Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muller generator replication by Romerouk

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • @Rod,

    Thanks for re-explaining it. I'm coming around slowly.

    Also thank you qvision and Elias for the links

    My hang up was in thinking that current was the amount of flowing electrons, and voltage was the speed of the electrons: not the case. Voltage is the potential of electron travel, not the speed of electron travel.

    So now, when a generator coil is charged, it peaks the voltage before any current begins to flow. Thus we can have our voltage without lenz. But then the current begins to flow and as such, lenz starts to show up. So the idea is to delay the current without having to worry about voltage...?
    Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone else's ~BW~ It's kind of fun to do the impossible ~WD~ From now on, I'll connect the dots my own way ~BW~ If I shall be like him, who shall be like me? ~LR~ Had I not created my whole world, I would certainly have died in other people’s ~AN~

    Comment


    • Now for the next question,

      Why when you first charge an inductor does voltage spike before current flows? I have my ideas but was wondering if anyone already knew so I don't have to speculate.
      Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone else's ~BW~ It's kind of fun to do the impossible ~WD~ From now on, I'll connect the dots my own way ~BW~ If I shall be like him, who shall be like me? ~LR~ Had I not created my whole world, I would certainly have died in other people’s ~AN~

      Comment


      • Originally posted by elias View Post
        @Rod

        Have you tried charging low impedance batteries with your coil? Because batteries have low impedance they should behave like shorting coils. I think that this was the "secret" of the Watson machine, he was charging batteries by pulsing the coils into the battery at the "right" moment, so that the phase delay of the "current" made Lenz go away.

        If you have achieved no drag by shorting through diode bridges, I suggest give this a try!

        Elias
        No I have not tried that,its a good idea I have just finish my 3rd new Rotor.
        It was rather difficult to get them all just perfectly in the right place.

        getting the coils together I need to make a few more.

        This is what I came up with from what I calculated from my research, also the designee are the best or as close as we can get on the budgets we have and skills and resources at our disposal.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Shadesz View Post
          Now for the next question,

          Why when you first charge an inductor does voltage spike before current flows? I have my ideas but was wondering if anyone already knew so I don't have to speculate.
          Do you mean by a mechanical switch? the moment you close the switch Its because of what we call the bounce effect. have you ever heard of a de-bounce circuit? pair of cross coupled NAND gates.
          there is a reason why switching a coil with a transistor is better than a reed switch. that's why they burn out. they do not close fast enough.
          every mechanical switch will actually switch on and off several times before it's properly closed. that's what the spike is.

          If this is what you are referring to

          Comment


          • That is good work Rod, beautiful.

            This is the old image for the Watson Machine that is amazingly black and white, as I have never understood why, maybe it was copied from a book:



            Anyway ... what really is interesting about this design, are these five points:
            1. A really large rotor!
            2. Really long coils!
            3. Muller type Odd/Even design, as you can see the magnets and coils are not completely aligned.
            4. Really large space between the magnets.
            5. A really large flywheel.


            Now that is quite interesting!
            What about the long coils? actually I did a test a couple of days ago with a fat coil and a long coil with about same number of turns. I shorted them, and both of them were drawing about the same amount of current when shorted, but ... The long one had much higher lenz delay, and dragged the rotor much less! Because it had less resistance. Longer the coil less resistance it takes for each turn.
            Watson was pulsing all of this into a low impedance battery, now this sounds familiar, doesn't it?

            Only speculations and some food for thought ...


            Elias
            Humility, an important property for a COP>1 system.
            http://blog.hexaheart.org

            Comment


            • Originally posted by elias View Post
              That is good work Rod, beautiful.

              This is the old image for the Watson Machine that is amazingly black and white, as I have never understood why, maybe it was copied from a book:



              Anyway ... what really is interesting about this design, are these five points:
              1. A really large rotor!
              2. Really long coils!
              3. Muller type Odd/Even design, as you can see the magnets and coils are not completely aligned.
              4. Really large space between the magnets.
              5. A really large flywheel.


              Now that is quite interesting!
              What about the long coils? actually I did a test a couple of days ago with a fat coil and a long coil with about same number of turns. I shorted them, and both of them were drawing about the same amount of current when shorted, but ... The long one had much higher lenz delay, and dragged the rotor much less! Because it had less resistance. Longer the coil less resistance it takes for each turn.
              Watson was pulsing all of this into a low impedance battery, now this sounds familiar, doesn't it?

              Only speculations and some food for thought ...


              Elias
              Thank you Elias
              you have just confirmed my raving on about the resistance needing to low as possible.
              great Photo and information.

              Comment


              • you could also say that each coil in the picture resembles the secondary of a Tesla Coil
                Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by toranarod View Post
                  Do you mean by a mechanical switch? the moment you close the switch Its because of what we call the bounce effect. have you ever heard of a de-bounce circuit? pair of cross coupled NAND gates.
                  there is a reason why switching a coil with a transistor is better than a reed switch. that's why they burn out. they do not close fast enough.
                  every mechanical switch will actually switch on and off several times before it's properly closed. that's what the spike is.

                  If this is what you are referring to
                  Sorry I should not have used the word spike.

                  My question is, why when you switch an inductor are voltage and current out of phase with voltage being the leader?

                  Ps, nice build! I wish I had build skills and more resources to do so.
                  Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone else's ~BW~ It's kind of fun to do the impossible ~WD~ From now on, I'll connect the dots my own way ~BW~ If I shall be like him, who shall be like me? ~LR~ Had I not created my whole world, I would certainly have died in other people’s ~AN~

                  Comment


                  • @Elias,

                    Very nice. Long coil over fat coil makes total sense when you want to reduce resistance. Less wire per turn = less resistance per turn.

                    I have a question about your test. What were the cores made out of, and what did each core weigh?

                    Thanks
                    Last edited by Shadesz; 09-25-2011, 11:19 AM.
                    Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone else's ~BW~ It's kind of fun to do the impossible ~WD~ From now on, I'll connect the dots my own way ~BW~ If I shall be like him, who shall be like me? ~LR~ Had I not created my whole world, I would certainly have died in other people’s ~AN~

                    Comment


                    • Hey guys, I'm waiting for more conversation about why we get the phase difference from inductors before I share my theory.

                      But just as a side note, with my current theory, it appears that a drive inductor maximum phase shift may be 90 degrees, but a generator inuctor (pickup inductor) maximum phase shift could be 180 degrees.



                      If anyone has the capabilities I would ask them to test this on a transformer.
                      Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone else's ~BW~ It's kind of fun to do the impossible ~WD~ From now on, I'll connect the dots my own way ~BW~ If I shall be like him, who shall be like me? ~LR~ Had I not created my whole world, I would certainly have died in other people’s ~AN~

                      Comment


                      • Just some history for those not familiar with the Watson Machine...

                        Watsons SelfPowering Generator Energy from Vacuum
                        Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone else's ~BW~ It's kind of fun to do the impossible ~WD~ From now on, I'll connect the dots my own way ~BW~ If I shall be like him, who shall be like me? ~LR~ Had I not created my whole world, I would certainly have died in other people’s ~AN~

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by MonsieurM View Post
                          you could also say that each coil in the picture resembles the secondary of a Tesla Coil
                          The beauty of creation is the fact that it makes you learn all the time, and it will never ever end I suppose.
                          Humility, an important property for a COP>1 system.
                          http://blog.hexaheart.org

                          Comment


                          • take a little break and watch (some of you have probably already seen it )...even you are harmonic....enjoy

                            World Science Festival 2009: Bobby McFerrin Demonstrates the Power of the Pentatonic Scale - YouTube

                            Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Shadesz View Post
                              @Elias,

                              Very nice. Long coil over fat coil makes total sense when you want to reduce resistance. Less wire per turn = less resistance per turn.

                              I have a question about your test. What were the cores made out of, and what did each core weigh?

                              Thanks
                              Yes At first I was speculating that fat coils are better, but experimentation proved otherwise, will post a picture of my coils as I get my hands to them. For the mean time:

                              First coil: 700 turns of 0.7mm wire about 80mm in length, with a 10mm diameter ferrite core.

                              Second coil: about 700 turns of 0.7mm wire about 40mm in length with a 10 mm diameter ferrite core.

                              These are approximations, not exact values, but the voltage reading was the same for the same rotor, and the second one really dragged more while shorting.

                              I did also another test with another type of coil with 2mm wire on it with the same results.

                              Elias
                              Humility, an important property for a COP>1 system.
                              http://blog.hexaheart.org

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Shadesz View Post
                                Hey guys, I'm waiting for more conversation about why we get the phase difference from inductors before I share my theory.

                                But just as a side note, with my current theory, it appears that a drive inductor maximum phase shift may be 90 degrees, but a generator inuctor (pickup inductor) maximum phase shift could be 180 degrees.



                                If anyone has the capabilities I would ask them to test this on a transformer.
                                That's an interesting idea
                                I would like to know what your thinking is we need some new input.
                                if it is 180 then that would be fantastic
                                always willing to look at new ideas.
                                why we get the phase difference from inductors because any electrical field in motion creates magnetic field in motion. and that magnetic field in turn induces current to flow in the opposite direction to the current that created it. that's all I got.

                                Please explain your Ideas

                                Last edited by toranarod; 09-25-2011, 02:09 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X