I want to start out by saying that I really do like this forum and plan to be a participating member in the foreseeable future. But I am finding that there are some frustrating things that keep cropping up. Right now, I am a "backyard" researcher of electrical phenomenon, mainly for the purpose of discovering a new source of energy. This forum is a great resource in getting the opinions of others with the same goals. Here's my problem. I post a topic I need discussion on and I get a lot of response. This response is great but lacks context. Here's an example: Let's say I post a topic that asks for opinions on the boy-ency of Styrofoam in steel bathtubs(it's a silly topic). Then the responses pour in. Lots of these responses are statements which, for the most part, sound like facts being presented. But really, who is to know that a statement being made is accurate or not. So the next best thing to do is to look up information on the person who has made the statement. Again, for the most part, most people don't have any information listed about themselves. If someone makes a response to my question, and they are a worker at a steel bathtub manufacturing plant, this persons comments have context. If someone else makes a comment and they have listed themselves as a avid studier of the topic but has made no practical experimentation, then the context for this comment has also been made. Comments with context have value. Comments without context lack significance.
I'm going to make a guess that in this forum there are 2 types of people making comments. There are those who perform experiments and post information about experimentation, and there are those who are read about others experiments and come up with theories and post there information about their theories. Both of these types are important to move ahead to find new discoveries, but it would certainly help to know who is doing practical experiment and who is doing theoretical analysis.
It would be nice to look up a members information to see what their context is. I am guilty of not doing this, so I have updated my profile to help out with this information. I post this not to bag on the members but to help out the quality of the forum. It sure is frustrating to have 50 comments on a posted topic not knowing where that information came from in the first place, or from what angle a person is coming from. It would be nice to know a little bit more about the involvement a member has to a topic when reading their comments. Are you just a causal browser giving your two-bits, or are you a 10 year experimental researcher to this given topic?
Just for the record, I'm not trying to pick a fight. I think that this is a valid concern in moving forward to the goal we all share.
I'm going to make a guess that in this forum there are 2 types of people making comments. There are those who perform experiments and post information about experimentation, and there are those who are read about others experiments and come up with theories and post there information about their theories. Both of these types are important to move ahead to find new discoveries, but it would certainly help to know who is doing practical experiment and who is doing theoretical analysis.
It would be nice to look up a members information to see what their context is. I am guilty of not doing this, so I have updated my profile to help out with this information. I post this not to bag on the members but to help out the quality of the forum. It sure is frustrating to have 50 comments on a posted topic not knowing where that information came from in the first place, or from what angle a person is coming from. It would be nice to know a little bit more about the involvement a member has to a topic when reading their comments. Are you just a causal browser giving your two-bits, or are you a 10 year experimental researcher to this given topic?
Just for the record, I'm not trying to pick a fight. I think that this is a valid concern in moving forward to the goal we all share.
Comment