Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Video

    New video "Lenz Delay Propulsion" confirmation video from Whoppyjump!


    accelerating rotor under load 1.wmv - YouTube

    Comment


    • Table.

      Table from Woopy:

      The rotor gains 441 rpms while imput drops 101 ma when power's increased to 10 volts in his new double magnet setup. Woopy's gaining a great amount of power with just one coil! Woopy's output coil is now shorted through a FWBR and a 1 Ohm resistor. Still a very rudimentary setup.
      Last edited by Allen Burgess; 06-21-2017, 11:55 AM.

      Comment


      • Hi Allen

        Thank's to you for bringing my video and experiment here, because it takes always a lot of time and energy to publish everything all arround the different forum, and answer all the questions.

        Just for info i have modified the datasheet (blue which i replaced by a more brown but correct one ) because the first line is wrong

        i made a mistake, the no load is 836 rpm , and the current is 470 ma AND FROM THIS POINT ( what is slightly under the threshold ), the deceleration is going on and on down , slowly and constant , to 230 rpm, so the rpm lost is 606 rpm and not 240. (836 -230 = 606 rpm as i have wrongly written) while the current on the prime mover is increasing from 470 ma up to 570 ma.

        But for the acceleration result all seems to be correct.

        And of course i wait for Toranarod and all the Muller replicator for some input

        So as i am here, i profit to ask if you have any idea as off the acceleration process , and if it is a delayed Lenz how it occures ?

        So happy to share here also

        and good luck at all

        laurent
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • Hi,
          very good expirement.
          But, using coil core is metal, isn't it ? Why do you use ferrit core ?
          Ferrit core never accleration at the short circute genrator coil .. İf using ferrit core and getting accleration, all problem solved...
          Sorry my bad english..

          Comment


          • Originally posted by antony27 View Post
            Hi,
            very good expirement.
            But, using coil core is metal, isn't it ? Why do you use ferrit core ?
            Ferrit core never accleration at the short circute genrator coil .. İf using ferrit core and getting accleration, all problem solved...
            Sorry my bad english..
            ok Please try it and than post your results perhaps you will be suprised

            good luck

            laurent

            Comment


            • Spiral coil test

              I failed to get my Rodin Spiral output coils to show any sign of the "Lenz Delay acceleration" effect at any RPM over the past few days of testing, so I'll upload no video. I sent my 1' sphere magnet on a very high speed run, but still a bite from the shorted trifilar at top end.
              Last edited by Allen Burgess; 10-24-2011, 01:58 PM.

              Comment


              • Delayed Lenz Effect Overunity in transformer.

                Gotoluc's got money for nothing here:

                Delayed Lenz Effect in Transformer Test 3 - YouTube

                Comment


                • Ferrite cores do work, just not as well, they need a higher frequency to be as useful.

                  Gotoluc's video is amazing, 0 Watts in, 10 Watts out ...

                  Comment


                  • Hi QV,
                    Truth is, he is not doing the measurements correctly.

                    The apparent power isn't zero at all.
                    He needs to work out the rms values for the TOTAL voltage and current supplied to the transformer.

                    For a symetrical sine wave as shown in his scope shots he has to multiply the max peak to peak current by the max peak to peak volts.

                    Then bring this answer to rms value multiply his answer by ......one half of the square root of 0.5, (approximately 0.3535 times the peak to peak values).

                    This is the total apparent or reactive power including any I squared R losses etc. to the circuit.

                    You can see from the scope shot it is far far from zero.

                    There has to be a certain amount of energy sloshing back and forth between the inductor an capacitor to keep the reactances charged over their own part of the cycle. If it were zero power there'd be no deflection on at least one of the channels of the scope. (E times I, so anything times zero is zero)

                    His first scope shot shows there's a phase lag of over 90 degrees, I think.
                    If it were precisely 90 degrees then the Cosine of the phase difference would be exactly zero giving true FREE energy as output. From apparent power times Cos phi.

                    BUT because the indicated phase difference is slightly over the 90 degree mark. It means there is indeed some REAL power supplied to his circuit.

                    This REAL power may well account for the 10.6 Volts seen across his 10 Ohm resistor, giving a dissipation of about 11 watts.

                    Gerry

                    Comment


                    • Ah well that's a shame

                      Comment


                      • New old reuploaded video.

                        gotoluc's resurrected video:

                        Delayed Lenz Effect in Transformer Test 3 - YouTube

                        and replication:

                        Luc's Delayed Lenz Circuit.MOV - YouTube
                        Last edited by Allen Burgess; 10-26-2011, 01:24 AM.

                        Comment


                        • Quote from Kator01.

                          Quote from Kator01:

                          "Hello everyone,

                          I tried to replicate Luc`s setup however I measured the real-power with this famous german Hartmann & Braun Instrument ( 1980)

                          Wattavi Equipment Hartmann & Braun AG; Frankfurt, build 1979

                          It is a pure Power-Meter which cannot be fooled because the current to be measured is used to magnetize a closed iron-core in the center of which a electrodynamic meter-coil ( galvanometer-coil) is turning the needle. A small current resulting from the voltage is fed into this sensitive coil.
                          Now current and voltage determine the real power monitored in this Instrument in a direct way - no interpretation , no calculation by pic-programms.
                          In all configurations I tested ( I have a torióid-transformer with two identical secondaries specified for 50 V each )
                          there was always real-power flowing from the grid into the system. Average efficiency was about 75 to 80 %.
                          Wattage was in the range from 5 to 10 Watt into a 1 Ohm-Power-Resistor. Average efficiency was about 75 to 80 %. Phaseshift was monitored across a 0,27 Ohm Power-resistor and strange enough my scope definitely showed a 90 degree phase-shift in an configurations. This result was veryfied at the same time with a standard mechanical power-meter - Ferraris-meter - we use here in germany as the main grid-meter
                          https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ki/Stromzähler
                          The minute phaseshift-difference ( maybe 2 to 5 degrees) simply escapes these digital meters and I have to confess that I first was confused by my scope-readings until I realized that these Digi-meters can not be used in these measurements and visually I was not able to detect the small difference on my scope.
                          The wattavi K however can not be fooled.
                          Sorry folks this setup does not work.
                          Regards"

                          Deepcut needs to reconfigure his rotor by adding more diametric magnets to the axel, side by side, and the output coils side to side; Then the coils would work wired serialy.
                          Last edited by Allen Burgess; 10-28-2011, 12:10 AM.

                          Comment


                          • Thanks AB, so you're kator on ou.com ?

                            Comment


                            • You got the "jump" on me between edits!

                              What do you think about stinging the diametric rotors out lengthwise, with one power coil, and multiple ouputs side by side?

                              Comment


                              • FreeEnergy26.

                                Well it looks like Freeenergy's Trifilar Rodin, is spinning up with less input from just the BEMF alone, and that his third coil is inert, so no Lenz Delay here as thought.

                                Quote:

                                "circuit is hall sensor to 556 timer to (2) 3055 transitstors. one transistor per winding. Back emf is captured with diode off each of the two windings. third winding on this coil is not being used in video."

                                I positioned my 1" Neo sphere inside my plumber spool coil, wraped 32 gauge bifilar, and placed them inside the air core of my spiral Toroid to power the spinner. The plumber spool bifilar generated 275 volts with the sphere spinning at over 26,000 RPM inside. Pretty cool looking setup, but no "Lenz Delay effect".

                                Shorting the coil knocks the sphere right out on to the floor. No evidence at all of any "Lenz Delay". Whats more, Freeenergy26 has revealed his output is all retrived through diodes from the primary BEMF.

                                Freenergy26's circuit sounds nearly identical to the one Romero said generated acceleration under load. See attachment:
                                Last edited by Allen Burgess; 06-21-2017, 11:55 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X