Bashar Free Energy Space-Time Antenna Replication

[Tishatang]

morpher44
I have some thoughts: First, I assumed magnetic fields important. But, as I read thread, cosmic or tachyon particles supposed to be source? If true, perhaps aim axis of coils at center of galaxy. The three stars forming belt of Orion constellation; related to three great pyramids alignment.

You are right stretching coils out in phi ratio. Here is image of vortex of water at around 5 min mark this video.

Nature Was My Teacher - The Vision Of Viktor Schauberger (part 2 of 4) - YouTube

Walter Russell had the two spirals coming to a point facing each other. Bashar coil more correct they interlace a little; maybe about 1/3 the length. This is discussed in the extensive writings of David Wilcock where he discusses error of Russell. He also discusses the reason for quantization of energy you observed. Its been a long time since I read this, maybe I can find link?

The extra space between coils makes it easier to interlace them. As I looked at the threads of a wood screw to represent the coils, where they interlace, they cross each other at right angles more or less. When the wires cross at right angles, these junctions cancel each other magnetic fields. This creates or receives scalar (tachyon?) energy. This is secret of caduceus coil and, I think, Henderson basket weave coils. Between the pegs, wires are crossing at right angles.

You want the electricity flowing in one direction. So, when it is returning, it is going the opposite direction to cancel the fields to create the scalar interface. Usually, this means the two coils of Bashar would be wired in series?

It might be in your experiments, you hit the right combo and a large amount of energy comes pouring in. I suggest a big knife switch or emergency cutoff.

Victor Schauberger referenced in above video, discovered that air vortexes above a certain speed are self sustaining. He invented the German flying saucer by spinning the air vortex generators to maybe 60,000 rpm. When they installed the special high speed motor, it took off and went right thru the roof of the lab!

Just food for thought.

[Tishatang]

morpher44
look what I found: Double vortex image

Lucas – The Invert Vortex From 21 December 2012 – Starting The New – 27 January 2013 | Lucas 2012 Infos

[d3x0r]

Bashar conical fields

I recently saw this guy David LaPoint on youtube. He's got a theory about bowl-shaped magnetic fields. Two intersecting conical coils also resemble this magnetic field.

Primer Fields Part 1

It's a very intersting behavior that these bowl shaped magnetic fields exhibit. A bowl with a hole in the bottom is also a deformed torus.

[Tishatang]

d3x0r
Great find, thanks for posting. I thought this was common knowledge that the magnetic fields of a bar magnet circled back to the bloc wall in the middle. I believe it was Howard Johnson who plotted the magnetic field point by point years ago? There was a video about it I saw maybe ten years ago.

Anyway this video takes it into the real world with these bowel shaped magnets. He does not explain the polarity of the bowel. One cannot have unipolar magnets. When one is North for example, is the inner part of the bowel South?

Is the shape of the bowel a hemisphere or a parabola? I suspect the curve maybe be that of a rope or chain hanging between two points? There is a name for this curve that I do not recall. Gravity is pointing straight down at any point on the curve. If you have the reverse magnetic polarity coming up from the bottom, than the direct opposing force would create the flat plane center of the galaxy.

As I recall, the curve of a chain hanging can be generated by putting a mark on the edge of a circle. You roll the circle on a flat plane and you plot the points of the mark on the background plane as you roll the circle. I hope this is correct? It's been a long time since I read this.

Winding a coil in this shape would be a lot more complicated than on a conical form. But the video hints the Bashar coil would work whether or not the points come together or are interlaced. You would just get different effects?

[morpher44]

thoughts: magnetomer versus Lorentz-o

I've been trying to reason out this cone-shaped,
interpenetrating cone thing and have come to TWO
experiments to add to my TODO list:

Lorentz-O
----------
Stan Deyo has a nice anti-gravity lecture and during this
multi-part lecture mentions Lorentz-O.
To get a spinning electro-magnetic vortex, one way would
be to have a ferromagnetic ring with a NOTCH cut in it.
Wrap a coil around this, PULSE it with DC, and
a spinning field develops because the shape is very much
like a horse shoe magnet, with a North face and a South face
at the notch location on the ring. The pulse are just
raising and lowering the intensity. Do this on a periodic basis,
and like pushing a child on a swing, you can keep the spin
going with low energy input.
This approach would argue that the Bashar coil should be wound
such that the down-going cone and the up-going cone have
wiring in the "SAME" spin direction. No bucking fields .. just
an attempt to inductively couple with a spinning field -- the vortex
created using this Lorentz-O approach.

OR ... another idea....

Magnetometer-Like Approach
----------------------------
Suppose instead the two cone shaped coils are wound around their
circumference such that when one is upside-down and put into
the other, the wiring sees currents flowing in the "opposite" direction.
I've been reading up and studying fluxgate magnetometers.
You actually need more coil winding here. You need the
"excitation" coil that is pulsed with LOW-FREQUENCY AC or DC pulses,
and you need the "sensing" coil that is used to observe the
echo pulses coming back when the coil is placed in the presence
of a magnetic field.
Normally magnetometers use ferromagnetic material, but this
approach can be utilized for more "subtle" magnetic fields using
air coils (I speculate).
So if the BASHAR STA was wound bifilar on both cones,
and wired such that you have opposite turn directions when the
coil is constructed, the "excitation" coil can be pulsed with low-frequency,
say 100hz or so, pulses, low power. The "sensing coil" would
give an ECHO pulse that is proportional too the magnetic field seen
by the coil at various orientations. Putting the coil in alignment with
the down-ward slanting magnetic field line is likely ideal if you
are trying to TAP that.
Now for the tricky part though.
The equations for fluxgate magnetometers have not yet fully been
worked out, I don't think. These are devices that have many
variables, the geometry, the materials, the number of turns,
the magnetic fields involved, the current going thru, the mutual-induction
in the device, etc.
Using this fluxgate approach for power-generation is an area of research
not yet investigated -- in the public domain -- for some reason.
I find that odd.

Conclusion
----------
I'm starting to lean towards magnetometer, magnetic resonance, etc.
as a viable approach for many of these devices.
The Lorentz-O Stan Deyo idea is also interesting, but there appear
to be things about this that Mr. Deyo didn't pass along, and it
just seems a bit more complicated.

I hope some of you experimenters out there might think about
these ideas with respect to things you might want to try.

[morpher44]

really good PHI video

Phi VBM Tori Array - YouTube