[This thread is the extension to the Lockridge Device Peter Lindemann thread. This thread is for discussion of the Generator phase of the new device.]
I just need to think on it. The diagram helps a lot. Turion's post about induction generators helps.
Let me paraphrase what I think I see, and please comment if you think I'm in the weeds (or not).
Our mod'ed motor drives (mechanically) the flywheel and the generator rotor.
The recovery output from our mod'ed motor is rectified and smoothed, making it DC.
This DC is fed into the generator rotor winding - this aspect is different from the induction generator described by Turion (if I understood correctly, Turion's device did not apply input electricity to the the rotor nor to the stator, relying only on residual magnetization to get the ball rolling).
The high-V from the rotor is re-rectified (is this actually necessary, or will one diode be enough? 'Scope may tell.).
The low-V from the stator is rectified.
The high-V and low-V outputs are connected in series and simultaneously dumped (via switching / commutation) into a cap, which feeds back into the input of the mod'ed motor.
I'm willing to give this a go and report back (when my flywheel arrives).
My motor is different than yours - I've got the 2-pole motor and the mod is a single winding.
I guess that I have to strip another armature and wind it in the same manner as the motor (one coil across the axis of the armature), but with different (very thin) gauge.
I can even scavenge the armature and case that no longer have brushes (since I cut them out and used them as recovery brushes).
The magnets look like they're really glued in. I don't know if I'll succeed in knocking them out with the tools I've got at hand. Is it OK to substitute with a cardboard tube or something - we don't actually need the case to be metallic?
thanks
pt
Originally posted by Matthew Jones
View Post
Let me paraphrase what I think I see, and please comment if you think I'm in the weeds (or not).
Our mod'ed motor drives (mechanically) the flywheel and the generator rotor.
The recovery output from our mod'ed motor is rectified and smoothed, making it DC.
This DC is fed into the generator rotor winding - this aspect is different from the induction generator described by Turion (if I understood correctly, Turion's device did not apply input electricity to the the rotor nor to the stator, relying only on residual magnetization to get the ball rolling).
The high-V from the rotor is re-rectified (is this actually necessary, or will one diode be enough? 'Scope may tell.).
The low-V from the stator is rectified.
The high-V and low-V outputs are connected in series and simultaneously dumped (via switching / commutation) into a cap, which feeds back into the input of the mod'ed motor.
I'm willing to give this a go and report back (when my flywheel arrives).
My motor is different than yours - I've got the 2-pole motor and the mod is a single winding.
I guess that I have to strip another armature and wind it in the same manner as the motor (one coil across the axis of the armature), but with different (very thin) gauge.
I can even scavenge the armature and case that no longer have brushes (since I cut them out and used them as recovery brushes).
The magnets look like they're really glued in. I don't know if I'll succeed in knocking them out with the tools I've got at hand. Is it OK to substitute with a cardboard tube or something - we don't actually need the case to be metallic?
thanks
pt
Comment