Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Radiant Energy theory

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Farmhand View Post
    I'm looking at that diagram above and wondering if there should actually be two drawing's to represent properly what happens.

    The one above and another the same, but with no magnetic field and the radiant arrows pointing inwards. To represent what happens when the current stops. It's when the current is shut off we collect the radiant back in, isn't it? Or as much as will fit into the particular coil we are switching.

    Or do we only collect the magnetic field back in ? Or some of both ? If the radiant energy only leaves the wire and go's away we can't get it back, unless other radiant energy replaces it. Does the radiant energy cause negative resistance, because it leave's a "virtual vacuum" ?

    Just a thought.
    You may be right about the drawings. I believe energy both enters and is repelled from the wire at both the moment of switching on and off.

    At the switch on we get the negative radiant which has the cooling effect as well as the strange effect on the battery. I haven't fully tested this as i crystallized some batteries playing with this.

    Negative resistance is a term used at the patent office for energy from the radiant. They wont accept that energy is entering the system from another source as this would mean electrical theory has to be rewritten. However they are happy to accept a negative resistor

    I think the same can be said of the virtual vacuum, they are just terms to explain what we don't understand without accepting there is a problem with the standard electrical theory.

    Its like saying the energy is there but I'm not looking at it as it will mean I am wrong.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Web000x View Post
      You should study the works of Eric Dollard if you have not already. He is extremely clear in his explanations of Tesla phenomena. I have never found Tesla, Bedini, or Bearden explanations as thorough as Mr. Dollards

      The "Radiant Energy" pulse shown in the diagram is simply dielectric flux, magnetism's conjugate energy form. All electric circuits are wires for the conversion between magnetism and dielectric forces hence oscillations occur. These oscillations occur in the space outside of the wire. The wire just reflects dielectric into magnetism and visa versa.

      I am convinced that Eric Dollard's derived algebra is correct. He states that there are two types of power flow, positive and negative.

      Everybody is familiar with the first which is V*I = Watts. The negative flow would be -V*I = - Watts. These are real power values so they are in the domain of +1 or -1, no imaginary numbers in this simplified equation. These would simply be the products of magnetism and dielectricity at that point in time.

      Dollard speaks of the importance of synchronous parameter (capacitance/inductance) variation vs. time for the synthesis of energy.

      When Bedini uses his battery chargers, I'll bet that he is hitting a battery with a capacitor dump which causes oscillations in the battery. The battery is then acting like a varying capacitor. When the battery oscillations are negative, the battery gets another cap dump (positive current flow against a negative voltage slope) which causes a negative power factor or aka Free/negative energy.

      That is why Bedini states that multicoil machines will be the bearers of overunity. They are able to recharge a capacitor quickly enough to dump again before the oscillations in the battery are able to dampen out too much.

      This hasn't been experimentally verified by myself, but it would tie together much of the jargon that has most everybody baffled.

      Dave
      I here what you are saying on Dullard and will look it up. I also agree on the mathematics you propose although I cant visualize your cap dump thing as yet.

      Comment


      • #18
        ooops sorry Dollard

        Comment


        • #19
          Interesting stuff, Web000x, is there any particular source of Eric's work's we could start with, to ease into it ? Kind of. If thats possible.

          Cheers

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Farmhand View Post
            Interesting stuff, Web000x, is there any particular source of Eric's work's we could start with, to ease into it ? Kind of. If thats possible.

            Cheers
            He is pretty intense in his explanations, but he does show experimental evidence of his claims. You get to see his setups while he is explaining theory. I'll try and help if you have any questions.

            He doesn't teach anymore since he got scammed a while back so the video's are old. Here they are:

            http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...OEhj0Q&cad=rja

            http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...zN1QUw&cad=rja

            http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...3I5pvg&cad=rja

            He also has published mathematics for describing this which he speaks of.

            Those should keep you thinking for a minute.

            Dave

            Comment


            • #21
              Great info and insights. I did find out from some other reading that said it takes high voltage at about 10k hz to really study it. No voltage was given.

              If the radiant energy only leaves the wire and go's away we can't get it back.
              Only if you turn it back on. I would think we dont want it back into the wire but outwards into a device with the proper materiel's to utilize it. Finding the materiels is the hard part. Some of the amateur ideas I have may have been already tried. If the voltage/pressure leads the current maybe inputting a frequency or multiple frequencies ahead of the voltage/pressure might do something if thats possible. Playing around with my magnets as I usually do everyday,I had my laser light on the table and that got me to thinking about radiant. I then remembered the pic I posted and thought of a wire going through the center of a cylindrical glass tube or other materiel and then try to collect the radiant energy into that.
              This idea was for simple low ma lighting. With the added information given to me here Ill throw out some amateur ideas that may or may not have merit.

              Multiple wires,not twisted,through the center of the cylinder materiel, with the Pulsed radiant wire in the center and the others with frequencies.

              Wrapping the outside of the cylinder with a suitable materiel in a helix or scalar fashion. Iron,copper,litz,magnesium?

              Coating the cylinder with a materiel.

              Embedding the cylinder materiel with another materiel.

              I would think it would be advantageous to find out what reacts with this energy first rather than trying to just push electrons through copper coils alone.

              They wont accept that energy is entering the system from another source
              Yet it seems from what ive read thats its accepted that from sunlight on metal that for every photon absorbed an electron is ejected.

              At the switch on we get the negative radiant which has the cooling effect as well as the strange effect on the battery. I haven't fully tested this as i crystallized some batteries playing with this.
              That is intense. It reminds me of Sweets Vta work without the barium magnet.

              My knowledge of the radiant aspects of electricity has been expanded so thanks to everyone here!

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Web000x View Post

                He also has published mathematics for describing this which he speaks of.
                I have put a collection of Eric Dollards document on my website:
                Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/

                There appear to be some DNS problems. You may also find it here:
                Bestandsoverzicht van /tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thanks for putting up that archive lamare, it's an excellent collection.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    wow a lot of things to take in, it will take me a while to digest it

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Wow, I got through the first video Web000x posted and really enjoyed it. Very interesting. Eric is a very intellegent guy. After the first video I had to sleep on it. The next day I had visitors arrive, so i have to entertain them.

                      It will take some time to absorb it all. But it makes a lot of sense to me.

                      I watched you're video too 7imix. Sweet little setup.

                      What frequency did you get the full wave at resonance at ?

                      What model is you're new 2 channel scope ? I need one.


                      Cheers

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by JasonD View Post
                        Any thoughts?

                        You may want to check out some of the documentation by Roberto Handwerker I found:

                        Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Reference_Material/deltaavalon/

                        http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Mat...%20revised.pdf

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Edwin Gray Circuit Explanation With Zpe Free Energy schematics :

                          YouTube - ‪Edwin Gray Circuit Explanation With Zpe Free Energy schematics‬‏

                          this video show the link between impedance and radiant energy .

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Hi Guy's, Umm somehow I've ended up watching these video's and I get the feeling there is something here to help us.

                            Very interesting stuff. This guy is a big hope to enlighten Academia, maybe.
                            He explains things very well. Hold on to the top of you're heads, it's pretty deep.
                            Part 1
                            YouTube - ‪The Electric Universe Pt1 of 4‬‏
                            Part 2
                            YouTube - ‪The Electric Universe Pt2 of 4.mpg‬‏
                            Part 3
                            video missing Must be good.
                            Part 4
                            YouTube - ‪The Electric Universe Pt4 of 4‬‏

                            Radio interview. Part 1
                            YouTube - ‪RIR W Thornhill The Electric Universe 1/12‬‏

                            Just look for more parts in the related video's column, or up next.



                            Cheers

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Dollard is connecting dots for me. I'm just reading his work on Tesla coils and it all makes sense now.

                              The use of an additional coil and lead to slow down current allowing more time for the dipole to absorb radiant energy, just my interpretation.

                              Thanks for the great info

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Induction In The Dimension Of Space !

                                Hi guy's, mbrownn, this document I just linked to in another thread, I still have not finished it yet, but having got to figure 8 page 50 of the actual document, page 51 of the PDF, and he is saying that transformers transfer longitudinal energy to the secondary and the electron flow is through the primary, which in my simple way of thinking would leave only half the energy to pass through the primary and out the other side but it would be measured the same because the longitudinal energy didn't get measured on the way in anyway.

                                But it was there. And when it go's to the secondary it causes different current.

                                This document could well explain how the thing with the inverter actually worked. It's not exactly how I seen it, but similar, sounds much more likely than the theory I came up with.

                                There is a lot of interesting stuff in this document.

                                I'm still studying the paper, but I thought I would share that.
                                http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_...%20Dollard.pdf

                                Anyone got any thought's on that.

                                The good stuff starts on page 35 of the PDF ( at the start of the hand writing) and p34 of the document same page different number.

                                Section 4- Induction In The Dimension Of Space. Sounds good.

                                Cheers

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X