The Lee-Tseung Lead-out/Bring-in Energy theory

[ltseung888]

Air molecule = hydrogen?

If hydrogen then by that theory we can also get extra kinetic energy from hydrogen oxide (water), hydro carbon (fuel), etc. As proof, people installing something weird on engine can have added power. Some able to run a car without consuming anything (Joe Cell).

Resonance may required, but the collecting/retainer part important too.

Dear sucahyo,

If you check on the composition of air via google, you will find that air consists mainly of nitrogen and oxygen gases. Hydrogen gas molecules have a higher molecular velocity and can escape from the atmosphere to outer space more easily. (If you are not familiar with the concept of escape velocity, please google.)

You actually brought up an important concept. What are the factors governing the molecular velocity of gases?

The answer lies in their mass and the absolute temperature. In general, the lighter the mass and the higher the absolute temperature, the higher will be the molecular velocity. There is a layer of gas (atmosphere) on Earth because the escape velocity of many gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, argon, carbon dioxide is much less than the escape velocity. The moon has no atmosphere because it has a low mass and thus a low escape velocity. All gases escaped to outer space long ago.

In other words, the gravitational attraction force on Earth is responsible for maintaining the presence of our atmosphere. This leads to the second divine revelation – if we can bring-in the kinetic energy of air molecules, we may be able to bring-in the gravitational energy directly.

More on that later.

God gives us the almost inexhaustible kinetic energy of air molecules. God also gives us the equally inexhaustible gravitational energy on Earth. Can we understand and use them? Amen

[ltseung888]

Soliciting comments before the next step

Confirming the scientific facts and explanations

Before we go to the next step, I would like to get comments on the following:

1. Is that concept of “OPEN system bringing-in environmental energy” scientifically correct?

2. Does this concept violate the Law of Conservation of Energy or any other Laws of Thermodynamics?

3. Do the air molecules contain almost inexhaustible kinetic energy at the surface of the Earth?

4. Is the tuning fork resonance system a form of “OPEN system bringing-in the kinetic energy of the surrounding air molecules”?

5. In resonance, the bring-in energy will keep reinforcing the vibrations or oscillations similar to pushing the swing at the right frequency. The amplitude of vibration can increase exponentially. Is this explanation scientifically sound?

The above are tinny steps that a physicist or scientist can carefully examine without any stigma or fear of being labeled as “a supporter of the impossible perpetual motion machine”.

God has given us the phenomenon even before the Industrial Revolution. Is his revealing the explanation via an old, retired and dejected man -- a modern day MIRACLE? Amen.

[ltseung888]

Use every moment to its fullest

Is this a message from the Almighty?

I just received an email that a relative passed away yesterday. Another one got inoperable cancer. Life is short and we must use every moment to its fullest.

Instead of waiting for responses to the small steps, I shall pump out as much as I can before facing the Almighty in the next World. In that way, I can say that I tried my very best in the limited time of my humble life.

I shall now continue with actual inventions or devices that use the kinetic energy of air molecules.

1. The tuning fork systems on resonance boxes. The experiment is easy to perform. One can choose a quiet room with windows and doors closed. One can purchase 20 sets of identical tuning forks from China at a price of US$200. A microphone can be placed at a known distance from the first tuning fork. The sound signal can be converted to an electrical signal that can be displayed on an oscilloscope. Initially, one tuning fork is used. Then two, three, four…twenty tuning forks are used. The intensity and the duration of the sound can be recorded and compared. The details of the experiment can be found in:
Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - kinetic energy of air molecules

For those who are not familiar with tuning fork resonance, they can get some basic information via the following youtube videos.

YouTube - Resonance
YouTube - conceptual physics Demo of Resonance
YouTube - U10120 Tuning Forks on Resonance Boxes

More to come.

God gives us the virtually inexhaustible kinetic energy of gas molecules. We need to understand and/or perform the first experiment. In this experiment, we rely on resonance to bring-in that kinetic energy! Amen.

[student8195]

Confirming the scientific facts and explanations

Before we go to the next step, I would like to get comments on the following:

1. Is that concept of “OPEN system bringing-in environmental energy” scientifically correct?

2. Does this concept violate the Law of Conservation of Energy or any other Laws of Thermodynamics?

3. Do the air molecules contain almost inexhaustible kinetic energy at the surface of the Earth?

4. Is the tuning fork resonance system a form of “OPEN system bringing-in the kinetic energy of the surrounding air molecules”?

5. In resonance, the bring-in energy will keep reinforcing the vibrations or oscillations similar to pushing the swing at the right frequency. The amplitude of vibration can increase exponentially. Is this explanation scientifically sound?

The above are tinny steps that a physicist or scientist can carefully examine without any stigma or fear of being labeled as “a supporter of the impossible perpetual motion machine”.

God has given us the phenomenon even before the Industrial Revolution. Is his revealing the explanation via an old, retired and dejected man -- a modern day MIRACLE? Amen.

I showed your post to my fellow students. Here are our answers:

1. When you use the term OPEN system, you already assume that energy can flow in and out of the system. The energy can be obvious like wind. The energy can be less obvious like the kinetic energy of gas molecules. Our textbooks on thermodynamics specifically mentioned that they are dealing with CLOSED systems.

2. If you are dealing with OPEN systems, there is no violation of the Law of Conservation of Energy or any other Laws of Thermodynamics. Aaron answered that question in great detail.

3. We believed that the molecular velocity is related to the absolute temperature. If there is room temperature, the air molecules will have molecular velocity. The energy may have been provided by the Sun, by the volcanic activities of the Earth or left over since the creation of the planet Earth.

4. We debated much on the tuning forks as “OPEN system bringing in the kinetic energy of the air molecules”. Your example of the moving wall changing the random motion of molecules to a pulsing order convinced us. We believe that a computer simulation can be done. This is a big revelation to all of us. A vibrating object can convert the random motion of air molecules into a pulsing order. The kinetic energy of the molecules is brought-in into the system as a result.”

5. It dawned on us that a vibrating object is constantly exchanging energy with the air molecules. If the frequency is not correct, the resulting forces may be less effective or even cancel out. If the frequency is just right, the resulting forces may reinforce and keep adding energy to the system. It is a new explanation of resonance.

We decided to discuss it more and bring it to the attention of our professors. We shall post their opinion in future posts. We do not mind posting our computer simulation models and even our photographs. This is fun.

[ltseung888]

Doing the tuning fork experiment with an oscilloscope

Involving the academics

Dear Student8195,

I am glad that you are getting other students and your professors involved. Please make sure that they read the following:

Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - The locked teaching thread

Since you are at a University, you may be able to do the tuning fork experiment. Use at least 4 tuning forks and an oscilloscope. Use a set up similar to:

3A50.60 Damped Tuning Fork Oscillations

Compare the amplitude of the voltage and the duration of the sound when one, two….n tuning forks on resonance boxes are present. If possible, take videos and screen shots and post them on youtube and place the links here. The comparison of waveforms and time duration will be very educational.

This simple and scientific experiment will help the understanding of resonance and the bringing-in of kinetic energy of gas molecules via vibrating objects. Obviously, this experiment can be repeated worldwide in almost all universities. There will be no doubt to its validity and repeatability.

God works miracles. But men still need to open their eyes and do the experiments. Amen.

[ltseung888]

Potential involvement from Electrical Engineering experts

The Alumni Dinner

We had a small Alumni Dinner for those in and around Los Angeles Area. About sixty people attended. Many brought their spouses along. The special speaker was a school- mate turned fortune teller. He was really funny and we enjoyed his stories. Some of us are planning for the big 50 year reunion in Hong Kong in 2013. It was good to see many old classmates that lost touch for over forty years.

It may be the arrangement of the Almighty that I sat next to a young couple who were very technical. The husband is a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. The wife also works in the wireless communication industry. I talked about the tuning fork resonance phenomenon and why I believed that the kinetic energy of gas molecules could be brought-in via the vibration of the first tuning fork.

They were very smart and picked it up right away. They mentioned that in their design of transformers, they deliberately introduced damping. They might be able to design circuits that specifically look for or work at near resonance. They may be able to arrange for good oscilloscopes to do detailed verification of the FLEET prototypes.

The good thing is that they are only about one hour drive from my home.

God works in mysterious ways. Just trust Him and miracles will happen. Amen.

[ltseung888]

Devices that brings-in energy from air

Converting sound energy into electricity

Some one suggested that we can use the piezoelectricity effect to convert the sound energy into useful electricity. In that way, the kinetic energy of air molecules can be used.

Piezoelectricity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In reality, there are much easier methods. We have to remember that we need OPEN systems. If we have air flowing in and out of a system, that system can be considered an OPEN system. In particular, air is not a fuel but it can be an energy carrier. The equations for Energy are:

1. Energy In (Ein) = Volume In x Pressure In
2. Energy Out (Eout) = Volume Out x Pressure Out

Ein can be greater than Eout. The difference is the Energy Brought-In by the air flow!

Some existing devices already use such energy even though the engineer or the manufacturer does not realize it!

The first example is the water+air jet used to clean the streets in Hong Kong. Such a jet is much more energy efficient than all water or all air systems. We then changed the design so that we could pump water+ air upwards. Dr. Raymond Ting got a patent and did a demonstration and won silver prize in an Inventor Show. His experiments demonstrated that he could use one fourth the power to deliver the same amount of water to a given height. There is one major drawback of the invention – water hammering. If there were air bubbles in a conventional water piping system, there might be a loud noise leading to the possible destruction of the water pipe and the surrounding structures.

However, for applications that have a constant flow, this water hammering problem can be overcome. This invention, apparently, is already used in China in some of its water work projects.

A simpler example is the supersoaker toy water gun or the water rocket. Air is pumped into the toy. Some energy comes from the pumping action. Some energy is from the air itself. (Ein is greater then Eout).

God gives us eyes and brains. We sometimes can see but cannot use our brains to analysis what is really happening. The resonating tuning fork system is an example. The air+water jet and the toy water guns are other examples. Amen.

[ltseung888]

Bringing-in gravitational energy via the pulse-pushed pendulum

More information from the locked teaching thread

Now we are ready to move to the more interesting revelation of bringing-in energy from gravity at the surface of the Earth.

As we mentioned previously, the existence of the Atmosphere is due to the gravitational force of the Earth pulling the air molecules back. The molecular velocity of these gas molecules is much less than the escape velocity of the Earth. The common analogy is that if we throw a ball up, it will fall back down. However, if we can throw the ball up with a velocity greater than the escape velocity, the ball will leave Earth!

The revelation discussed here is – can we bring-in the gravitational energy into our device directly? Gravitational field exists everywhere. The Sun attracts the Earth. Every Object attracts every other object. Even you and I attract each other. If you move away or towards me, there will be an energy exchange. Energy = Force x Displacement (vector arithmetic or direction must be taken into account).

Please read reply 3 to 10 in the thread:
Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - The locked teaching thread

Those posts explain how gravitational energy can be brought-in into a pulse-pushed pendulum. The surprising revelation is that two parts of supplied horizontal energy can bring-in one part of vertical or gravitational energy.

Thus the supplied Input Energy = 2 units; the bring-in Gravitational Energy = 1 unit; the total Input Energy to the pendulum system = 3 units. Assume that the loss is negligible, the Output Energy = 3 units. The coefficient of performance COP = Output Energy/Input Energy = 3/2 = 1.5.

Thus with the simple pulse-pushed pendulum, we can already bring-in and use the almost inexhaustible gravitational energy anywhere on Earth. The Milkovic two-stage pendulum is a working example. In outer space, there will still be gravitation forces from the stars. We can theoretically use such energy from anywhere. Even if there is no air, we can use this source of energy!

God has given us Gravitational Energy that can be used anywhere. Are we intelligent enough to study the physics and mathematics in reply 3 to 10 of the above mentioned thread? God help those who help themselves. Amen.

[ltseung888]

Comments on the pulse-pushed pendulum

Some comments on bringing-in gravitational energy via the pulse-pushed pendulum

1. If the bringing-in of gravitational energy is this easy, why did scientists fail to understand and use it before Dec, 2004?

It is like the tuning fork resonance systems. How many scientists understand that such systems bring-in the kinetic energy of air molecules? Scientific authorities also make mistakes or have oversights. They are not infallable!

2. In the mathematics, the horizontal work done is assumed to be equal to the supplied horizontal force x the horizontal displacement. Is this assumption correct?

In vector arithmetic, we can always resolve the vectors into the X, Y, Z components. In our case, we focus on the X and Y component. It is a known and accepted technique in Physics and Mathematics.

3. What is wrong with the explanation in most textbooks? In most textbooks dealing with the pendulum, the assumption is that the total energy of the pendulum is conserved. Any pushing or pulling will provide the extra energy. The system is CLOSED. No other energy is seen entering the system. Why is the explanation incorrect?

The explanation is incorrect because the pulse-pushed pendulum is actually an OPEN system. The tension in the string brings-in the gravitational energy. So long as there is tension in the string, gravitational energy can be brought-in. Not seeing that gravitational energy is brought-in has been an oversight or mistake from scientists in the past (and many in the present).

We have now disclosed two divine revelations:
1. Kinetic Energy of air molecules can be brought-in via a resonating tuning fork system.
2. Gravitational Energy can be brought-in via a pulse-pushed pendulum.

Please study and digest them carefully. Other revelations will be clearer if these first two revelations are well understood.

God provides us with pollution free energy that can be brought-in anywhere on Earth. Why are we so stupid as to burn the fossil fuels that pollute our environment? Amen.

[ltseung888]

The full theoretical understanding of Bring-in Energy Devices

Completing the theoretical understanding

Let me assume that you have studied and understood the first two divine revelations:
1. The kinetic energy of air molecules can be brought-in using the tuning fork resonance systems. The air+water jet for street cleaning is a working prototype.

2. Gravitational energy can be brought-in using a pulse-pushed pendulum. Two parts horizontally supplied energy can bring-in one part of vertical (gravitational) energy. The Milkovic two stage pendulum is a working prototype.

3. Now we can move to the magnetic pendulum. If we can extract gravitational energy from a pulse-pushed pendulum, we must be able to extract magnetic energy from a pulse-pushed magnetic pendulum. This is described in the locked teaching thread at my bench at: Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - The locked teaching thread The Forever Yuen experiment is a working prototype.

4. The tuning fork is a vibrating device. The pendulum is an oscillating device. Can we change the motion into a pulsed rotation for higher efficiency? The answer is obvious. Many examples are available via the Internet. For example, the Newman, Bedini, Liang, Wang motors are working examples. We also have the Tong Wheel that demonstrated overunity at the Inno Tech Design Expo 2009 in the Hong Kong Convention Center.

5. If pulsed rotation at the right frequency (resonance again) can bring-in electron motion energy of the orbiting electrons, is it possible to have motionless flux change systems to achieve the same effect? Many examples now exist on the Internet. For example, the Ismael Aviso device discussed in: FUELLESS CAR PROTOTYPE by ISMAEL MOTOR ; the Tariel Kanapadze device shown at: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze ; the Joule Ringer from Lasersaber, etc. We also have the FLEET prototypes.

The common thread behind all devices appears to be:
1. They are OPEN systems. Energy from the surrounding environment is brought-in. The environmental energy sources are virtually inexhaustible. Examples include kinetic energy of air molecules, gravitational energy and electromagnetic energy (or electron motion energy).

2. Some type of resonance or pseudo resonance effect is needed. The analogy of pushing the swing gives a better understanding. One must push the swing at the right frequency to get it swing higher. Any other frequency may get it slightly higher but may also damp its motion.

3. The difficulty in reproducing such devices is in reproducing such resonance conditions. The careless researcher or replicator may miss that condition even though he may have a similar circuit or set up.

God has given us virtually inexhaustible energy in the form of kinetic energy of gas molecules, gravity and electron motion. These sources of energy are non-polluting and exist everywhere on Earth. God has revealed this to many inventors worldwide. Why do we insult these inventors? Should we support them instead? Amen.

[ltseung888]

Divine Revelation 3 - Bring-in electron motion energy

Devine Revelation 3 – bringing-in electromagnetic energy

We can bring-in the kinetic energy of the air molecules. We can bring-in the gravitational energy of the Earth. Can we bring-in electromagnetic energy?
What are the factors or conditions we need to consider?

We know that the vibration of a tuning fork can change the random motion of the air molecules into a pulsed order. The pulsed order uses or brings-in the kinetic energy of the air molecules. Sympathetic vibration or resonance is required.

We also know that pulse-pushing a pendulum can bring-in gravitational energy. The frequency of pulsing must be at the resonance frequency to achieve the best result.

We also know that a permanent magnet can be thought of as many tiny magnets or dipoles aligned together. The most elementary dipole is an orbiting electron. These electrons are normally bounded by the molecular structure and may be in all random directions. We can use electric or magnetic fields to change the random directions into some ordered or pulsed order direction. Can such dipoles act as vibrating tuning forks or oscillating pendulums? If so, can they bring-in the electron motion energy of the electrons?

Divine Revelation 3 is that – this is entirely possible. We need some type of resonance condition. The neighboring atoms giving energy to the system will try to regain that energy from its neighbors. This creates a rippling effect in 6 directions. In some instances, this phenomenon shows itself as a cooling effect. It can reverse the effect of global warming.

Thus in many claimed overunity inventions; electron motion energy is brought-in. The Output Energy measured can be much larger than the Supplied Input Energy. Such inventions do not violate any Laws of Physics. We should value such hardworking and path leading inventors. Hopefully, they will have an encouraging environment in the Energetic Forum.

God also reveals that the electron motion energy of electrons can be used. This is even better than chemical energy. Chemical energy requires changes in composition so that the electron cloud distributions are different. This is even simpler. Amen.

[rave154]

oh & on it goes

[jpentp]

Well EF tag your it, now its your turn to get the endless ramblings of old LT and his endless cast of characters to fill countless pages of his lead out, bring in, move over, fall down........ Theory of everything!
Enjoy the show, the man is a tireless purveyor off perpetual fantasy ramblings but he is entertaining if nothing els

[ltseung888]

Theory of Everything???

Well EF tag your it, now its your turn to get the endless ramblings of old LT and his endless cast of characters to fill countless pages of his lead out, bring in, move over, fall down........ Theory of everything!
Enjoy the show, the man is a tireless purveyor off perpetual fantasy ramblings but he is entertaining if nothing els

Thank you for your comments. I believe you also follow the Rosemary Ainslie research. She will have a demonstration on March 12, 2011 at one of the Universities. My Lead-out/Bring-in theory will support her research results.

As Aaron said: "It is an OPEN system using non-equilibrium thermodynamics."
(In your words: Theory of Everything)

Or you can follow this thread from the beginning and also its links. Once your understanding reaches Divine Relevation 3, you will find the understanding of all claimed overunity inventions easy. Amen.

[rave154]

Thank you for your comments. I believe you also follow the Rosemary Ainslie research. She will have a demonstration on March 12, 2011 at one of the Universities. My Lead-out/Bring-in theory will support her research results.

As Aaron said: "It is an OPEN system using non-equilibrium thermodynamics."
(In your words: Theory of Everything)

Or you can follow this thread from the beginning and also its links. Once your understanding reaches Divine Relevation 3, you will find the understanding of all claimed overunity inventions easy. Amen.

All of these Granduose statements & claims....and yet....after all this.....years of it....all he can do.......is light LED's using someone elses JT circuit.