The Magnetman MEG release Date 5/11/11

[pengrove]

this is the basic idea use the meg at low hz for the ease of geting the parts to make it work ,here is a simple diagram of what i'am doing

cheers ztec2002

You are using just a typical magnet configuration?

[pengrove]

this is the basic idea use the meg at low hz for the ease of geting the parts to make it work ,here is a simple diagram of what i'am doing

cheers ztec2002

So you have a figure 8 flux pattern. Wild.

[ztec2002]

hi pengrove

reducing my meg to two magnets, winding my own coils and trying the standard meg configuration testing it , than your monopole configuration , this way all i have to do is swap out the magnet configuration ,and i will post the results.

ps riped apart a micro wave oven transformer for the wire required just because i forgot to buy it on the way home from work

cheers ztec2002

[pengrove]

reducing my meg to two magnets, winding my own coils and trying the standard meg configuration testing it , than your monopole configuration , this way all i have to do is swap out the magnet configuration ,and i will post the results.

ps riped apart a micro wave oven transformer for the wire required just because i forgot to buy it on the way home from work

cheers ztec2002

Don't forget the Updates.



If I am not mistaken that is Bearden's Original MEG at the top.

[pengrove]

in beardens words

You have to isolate the B field and let the A field uncurl in the transformer core. When you perturb the core filled with uncurled A field potential the coils pick up the energy.

So what we have been doing is letting both the A field and the B field uncurl in the transformer core. When we should of been keeping them separated and isolating the B field.

I do not think ferrite cores will work correctly. Black sand Magnetite , Metglass , or possibly basic soft iron transformer core material in layers should work.

[SuperCaviTationIstic]

pengrove,
can you post a link to that quote from Bearden? He usually cites things in his papers, and I'd like to know if he cited anything about the separation of a and b fields

[pengrove]

pengrove,
can you post a link to that quote from Bearden? He usually cites things in his papers, and I'd like to know if he cited anything about the separation of a and b fields

I quoted him wrong but the point is still valid. I got the B field and the A field reversed.

He talks about it in Energy from the Vacuum 1.

Picture the flux of a monopole Magnet in the middle of the Meg and watch the video once. What he says actually makes sense if you do.

[pengrove]

All I have to say is,, Holy ****,, it works..

[Mario]

Hi Pengrove, can you elaborate on that? You mean with the setup with the scalar magnets like in your first drawing or like the second of the two pics you just posted?

[pengrove]

Hi Pengrove, can you elaborate on that? You mean with the setup with the scalar magnets like in your first drawing or like the second of the two pics you just posted?

Right now I have norths facing the core with a space in between them. If you read the patent and look at the other core configurations you will see what I mean. I don't have the total input vs. output as of right yet. But I can say that it works well.

[Mario]

Right now I have norths facing the core with a space in between them. If you read the patent and look at the other core configurations you will see what I mean. I don't have the total input vs. output as of right yet. But I can say that it works well.

I'm not sure which setup of the patent you're referring to, they don't show a space. Also, by space, do you mean air or magnetic conducting material? I have a setup I've been playing with with no success, I don't mind trying new things if you're willing to share. Frequency, duty cycle etc. is no problem, I can do pretty much everything I want.

[pengrove]

I'm not sure which setup of the patent you're referring to, they don't show a space. Also, by space, do you mean air or magnetic conducting material? I have a setup I've been playing with with no success, I don't mind trying new things if you're willing to share. Frequency, duty cycle etc. is no problem, I can do pretty much everything I want.

All I get out of the regular dipole MEG is heat and amps.

I have half an inch of air between my magnets. Both norths face the core.

Just changing the magnet configuration reduced the input amperage to 1/3.

IF the actuator coils are not correct you will get little or nothing at all out of it.

Are you getting anything at all? What core do you have?

[pengrove]

My tests are showing that a typical magnet across the MEG core makes it heat up and not work. With norths facing the core only I can not tell the difference with the magnets or with out them.


My final conclusion until further notice is that the Magnet in the MEG is just to throw us off. Its not needed at all. And if it ends up that it does need magnets it will be only north facing the core. But I really don't think that they are doing anything.

None the less the MEG is very interesting.

[pengrove]

Any magnetic flux that is sucked into the metglass core is not coming back out. So where is the energy coming from? The space around the core, I guess they call it the vacuum.

This Meg could be scaled up to a very large size by the looks of it. The more coils of wire wrapped around this core the more you will get out of the MEG. All you have to do is pay for the switch.

[Mario]

I made my setup in order to replicate Flynn's parallel path (solid state version). My core is not metglas, it's about the same size but ferrite for high efficiency and hi freq. applications up to 1 KW. I have tried different magnet strenghts, freq and also tried taking only the collapsing part of the output as explained in the attached paper. Still no luck. Without magnets it works as a standard high efficiency transformer I could easily move the coils for MEG type arrangement. My question is, do you actually see more out than in with your metglas setup?