If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
That is a very dangerous circuit and should not be posted on an open forum like this.
People with little knowledge on electronics can kill themselfs with that circuit.
The moment you remove the leads from the battery a voltage of about 150V will appear on that leads.
That is a very dangerous circuit and should not be posted on an open forum like this. People with little knowledge on electronics can kill themselfs with that circuit. The moment you remove the leads from the battery a voltage of about 150V will appear on that leads.
I wish some people would stop trying to censor me. Open means free. It wouldn't be much of an open forum if I censored this information, now, would it?
But to placate the critics and safety trolls, I'll put up a disclaimer.
That is not a capacitive transformer. It is a reactive voltage divider. The impedance of different capacitors will differ based on their capacitance, and so will offer differing "resistance" to the AC current, meaning you essentially have two resistors one after another, creating...A voltage divider.
This is a true capacitive transformer, and a very good idea.
That is not a capacitive transformer. It is a reactive voltage divider. The impedance of different capacitors will differ based on their capacitance, and so will offer differing "resistance" to the AC current, meaning you essentially have two resistors one after another, creating...A voltage divider.
This is a true capacitive transformer, and a very good idea.
I've looked over the circuit, read the pamphlet, and as long as you follow the instructions, AND USE THE SECOND CAPACITOR, not just run the circuit with a single one...
it appears that what you will have at the batteries, is whatever you designed the circuit to have... and nothing more.
It would appear, the danger level is, whatever you set it to be.
I think that was George's whole point. It's not like he's a dummy. Furthermore, his commercial electrolysers exploit this method so they damn well better be safe and have probably had to go through CSA?
---------------------------------------------------- Alberta is under attack... http://rethinkalberta.com/
Has anyone seen my Bedini Ceiling Fan that pushes the warm air down, and charges batteries as an added bonus? Me neither. 'Bout time I made one!!!!! :P
I've looked over the circuit, read the pamphlet, and as long as you follow the instructions, AND USE THE SECOND CAPACITOR, not just run the circuit with a single one...
it appears that what you will have at the batteries, is whatever you designed the circuit to have... and nothing more.
It would appear, the danger level is, whatever you set it to be.
I think that was George's whole point. It's not like he's a dummy. Furthermore, his commercial electrolysers exploit this method so they damn well better be safe and have probably had to go through CSA?
A while back, I purchased a booklet from Eagle Research on capacitive battery charging for about $10. They included a booklet on capacitive transformers free of charge with my order.
Essentially, it shows how you can charge a battery using a capacitor instead of a transformer.
Funny, I did not know this thread existed. I started on some research nearly identical to this, however instead of using multiple plates it was to test the displacement theory of current.
The circuits here are the same as what I've tried. running the neutral lead to the bridge puts the circuit into the mains circuit and as such will always see a load, so that amperage can get dangerous if not careful.
I was more interested in Psi charge fluctuations, Although the amperage I'm getting is low, it's not drawing from the circuit on the capacitor.
That is not a capacitive transformer. It is a reactive voltage divider. The impedance of different capacitors will differ based on their capacitance, and so will offer differing "resistance" to the AC current, meaning you essentially have two resistors one after another, creating...A voltage divider.
This is a true capacitive transformer, and a very good idea.
Any idea where this went if anywhere? It's exactly what I've been currently working on. There is some strange things with capacitive transformers, they don't obey conventional electrodynamic theories for one.
Any idea where this went if anywhere? It's exactly what I've been currently working on. There is some strange things with capacitive transformers, they don't obey conventional electrodynamic theories for one.
Hi madH,
Could you state those strange things you have observed with capacitive transformers? What have you been doing?
Hi
Couple of Qs:
1 My mains V is 250, can I build one or must I step down to 120/150- I have capacitors rated 450V AC and bridge rectifier to 1KV.?
2 My caps are only 11 MFD each - can I parallel some to increase the charging current?
Thanks!
Comment