Originally posted by Zooty
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Muller generator replication by Romerouk
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Matthew Jones View PostWire with current on it by itself is inductive. You always have induction if you have a current. Unless you have reverse time. All Lenz tricking is a time reversal, time reversal equals polarity reversal, or no polarity at all.
Matt
Comment
-
Rodney,
I have tested a bunch of welding rods as a core, but they do heat up, and drag the rotor, the core is about 40mm in diameter, a pretty large core, and the magnet is 45mm in diameter. The welding rods are 2mm welding rods. I even used some straight clips as a core, but it made no difference, they did heat up.
Thanks
Comment
-
Originally posted by elias View PostRodney,
I have tested a bunch of welding rods as a core, but they do heat up, and drag the rotor, the core is about 40mm in diameter, a pretty large core, and the magnet is 45mm in diameter. The welding rods are 2mm welding rods. I even used some straight clips as a core, but it made no difference, they did heat up.
Thanks
My internet is down somebody near my home dug up the fiber optic cable.
thanks for the info about the welding rods. I was going to give them a try.
That is the most easily available material.
I have been working for a living the last few days and not had time to start my motor generator. Its on my mind and I will makes some changes.
have you had any more advances with your motor? anything new to share?
Comment
-
Nothing new, of course this might be because my magnets are large. The welding rods must not differ that much from laminated Iron plates.
You provided to final proof, so thank you for that, that motivates us. will be doing some tests.
Comment
-
Rod, can you test this with a ferrite core, I want to know if this effect is related to Iron cores or not. thanks, I have a rotor with 16 15mm dia magnets on it, going to use that for my newer tests.
Comment
-
-
laminates are less than 0.35mm in thickness and are much appropriate.
My next test will be done with magnets that have double thickness thus more magnetic flux to them, thus yielding to more voltage per RPM, as I recall Muller was using one inch thick magnets.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boguslaw View Post... Do you think that ferromagnetic material speed up magnetic flux or rather slow down ?
I don't know.
But I think the speed-up effect is not primarily related to the "propagation speed" of the magnetic flux in a coil core.
I think what helps us and what causes the speed-up effect, is that it takes time to polarize and then reverse-polarize a ferromagnetic core. I think physicists call this "reluctance". A ferromagnetic core "is reluctant" to change its polarity (when forced to do so by a passing magnet).
With an air core or vacuum, polarization of the core would happen "instantaneous". And this is why we need ferromagnetic cores - if my understanding is correct.
In other words: with a ferromagnetic core, there is a DELAY between the cause (= the passing magnet) and the effect/reaction (= polarization of the core).
If the rotor speed is high enough and just right, then there is just the right delay that the Lenz-force speeds up the rotor instead of slowing it down.Last edited by marxist; 08-09-2011, 10:05 AM.
Comment
-
Good point about polarization and delay model.
I think they define reluctance similar to resistance. Magnetize material have low reluctance compare to air and vacuum. They didn't mention anything about time though. It's good to know if there is a time delay in materials. I'm pretty sure it does. If we say it's the speed of light, I don't think the rotor speed we're having now will cut it. So if we going to model this way, the delay time must be a lot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by quantumuppercut View PostIt's good to know if there is a time delay in materials.
The way Physicists "explain" this in tech jargon is:
Reluctance of a material depends on the permeability of the material.
An when we look up Permeability (electromagnetism) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia we find:
...While at low frequencies in a linear material the magnetic field [in that material, i.e. in the core] and the auxiliary magnetic field [that is the field of the magnet] are simply proportional to each other through some scalar permeability, at high frequencies these quantities will react to each other with some lag time
The eye reacts with delay to the images and at a certain rpm of the coach's wheels, one can clearly see these wheels spin backwards while the coach actually moves forward.
The spinning backwards may be VIRTUAL (and not "real"), but how can you know what is real? You get nausea.
Please note: You know reality, because you can observe it. And you can clearly observe the wheels going backwards. Imagine you are a magnet with limited intelligence. What would be your reality? What would you react to? To the "virtual reality" which you can clearly observe, i.e. measure? Or to "real reality" (which is nowhere to be seen)?Last edited by marxist; 08-09-2011, 03:36 PM.
Comment
-
Newbie question...
Is a cycle time considered the time it takes for the magnets effect to start and stop affecting the coil? Or is it the time it takes for the start of one cycle to the start of another cycle? Just trying to get my head around basic terminology. Thanks in advanceTrust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone else's ~BW~ It's kind of fun to do the impossible ~WD~ From now on, I'll connect the dots my own way ~BW~ If I shall be like him, who shall be like me? ~LR~ Had I not created my whole world, I would certainly have died in other people’s ~AN~
Comment
Comment