Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muller generator replication by Romerouk

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Golden Mean

    Hey,

    I attended a Vedic Mathamatics seminar in Byron Bay Australia last year and
    found out about the the Golden mean or phi ratio of 1:1.618.
    I'm a very logical, scientific person and thus a friend paid for this to expand
    my mind to allow for this metaphysics, then quantify it to myself .
    (Plus ordered me a copy of "the book of Phi" by Jain.)

    I will not pretend to understand all the metaphyical side of these beliefs,
    however, the fact that Ben Franklin utilized a magic square/Lo-Shu square
    to in his experiments thereby the sum/sigma equals 260.
    Rodin coil used the 108 code, that is phi (1.618) to 100 decimal places and
    Searl effect generator factored in phi with the materials utilized.

    This is Jain words paraphrased from my notes in this seminar and I was the
    only non metaphysical person there that asked scientific questions. He was
    interested in my idea of having circuits containing the golden mean/phi.
    (If what everyone has been saying is true, we will see the results!!)

    Therefore, I must ask if anyone has seriously tried to incorporate the ratio
    of 1.618 in either geometry and/or Ohms law in a circuit?.
    I have only made a simple circuit and a metaphysist told me the correct
    colours to use to obtain a non-linear result.
    (can't explain how, I don't understand the metaphysics behind it)
    I have only utilized the phi ratio in a simple circuit to quantify to myself if
    there is anomolies to approaching this with a non scientific methodology
    and will this obtain broken symmetry with non-linear results?

    I know this a bit off topic but I'm very interested if anyone has used this
    concept in geometry of the coil and then compare to the actual calculated
    results of the expected properties of the coil.

    Regards
    Zero
    Last edited by ZeropointEnergy; 09-23-2011, 02:08 AM.

    Comment


    • great link

      Originally posted by Shadesz View Post
      I E-mailed the company that made the calculator I used above to thank them and inquire as to how they calculated the information. This was the reply that I recieved...



      Very interesting. I am grateful that they were willing to release their information to the world. Especially in such a user friendly way. I hope it brings them much business.

      K&J Magnetics - Magnetic Field Calculator

      Hey,

      Great link from K&J Magnetics for determining the magnetic field strength
      in grade N38 and over. I have just been using this as a resource tool before
      ordering my next lot of magnets. I wish they had grade 8 ferrite magnets
      included in there and would of saved me a massive amount of time that I
      spent mapping out the magnetic field strength to the air gaps between
      magnets. (iron filings on paper was utilized too)

      I was discussing what is the best tool for testing for uniform magnetic field
      strength when checking the properties, I said would have to be a simple
      design to create a home made gauss meter using hall sensors, or maybe was
      a complex design (just not sure if would work as advertised)


      Regards
      Zero

      Comment


      • Originally posted by elias View Post
        I see the golden ratio being the peak point here. 1.618. Thanks!
        the graph is very helpful I have added three magnets in a stack on my rotor.
        according to the calculator I am able to increase the field strength. and it seem to be spot on. Good call Thanks

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ZeropointEnergy View Post
          Hey,

          I attended a Vedic Mathamatics seminar in Byron Bay Australia last year and
          found out about the the Golden mean or phi ratio of 1:1.618.
          I'm a very logical, scientific person and thus a friend paid for this to expand
          my mind to allow for this metaphysics, then quantify it to myself .
          (Plus ordered me a copy of "the book of Phi" by Jain.)

          I will not pretend to understand all the metaphyical side of these beliefs,
          however, the fact that Ben Franklin utilized a magic square/Lo-Shu square
          to in his experiments thereby the sum/sigma equals 260.
          Rodin coil used the 108 code, that is phi (1.618) to 100 decimal places and
          Searl effect generator factored in phi with the materials utilized.

          This is Jain words paraphrased from my notes in this seminar and I was the
          only non metaphysical person there that asked scientific questions. He was
          interested in my idea of having circuits containing the golden mean/phi.
          (If what everyone has been saying is true, we will see the results!!)

          Therefore, I must ask if anyone has seriously tried to incorporate the ratio
          of 1.618 in either geometry and/or Ohms law in a circuit?.
          I have only made a simple circuit and a metaphysist told me the correct
          colours to use to obtain a non-linear result.
          (can't explain how, I don't understand the metaphysics behind it)
          I have only utilized the phi ratio in a simple circuit to quantify to myself if
          there is anomolies to approaching this with a non scientific methodology
          and will this obtain broken symmetry with non-linear results?

          I know this a bit off topic but I'm very interested if anyone has used this
          concept in geometry of the coil and then compare to the actual calculated
          results of the expected properties of the coil.

          Regards
          Zero
          I assume you are in Australia then? there are more Aussies joining all the time.

          Comment


          • Has anybody seen mariuscivic
            I heard you damaged your motor?
            Did you get your Diodes?
            Last edited by toranarod; 09-23-2011, 10:05 AM.

            Comment


            • Yep an Aussie

              Originally posted by toranarod View Post
              I assume you are in Australia then? there are more Aussies joining all the time.
              Hey Rod,

              That is correct mate. I have not been on forums long, however, has aided
              my experiments having like minded people building the same devices
              I'm finally obtaining all the parts for the Muller/RomeroUK replication at the
              same time as my current projects, now to find the time

              Regards
              Zero

              Comment


              • Hi ZPE,

                i like your idea about phi and circuitry, i don't know if anyone has tried it. Can you give us a schematic of what you tried ?

                Comment


                • Ok now I am confused...
                  I thought our way of maximizing phase shifts was to maximize inductance and minimize resistance? But how does that relate to what this guy has to say about calculating phase shifts?

                  The practical use of this chart is that anyone could select the frequency of interest and the amount of phase shift that they would allow and then calculate how much inductance would be required to satisfy the desired phase shift allowed.

                  This illustrates that the lower the phase shift you desire the greater the inductive reactance must be at any given frequency which you select.


                  Magnequest - Transformers and Phase Shifts

                  Notice his conclusion (the underlined part in the quote). Isn't this the opposite of what our current thinking is? Can someone help me understand?
                  Last edited by Shadesz; 09-23-2011, 10:59 AM.
                  Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone else's ~BW~ It's kind of fun to do the impossible ~WD~ From now on, I'll connect the dots my own way ~BW~ If I shall be like him, who shall be like me? ~LR~ Had I not created my whole world, I would certainly have died in other people’s ~AN~

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by toranarod View Post
                    Has anybody seen mariuscivic
                    I heard you damaged your motor?
                    Did you get your Diodes?
                    Hi Toranarod
                    I did damage my rotor;tryed to fix it but in the end one magnet flew off. I was very lucky it didn't hit me . It flew off around 6000 rpm. So now i bouth other 16 mags (10/10mm cube n48) becouse i want to make a new rotor with the duble nr of magnets hopping i will get the same effect at lower rpm.Since i want to make a new one please tell me if you now what is the best distance between the mags. I'm also on the other forum Muller Dynamo . Im changing very frequently my setup becouse now i have some more time and also i have many ideas. I'm doing that becouse not always the theory is the same as practice. Yesterday i connected the gen coils between them before the bridges and i did get the speeding in dead short but not in load. Didn't knew what to do with that, i've changed once again my setup

                    Comment


                    • Hi mariuscivic. Recently Romero shared the info about the magnet spacing.
                      If I remember correctly it is to be minimum 1.2 times of the magnet width between adjacent poles in NS configuration.

                      Pozdro!
                      “ THE PERSON WHO SAYS IT CANNOT BE DONE SHOULD NOT INTERRUPT THE PERSON DOING IT ! ”

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Shadesz View Post
                        Ok now I am confused...
                        I thought our way of maximizing phase shifts was to maximize inductance and minimize resistance? But how does that relate to what this guy has to say about calculating phase shifts?

                        Magnequest - Transformers and Phase Shifts

                        Notice his conclusion (the underlined part in the quote). Isn't this the opposite of what our current thinking is? Can someone help me understand?
                        He does not use the standard definition of the angle. He looks at "phase angle equals arc tan of the quantity R divided by X" , arctan(R/X).

                        The standard definition is arctan(X/R).

                        See Phasor Diagrams here: Phase Relationships in AC Circuits

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by mariuscivic View Post
                          Hi Toranarod
                          I did damage my rotor;tryed to fix it but in the end one magnet flew off. I was very lucky it didn't hit me . It flew off around 6000 rpm. So now i bouth other 16 mags (10/10mm cube n48) becouse i want to make a new rotor with the duble nr of magnets hopping i will get the same effect at lower rpm.Since i want to make a new one please tell me if you now what is the best distance between the mags. I'm also on the other forum Muller Dynamo . Im changing very frequently my setup becouse now i have some more time and also i have many ideas. I'm doing that becouse not always the theory is the same as practice. Yesterday i connected the gen coils between them before the bridges and i did get the speeding in dead short but not in load. Didn't knew what to do with that, i've changed once again my setup
                          Warned you about that didn't I ? Glad you're okay but please guys this isn't worth getting killed or injured over. It's like playing Russian Routlette. Put a fence of some sort around your setup if you are going to go for the higher RPM's. A simple 1/2" or so plywood or other wooden perimeter will protect you from most projectiles. And easy to find scrap plywood free at almost any construction site if you don't have some.
                          There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

                          Comment


                          • After days of testing ... here is my first result, thanks to Romero for advising the single coil/many RPM test


                            Speed Under Load Test.


                            COIL :

                            24 SWG (0.56mm, 23 AWG is closest at 0.573mm)

                            L = 53 mH
                            R = 60 Ohms

                            55mm long and 37mm wide.

                            Coil former barrel diameter is 15mm.

                            Unsure of number of turns since shop bought.


                            ROTOR :

                            VHS motor.

                            Diameter : 60mm


                            MAGNETS :

                            8 x 10mm diameter x 5mm height disc magnets, grade N42.
                            Magnets arranged N/S.


                            DRIVE CIRCUITRY :

                            Standard SSG drive circuit with charging diode removed.


                            RESULTS :

                            At 1100 RPM, shorting the coil increased the RPM to 1290

                            The input current went up from 115 mA to 120 mA

                            I will now do more testing and post results

                            I have done more testing and at some spots the RPM goes up while the current draw remains the same and i have just found my first spot where RPM goes up and current draw goes down.

                            @ Marius, this is at low RPM's starting off at around 1000 and the effect is there.

                            I do what ewizard advises and i put some MDF and some tool boxes around the device to catch any escaping magnets.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by kEhYo77 View Post
                              Hi mariuscivic. Recently Romero shared the info about the magnet spacing.
                              If I remember correctly it is to be minimum 1.2 times of the magnet width between adjacent poles in NS configuration.

                              Pozdro!
                              Hi kEhYo77!

                              You're right. But in NNN configuration i don't think it's the same. I've allready put on my rotor 10 mags (10/10mm) witch gave a distance of 20mm between them and i had trouble with my hall senzor.It was very dificult to find the ''sweat spot'' for triggering and I couldn't spin the rotor more than 3000 rpm. In my curent rotor the space between the mags is 25mm. Those 5 mm more make a huge difference . I think it's very important the strenght of the magnetic field.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ZeropointEnergy View Post
                                Hey Rod,

                                That is correct mate. I have not been on forums long, however, has aided
                                my experiments having like minded people building the same devices
                                I'm finally obtaining all the parts for the Muller/RomeroUK replication at the
                                same time as my current projects, now to find the time

                                Regards
                                Zero
                                great to see. you would know just from the word Torana I am Aussie.
                                A Torana is a gateway seen in Buddhist architecture. its also an aboriginal word like the wind they named a car after.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X