I found Gustave Le Bon's missing book called "Synthetic Radioactivity"

[clueless]

to those who have read these books

can you suggest some parts/chapters that gave you that ah-ha moment. The reason I ask is I don't do well reading from the computer in a lot of formats. Another reason I ask is the price at the book depositiory is a little steep for me at this time. The last reason is I'm not very adapt at concrete abstract thinking or abstract thinking that relates to reality.
I was thinking that maybe there are areas that a person can test or experiment with to follow along or understand better.
Or maybe somebody could write a short outline of what he is talking about and how it relates to anything.
I read some of Russell's book and understand conceptually what he said but it seemed to be not very clear when you get down to where the rubber meets the road.
One example that comes to mind is I understand light but not the lightbulb( before its widespread use) until I can compare and contrast the difference. Then I see.
Hope that helps why I ask and I hope I'm clear.
Thanks
-rg

[SilverToGold]

Space-Time is a lie.
E=mc^2 is a lie.
Special Relativity is a lie.
General Relativity is a lie.
The speed of light is the speed limit of the universe is a lie.

I guess the photoelectric effect is a real phenomena (but he didn't discover it) but his quantum mechanical explanation is bogus. Light is not quantum lumps. So that's another lie. Light is longitudinal vibrations in the ether like sound waves. It does not come in lumps. But Einstein says the ether doesn't exist, another lie.

The photoelectric effect is used to hide natural radioactivity in all mater.

I'm having a very hard time finding any truth in Einstein except in this quote of his.

The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein

Notice how mainstream science is made to worship Einstein and how they don't even know who Tesla is.

What has Einstein ever given us? Tesla with his misaligned achievement has done way more than Einstein ever has.

But yes, some truth mixed with lies is the best way to warp people's minds. That's what mainstream science is.

Well MonsieurM, I don't think that sounds cynical at all, I think that is the start of enlightenment when you can see the lies, you can move towards the truth. Don't you think

as the old saying goes: knowledge is power.

I won't go as far as to call Einstein a "quack". The way to convince people of a lie, is to blend it with some truth. I think We were just told half the story, which in itself is quite cynical, don't you think ?

[sebosfato]

Hello Silvertogold,

I would like to know where are the flaws in einstein space time do you know?

What is your classical scientific background? I'm in the 1° year of the physics university... mine classical not much

And my intention is to discover who's most correct--My real intention is to change the world and knowledge is the way at least might be...

Thanks

[Armagdn03]

Hello Silvertogold,

I would like to know where are the flaws in einstein space time do you know?

What is your classical scientific background? I'm in the 1° year of the physics university... mine classical not much

And my intention is to discover who's most correct--My real intention is to change the world and knowledge is the way at least might be...

Thanks

"When Albert Einstein wrote his first articles about relativity at the turn of the lastncentury he drew some astute conclusions about cosmic reality that changed the physics of his time. However, he drew upon some assumed facts that were not true. Without the correct information it was necessary for him to put himself in different frameworks, with
different viewpoints to try to make sense of how the world worked. Yet, he was the first physicist to show the truth of an inseparable union between space and time.

Einstein relied upon the results of the Michelson-Morley experiments with light designed to show a relative velocity differential between a possible ether and the travel velocity of the earth. This important experiment is well documented. It was designed to demonstrate
that the earth moved faster or slower than an ether flow and that the difference would be measurable by sending out a light signal, reflecting it back to a measuring devise. The results showed that light traveling and reflecting back in one direction of earth’s motion or in the opposite direction showed no difference at all. They drew the conclusion that an
ether did not exist. The easy conclusion they should have drawn is that the ether of earth’s orbit travels at the same rate as earth. It would be more correct to say that the earth travels at the speed of the field of its orbit."

[StweenyA]

Thanks for book!

SilverToGold, we must break it to them slowly, piece by piece, otherwise they may just discard us as lunatics

Like an article in the local Popular Mechanics this month, titled:
"Star power. Is Fusion finally for real?"
sub titled:
"A rosy future fuelled by cheap, unlimited energy has been just around the corner for decades."

Wooow. Aren't they smooooth...

[sebosfato]

Hi armagdn
I read about this experience, but seems to me that actually the difference was not possible due to the impossibility of the light to go even faster than light, for example you have a car running and illuminating the road... like If the light has a maximum speed but relative to the car not for an observer looking to the event... In my opinion in this case light could move faster than the maximum said limit but could loose speed as matter of vacuum (medium) electromagnetic proprieties.. If it is so a wave that travels... In my view also there is dispersion of the light energy perpendicular to the wave direction (like when you drop a rock on the water)

However the space time thing explain quite well how mass (energy) can distort the space time structure so light can be deviated (caused to curve) by action of gravity.

I read about evans theory of unification called einstein cartan evans ece and they kind of accept some things and reject others, while states that magnetic fields and electric fields creates a kind of torsion in the space time structure while the mass (gravity) just curve it, so in my thoughts this kind of distortion should make light to vortex thru the structure of space time within a field... is that correct?

Please let us know, i'm not going to call anyone lunatic. =)

The real thing is that i believe mass is energy and so inertia is only the fact that you need to raise the amount of kinetic energy of the energy (mass)...

I call people with incapabilities of change the way of thinking lunatics.

I don't know much about the ether theories... would you teach us your findings?

My colleges says that the more they learn the more they notice there is something really wrong about everything they are teaching in the university.

thanks again

[SilverToGold]

Hi There sebosfato, if you are sincere about learning more about this I suggest you go read William Lyne's books. There is just so much to it and I don't have enough time to get into it all here but only on a superficial level.

Space Time means that space has properties and can bend and that it's tied directly to time. Double speak, just like wave-particle duality. Once your mind ties these things together you will get confounded.

It was all to kill the truth about the ether. The ether basically negates the laws of Thermodynamics because there is NO SUCH THING AS A CLOSED SYSTEM! The ether pervades everything, is everywhere and it powers everything. The universe is not dying in entropy, it's increasing in structure and complexity.

The Michelson-Morley experiment did not work because the ether is dragged with the earth at it's surface. So it does not move at the surface.

Space time bending light is bogus. Light is basically sound waves in the ether and any wave will bend when it comes to an edge. This is normal wave properties any first year physics student should know. They lied about light being a particle and had invented space time to explain the curvature of light in a "quantum particle" frame.

Big Bang? LOL, talk about energy from nothing and they say that perpetual machines are not possible? How do they go to sleep at night with such contradictions stinking up the recesses of their small minds?

I have BS degrees in Physics and Electrical Engineering from top schools... not that it matters in my opinion. It was just a waste of time. Now I have to undo all that crap they feed my poor eager young mind.

You want the truth? You must learn about Tesla and his views on physics. For that I would recommend reading these books. Lyne is the best because he cites his sources and bases his ideas off of Tesla's ideas. Not to say he is perfect but he is about as close as you're going to get from any books.

Hello Silvertogold,

I would like to know where are the flaws in einstein space time do you know?

What is your classical scientific background? I'm in the 1° year of the physics university... mine classical not much

And my intention is to discover who's most correct--My real intention is to change the world and knowledge is the way at least might be...

Thanks

[StweenyA]

Greetings sebosfato,

If you would like online resources to help explain the ether (also spelt Aether), then here's what I thought was quite a good explanation:
There are more links at the bottom of each page, that go more in depth.
enjoy

Ether Physics - Fringe Science

[SilverToGold]

The real thing is that i believe mass is energy and so inertia is only the fact that you need to raise the amount of kinetic energy of the energy (mass)...

Why do you believe that mass IS energy? Mass can deliver energy but that does not make it energy any more than me delivering a pizza to your house make me a pizza.

Mass is NOT energy. Mass can not become energy. Mass is swirls in the ether. Mass can "condense" energy out of the ether to forms that we can measure.

Radioactive mass according to Tesla is doing just that. You shield it from the cosmic rays of the ether and radioactive material will cease to be radioactive. Radioactivity rates change with the solar output of the sun and the rest of the universe.

When an atomic bomb goes off, it is just super concentrating these cosmic rays! That is just a small portion of how much energy is going through everything at all times! You shield those cosmic rays and you're atomic bombs will not work anymore. But since all things derive their energy from the ether, they will probably sooner or later stop working also if you keep shielding it from those vital cosmic rays.

[StweenyA]

SilverToGold, good post, I second all that.

About your degree.... really a complete waste of time? If you could reset those years, what would you do instead?
Tesla did electrical, although maybe it was different at the time. hmm

[SilverToGold]

Greetings sebosfato,

If you would like online resources to help explain the ether (also spelt Aether), then here's what I thought was quite a good explanation:
There are more links at the bottom of each page, that go more in depth.
enjoy

Ether*Physics - Fringe Science

I don't know about that. There are many theories on the ether (most are wrong) but usually by people giving second hand interpretations. He says ether flows out from all matter... if so, where does it come from? Makes no sense and no proof.

The ether is just a medium for transmission. A fluid medium. That is it.

Go directly into the old school teachers. Look into Faraday, JJ Thompson and Tesla. This is where you will get the best information. These guys were real scientist and they were fighting Relativity (as brought about by Boscovich and later stolen by Einstein). They were closer to the truth than anyone you're going to see today.

There is a lot of mis-information out there. Who to trust? Go back to the originals and forget the all the johnny come lately.

And when someone talks about "scalar waves", that means they don't know what a scalar is and might not be so accurate in their other views also.

[StweenyA]

SilverToGold, isn't gravity a result of mass displacing the ether?

[SilverToGold]

SilverToGold, good post, I second all that.

About your degree.... really a complete waste of time? If you could reset those years, what would you do instead?
Tesla did electrical, although maybe it was different at the time. hmm

Thanks. Maybe not a total waste of time but I am pissed about wasting all that time learning what I now know to be propaganda. It's disheartening to learn that you've basically been lied to all your life.

But I can build a circuit and I do know some basic physics. There is obviously some truth in science but the really important things are kept from you and the false gods of science are there to be gate-keepers between you and the truth.

Notice how so called science is closed minded? And that is what science is all about? Know it all who know nothing.

You want to be great? Realize you're an idiot who knows nothing and go from there. You will be way ahead of the rest.

[StweenyA]

SilverToGold, Agreed. If they taught about the Ether, energy shuttling, not killing the dipole, what electricity really is, single wire transmission or wireless transmission, impulse technology (tesla's transformer) etc, I would join the course like a shot, and study like there's no tomorrow.

[SilverToGold]

SilverToGold, isn't gravity a result of mass displacing the ether?

I really don't know but I also know no one really knows either.

Tesla had a Dynamic Theory of Gravity and had most of it worked out by 1895! His entire life's dream was to build an ideal flying machine. He was ALL about gravity and this was his real purpose in life. The power stuff was just a needed part for his craft.

According to JJ Thompson who stole his idea from Tesla after Tesla gave a preliminary talk about his idea of gravity around 1892 (and later kept quiet about it due to this theft), momentum is transmitted by tubes of force. This is where the gravity is coming from. The tubes transmit through the ether but they are not the ether. So ether is not directly gravity as so many people proclaim.

Instead of thinking of gravity, think in terms of momentum transfer. Momentum is more fundamental than gravity. Gravity kind of arrises out of momentum. At least that seems to be the way the old school guys thought of it if my interpretation is correct.

Tesla later proved his mastery of physics by building his ideal electric flying machine based on his Dynamic Theory of Gravity. This is where all the so called UFO's come from, they are TESLA's MACHINES that the government stole from him!

Tesla's paper are STILL under top secret and we are NOT allowed to see them after 70 years! You can get plans for an atomic bomb but you will not get close to those papers. Tell you something?

Once you realize just what a giant this guy is, you better pay attention to his ideas of physics over some bogus guy who's only patent was for refrigeration machine and stealing ideas from Boscovich.