Why Einstein's relativity theory is plain wrong

[lamare]

Heaviside Vol II, Page 533

I'm afraid it is not that easy to establish whether or not bodies can travel faster than the speed of light. All bodies consist of atoms, electrons and such, which are known to be some kind of localized electro-magnetic wave structure.

While it is clear that a solid body can move at speeds greater than that of sound trough the air, or with speed greater than the propagation speed of waves trough water, that does not mean a body can move faster than the (local) speed of light just like that.

I mean, we are talking about bodies, "things", made up of waves. "Things" that cannot be considered "solid" with respect to the aether just like that.

Now I'm not saying it's impossible for particles to travel faster than the local speed of light, but I think you would need to establish a situation whereby the aether that is flowing around within the body is much more stiff than the "background"/"surrounding" aether the body moves trough. You would sort of need an "ice-like" aether body moving trough a fluid-like aether medium.

So, it would be very interesting to know whether or not the aether has different phases and some kind of temperature. Paul Stowe's work suggests that may very well be the case:

Tuks DrippingPedia : Stowe The Cause Of Gravity EM And QM

Since we can treat the vortices as quasi-particles, given a sufficient density, this system can also be consider a complex form of standard kinetic theory, as modified to account for interactive forces extending from the vortices. Thus this system will also have a form of pressure, density, temperature and fundamental action.

[nueview]

thank you Lamare
for making a very concise point about energy and matter and the relation to the speed of light truly an inspired statement.
Martin

[Ktulu]

Hi!
Inexpert here:
O.K.! So, let's just try and imagine putting it in practice.
2 frame references: the spaceship with one twin launches and flies away (well, accelerates away ), and the Earth that remains behind, with the other twin on it.
Well, yes! You now have two different frame references.
Then WHY NOT think the other way around? Namely, the Earth accelerating away from the spaceship, so the twin on Earth ages slower.
Anyway, I know the equation is complex, however, I can't get it why it couldn't be the other way around.
So, when we will ultimately put it in practice, I'm guessing... nothing will happen.
Take Proxima Centauri, for ex. It emits light that takes 4.5 years to reach us. So, the light itself travels 4.5 years to us. The day it arrives, do they actually think a lot less have passed on the "rocket" that brought the light here?! If so, then why did they even think of trasmitting the message out into the unknown back in the 70s, when they already knew that light-speed alters matter?! Because, ultimately it does. I don't think I could travel at light-speed, without my cells and DNA being altered in some way (in order to age slower than the observer).
So, what would the 1970s outgoing message sound like, the moment it arrived at the destination... ?

[stivep]

Transformer by Alexander Kugushov part#2.swf





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxDVbj_IfpU*

More information is covered in this video, much more.
Plus my comments


Wesley

[Joit]

Einstein (Fraud,Thief) Is WRONG, Infinity Is Flawed (Michio Kaku) - YouTube

[lamare]

i formulated a new aether theory, based on Maxwel/Stowe's:

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff - On Space Time And The Fabric Of Nature

Simulating an aether model of EM using OpenFoam? -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

Have fun!

[forelle]

Hi all
Here is an Article where Einstein himself refutes the SRT(special relativity theory)without an aehter he introduced 1905.
1920 he came up with the ART (general relativity theory) aether included.But at that time nobody accept it.
It Includes:
-speed of light is not an absolut constant
-gravitation from our fixed stars in our gallaxy goes through the whole space to our earth surface,wherby no place is left for the supposed gravitational free inertialsystems in the SRT
-space should be curved
-inflexible structures are declared as fiction
-timemeasuring is reduced to arbitrary running watches and the possibility of syncronising excluded
For more information click this link(only german):
http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/buch.pdf