Scientific evaluation of Nikola Tesla work.

[Tehnoman]

Hello all.

Has been a long time since I have started a new thread. But now I feel it is time again. The reason is because quite recently I restarted more intense search into K.Meyl experiment and possible explanations. During the search I stumbled across one site, which I was not aware before:
Andre Waser publications

The most interesting could be these:
Nikola Tesla Wireless systems
Nikola Tesla Radiation and Cosmic rays

In the first one there is also this reference to document [47] (which I have not been able to find anywhere, Andre himself hasn't responded to my e-mail message) about analysis of Meyl experiment. The conclusion seemed to be that it can be explained by present (conventional, call it as You wish) high frequency analysis.

His papers seem reasonable, I haven't found any reason to doubt them. Then maybe there is this thing that science has given the chance for Tesla technology, but it simple doesn't destroy our present knowledge about nature?

There is this thing to think about.

P.S. I do anticipate that his thread will die out due to lack of knowledge for most people about vectors and mathematics behind the descriptions.

[ZeropointEnergy]

Tesla supporter

Hey,


I'm a huge fan of Nikola Tesla and that was what influenced me to
get into electronics as a hobby and now studying at Uni/school.

The single wire transmission technology was replicated is the 70's
in a small scale arrangement powering a 100-200W bulb.
I will have to check all my old folders and post up the name of
the video that it's from.

The potential for this is amazing but is all based on resonance between
the transmission and reciever points.
Even in the 70's the inventor replicating it was asking for funding to
scale it up for practical power uses and I thought twice about trying
to make small model.
Essentially I'm going to have to make two Tesla coils with equal
capacitance/inductance and not owning a metal lath to engineer
slowed me down. (one day I hope to try)

Have you replicated the "Tesla single electrode Roentgen tube" or the
"Magnifying Transmitter", I cant understand all the the old symbol
notations for Tesla's patents and how to convert to new.
(done the online search no results)

Thankyou for sharing the link I have 5 Tesla books on patents/life
but they didnt clearly explain his methods in todays physics.
The analogies of Andre Waser answered a few questions I had and
reinterated what I knew about Tesla that he is right about his theories.
Also, as the people like Bearden get due credit the classical EM model
corrected, only then can replicate and give Tesla his due respect
100+ years later for his concept.

Regards
Zero

[Jetijs]

I have also had success in replicating the one wire system. I was able to power a 10w light bulb at full brightness and at a power consumption also around 10w, so almost 100% efficiency. The distance between two Tesla coils was around 15 meters. Both coils were equal, but the efficiency depended on the single connecting wire length, at some length the light bulb was at full brightness, at other lengths it was dimm and some tuning was needed on the secondary Tesla coil to get it brighter, it seems that the connecting wire length changes the parameters of the resonant system depending on its length and thus additional tuning is needed. I believe it is because of the wavelength of the coil operation frequency.

[ZeropointEnergy]

Great work

I have also had success in replicating the one wire system. I was able to power a 10w light bulb at full brightness and at a power consumption also around 10w, so almost 100% efficiency. The distance between two Tesla coils was around 15 meters. Both coils were equal, but the efficiency depended on the single connecting wire length, at some length the light bulb was at full brightness, at other lengths it was dimm and some tuning was needed on the secondary Tesla coil to get it brighter, it seems that the connecting wire length changes the parameters of the resonant system depending on its length and thus additional tuning is needed. I believe it is because of the wavelength of the coil operation frequency.

Hey Jetijs,

I'm glad to hear that you replicated the single wire wireless electricity
transmission between two Tesla coils, it inspires me.
I'm constucting a Tesla coil atm with a torrid of 8x2.25in ( 203.2x57.15mm)
that I ordered on eBay so when have time to finish I can make another

Clearly, Tesla was on to a new methodology to transmit energy and it
needs closer look since we still use his AC generation patents today.

Have you constructed his "Single Electrode Roentgen Tube"? as I believe
this was a negative energy transmitter, (Crookes tube only use the
cathode to pump the electrons, yet it is a negative system that needs
more research) only the green plasma could verify my questions.

I understand most of the math/physics about Tesla's longitudinal (scalar)
waves and his inventions. However, no equations have been released to
factor in RE (negative) energy, or a conventional physics expainations.

I could obtain data on how a Crookes tube that is was a negative energy
generator.
In 1895 Jean-Baptiste Perrin constructed a tube with a catcher to
collect the cathode rays. This was attached to a electroscope to
measure its charge which turned out to be a negative charge and proved
it was a carrier of negative electricity.

Yet they say the "paddlewheel" tube can NOT be turned by the
energy from an electron and had to be the expanding air in the open tube.
My problem with that conclusion is they dont provide the data on the
radiometric effect Heat causing paddlewheel to move) and
J.J Thomspon in 1903 calculated that the electron did not have the energy
to generate more than 1 RPM, so what causes it?

Thanks for the post I have more paperwork to do calculating variables
on two Tesla coils in resonance.
So many experiements and so little time

Regards
Zero

[Jetijs]

Hi.
This is how I see it:


Depending on the distance the coils are from each other, you can get the standing wave into the secondary Tesla coil completely or way off. In the first example when the wave hits the secondary Tesla coil completely, you get up to 100% energy transfer, on the second example there is way less energy transfered and to get the max out, you need to change the parameters of the secondary Tesla coil, by rising the topload capacity for example.
I could be wrong here, but that is the conclusion I got from my experiments.

[ZeropointEnergy]

nice

Hey,

Nice visual representation there and I see it that way it
reasonanates between the two coils and distance of the wires.
I understand the concept of the mutual inductance aspect to
this arrangement although the longitudinal waves are
proportional to the direction of the fields. (magnetic/electric)

Did you try an make an adapted reasonate circuit for the
transmitting and recieving the energy.

That was how I seen it replicated on a small scale without
having to transmit high amounts of energy and can make
a model that fits on a bench.

Regards
Zero

[Tehnoman]

Good to hear that there are people who works towards this direction.

However about the one wire energy transmission - It can be done with the very same AC invented by Tesla. If one has good ground connection, the energy can be transfered trough phase wire only. Losses are dependent from resistance and distance.

If one can obtain completely wireless energy transfer - that is a whole different story. Also it must be said that Magnifying Transmitter working principle does not ensure completely wireless energy transmission - the connection to Earth is still needed (as explained by Waser).

These are just some comments to think about.

[griffin.adam.h@gmail.com]

Trying to understand Meyl setting q=0 and int(V)<>0

Dear Tehnoman, I hope you see this message as I think you understand this stuff.

Please if you could help me understand:

In Meyl's book "Scalar Waves" Fig.3.3 it says

LineIntegral(E-ds)=-Uein which
1. means somehow kirchoff's voltage law around a loop is not zero?
2. do you know what he means by the subscript, 'ein'?
3. Somehow Dr. Meyl must be compensating the fact of setting Divergence(D)=0 such that the charge density is always zero which I can maybe understand with Dr. Meys's argument that the electric field lines actually terminate at the center of each charge?

Regards and thanks for commenting!
griffin.adam.h@gmail.com


05APR20 update: I spoke with someone who could not get their Meyl kit to work, the simple resolution was this person mistook the output of the transmitter labeled "+" and "-" for where to plug the input in. The easy fix was to rotate the board 90deg and plug the wires into the two center banana plug inputs.
Adam Griffin

Hello all.

Has been a long time since I have started a new thread. But now I feel it is time again. The reason is because quite recently I restarted more intense search into K.Meyl experiment and possible explanations. During the search I stumbled across one site, which I was not aware before:
Andre Waser publications

The most interesting could be these:
Nikola Tesla Wireless systems
Nikola Tesla Radiation and Cosmic rays

In the first one there is also this reference to document [47] (which I have not been able to find anywhere, Andre himself hasn't responded to my e-mail message) about analysis of Meyl experiment. The conclusion seemed to be that it can be explained by present (conventional, call it as You wish) high frequency analysis.

His papers seem reasonable, I haven't found any reason to doubt them. Then maybe there is this thing that science has given the chance for Tesla technology, but it simple doesn't destroy our present knowledge about nature?

There is this thing to think about.

P.S. I do anticipate that his thread will die out due to lack of knowledge for most people about vectors and mathematics behind the descriptions.

[Ernst]

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-practice.html

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...nsmission.html


So much for Konstantin Meyl....

Ernst.

[Kokomoj0]

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-practice.html

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...nsmission.html


So much for Konstantin Meyl....

Ernst.

Have you contacted him and confronted him about this?


Directory:Konstantin Meyl - PESWiki


General contact:

Tel: +49 (0) 7721 / 51811
Fax: +49 (0) 7721 / 51870
E-Mail: info(-at-)meyl.eu

Please pay attention to our office times: (CET)
Monday-Friday 9:00-12:00 AM and 1:00-3:00 PM

Special contact:
Prof. Dr.Ing. Konstantin Meyl
Tel: +49 (0) 7732 13 67 9
Fax: +49 (0) 7732 91 99 11
E-Mail: Prof(-at-)meyl.eu


what surprises me is that this slipped past Brhun, one of his biggest critics

[Kokomoj0]

Hi.
This is how I see it:


Depending on the distance the coils are from each other, you can get the standing wave into the secondary Tesla coil completely or way off. In the first example when the wave hits the secondary Tesla coil completely, you get up to 100% energy transfer, on the second example there is way less energy transfered and to get the max out, you need to change the parameters of the secondary Tesla coil, by rising the topload capacity for example.
I could be wrong here, but that is the conclusion I got from my experiments.

you could also be 100% correct


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxJg8VJ-dBA#t=55


.