Multiple LCR resonance Circuits

[ltseung888]

What is wrong with the USA Educational System?

What is wrong with the USA education?

We had our pot luck party and one of the topics that interested most Chinese Parents in US is the question – what is wrong with the USA educational system? What do they need to do to ensure that their children get the best out of life?

Tseung: ‘A number of you bought the Electronic Snap Kits for your children? What happened? Did any one finish the projects?”

Parent A: “My kid spent three days on it. He did about 30 projects. Then he complained that he did not understand what is going on behind the building. I could not help him as I know nothing about physics and electronics. May be he will pick it up again after he learned more physics and electronics.”

Parent B: “My kid had some friends over. They were happy for a whole afternoon. When his friends left, some parts are missing. They are probably mixed with other toys.”

Parent C: “I used the tiger mom method. I forced my 11 year old son to do the projects one by one. He must explain to me after finishing one before he can work on another. I encouraged him to show some of the exciting results to his friends. I can see that he could benefit greatly from it. However, some of the concepts are far too difficult – even for me! I had to learn what are NPN and PNP, Diodes and ICs, Capacitors and Inductors etc. I do not have that much time.”

Parent D: “My 16 year son had a look and said it was far too boring. It is now my toy. I play with it from time to time. The Kit does not provide enough technical information. I have to hunt for additional information on the Internet. I wanted to do a Steven Mark type generator. However, there is a long way to go.”

Parent A: “In USA, there is too much emphasis on sports. In School, the heroes and idols are the athletes. Working on science projects will be labeled as a nerd. Kids are easily influenced by peer pressure.”

Parent B: “I prefer to send my kids to an environment such as summer camps. Some examples are music and tennis camps. My kids listen to coaches more. The coaches are professionals. They can teach my kids better tennis than I ever can. Will you run any electronics camps?”

Parent C: “I believe that one must excel in any field before one can truly enjoy it. In order to be better than others, one must exert more effort. I did not get to my present position in life through family fortune or connections. Every achievement was via hard work. I want my children to value hard work and dedication.”

Tseung: “Education is like politics. Different people can have different opinions. What matters are the end results! Unfortunately, the end results depend on many factors – school, family, friends, churches, TV and now Internet. I shall just sow seeds.”

[ltseung888]

The conclusive 4 Tuning Fork Experiments (part 1)

Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - kinetic energy of air molecules

Please see the above link for details.

Two identical tuning forks on resonance boxes do sound louder than when 1 is alone. The best position is for the two tuning forks to be ¼ wavelength apart with the open end of the resonance boxes facing each other. However, even if the resonance boxes are parallel to each other, the resulting sound is still louder and last longer.

More can be done. But the most vigorous experiments should be done at the esteemed universities as one of their PhD programs. I still do not know how to absolutely provide an exact striking force to the first tuning fork! Help appreciated…..

The First Divine Revelation is once more confirmed. The experiment is definitely scientific and can be repeated at all teaching Universities with 4 or more identical tuning forks on resonance boxes, a microphone and a computer program that can display the sound waveforms.

[ltseung888]

Lessons learned from the 4 Tuning fork resonance experiments

The lessons include:

1. Actual experiments are important even though the theory already predicted more tuning forks will sound louder and last longer.

2. The actual positions of the tuning forks are important. The use of ¼ wavelength distances was “guessed”. It speeded up the identification of potential resonance positions. Without the “guess”, much time would have been wasted.

3. It was difficult to use exactly the same force to strike the tuning forks. However, the trend was unmistakable. We may need to replace the first tuning fork with a sound produced electromagnetically. A sound that can be guaranteered to have same frequency and amplitude every time.

4. A resonance tube with the tuning forks at ¼ wavelength intervals will be a worthwhile effort.

5. The very large 440 Hertz tuning fork may not be the best to use as it produced a rapidly dropping sound.

6. The production of sound at the right frequency and loudness can learn much from the funny and educational video at Resonance Experiment - YouTube

7. The theory says that the kinetic energy of air molecules can be brought-in at resonance. That is why 2, 3, 4…n tuning forks sound louder and last longer than 1 alone. The random molecular motion of the air molecules will be changed into a pulsing order. A group of faster moving air molecules will be followed by a slower moving air molecules and the pattern repeats.

8. I never invented the tuning fork or the resonance chambers on musical instruments. I just did the physics and mathematics to show the following:

a. A ball hitting a moving piston from the front will rebound faster and obtain some of its added kinetic energy from the piston.

b. A ball hitting a moving piston from behind will rebound slower and give some of its kintetic energy to the piston. This is the magic of bringing-in kinetic energy of air molecules.

c. In order for a continuous transfer of kinetic energy of air molecules, the pulsing frequency must match that of the tuning forks.

The important NEW concept that I have put on the table for Physicists is – kinetic energy of air molecules can be brought-in at resonance. That fact does not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy. If this NEW concept is correct, we may be able to use a similar technique to bring-in gravitational energy or magnetic energy. In particular, we may be able to bring-in the electron motion energy with multiple LCR circuits in resonance.

Thanks to the Almighty for such a Divine Revelation.

[ltseung888]

Using a guitar as a resonance box

We all know that a tuning fork held by hand will not sound very loud. The loudness increases greatly when the end of the tuning fork is pressed on a flat surface.

One very good surface is the resonance box.

I decided to try to use a normal guitar as a resonance box. I placed the vibrating tuning fork firmly on the guitar. As expected, the sound was much louder.

The previously accepted explanation was that a larger surface was caused to vibrate and hence the louder sound. Can a different explanaton be correct - more kinetic energy of air molecules are brought-in to create the louder sound?

What is scientific dogma (sticking to established teaching and object to all alternative explanations)? How should a true scientist approach such a challenge?

[ltseung888]

Discussion with a Professor from China

Discussion with a Physics Professor from China

Prof J: “I want to address your issue of scientific dogma. The accepted explanation that the sound produced by 2 or more tuning fork is louder and lasts longer is a more efficient use of the striking force. There is no additional energy coming from the surrounding.”

Tseung: “I do understand that is the accepted explanation. But the new explanation that the kinetic energy of air molecules is brought-in at resonance is scientifically correct in every way – both theoretically and experimentally.”

Prof J: “When there are two alternative explanations, the correct scientific method is to stretch both and see which one breaks down. Can you suggest such experiments?”

Tseung: “I have 4 tuning forks on resonance boxes, I can take one tuning fork out. Compare its sound alone (Case A) with the case of bring the resonance box close to it (Case B). It is clear that Case B sounds louder and lasts longer than Case A. The best position is when the closed end of the resonance is at approximately 1/4 wavelength.”

Prof J: “The classical explanation is that the scenario produces a standing wave. The energy required to maintain a perfect standing wave is zero. The energy going into the resonance tube would increase the amplitude of vibration. Thus a louder sound will be heard. There is no new energy coming from the surrounding.”

Tseung: “Then how would the classical theory explain the case of 2, 3, 4…n tuning forks sound louder and last longer progressively when placed appropriately in a resonance tube with the tuning forks situated at ¼ wavelength apart.”

Prof J: “If we put a dozen or a hundred tuning forks, the resulting sound were demonstrated to be progressively louder and longer. Classical theory will have a hard time explaining. The dogma comes when some traditionalists dismiss the experimental evidence. At present, these traditionalists may say that the experiment is faulted because the striking force is not guaranteed to be identical.”

Tseung: “I do agree that I cannot guarantee that the striking forces are identical with human muscles. We may replace the first tuning fork with an electromagnetic means. We may use a signal generator with a speaker to produce the initial 440 Hertz sound instead of striking the tuning fork. We may replace the heavy duty tuning forks with a more sensitive version.”

Prof J: “You can see why the Universities in China are taking time. If your lead-out or bring-in energy theory is established without any doubt, the impact to science and to the energy industry is comparable to an Atomic Bomb. There will be no need to drill any oil or coal. The Steven Mark Type devices will replace all existing power plants. The economic and political power will shift dramatically. It is not scientific dogma holding the theory back. It is scientific prudence. Your name and the work from your team are already well known in China. Your posts on the Internet have not been ignored.”

Tseung: “If the lead-out or bring-in theory is correct, more resources should be poured in.”

Prof J: “How do you know that the USA, China and other Governments are not pouring in vast resources behind the scene? The Atomic Bomb project was at one time a highly confidential project – top, top, top secret.”

[ltseung888]

Longest sound on Aug 20, 2011

Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - kinetic energy of air molecules

Reply 14.

That configuration produced the longest sound so far as of Aug 20, 2011.

Further confirmation that kinetic energy of air molecules can be brought-in???

[ltseung888]

More Discussion with Prof. J

More Discussion with Prof. J

Tseung: “The signal generator, oscilloscope and other test equipment arrived from China yesterday. I am ready to do more experiments.”

Prof J: “With the signal generator, you can guarantee a constant sound with given frequency and amplitude. That will add much weight to your experiments.”

Tseung: “What happens if I let the signal generator produce a note in a closed room. I can put in a microphone and capture the waveform on an oscilloscope. That will be waveform A. I then put in passive elements such as resonance tubes, resonance boxes and place them appropriately. The new waveform will be waveform B.”

Prof J: “I understand your simple experiment now. You are using the same constant sound source. Waveform B is expected to show much higher amplitude. You then suggest that extra energy comes from the molecular motion of air.”

Tseung: “The suggestion is at least scientifically possible. We can lead-out or bring-in energy from air! It must be considered as a scientifically correct experiment.”

Prof J: “I know that the result will be in your favor even before doing the experiment. The air chambers in most musical instruments achieve the same purpose. But with your setup, you can have accurate, quantitative data. That alone is scientifically worthwhile.”

Divine Revelation 1 cannot be wrong. Both theory and experimental evidence confirm that.

If kinetic energy of air molecules can be brought-in at resonance, can electron motion energy be brought-in at multiple LCR resonance?

[MonsieurM]

You'll then be creating a wave (like the ocean wave )

[ltseung888]

Absolute confirmation of Divine Revelation 1

Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - kinetic energy of air molecules

I now have the signal generator from China. I can produce a constant sound with given frequency and amplitude.

Please see the above link for the waveform comparisons.

I cannot strike the tuning fork with the same force every time. However, I can adjust the signal generator to provide the same sound every time!

Thank you to the Hong Kong Government for the HK$6,000. It is being spent wisely. The oscilloscope arrived yesterday too. Fun time begins.

[ltseung888]

Shock wave

You'll then be creating a wave (like the ocean wave )

The plan is to send a shock wave to the scientific community.

A new understanding of resonance and bring-in energy is here.

[ltseung888]

The Michael Prototype in USA

Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - Flux Change Systems

Please follow what happens via the above link.

The systematic approach may lead us to the Steven Mark TPU logically.

Multiple LCR resonance circuits are definitely worth investigating.

[ltseung888]

More discussion with Prof J

Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - kinetic energy of air molecules

I now have the signal generator from China. I can produce a constant sound with given frequency and amplitude.

Please see the above link for the waveform comparisons.

I cannot strike the tuning fork with the same force every time. However, I can adjust the signal generator to provide the same sound every time!

Thank you to the Hong Kong Government for the HK$6,000. It is being spent wisely. The oscilloscope arrived yesterday too. Fun time begins.

Prof J: “I think that the above experiment with the constant sound source and a resonance box is much more convincing scientifically than the 4 tuning forks.”

Tseung: “Can you elaborate?”

Prof J: “With the 4 tuning forks, you cannot guarantee to have the same striking force. If you strike hard on the 2 tuning fork case, the sound will be louder than the 4 tuning fork case. Displaying the waveform does not help.”

Tseung: “I accept that.”

Prof J: “With the constant sound, a certain waveform was first captured. A resonance box was then brought close to the speaker. The resulting sound was much louder. That waveform was captured. Everyone in the room could hear the unmistakable louder sound.”

Tseung: “The louder sound represented more energy. The resonance box is a passive device – meaning that it could not supply energy by itself. The explanation that molecular motion was led-out or brought-in is extremely reasonable.”

Prof J: “True. I still support your buying 4 tuning forks even though the conclusive experiment comes from the signal generator. The future Physics Classes may use the signal generator to demonstrate the bringing-in of molecular energy. The four tuning fork video would still have its scientific and historic value.”

Tseung: “The Hong Kong Government will be proud to have provided the US150 for the 4 tuning forks. These 4 tuning forks are now in my possession. They may turn up in a museum one day.”

Prof J: “Together with the Electronic Snap Kit 303 and the signal generator. The home-made hammer from a chopstick will be there too. It will be a fun story.”

Can there be doubts on Divine Revelation 1 – Energy of air can be brought-in at resonance???

[ltseung888]

The first oscilloscope measurement on Michael prototype 005

Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - Flux Change Systems

Please follow the measurements from above link.

Need to add the electronic components to turn them into LCR circuits.

[ltseung888]

Testing the Tseung prototype from Hong Kong

Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - Flux Change Systems

See reply 26 and 27.

I used the oscilloscope to repeat and double check the prototype performance. I still have my best prototype from Hong Kong. With the wires spread well apart, I managed to get a Tseung FLEET Comparison Index (COP?) of 89. THe best figure from Hong Kong was over 200.

I then played with the wire spacing - placing them closer. One of the results was definitely over 100. However, in the playing around, my poor soldered joints fell apart. I decided to put the prototype on breadboard and achieved a result of around 89 again.

The most interesting curves are the power curves. The Output Power Curve was much larger in the area covered - both positive and negative. Overunity was confirmed beyond any shadow of doubt. Please check the diagrams for yourselves.

Multiple LCR circuits in resonance is the right direction to go.

[ltseung888]

Ordered another Atten Oscilloscope

The Hong Kong set up with 2 oscilloscopes will be repeated in USA.

Tuning will be much easier. Comparing the Input and Output power and other waveforms directly is easier with two oscilloscopes.

The tuning forks, the signal generator, the electronic snap kit 303 and the two oscilloscopes may be good investment for any group interested in multiple LCR research.