The Golden Tractate of Hermes Trismegistus applied to electromagnetism

[Dave45]

The frequency you would need frequency 528 Hz (DNA repair frequency ?) : NO MUSIC single tone - YouTube

I believe it could be done, would be a worthwhile en devour, after we get FE I will go in this direction.
Tesla found that the electric field healed the body, I probably read it in one of your posts

[MonsieurM]

I may not have said this enough,

Dave and the rest of you guys....
I feel blessed to have met you ...knowing that a New Paradigm is about to be born...I want you all to know that we would not be here if it was not for you guys...so I am humbled and blessed to hold this discussion with Great Minds such as you guys...as my friend says may the Angels walk along side you

[MonsieurM]

I just wanted to mention this for the curious mind and important ...For most of the research done on medical use of electromagnetic waves; one aspect has been overlooked and that is to obtain optimal results such as in the use of Violet rays....the Antenna / the patient has to have followed an Alkaline Diet...In this research I have found that Alkaline Water and Diet enhances the healing aspect of the body.





---------------------from a previous post http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post163380

According to Marcel:

“This structuring is best assayed with a UV spectro-photometer where one finds an increase in UV absorption due to an increase in the water bonding from the water forming chains on itself. The magnetic moment of this structured water is increased by 0.07 gauss and there is also an increase in the pH and dielectric conductivity.

sorry for the repetition;

key word quartz

Edgar Cayce often recommended animated ash and ultra-violet light therapy for persons suffering from cancer. The readings stated that the animated ash would increase the oxygen in the body and assist the immune system in fighting the cancer.

" Animated ash was a form of bamboo that was reduced to activated charcoal by means of a partial vacuum electrical carbon arc process. The resulting ash (alkaline ) was taken internally

Cayce’s dietary recommendations for cancer tended to follow several key themes:

• Eat a diet that tends to produce a balanced pH in the system with
a tendency towards alkalinity.

Imagine a medical tool where you take a UV laser pointer or violet ray and place a healthy cell , like stem cells, contained in a quartz lens and then shoot the UV laser through it, which would carry the healthy information in the beam, to heal sick people .

so to increase the UV effect, an Alkaline diet would be recommended



Cancer Healing & Spirituality (4): Edgar Cayce on Cancer Causes and Treatment (2)

sorry for the repeat wanted to post the rest of the paragraph

from The Legacy of Marcel Vogel

According to Marcel:

“This structuring is best assayed with a UV spectro-photometer where one finds an increase in UV absorption due to an increase in the water bonding from the water forming chains on itself. The magnetic moment of this structured water is increased by 0.07 gauss and there is also an increase in the pH and dielectric conductivity. Boiling of the water after structuring shows no change in the UV spectrum, so one can conclude that a permanent chemical change has taken place. When a drop of this structured silica water is dried on a slide and compared with untreated silica water, the photomicrographs show the formation of needle-like silica crystals in the structured water drop while the untreated water dried to an amorphous mass of silica gel. This shows that the process of structuring water produces a structuring or ordering effect on the solutes in solution.”8

[MonsieurM]

Principle of Mentalism: Universe is all Waves

One of the most subtle way found to control the Vox Populi is this



and I am allergic to them ...truly

think of the knot as a 3....long piece of cloth dangling as the 9.....

if the 9 is long....and the system has be in equilibrium.....then the 6 will be very small (ie a restrictive effect on your brain development )



Most of the free spirited inventors did not were ties.....

------------------

Necktie - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The necktie traces back to the time of Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) when Croatian mercenaries from the Croatian Military Frontier in French service, wearing their traditional small, knotted neckerchiefs, aroused the interest of the Parisians. Due to the slight difference between the Croatian word for Croats, Hrvati, and the French word, Croates, the garment gained the name "cravat".[1] The new article of clothing started a fashion craze in Europe where both men and women wore pieces of fabric around their necks. In the late 17th century, the men wore lace cravats that took a large amount of time and effort to arrange. These cravats were often tied in place by cravat strings, arranged neatly and tied in a bow.

[Dave45]

I may not have said this enough,

Dave and the rest of you guys....
I feel blessed to have met you ...knowing that a New Paradigm is about to be born...I want you all to know that we would not be here if it was not for you guys...so I am humbled and blessed to hold this discussion with Great Minds such as you guys...as my friend says may the Angels walk along side you

The feeling is mutual my brother
May God Bless you and keep you and protect you in all your en devours.
your servant
dave

[electronicsounds]

Never tell a man he's not free

We must be very thankful for the internet because we can meet people with mutual interests, because you won't be able discuss teachings and concepts that are outlawed by the current indoctrinating system with everyone and as the title of this reply says, never tell a person he's not free. Whenever I try to discuss anything revolutionary I always get that ''you believe all the s**t you read on the internet'' reply. It is very difficult to get people to think, they prefer to follow like sheep do.

[electronicsounds]

now back to thinking..........

Does this make any sense? , because I have been thinking about this concept quit long now but had difficulty to express it in words….

To change the velocity of a car being driven by a stubborn drive that has no intention to stop, without major forces or extreme energies and thus preventing harm, another car could be used to reach the car and drive by it; then the car gets hooked to the other while the car changes amplitude/magnitude, forcing the car to change its velocity too and resulting in a car moving at different velocity from that the driver originally intends.
Now compare this to an element; the velocity that is how much distance is covered per unit time can be viewed as frequency. The cars amplitude is the resistance at a particular instant. This resistance is similar to what we call inertia but on different scale, since a fractal property should manifest itself on all scale. So my crude analogy is if we manage to match the frequency of a wave and then phase it accordingly to what we intend to do (increase or decrease an element’s frequency), to the element’s wave and manipulate our wave’s amplitude/displacement (damping or interference) we can change the element’s frequency thus forcing it to turn into another element.
Another thing, according to Walter Russell’s periodic table hydrogen has one of the highest frequencies, therefore it can be changed into all the other elements that have lower frequency, can this correlate to the fact that hydrogen is the most abundant element in our universe?

Sorry for writing long…but couldn’t do any better

[MonsieurM]

You are quite correct...you have grasped the essence of the concept that Walter Russell And John W. Keely were trying to convey

6 is your target and 9 your control wave



John W. Keely

...When these harmonics form unisons or direct harmonic relations the two vibrating aggregates and their chords of vibration are said to be sympathetic to each other. This unison of frequency dictates that what happens to one vibratorily happens to the other simultaneously.

[MonsieurM]

slight correction: 6 is your target, 3 your control wave and nine the resulting wave (ie the new element)

principle of correspondence:

[shawnnweed]

Does this make any sense? , because I have been thinking about this concept quit long now but had difficulty to express it in words….

To change the velocity of a car being driven by a stubborn drive that has no intention to stop, without major forces or extreme energies and thus preventing harm, another car could be used to reach the car and drive by it; then the car gets hooked to the other while the car changes amplitude/magnitude, forcing the car to change its velocity too and resulting in a car moving at different velocity from that the driver originally intends.
Now compare this to an element; the velocity that is how much distance is covered per unit time can be viewed as frequency. The cars amplitude is the resistance at a particular instant. This resistance is similar to what we call inertia but on different scale, since a fractal property should manifest itself on all scale. So my crude analogy is if we manage to match the frequency of a wave and then phase it accordingly to what we intend to do (increase or decrease an element’s frequency), to the element’s wave and manipulate our wave’s amplitude/displacement (damping or interference) we can change the element’s frequency thus forcing it to turn into another element.
Another thing, according to Walter Russell’s periodic table hydrogen has one of the highest frequencies, therefore it can be changed into all the other elements that have lower frequency, can this correlate to the fact that hydrogen is the most abundant element in our universe?

Sorry for writing long…but couldn’t do any better

I would have to agree with this assessment. We know that according to the first law of thermodynamics that all energy in an enclosed system, such as the universe, will remain the same but will inevitably change forms from solid to liquid to gas or to plasma. There obviously has to be a base element and that element would be the one of the highest frequency. Now for that element to change into another would depend on certain forces or combination of forces. Time, gravity, pressure, magnetism, heat, cold, polarity, etc. will cause all matter or its individual properties to change. But to learn what particular forces cause effectual change across the board of elements would be a massive undertaking that only God himself could figure out. After all we are still adding to the periodic table. It took us 6,000 years to split the atom. We still aren't sure exactly what light is and until recently thought that light was the fastest record-able speed. For the most part we are children fumbling in the dark and only discovering at the rate in which our imagination meets out intellect. But I love you train of thought; it's quiet logical.
,Shawn

[shawnnweed]

Discovery of a 'dark state' could increase maximum theoretical efficiency of solar cells from 31 to 44 percent





--------------

Chemists propose explanation for superconductivity at high temperatures

Here is a thought. I do not how 'out to lunch' it may be but it worth pondering. When you study ionic propulsion it is said that due to the electrons rate of speed, due to higher voltages, over the surface of a given metal that it actually grabs the air around it and forces the air in the direction that it is flowing. At least this is how I understood it.
I also watched a video where a scientist built a capacitor from two copper cups and a glass flask. They showed how the metal cups could be charged with electrons, positive in the top copper cup and negative in the bottom copper cup. These two copper cups had a glass flask separating them because we know what happens when a positively charged metal meets a negatively charged metal, the sparks begin to fly. However they removed the charging leads and then removed the two copper cups, from the glass flask, and touched them together and guess what...no spark. Yet when they reassembled them with the glass container the electricity was still there and it discharged when they shorted them. It was said that the electricity must have been stored on the surface of the glass. We all know that capacitors are for storing high amounts of electrical voltage. And once again the voltage being on the exterior.
What if the voltage, as we know it flows along the exterior of metal while amperage flows in the interior? Just a thought through observation. Would this make a difference when it comes to superconducting?
,Shawn

[MonsieurM]

We must be very thankful for the internet because we can meet people with mutual interests, because you won't be able discuss teachings and concepts that are outlawed by the current indoctrinating system with everyone and as the title of this reply says, never tell a person he's not free. Whenever I try to discuss anything revolutionary I always get that ''you believe all the s**t you read on the internet'' reply. It is very difficult to get people to think, they prefer to follow like sheep do.

You can't convince people ....posted this in the beginning of another thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/psychi...antenna-4.html

human is a creature of habit, you cannot easily convince people to abandon their method of work, all you can do is inform and let them make the choice for themselves... and some will be curious enough to try and experiment...

-----------------------

good to read you Shawn ....and I agree with you....you also realize that when you associate glass and copper, you associate dielectricity with diamagnetism....

and also you are sandwiching the glass with two oppositely charged copper cup...doesn't that sound to you like 6 3 9

Here is a thought. I do not how 'out to lunch' it may be but it worth pondering. When you study ionic propulsion it is said that due to the electrons rate of speed, due to higher voltages, over the surface of a given metal that it actually grabs the air around it and forces the air in the direction that it is flowing. At least this is how I understood it.
I also watched a video where a scientist built a capacitor from two copper cups and a glass flask. They showed how the metal cups could be charged with electrons, positive in the top copper cup and negative in the bottom copper cup. These two copper cups had a glass flask separating them because we know what happens when a positively charged metal meets a negatively charged metal, the sparks begin to fly. However they removed the charging leads and then removed the two copper cups, from the glass flask, and touched them together and guess what...no spark. Yet when they reassembled them with the glass container the electricity was still there and it discharged when they shorted them. It was said that the electricity must have been stored on the surface of the glass. We all know that capacitors are for storing high amounts of electrical voltage. And once again the voltage being on the exterior.
What if the voltage, as we know it flows along the exterior of metal while amperage flows in the interior? Just a thought through observation. Would this make a difference when it comes to superconducting?
,Shawn

[MonsieurM]

and if you think on it....it is a simple LC circuit: Principle of Correspondence

An inductor (or reactor or coil) is a passive two-terminal electrical component used to store energy in a magnetic field

A capacitor (formerly known as condenser) is a passive two-terminal electrical component used to store energy in an electric field.

An LC circuit, also called a resonant circuit or tuned circuit, consists of an inductor, represented by the letter L, and a capacitor, represented by the letter C. When connected together, they can act as an electrical resonator, an electrical analogue of a tuning fork, storing electrical energy oscillating at the circuit's resonant frequency.

[MonsieurM]

Just occured to me....Based on what was just posted...I could also say then that the concept of 6 3 9 is an LC Circuit


An LC circuit/ 6 3 9 circuit , also called a resonant circuit or tuned circuit, consists of an inductor, represented by the letter L, and a capacitor, represented by the letter C. When connected together, they can act as an electrical resonator, an electrical analogue of a tuning fork, storing electrical energy oscillating at the circuit's resonant frequency.



IMHO...it makes sense to me...what do you think

[electronicsounds]

can we really rely on the atomic data we are provided with in our books, internet and all other sources ? for example atomic models, radii, and electron,neutrons, proton structure of the atom.
Are there any revolutionary ideas about these, especially from Walter Russell, because I still am far back in reading all his work, but decided to spend some time studying his periodic table.
If yes can you refer them to me. thanks
thanks