Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Transformers, Coils and Free Energy Theories.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Transformers, Coils and Free Energy Theories.

    Hi all, I make this thread so we can all put forward and/or discuss theories which may explain a COP over 1.

    Using a Pulsed DC transformer as a device to consider I have theorised that in transformers and coils when current flows through them the only energy that is lost is in Ohmic resistance and that which flows to ground from the negative end. However when the transformer is idle the losses are due to radiative losses of the flux, as the flux is lost more current must flow to ground to create more flux to keep the flux at maximum, this give's the Idle state current flow of the transformer. When current is used from the secondary it is caused by the potential of the flux built in the transfomer.

    No current flows from one winding of a transformer to the other they are isolated from each other. When current flows through the coil a magnetic field is built in the environment around the coil utilising energy present in that area "outside the coil". When no current is drawn from the secondary only enough current can flow to replace the radiated or dissapated flux to keep flux density at maximum for that transformer.

    Then when current is drawn from the secondary it is caused by the potential of the flux across the load in the secondary circuit, as the flux falls, more current flows to ground in the primary circuit to manifest more flux in the environment which is present across both the primary and the secondary windings, and resists the flow of current in the primary circuit, so as more current is allowed to flow in the secondary circuit which acts to lower the flux then more current can flow in the primary circuit.

    Transformer Theory.
    Transformers Part 1 - Beginners' Guide to Electronics

    From link.
    "Preface
    One thing that obviously confuses many people is the idea of flux density within the transformer core. While this is covered in more detail in Section 2, it is important that this section's information is remembered at every stage of your reading through this article. For any power transformer, the maximum flux density in the core is obtained when the transformer is idle. I will reiterate this, as it is very important ...

    For any power transformer, the maximum flux density is obtained when the transformer is idle.
    From link
    Quote:

    The idea is counter-intuitive, it even verges on not making sense.

    Be that as it may, it's a fact, and missing it will ruin your understanding of transformers. At idle, the transformer back-EMF almost exactly cancels out the applied voltage. The small current that flows maintains the flux density at the maximum allowed value, and represents iron loss (see Section 2). As current is drawn from the secondary, the flux falls slightly, and allows more primary current to flow to provide the output current.

    It is not important that you understand the reasons for this right from the beginning, but it is important that you remember that for any power transformer, the maximum flux density is obtained when the transformer is idle. Please don't forget this."
    I only bolded part of this sentance from the previous passage because I think it is intentionally misleading, in the sense they are trying to keep people interested in tranformer theory and not free energy.

    As current is drawn from the secondary, the flux falls slightly, and allows more primary current to flow to provide the output current.
    I think it should read like this.
    As current is drawn from the secondary, the flux falls slightly, and allows more primary current to flow to manifest the required flux in real time to induce the required current flow in the secondary circuit. The current through the primary goes to ground, it is different current.

    From link.
    3. How a Transformer Works
    At no load, an ideal transformer draws virtually no current from the mains, since it is simply a large inductance. The whole principle of operation is based on induced magnetic flux, which not only creates a voltage (and current) in the secondary, but the primary as well! It is this characteristic that allows any inductor to function as expected, and the voltage generated in the primary is called a "back EMF" (electromotive force). The magnitude of this voltage is such that it almost equals (and is effectively in the same phase as) the applied EMF.
    So my theory is that the energy in the primary circuit does not expand into the magnetic field it flows to ground and the magnetic field is manifested from environmental energy to oppose it. The current created in the secondary circuit remove's the magnetic flux by the load present in the secondary circuit as a result of the potential created by the CEMF across that load.

    Only when the flux is reduced and the opposing force removed can more energy flow in the primary circuit. The CEMF must be from a different source to the EMF as I don't see how one force can oppose itself.

    The CEMF is Almost Equal to the EMF and the EMF is what we contribute. So the CEMF must be manifested from environmental energy,

    Here is some rough sketch's I made to help myself to understand it, my symbols do not comply with conventional symbols because I have no training, and I may be wrong about some things.
    https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=32a91...1088&sc=photos

    Same thing happens in a single inductor but there is no secondary circuit, the CEMF can be removed by a diode.
    https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=32a91...1089&sc=photos

    And the current produced by it can be calculated, much better by somebody else.
    https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=32a91...1090&sc=photos

    The current through the coil can be reclaimed to a degree aswell, I have demonstrated this even without a transformer.

    It makes no difference when or where, if there is energy expended an almost equal amount of energy appears from the Aether to oppose it. Or else we would be very very strong.

    Happy to hear of any thoughts on this.

    Cheers

    P.S. I'll make a new series of better drawings soon to explain my thoughts more clearly. I just have to work out the best way to draw it, to show it in picture's is difficult and to explain it is even harder.
    Last edited by Farmhand; 06-25-2011, 02:54 AM.

  • #2
    Of course there are a couple of tricks to using coils to extract more energy from the environment.

    As shown by Nikola Tesla and mentioned numerous time's by him.

    1. The coil should have very little DC resistance while retaining the required self inductance for momentum.

    2. The coil should be switched on and off very abruptly, not necessarily "rapidly" but the switching waveform should be vertical on both rise and fall.

    A Switching waveform where the rise and fall time of the switch can barely be seen on an analogue oscilliscope is best.

    Like these pulses destined for the Mosfet gate.
    https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=32a91...1660&sc=photos

    When a coil is switched with a very square pulse ( suddenly on then off again) a waveform like this below is produced from the negative end of the coil, after the current through the coil has ceased the magnetic field collapses and if it were not for the recovery diode to the charge battery (or a load on a secondary) it would collapse into the coil and destroy the mosfet, by trying to chase the current to oppose it it would go right through it, because of the power level I'm using and the suddeness of the switching coupled with the momentum of the self inductance and very little resistance the CEMF is quite substantial, and many of us know how quickly this can destroy a solid state switch if there is no load presented to the recovery mechanism.

    This is a battery charging waveform I labeled for the benifit of those who are new to this. In my opinion this waveform shows "Near Unity" effect just from the recovery diode. The energy through the coil can be collected as well.
    https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=32a91...1735&sc=photos

    It is also my belief that the abruptness of the switching contribute's to a condition where the potential (voltage) is presented to the coil therefore current must flow, however current lags behind voltage and so if the voltage source is decoupled again before current can flow from the source that provided the voltage (potential) then some current still flows, but I have yet to consider the mechanics of how, I imagine that it could be from caused by environmental magnetic flux "having no choice" but to collapse into the feed wire and coil completing the circuit that way. I suspect this effect may be very reduced below moderate frequencies.

    Cheers
    Last edited by Farmhand; 06-23-2011, 03:36 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      The DC resonant charging circuit as used on Tesla coils is a good way to harness the CEMF and use it in the next cycle. It is included in Tesla's Ignition coil Patent.
      NIKOLA TESL-A - Google Patents

      This is a very good page explaining DC resonant charging circuits.
      DC Tesla Coil design

      By putting a series inductor into the positive line before the transformer the CEMF can collapse into a capacitor across the supply rails, then the next time the switch closes it discharges the capacitor through the primary.

      If a de-Q-ing diode is used no reversal of the CEMF can happen.

      So the first cycle of operation is a normal pulse through the system and every one after that has almost double the energy. No actual resonance needed for that part if a De- Q - ing diode is used. If no De-Q-ing diode is used when a well switched transformer is suddenly unloaded a negative current reading will appear at the source battery very breifly. If Nikola had had a good diode he would have included it in his ignition coil patent.

      Here is my TC charging circuit added to a normal switching circuit.
      https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=32a91...1195&sc=photos

      I am about to take steps to install a resonant charging circuit on my Bob Boyce transformer, so I can document the difference if there is any. I think there will be a difference for sure.

      Cheers
      Last edited by Farmhand; 06-23-2011, 04:53 AM.

      Comment

      Working...
      X