Tweet
INTRODUCTION TO MECHANODYNAMICS
Ph. M. Kanarev. kanphil@mail.ru
--
I've been studying the energy multiplier by FM Chalkalis
F.M.CHALKALIS ENERGY MULTIPLIER
M. Kanarev did mathematical proof of the machine how it produces COP 1:50. (5000%) efficiency). The inventor's original calculation was close to COP 1:99. (10,000%). The flaw M. Kanarev pointed out was Chalkalis misinterpreted the weight (W) and mass during his calculation. 48kg of weight is about 4.8kg of mass.
What I'm stuck and tried to figure out, half of M. Kanarev's proof are using classical mechanic's rotational body. I could understand how he derived little over 1kW output of the rotating wheel. It's COP would be about 1:3. So, its mechanical power produces greater power that the electric motor consumes to maintain the wheel at 160 RPM. The motor uses 24V and 17A (407W).
The last part of M. Kanrev's proof is different. I really don't get it clearly cause it adds up mysterious 40+ COP to make it 50 COP in total. (The attachment file also contains a device whose COP is about 1:10.)
How to calculate the torque of a rotating wheel at constant speed? For example, M. Chalkalis' wheel revolves at 160 RPM with the weight of 50kg+. I know the torque value is pretty good but I'm stuck at finding its real value by pencil and paper.
How to calculate the torque of Earth? I thought it would be so simple. But, the physics book I've been reading, and hours of internet search haven't give me an answer yet.
I can find the total kinetic energy(mass, radius, angular speed). Then, getting the torque value is question mark. Is it fine to use P(power) = torque x angular speed, and Kinetic energy formula K = 0.5 x Inertia x (angular speed)^2?
OR
should I use the electric motor theory to estimate the size and weight of a rotating wheel? I found the material about bearing friction torque.
PS: How do I upload 1MiB of doc file?
Ph. M. Kanarev. kanphil@mail.ru
--
I've been studying the energy multiplier by FM Chalkalis
F.M.CHALKALIS ENERGY MULTIPLIER
M. Kanarev did mathematical proof of the machine how it produces COP 1:50. (5000%) efficiency). The inventor's original calculation was close to COP 1:99. (10,000%). The flaw M. Kanarev pointed out was Chalkalis misinterpreted the weight (W) and mass during his calculation. 48kg of weight is about 4.8kg of mass.
What I'm stuck and tried to figure out, half of M. Kanarev's proof are using classical mechanic's rotational body. I could understand how he derived little over 1kW output of the rotating wheel. It's COP would be about 1:3. So, its mechanical power produces greater power that the electric motor consumes to maintain the wheel at 160 RPM. The motor uses 24V and 17A (407W).
The last part of M. Kanrev's proof is different. I really don't get it clearly cause it adds up mysterious 40+ COP to make it 50 COP in total. (The attachment file also contains a device whose COP is about 1:10.)
How to calculate the torque of a rotating wheel at constant speed? For example, M. Chalkalis' wheel revolves at 160 RPM with the weight of 50kg+. I know the torque value is pretty good but I'm stuck at finding its real value by pencil and paper.
How to calculate the torque of Earth? I thought it would be so simple. But, the physics book I've been reading, and hours of internet search haven't give me an answer yet.
I can find the total kinetic energy(mass, radius, angular speed). Then, getting the torque value is question mark. Is it fine to use P(power) = torque x angular speed, and Kinetic energy formula K = 0.5 x Inertia x (angular speed)^2?
OR
should I use the electric motor theory to estimate the size and weight of a rotating wheel? I found the material about bearing friction torque.
PS: How do I upload 1MiB of doc file?
Comment