Bashar Free Energy Space-Time Antenna Replication

[morpher44]

Starting a new thread here for those who might be
interested in replicating the so called
"Free Energy Space-Time Antenna".
This Antenna was described by an Alien named
Bashar channeled through Darryl Anka.
I have no affiliation to Darrly Anka.
I'm just curious about this device.

The video:
YouTube - Bashar - Free Energy Space-Time Antenna Replication

Inspired by this video:
YouTube - Bashar - Free Energy Space-Time Antenna

Darryl Anka on Wikipedia:
Darryl Anka - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Official Site of Bashar channeled by Darryl Anka

[morpher44]

construction slide show

YouTube - Bashar Free Energy Space-Time Antenna Construction

[Savvypro]

Have a look at the following video. Keep an eye on the spark colour @1:04 - 1:05 - it's green.

YouTube - Sparking a prototype of Bashar's Free Energy Space-Time Antenna

The coil within a coil design, reminds me of the coil design that was developed by Walter Russell.

See the "Russell's Counter-wound Overlapping Conical Coil Designs" at

Walter Russell -- Energy Generator Coils

[o541o]

If you think about it those coils are also very similar to a Caduseus coil.

[dubsta]

Not sure where I stumbled upon this information last week, but I have been fascinated ever since.

Looks like the vortex energy flowing in and out of pyramids.

the coil looks amazing...

[morpher44]

Bashar Coil used in Joule Thief Circuit

YouTube - Ep. 3: Bashar Coil used in Joule Thief Circuit

[conradphd]

YouTube - Ep. 3: Bashar Coil used in Joule Thief Circuit

A silly question? From looking at the circuit diagram it appears the LED is directly across the battery and it should light with the transistor removed - provided the battery voltage is above the forward junction voltage of the LED?

Isn't the transistor when conducting just shorting across the LED and turning it off? Maybe I see the diagram different than drawn.

[morpher44]

circuit

A silly question? From looking at the circuit diagram it appears the LED is directly across the battery and it should light with the transistor removed - provided the battery voltage is above the forward junction voltage of the LED?

Isn't the transistor when conducting just shorting across the LED and turning it off? Maybe I see the diagram different than drawn.

At the collector there is actually a branch the current can take.
It can either go thru the transistor, from collector to emitter or
it can go thru the LED (or a little of both). When the transistor
has a current at the BASE, it will allow current to flow thru
from C to E. When the BASE is pulled closer to ground, current
will not flow thru the transistor as easily, so the LED will see more current.

This is the Joule Thief approach. It uses very little power from
the battery because the coil sort of SNAPs, pulsing the LED quickly,
and then the back to steady state with the current flowing
thru transitor -- over and over again.

There are other oscillator circuits too: armstrong, colpitts, etc.
Joule Thief is so easy and provides this nice low-power feature.

[conradphd]

At the collector there is actually a branch the current can take.
It can either go thru the transistor, from collector to emitter or
it can go thru the LED (or a little of both). When the transistor
has a current at the BASE, it will allow current to flow thru
from C to E. When the BASE is pulled closer to ground, current
will not flow thru the transistor as easily, so the LED will see more current.

This is the Joule Thief approach. It uses very little power from
the battery because the coil sort of SNAPs, pulsing the LED quickly,
and then the back to steady state with the current flowing
thru transitor -- over and over again.

There are other oscillator circuits too: armstrong, colpitts, etc.
Joule Thief is so easy and provides this nice low-power feature.

It can either go thru the transistor, from collector to emitter or
it can go thru the LED (or a little of both). When the transistor
has a current at the BASE, it will allow current to flow thru
from C to E. When the BASE is pulled closer to ground, current
will not flow thru the transistor as easily, so the LED will see more current.

Of course - the transistor is basically a non-linear resistance in parallel with the LED (as connected) and therefore the LED should show conduction when the transistor is out of the circuit. If a Red LED with a forward junction of about 1.7V is used it would be dim, yet operate to some extent with 1.5V from the battery without the oscillation you show in the scope shots.

When you are adjusting the base resistance you are also taking the transistor into a saturation state which will in essence pull the parallel resistance down so far that the voltage drop present is insufficient to allow the LED to forward bias. What would you see when you add a LED with the reverse of the one you now have? Would seem to me that you could obtain additional benefit from utilizing both pulses.

I would also think from what you show that when the transistor is saturated that the dissipation would be higher than through the LED and this energy is wasted in heat in the transistor.

This is not to criticize your work- rather I question if you are seeing anything which is different than a standard inductance coil would offer? I have no concern with the type or configuration of the oscillator - rather I would think the idea is first to see what the coil could display as stated it might be different. Maybe a simple straight forward test of doing a ping with some sort of generator and load the coil with a pure resistance would show a result that could be worked with. Your present circuit is dependent on the coils L and C with environmental C. Indeed the transistor comes into direct play here also - yet there appear to be far to many variable to work around and the simple ping and load would offer much more.

The magic should be in the coil? not the less than magical JT configuration.

[morpher44]

Ep. 4: Expriments with Radiant Energy

In this episode I apply some of the ideas in Tesla's pattent #685,957. A plate antenna is impacted from radiant energy from the cosmos. The electrical impulses ping the coil, which is sitting above a capacitor attached to ground. This will make it oscillate at its self-resonant point, which in my coils is about 1.2Mhz (within the AM band). A trivial little circuit can be attached to bleed off energy and convert it to DC.
It occurs to me that the tetrahedron casing this thing is suppose to have can be the PLATE ANTENNA. A tetrahedron is the smallest, most compact, optimum, platonic shape that exposes 4 surfaces to the cosmos. As such, energy from all parts of the universe can impact it on one of its 4 surfaces. That would in-turn ping the coil. Get the coil humming, and the electric fields it produces can ionize the plate surfaces, making them even better receivers... and power might build up to some threshold. So I think the tetrahedron casing might be necessary to see energy build. Sound plausible?

YouTube - Ep. 4 - Bashar Free Energy Space-Time Antenna & Radiant Energy

[morpher44]

Of course - the transistor is basically a non-linear resistance in parallel with the LED (as connected) and therefore the LED should show conduction when the transistor is out of the circuit. If a Red LED with a forward junction of about 1.7V is used it would be dim, yet operate to some extent with 1.5V from the battery without the oscillation you show in the scope shots.

When you are adjusting the base resistance you are also taking the transistor into a saturation state which will in essence pull the parallel resistance down so far that the voltage drop present is insufficient to allow the LED to forward bias. What would you see when you add a LED with the reverse of the one you now have? Would seem to me that you could obtain additional benefit from utilizing both pulses.

I would also think from what you show that when the transistor is saturated that the dissipation would be higher than through the LED and this energy is wasted in heat in the transistor.

This is not to criticize your work- rather I question if you are seeing anything which is different than a standard inductance coil would offer? I have no concern with the type or configuration of the oscillator - rather I would think the idea is first to see what the coil could display as stated it might be different. Maybe a simple straight forward test of doing a ping with some sort of generator and load the coil with a pure resistance would show a result that could be worked with. Your present circuit is dependent on the coils L and C with environmental C. Indeed the transistor comes into direct play here also - yet there appear to be far to many variable to work around and the simple ping and load would offer much more.

The magic should be in the coil? not the less than magical JT configuration.

The Joule Thief circuit only puts an LED in one direction ... but you can have many in series if your voltage pulse is large enough.
This circuit is not anything I came up with ... but used by people here for all sorts of stuff.

>I question if you are seeing anything which is different than a
>standard inductance coil would offer.
This Joule Thief experiment was really to get a sense of the
phases and to make sure my wiring is all correct ... and that it does
work as a transformer.
See Ep. 4 where I start to play with Radiant Energy with the thing.

Re: magic in the coil.
I believe in magic ... as long as it can be explained with physics ... even
if we don't yet know what the formulas are yet.

What I'm thinking today is that this particular geometry may offer
some benefits not simply as a coil ... but also as an antenna.
I know about string theory only in terms of a documentary I watched.
I was struck by the idea of a "brane" (short for membrane).
If you could create a brane that wiggles within a coil, as it
is impacted by incoming radiant energy, the coil would receive
that via induction as the brane wiggles.
So rather than a PLATE surface attached to a wire, why not
have a wiggling brane in your coil?

One experiment that could be tried, is to create a high-voltage
oscillation on the coil, and to attempt to hold something magnetic
in the center.
The electric and magnetic fields floating around this coil will be interesting.

The people doing Rodin coils are thinking the shape of the coil is what
Rodin is talking about. But what if the COIL is not that shape, but rather
two cones arranged in this Bashar way? What if the fields it creates
are toroidal?
Rodin's so-called miny-black-hole, signularity description could be a
brane floating in a electro-magnetic toroidal shape create by
cone shaped coils?
Anyone willing to do the math on that? Yikes...

[morpher44]

Have a look at the following video. Keep an eye on the spark colour @1:04 - 1:05 - it's green.

YouTube - Sparking a prototype of Bashar's Free Energy Space-Time Antenna

The coil within a coil design, reminds me of the coil design that was developed by Walter Russell.

See the "Russell's Counter-wound Overlapping Conical Coil Designs" at

Walter Russell -- Energy Generator Coils

Yeah I saw that silly video and kinda laughed at the idea that the guy wanted to go out and read his electric meter to see if something changed. I don't know if this was tung-in-cheek or serious... you never know with youtube.

Thanks for the tip about Walter Russell. I've come across him before but never read his stuff. I guess I have some major reading to do.
Russell seems to have a certain intuition that some would perceive
as genius .. and other would perceive as wacko. I like historical characters like that -- they are the catalyst for change.

[morpher44]

Caduseus coil

If you think about it those coils are also very similar to a Caduseus coil.

The so called "bucking field" phenomenon is probably similar.
The Bashar coil may also be an antenna, however, because
the geometry might lend itself to reception of radiant energy.
So I'm leaning towards the idea that this Bashar thing is
coil - slash - antenna.
One thing we tend to do is go crazy with categories.
Coils aren't really coils... they are LRC circuits. They have resistance.
They have capacitance. As such, they have various properties
that can be measured that are non-linear. We like to keep our
world simple and "simplify" by inventing nice little circuit components
that are easy to think of with nice "ideal" linear behaviors ... so
that our equations work out. But reality isn't totally like that.
Electronic devices can be much more complex.

One thing that points to the Heaviside simplifications as being something
that really messed us up -- like Bearden implies -- is when
you have these simple little equations like for bandwidth of an
LRC circuit. When your coils Q is high, series bandwidth is this
very steep SHARP resonant peak. We understand that ... it makes
it hard to dial in that point ... got it. Those who have played with
radio tuners understand that notion of tuning in ...
Ah .. but what about parallel bandwidth. Does it approach infinity when
Q is high? Mathematically it does with the formulas we are taught.
But those are simplifications of something in nature that is not
exactly like that.
Notions of INFINITY are very fuzzy... and difficult to engineer
on the workbench.

[morpher44]

interesting conical motion video

YouTube - Conical Motion 1

[morpher44]

speculation: 3-phases?

In one drawing of the Bashar coil thing, it shows that the 3 walls of the tetrahedron casing touch the top of the coil at 3 places on the top diameter, separated by 120 degrees.
It occurred to me yesterday that IF the 3 surfaces were isolated from each other, this would be 3 separate phases of energy entering the coil. As such, 3 waves could be made to occur in the coil, each being resisted with reactance, as the magnetic fields are set up to respond. This might create a sort of SPINNING field, like in the animation above.
The 4th surface could be attached to GROUND.
Particles arriving to any of the 3 surfaces will want to find the path of least resistance to GROUND, and will only find it through the coil.
This 3-phase notion is very much like AC motor design ... but in this case the motor's axle is a magnetic field, which experiences no mechanical friction.