The essence of the physical effect of generating free energy from the secondary field

[Guntis]

Like to start from the BackGround and then on the top of this thing.
This is related only to FerroMagnetic effect of generating free energy from the secondary field.

First step: BackGround

Downloadable .pdf document Step ONE

* Downloads | FerroMagnetic

We go Step By Step until 10th of July The BirthDay of Nicola Tesla
(i like to do and if all goes ok)

.

[Farmhand]

Makes sense to me !

Hi guntis, The first step make's complete sense to me, and I have tried to explain this aswell, if you are saying what I think you are saying I agree with you competely. That the input current does not directly contribute to the magnetic field or rather that the magnetic field contains greater energy than the input power minus the power that flows to ground through the primary coil.

Looking forward to step two.

Cheers

[Guntis]

Hi guntis, The first step make's complete sense to me, and I have tried to explain this aswell, if you are saying what I think you are saying I agree with you competely. That the input current does not directly contribute to the magnetic field or rather that the magnetic field contains greater energy than the input power minus the power that flows to ground through the primary coil.

Looking forward to step two.

Cheers

That way i start from the Groud for clear without messups to be clear about physical effects and then way up to polish it with HV and how to organize all process on commutation with quasi-resonant interval and so on...

Step By Step

[Guntis]

Do you know the chemical secret of lead acid battery? Although these batteries have been used for over 150 years, I believe most people don't know their principle.

This is not related to my post – if you want to discuss this, make a new thread.

[boguslaw]

Guntis

Can you explain in simple words what is that document about ? In plain English. My English is simple and not complicated but this document need a language expert.

Maybe you should edit this document ?

[Core]

With a dielectric in between, looks like you end up with a one pole magnet. Is this correct?

Respectfully,

Core

[Core]

With a dielectric in between, looks like you end up with a one pole magnet. Is this correct?

Respectfully,

Core

Just wanted to re-phrase my comment.

With the thin dielectric in between the ferrite rings how do you end up with a solid 'S' & 'N' pole? This would imply that you have a one pole magnet. I believe I am mis-reading this. Due to the dielectric break why wouldn't you have two magnetic fields on the left side?

Respectfully,

Core

[WeThePeople]

Do you know the chemical secret of lead acid battery? Although these batteries have been used for over 150 years, I believe most people don't know their principle.

If you have something like this to share,
please do start a new thread on this
and tells us what you know about this.

[lamare]

Like to start from the BackGround and then on the top of this thing.
This is related only to FerroMagnetic effect of generating free energy from the secondary field.

You may want to check out the work of the German Prof. Claus Turtur:
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/turtur1e.pdf

He explains the basic theory of how both the "static" magnetic field and the electrostatic field actually convert ZPE into these fields and that is where free energy eventually comes from. I have referred to him in my "article" over at pes:

Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

Well, it may be right that particle physics says it's easy to extract EM energy from the vacuum, but that does not tell us how we can use that, nor how we can engineer systems that are able to make use of this unknown, or better: overlooked, territory. Where is that energy? Where does it come from and where does it go?

The answer to these questions can be found in the paper Conversion of the Vacuum-energy of electromagnetic zero point oscillations into Classical Mechanical Energy by the German Professor Claus Turtur. In the chapter "A circulation of energy of the electrostatic field" (pages 10-14) he makes a straightforward calculation of the energy density of the static electric field surrounding a point charge using nothing more than Coulombs law and the known propagation speed of the electric field, the speed of light, and shows that there must be some kind of energy circulation between the vacuum and charge carriers:

-:-
If electrostatic fields propagate with the speed of light, they transport energy, because they have a certain energy density. It should be possible to trace this transport of energy if is really existing. That this is really the case can be seen even with a simple example regarding a point charge, as will be done on the following pages. When we trace this energy, we come to situation, which looks paradox at the very first glance, but the paradox can be dissolved, introducing a circulation of energy. This is also demonstrated on the following pages.

The first aspect of the mentioned paradox regards the emission of energy at all. If a point charge (for instance an elementary charge) exists since a given moment in time, it emits electric field and field’s energy from the time of its birth without any alteration of its mass. The volume of the space filled with this field increases permanently during time and with it the total energy of the field. But from where does this “new energy” originate? For the charged particle does not alter its mass (and thus its energy), the “new energy” can not originate from the particle itself. This means: The charged particle has to be permanently supplied with energy from somewhere. The situation is also possible for particles, which are in contact with nothing else but only with the vacuum. The consequence is obvious: The particle can be supplied with energy only from the vacuum. This sounds paradox, so it can be regarded as the first aspect of the mentioned paradox. But it is logically consequent, and so we will have to solve it later.

[...]

Important is the conclusion, which can be found with logical consequence:
On the one hand the vacuum (= the space) permanently supplies the charge with energy (first paradox aspect), which the charge (as the field source) converts into field energy and emits it in the shape of a field. On the other hand the vacuum (= the space) permanently takes energy away from the propagating field, this means, that space gets back its energy from field during the propagation of the field. This indicates that there should be some energy inside the “empty” space, which we now can understand as a part of the vacuum-energy. In section 3, we will understand this energy more detailed.

But even now, we can come to the statement:
During time, the field of every electric charge (field source) increases. Nevertheless the space (in the present work the expressions “space” and “vacuum” are use as synonyms) causes a permanent circulation of energy, supplying charges with energy and taking back this energy during the propagation of the fields. This is the circulation of energy, which gave the title for present section 2.2.

This leads us to a new aspect of vacuum-energy:
The circulating energy (of the electric field) is at least a part of the vacuum-energy. We found its existence and its conversion as well as its flow. On the basis of this understanding it should be possible to extract at least a part of this circulating energy from the vacuum – in section 4 a description is given of a possible method how to extract such energy from the vacuum.
-:-

So there we are. The electric field (the airflow in our fandoor analogy) is on the one hand powered by the vacuum and on the other hand it powers the vacuum. So, at least part of the energy in space / the vacuum, referred to with names as "Zero Point Energy" (ZPE), virtual particle flux, the Dirac sea, Orgone, etc. is not only fueled by the electric field, it is continuously converted back into an electric field by each and every charged particle in the universe, which makes the electric field a source of energy. The implications of that are staggering. It means that the law of conservation of energy does not apply to electrical systems, because they are not isolated. After all, Turtur shows without a shadow of a doubt that energy is being extracted from the active vacuum by each and every charged particle and thus every electrical system in existence in the Universe.

Interestingly, Nikola Tesla already said the exact same thing in 1891:

-:-
Nature has stored up in the universe infinite energy. The eternal recipient and transmitter of this infinite energy is the ether. The recognition of the existence of ether, and of the functions it performs, is one of the most important results of modern scientific research. The mere abandoning of the idea of action at a distance, the assumption of a medium pervading all space and connecting all gross matter, has freed the minds of thinkers of an ever present doubt, and, by opening a new horizon—new and unforeseen possibilities—has given fresh interest to phenomena with which we are familiar of old.
-:-

[Guntis]

With a dielectric in between, looks like you end up with a one pole magnet. Is this correct?

Respectfully,

Core

we are dive in this too, but there are some wider areas to think about, not only electronic part but questions about...
Ok, i ask you "Magnetic energy is electronic part of this device or this is kinetic energy?"

[Core]

"Magnetic energy is electronic part of this device or this is kinetic energy?"

Well I'm really not sure. The magnetic field on the Bi2 core is a result of the kinetic energy from the 'magnetizer' core. With the dielectric split in the core waves are transmitted through the dielectric into the Bi2 core. To create a magnetic field in Bi2 core the 'magnetizer' core would have to be close or at its resonant frequency of the material to be strong enough to transfer through the dielectric.
Core Bi2, when vibrating, would create a magnetic field. These vibrations would cause the domains to align creating the field. I would imagine that this would be no different then striking a steel rod with a hammer to magnetize it.

So from what I see the kinetic energy from 'magnetizer' coil influences the Bi2 core to vibrate at a frequency that aligns the domains on its core. I guess another example would be two tuning forks of same pitch and weight influencing each other. So it would appear that the wave passing though the dielectric can do additional work while not adding to the work of the source.

If anything I said is correct then it would appear that the same procedure can be completed with other materials such as steel, iron, etc. The difference being the amount of energy required to 'jump start' the process. I guess in this case ferrite is ideal.

I really don't know.

Respectfully,

Core

[Core]

What happened?

-Core

[Guntis]

Downloads | FerroMagnetic

Design Of Device Step 2 final


...And help us God to all for free

[lamare]

Downloads | FerroMagnetic

Design Of Device Step 2 final


...And help us God to all for free

Is this a pure theoretic excercise, or do you have (witnessed) working examples?

Because as far as I understand this, you plan to use fixed static magnets to create a magnetic field to be picked up by a coil. If that is to be the principle, you would have to create a varying magnetic field, otherwise your coils cannot pick up the energy that is actually there, but wasted into space.

Anyway, may be this is helpful for you too:

I got that.

What I meant to say is that up to a certain degree, you can describe electro-magnetism using basically the same things as used in hydraulics. Some "thing", a fluid, flows trough some other "thing", a tube or water hose, a pump, etc. And actually 99% of electrical engineering uses this hydraulic analogy, where you can safely neglect the fact that underneath the surface, everything is really a wave (pattern), a very dynamic system.

And yes, you are right, you can also explain wave dynamics such that they can be understood to a degree without being too complicated, but only once you completely understand what is going on yourself.

What is very confusing with the current theory and thus the accompaning vizualisations is that we have been taught the electric field, the magnetic field and the gravitation field are three completely separate phenomena, which are connected in mysterious ways. In actual fact, they are not. This cymatic picture has told me very much:

You see some clear structure being formed as a result of just one phenomenon: sound waves in a liquid. If you imagine the little ball in the middle of the left picture being the earth and you know that the highlighted area's that form the structure in the cymatic picture are some kind of grains of some kind of material, it is clear that gravity must be a result of ether waves and not something mysterious. Of course, most of the structure is invisible in the real world, because you can only "see" the structure because of the grains in the liquid, but I am convinced the same kind of structure as seen on the picture actually surrounds the earth in the ether.

Finally, one comes to the following conclusion:

1. The gravity field is the pressure-variation of the ether
2. The electric field is the speed of the uni-directional movement of the ether
3. The magnetic field is the speed of the rotational movement of the ether
   

[Guntis]

Is this a pure theoretic excercise, or do you have (witnessed) working examples?

Because as far as I understand this, you plan to use fixed static magnets to create a magnetic field to be picked up by a coil. If that is to be the principle, you would have to create a varying magnetic field, otherwise your coils cannot pick up the energy that is actually there, but wasted into space.

Anyway, may be this is helpful for you too:

No static magnets, it uses HV HF modulated rings and by triggering these fields
you can move these rings horisontaly across the ferrite core and by moving it
cause to spin ferrite domains in ferromagnetic matereal by this moving rings
effect happening work who produces 50Hz frequency (depending on speed of moving rings)
speed of movement causes to produce this Low Voltage Low frequency.

it is fully tested near year. and i have witness that this device is fully
working aparatus to produce electric power and it has capabilities to feed itself with that power.