a big moral debate. You are obviously a very intelligent person as is Gravityblock, very intelligent indeed, many other's on these forums are aswell. I wouldn't want anybody to think that I thought otherwise, at all.

Anyway this is a very interesting subject. And what you say is a distinct possibility even in the near future, maybe. My fear would be that we may be sacrificing many generations of human life on this planet to achieve something quickly that would come naturally in time.

Say if we go hell for leather working on this and ruin the planet in the process but still no dice. Not very smart thing to do.

Or if we just fix our practices and do things the right way it might take a few more years, but at least our home planet would be still livable. Untill it blows up with the sun of course.

My honest opinion on this is if the sun is gonna blow, so be it, but I don't want any part in ruining the planet then leaving most people behind. Only the chosen one's would get a seat in that situation. And we need some smart one's to stay here to fix the problems created.

Anyway i'm staying here. To help the smart one's that stay.
I would hope we could do both things. At least those that wanted to.

Cheers

[ABCStore]

By the way, the term "anti-gravity" is wrong. We don't say "anti-electricity", "anti-sound", "anti-temperature", "anti-density" etc...

ABC

[gravityblock]

By the way, the term "anti-gravity" is wrong. We don't say "anti-electricity", "anti-sound", "anti-temperature", "anti-density" etc...

ABC

Play with the words all you want, but it doesn't change the concept or the meaning. Just being able to cancel or negate gravity will be a complete breaking of the shackles which binds us to this rock. There is no need to brute-force our way into space. There is no need to brute force the nucleons together for fusion. We can acheive this and more at low energy levels by out-smarting the atom.

GB

[gravityblock]

Hi 142857, Where will you go ?

I don't think you will find any planets that are like Earth and full of life, which have a natural place for you and the othe 6 billion people on Earth.

Cheers

In case you haven't noticed, life will take hold wherever it can on this rock. It is no different anywhere else in this universe. Nature creates types of beings to suit the medium in which they are placed. Earthworms live in the same world as man, but the soil is their ideal medium; fish live in water; the amphibian can live in air or water; the eagle prefers heights where the atmosphere is rarefied.

If life now manifests itself in various forms, do you think Nature has run through her repertoire and exhausted her possibilities on Earth? Do you think Nature can only bring forth life on this planet only? A lion would die in the Arctic, whereas a bear is quite happy there. Whether the Earth is covered with ice, whether it becomes too hot, whether it is radioactive or not, Nature will in every case devise an appropriate life form. And if Nature, with this wonderful power of creation, were supplemented by a spiritual power, what marvels could it not perform?

According to ancient texts, the human race rarely survives more than 7,000 years, having in this time exhausted its capacity to adapt itself to a constantly changing medium. Behold the wisdom of God who protects the planets close to the Sun by giving them a cloak of dense atmosphere and ether, and gives those distant ones, whose speed of revolution is low, a thin covering. The farther the bodies are from the Sun, the less covering they have, until we come to Saturn, which has none at all. Up to that point the ether and atmosphere are there to filter the rays of the Sun. From Saturn outwards, however, the planets again acquire an etheric cover on an increasing scale, no longer with the object of filtering the Sun's rays, but to produce a positive reaction to them, so as to provide sufficient heat to maintain life. So the atmospheric and etheric compositions of these planets are not the same as those of planets on this side of Saturn. The Sun, seen from Pluto, is small and the amount of energy it receives is insignificant. However, this little planet shines in space. Pluto's atmosphere for example is extremely sensitive to solar waves and sets up a violent reaction to this very small quantity of energy. I don't think it would be a problem to find a planet with a natural place for us. But then again, we would probably try to conquer it. Don't be bamboolzed and hoodwinked by TBTB.

GB