Nice work and info on those coils Farmhand
The way I see the spark gap method is basically pulsing the coil with relatively huge impulses, which I think in itself has its purposes/uses. Have you seen Peter's Free Energy Secrets Of Cold Electricity video? The things he quotes from the book "Secrets Of Cold War Technology" (I think that's the title) is fascinating. I've never thought about the waveform, just the big impulses. How would you go about looking at it with a scope?
I have no doubt that there's a loss with the gap, but this is what I've noticed so far and attempted to share on video but failed due to interference: Based only on the existing setup with 1360pF capacitance and nothing tuned, shorter gap distance apparently transfers more 'current' if that's the proper word to use indicated by brighter fluorescent glow, but a lower voltage indicated by shorter and denser streamers. A bigger gap distance allows less current indicated by a dimmer fluorescent, but the voltage seems to be doubled if not more indicated by the streamers that are twice the length but much thinner. They are much bigger bangs at such a low frequency than the buzzing of wasps at a higher frequency. Also input current seems to be lowest at smaller or bigger gap distances, a mid-sized gap can draw 4-8 times more current in my setup. (Unless it's affecting the meter in other ways). [edit] Also since the update below, there's some random "popping" going on with a bigger gap. I guess an analogy as far as the sound goes is similar to a car backfiring in between the regular consistency of the engine. I don't know what it is yet, but they sound impressive at least
So I'm thinking there must be a balance one can get here somewhere, and why it might be especially useful to have a closer gap but very abrupt and big impulses.
As far as scalar waves go, as far as I know you need flat spiral coils to do that I think over unity will require a lot of precise and specific tuning, you'll have to build your coils specifically for a certain frequency source you're trying to get into resonance with. I think Peter mentions "quarter wavelength of the source" for this kind of purpose.
I've just been testing out the new opto anyway. Much better results. Now it's turning off properly until I get to more than double the frequency of before. This also means that for my voltage in, I'm getting a much better voltage out of the flyback because it's now actually going between 0 and the + voltage. So all in all I'm getting about the same output from 6v as I was with 12v input before
Out of curiosity I also connected the scope to the bottom end of the 2nd coil that's still not connected to anything. The scope changed to the 1kV range and it was clicking away because of the auto range, and changed to 300v range before I quickly disconnected it because I think it's 600v max and I don't want to pop it So it looks like the other coil must be receiving over 100v (otherwise it'll be 100v range not 300v), it will ark a tiny bit, and it lights a fluorescent to a pretty decent brightness.
The way I see the spark gap method is basically pulsing the coil with relatively huge impulses, which I think in itself has its purposes/uses. Have you seen Peter's Free Energy Secrets Of Cold Electricity video? The things he quotes from the book "Secrets Of Cold War Technology" (I think that's the title) is fascinating. I've never thought about the waveform, just the big impulses. How would you go about looking at it with a scope?
I have no doubt that there's a loss with the gap, but this is what I've noticed so far and attempted to share on video but failed due to interference: Based only on the existing setup with 1360pF capacitance and nothing tuned, shorter gap distance apparently transfers more 'current' if that's the proper word to use indicated by brighter fluorescent glow, but a lower voltage indicated by shorter and denser streamers. A bigger gap distance allows less current indicated by a dimmer fluorescent, but the voltage seems to be doubled if not more indicated by the streamers that are twice the length but much thinner. They are much bigger bangs at such a low frequency than the buzzing of wasps at a higher frequency. Also input current seems to be lowest at smaller or bigger gap distances, a mid-sized gap can draw 4-8 times more current in my setup. (Unless it's affecting the meter in other ways). [edit] Also since the update below, there's some random "popping" going on with a bigger gap. I guess an analogy as far as the sound goes is similar to a car backfiring in between the regular consistency of the engine. I don't know what it is yet, but they sound impressive at least
So I'm thinking there must be a balance one can get here somewhere, and why it might be especially useful to have a closer gap but very abrupt and big impulses.
As far as scalar waves go, as far as I know you need flat spiral coils to do that I think over unity will require a lot of precise and specific tuning, you'll have to build your coils specifically for a certain frequency source you're trying to get into resonance with. I think Peter mentions "quarter wavelength of the source" for this kind of purpose.
I've just been testing out the new opto anyway. Much better results. Now it's turning off properly until I get to more than double the frequency of before. This also means that for my voltage in, I'm getting a much better voltage out of the flyback because it's now actually going between 0 and the + voltage. So all in all I'm getting about the same output from 6v as I was with 12v input before
Out of curiosity I also connected the scope to the bottom end of the 2nd coil that's still not connected to anything. The scope changed to the 1kV range and it was clicking away because of the auto range, and changed to 300v range before I quickly disconnected it because I think it's 600v max and I don't want to pop it So it looks like the other coil must be receiving over 100v (otherwise it'll be 100v range not 300v), it will ark a tiny bit, and it lights a fluorescent to a pretty decent brightness.
Comment