Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Magnetman MEG release Date 5/11/11

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by pengrove View Post
    wow very enlightening.

    Energy from the vacuum 11, magnetic gates. 37 mins in should shed some light on what I am saying. John clearly states that the beams created by a magnet configuration like the one I was showing is 4 times in strength. End the beams are targeting the coils on the MEG. I call it the equator. enough said.
    the beams are deflected by the control coils .... is equivalent to inclinate the plane of galaxy and flipping the pole of the planet? (instead of planet oscillation)

    I like your picture and other like :
    Sepp Hasslberger: Star Formation: Vortex Builds Stars, Planets
    Last edited by wings; 07-12-2012, 09:59 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Black Sand Magnetite mixed with epoxy might be best for the core.

      Comment


      • #33
        pengroove
        Anyhow.. i dont think that the field from the magnets in the middle are far enough, to reach the outer Coils. But i can be wrong.
        Maybe if someone build it, this Distance must be adjusted too.


        Wings
        That is an interesting Picture, it would mean, that the Earth not only turns around the sun but jumps like a Ball, and would explain, that the Earth got a different gradient, when you look at the different Angle to the Sun at each Wave.

        Or the whole Statement is a Lie, the Earth turns around the Sun each Year once, but it only walks along this waveform Path, and cause that the Earth change her angle to the Sun in Rotation.

        Its can be more like, That the Earth turns around the Sun once in a Suncycle. When the Poles flip each every 400 000 Years, then a Sun cycle is hummm... WavexYears= a lot Time.

        But i am even not sure, if they ever will flip or only move around, at the Bowl.
        Mainly i think the Magnetfield from the Earth is caused by the Metals in the Ground, when a Plate moved, like it in Japan did, the Poles do move also.

        Or can someone really verify that the Earth is moving around the Sun once each Year, or we still have to only trust our Scientists. I recall the Claim there, the Earth is flat, No, not the Earth, our Galaxy is, from what you see.
        Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Joit View Post
          pengroove
          Anyhow.. i dont think that the field from the magnets in the middle are far enough, to reach the outer Coils. But i can be wrong.
          Maybe if someone build it, this Distance must be adjusted too.


          Wings
          That is an interesting Picture, it would mean, that the Earth not only turns around the sun but jumps like a Ball, and would explain, that the Earth got a different gradient, when you look at the different Angle to the Sun at each Wave.

          Or the whole Statement is a Lie, the Earth turns around the Sun each Year once, but it only walks along this waveform Path, and cause that the Earth change her angle to the Sun in Rotation.

          Its can be more like, That the Earth turns around the Sun once in a Suncycle. When the Poles flip each every 400 000 Years, then a Sun cycle is hummm... WavexYears= a lot Time.

          But i am even not sure, if they ever will flip or only move around, at the Bowl.
          Mainly i think the Magnetfield from the Earth is caused by the Metals in the Ground, when a Plate moved, like it in Japan did, the Poles do move also.

          Or can someone really verify that the Earth is moving around the Sun once each Year, or we still have to only trust our Scientists. I recall the Claim there, the Earth is flat, No, not the Earth, our Galaxy is, from what you see.
          see
          Galactic Alignment

          galactic plane a paper thickness

          also

          NASA - Earth's Inconstant Magnetic Field
          Last edited by wings; 05-14-2011, 02:08 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by pengrove
            Ok take a coil of wire with soft iron core connect it to
            Slow slow, i feel like a old man this Weekend

            And no, sry, i did miss this Vid
            Last edited by Joit; 05-14-2011, 02:32 PM.
            Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Joit View Post
              Slow slow, i feel like a old man this Weekend

              And no, sry, i did miss this Vid
              Broli:

              http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ach-other.html
              Last edited by wings; 07-12-2012, 09:59 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Ok, now i did take 2 Ring Magnets from a Microwave oven, and 2 cubes Neodyms.
                Thought that is enough, to see if the Field increase or dont.
                The Ringmagnets are easier to hold both Poles together, and moving beside with the Neodym.
                But seriously, it does not change to much. You got a opposite Pole in the Middle Ok.
                But the Field dont gets bigger or flatter or have a longer range. It is about the same,
                as the Neodym, when i turn it, repells at the outer Poles.
                And anyhow i do miss the Fluxpath there at the MEG.
                When the Magnets should really interact, then the excitationcoils should create near the Strenght from the Magnets..
                Even when i still know, that holding 2 Poles to eachother will drop a 3rd standing Magnet faster as only one Magnet.
                Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Hollow Magnets with a Core inside maybe?
                  Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    it looks to me like the meg is beardens form of a monopole. With bucking magnetic fields triggered by the actuator coils. That can only explain this:

                    Last edited by pengrove; 05-15-2011, 01:46 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      So it does not matter if both souths are pointed in or both norths. We have two paths for the flux and we switch back and forth between the two. Creating a solid state generator that will power any appliance if its done correctly.

                      Case solved

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by pengrove
                        To be honest I am not totally sure if the exciter coils are causing a flip flop in polarities of the magnets or if its spinning the flux. I am leaning towards the flip flop.
                        IMO
                        scalar magnetic configuration =(need) scalar beam pancake control coils

                        P.S
                        I like:
                        Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by wings View Post
                          IMO
                          scalar magnetic configuration =(need) scalar beam pancake control coils

                          P.S
                          I like:
                          Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.
                          the actuator coils are just gate valves, turning them on closes the gate. Very simple and awesome design really.

                          Comment


                          • #43

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by pengrove View Post
                              the actuator coils are just gate valves, turning them on closes the gate. Very simple and awesome design really.
                              very flat coils:

                              Test 1: Load 18 watt globe.

                              Input:
                              7.4 Volts
                              1.9 Amps
                              14.06 Watts

                              Output:
                              13.11 Volts
                              1.22 Amps
                              15.99 Watts

                              COP = 1.137

                              The MEG - Replication Project - Hyiq.org

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by wings View Post
                                very flat coils:

                                Test 1: Load 18 watt globe.

                                Input:
                                7.4 Volts
                                1.9 Amps
                                14.06 Watts

                                Output:
                                13.11 Volts
                                1.22 Amps
                                15.99 Watts

                                COP = 1.137

                                The MEG - Replication Project - Hyiq.org
                                I emailed that guy waiting on his response.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X