Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dr. Steven E. Jones JT Variation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dr. Steven E. Jones JT Variation

    Hi ALL

    Guys please take a look at this when you get time, we will get this done also and report ASAP.

    Steven E. Jones demonstrates overunity circuit

    Ash

  • #2
    Originally posted by ashtweth View Post
    Hi ALL

    Guys please take a look at this when you get time, we will get this done also and report ASAP.

    Steven E. Jones demonstrates overunity circuit

    Ash
    He best get it into a calorimeter Asap. Only in this way with this type of low power circuit can it be proven.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by DrStiffler View Post
      He best get it into a calorimeter Asap. Only in this way with this type of low power circuit can it be proven.
      I agree with the good Dr. It needs to be tested properly and soon. There is not really any point to us replicating it except to use it, which is OK by me.

      To move to the next stage as Steven say's (answering where the energy come's from) it must be accepted as real by the scientific community.

      I'm wondering how that will come about. I would hope universities all over the world would jump at this. It needs to be standardised then replicated in many countries and at different universities.

      Then it could be added to the books. And some other "stuff" removed maybe.

      The main thing is that it is verified and accepted.

      Comment


      • #4
        He may be a physics professor but he does not seem to understand electronic circuits. He appears to be measuring the instantaneous output power produced by the collapsing magnetic field of the output coil against the simultaneous input power. This is indeed over unity for an instant but only because the energy stored in the coil over a long part of the cycle is being released in a very short time at that point in the cycle. If the "energy in" over a complete cycle is compared to the "energy out" over a complete cycle the efficiency is less than 50%. If you take a car battery with a trickle charger and let it charge for 24 hours and then put a 1 ohm resistor on the battery and measure the input to output power it will also be over unity for a short time. But that is not a true measurement of over unity because it is using stored energy.

        Comment


        • #5
          PhysicsProf finally revealed himself

          PhysicsProf finally revealed himself

          I am glad that PhysicsProf finally revealed his true identity. He received two FLEET prototypes since December 2010 and improved on them. He was the person who started the thread at Overunityresearch.com and helped me to set up my bench there.

          He is a true academic and did the testing and improvements thoroughly. He would not accept results without his own validation. His new variation of the Joule Thief circuit clearly had elements of resonance.

          With the Divine Revelations, I can confidently say that tuning forks in resonance can lead-out or bring-in the kinetic energy of air molecules. The random motion of the molecules was changed into a pulsing order. Such a pulsing order can sympathetically vibrate other identical tuning forks. Two or more tuning forks sound louder and last longer than when one single tuning fork is struck alone. The Physics and Mathematical model has been completed – it can stand any amount of challenge.

          The Divine Revelations revealed that multiple LCR circuits in resonance could behave like tuning forks. The random motion and/or orientation of the dipoles can be changed into a pulsing order. That pulsing order can lead-out or bring-in the electron motion energy of the dipole (or orbiting electron).

          There is no mystery to the source of energy. Chemical energy is due to the different configuration of the electron clouds around the different compounds. With pulsing electromagnetic fields, we can influence the electron motion and orientation without the chemical reaction! Such devices can run cold and contribute to Global Cooling.

          I am sure that many researchers will now focus on Multiple LCR circuits in resonance. Before too long, devices similar to the Steven Mark TPU will become a reality. The research will not only be done by poor, part-time researchers on the Internet but also by academically qualified researchers with strong funding and equipment.

          God has provided the miracle by changing water into wine. Prof. Steven Jones will be one of the most important wine servers. Amen.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by xee2 View Post
            He may be a physics professor but he does not seem to understand electronic circuits. He appears to be measuring the instantaneous output power produced by the collapsing magnetic field of the output coil against the simultaneous input power. This is indeed over unity for an instant but only because the energy stored in the coil over a long part of the cycle is being released in a very short time at that point in the cycle. If the "energy in" over a complete cycle is compared to the "energy out" over a complete cycle the efficiency is less than 50%. If you take a car battery with a trickle charger and let it charge for 24 hours and then put a 1 ohm resistor on the battery and measure the input to output power it will also be over unity for a short time. But that is not a true measurement of over unity because it is using stored energy.
            There will be dozens if not hundreds of Multiple LCR circuit variations all showing overunity. Look for standing waves or sine waves in the output power waveforms.

            The Joule Ringer is an example but lasersaber and others are not willing to claim and conclusively test for OU.

            Now the secret is out. Those who believed or claimed that the measurements were in error would be proven wrong.

            Praise the Lord

            Comment


            • #7
              Here's my pseudo replication..based on parts on the workbench, just to see if the circuit would work.
              I'm very familiar with Joule Thief's, but not in the configuration of this design.

              11 turn coil, with 10K pot, 2.2ohm resistor, 2K resistor, a 201 ceramic cap, red LED and C1213 NPN transistor.
              My battery is a 1.5V AAA, found in a door pocket of the car this afternoon

              My Sperry 6A meter reads 1.4V, as of 01:28 today.
              For this test, the pot is wound up to almost full, which hopefully means 9.8K.
              Inexact and done for a simple 'go' at the idea.
              I'm off to bed, will check if it's still running in the morning and, if so, see what voltage is left
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by xee2 View Post
                He may be a physics professor but he does not seem to understand electronic circuits. He appears to be measuring the instantaneous output power produced by the collapsing magnetic field of the output coil against the simultaneous input power. This is indeed over unity for an instant but only because the energy stored in the coil over a long part of the cycle is being released in a very short time at that point in the cycle. If the "energy in" over a complete cycle is compared to the "energy out" over a complete cycle the efficiency is less than 50%. If you take a car battery with a trickle charger and let it charge for 24 hours and then put a 1 ohm resistor on the battery and measure the input to output power it will also be over unity for a short time. But that is not a true measurement of over unity because it is using stored energy.
                @Xee
                With his background he should fully understand how a calorimeter will solve 99% of any doubt. I will tell him that until then he is walking a fine line, and could end up picking off tar and feathers from his back side like I have a number of times.

                Simple ohms says no way and that LED is not running at 900mW. Where is the 97V forcing current thru 10k?.

                I have watched the trail and well if that scope and their sims prove it....

                Edit: If the Doctor will look at ESEG on my web site he will see a circuit he will be familiar with only in a common emitter rather than common collector configuration. The ESEG will when integrated on a scope in a number of variations show up to CEC of 640, NOT TRUE although.
                Last edited by DrStiffler; 05-28-2011, 11:46 AM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  On Smart Scarecrows webcast, I seem to recall ZeroFossilFuel mentioning a change to the RomeroUK replication of his by using such a change in the transistors. Forgive my ignorance Dr., but would that be a link to narrow band running ?

                  Here's my result of the overnight test..still going, at what appears to be the same luminosity and the battery is showing as just above 1.25V. Looks to be efficient enough to find the exact components and make another
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Slider2732 View Post
                    On Smart Scarecrows webcast, I seem to recall ZeroFossilFuel mentioning a change to the RomeroUK replication of his by using such a change in the transistors. Forgive my ignorance Dr., but would that be a link to narrow band running ?

                    Here's my result of the overnight test..still going, at what appears to be the same luminosity and the battery is showing as just above 1.25V. Looks to be efficient enough to find the exact components and make another
                    If you want to talk eff., have all forgot NILS? Super White LED's going for up to a week.

                    I do not say the Doctor has or has not, yet he can jump through the same hoops and do a calorimetry measurement and all is said and done. Although he does have to determine which parts to measure as (will one or more cool?). Simple test, simple equipment and he should fully understand the concept.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Slider2732 View Post
                      On Smart Scarecrows webcast, I seem to recall ZeroFossilFuel mentioning a change to the RomeroUK replication of his by using such a change in the transistors. Forgive my ignorance Dr., but would that be a link to narrow band running ?

                      Here's my result of the overnight test..still going, at what appears to be the same luminosity and the battery is showing as just above 1.25V. Looks to be efficient enough to find the exact components and make another
                      That is all well and good, what is the quantitative results? A Red LED is easily fired from an AV Plug and Earth Ground, Get a White LED going and do the same test, what is the resistance in series with the LED?

                      What does simple ohms law say when you measure the drop across the load, not 900mW and if so how is the Veb of the transistor taking the high voltage needed to drive that current through the resistance.

                      See the problems, just another big long no-where thread unless he will do a heat measurement and all is done and said.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        My Poor Memory?

                        Did or did not a number of people report OU for the Ansile circuit using the same Tek Scopes and did they retract that finding or not? If not why is everyone so ticked off with her now and saying she has nothing?

                        Funny thing is I thought it had promise when looked at in a far more meaningful way. http://67.76.235.52/ainslie/exheatexp.htm
                        Last edited by DrStiffler; 05-28-2011, 03:37 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Quantitative results won't be arriving from myself yet. This meter is analog and has just a RX1K setting. So, the circuit sits now off the table and will continue running... til it doesn't.
                          I'll be doing the white LED test...right now a vehicle tail light with 5 epoxied super brights is being pulled apart

                          Quite true about the AV plug and LED. Got one here being trialled on 3x simple voltage doublers that runs an LCD watch, using a Ground affixed outside the window to a 1ft depth pipe. It appears to benefit from the attaching of a large bare aluminium encased 10,000uF cap as an 'aerial' and that removes the need to grasp the circuit strongly in ones hand.

                          After some searches and little information being found, what would be the expected JT run time of such a typical white LED from a 120mA 1.2V Ni-MH cell ?
                          I'll build 2 with similar components, one a regular JT, one with Steven Jones' circuit and run them side by side

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Dr. Steven Jones has dozens if not hundreds of OU prototypes to support him.

                            Originally posted by DrStiffler View Post
                            Did or did not a number of people report OU for the Ansile circuit using the same Tek Scopes and did they retract that finding or not? If not why is everyone so ticked off with her now and saying she has nothing?

                            Funny thing is I thought it had promise when looked at in a far more meaningful way. http://67.76.235.52/ainslie/exheatexp.htm
                            This time, Prof. Steven Jones will have dozens if not hundreds of working overunity prototypes ready to support him. We had the first FLEET prototype demonstrating overunity on July 13, 2010 in Hong Kong. Since then, we had at least 13 teams in Hong Kong capable of producing such prototypes. We ran two workshops/seminars at Hong Kong University. One of the students, Felix, produced a FLEET prototype with COP > 280. (I was coerced to use the term Tseung FLEET comparison index at the overunityresearch.com.)

                            I still have my best FLEET prototype with COP > 200 at my drawer in Irvine, USA. I am reproducing the waveform of the first prototype in July 2010. Note that the output waveform was a standing wave. A standing wave is a characteristic of resonance. I was stupid not to realize it in July 2010. That was pointed out to me by an expert with connections to United Nations in March 2011.

                            I was even more stupid to engage in a debate with Poynt99 in the overunityresearch.com forum. He introduced a moderator, Mr. Harvey Gramm. Poynt99 insisted that the mean power value must be used. With a standing wave, the mean power is zero. With his interpretation, all my FLEET prototypes would have zero output power! The correct interpretation must come from the actual waveforms.

                            Mr. Harvey Gramm and wife actually visited me a few weeks ago. He saw my working prototypes. In particular, we discussed the multiple LCR resonance circuits. He saw my air toroid that showed 30 second continued lighting of the LEDs with two secondary LCR circuits after the battery was removed. He was able to produce something much better within 2 weeks. I shall not steal the thunder from him in my posts.

                            I support Prof. Steven Jones totally. Please examine the standing wave from my FLEET prototype in July 2010 carefully. The energy of the orbiting electrons can be lead-out or brought-in at resonance. That is the secret and the source of extra energy.

                            God has provided us with pollution-free, almost inexhaustible energy. We just need to learn to use it. Amen.
                            Last edited by ltseung888; 07-31-2011, 09:20 AM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ltseung888 View Post
                              This time, Prof. Steven Jones will have dozens if not hundreds of working overunity prototypes ready to support him. We had the first FLEET prototype demonstrating overunity on July 13, 2010 in Hong Kong. Since then, we had at least 13 teams in Hong Kong capable of producing such prototypes. We ran two workshops/seminars at Hong Kong University. One of the students, Felix, produced a FLEET prototype with COP > 280. (I was coerced to use the term Tseung FLEET comparison index at the overunityresearch.com.)

                              I still have my best FLEET prototype with COP > 200 at my drawer in Irvine, USA. I am reproducing the waveform of the first prototype in July 2010. Note that the output waveform was a standing wave. A standing wave is a characteristic of resonance. I was stupid not to realize it in July 2010. That was pointed out to me by an expert with connections to United Nations in March 2011.

                              I was even more stupid to engage in a debate with Poynt99 in the overunityresearch.com forum. He introduced a moderator, Mr. Harvey Gramm. Poynt99 insisted that the mean power value must be used. With a standing wave, the mean power is zero. With his interpretation, all my FLEET prototypes would have zero output power! The correct interpretation must come from the actual waveforms.

                              Mr. Harvey Gramm and wife actually visited me a few weeks ago. He saw my working prototypes. In particular, we discussed the multiple LCR resonance circuits. He saw my air toroid that showed 30 second continued lighting of the LEDs with two secondary LCR circuits after the battery was removed. He was able to produce something much better within 2 weeks. I shall not steal the thunder from him in my posts.

                              I support Prof. Steven Jones totally. Please examine the standing wave from my FLEET prototype in July 2010 carefully. The energy of the orbiting electrons can be lead-out or brought-in at resonance. That is the secret and the source of extra energy.

                              God has provided us with pollution-free, almost inexhaustible energy. We just need to learn to use it. Amen.
                              I looked at you pictures and as with Prof. Jones, until a heat test is done it is indeed hope and I have never seen testing relying on scope traces only, let alone when it is digitized.

                              Edit: There must be more than one calorimeter at his university and it would take maybe four hours to put all criticism to bed.
                              Last edited by DrStiffler; 05-28-2011, 05:36 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X