Tweet
I personally got tired of seeing all the hypes and humanity saving devices for many years. I do believe in there has to be a real theory that any individuals can easily understand and use it to build practical FE devices.
I was going to study the original electromagnetism that has 20 equations not four. But, I came up to see this remarkable theory.
Sciences including mathematics are built-on axioms - few rules or laws humans define they hold truth whatsoever. Newton's laws of motion are the axioms. All other laws and theories are based on these. They have been proved over hundreds years. Nobody hardly asked the right question yet even Mr. Einstein.
I just copied context from other forum I posted. It's not my own idea. I studied "Introduction Mechanodynamics" by Ph. M. Kanarev that opens up the reality of free energy device remarkably simple. It's only 14 pages of physics article on Kanarev's web site.
I can't say Newton's laws are wrong. It just has lack of understanding about inertia of matter inherited cause and effect problem. The below is my understanding of the flaws. I like to hear from other members who have independent thinking whether I'm wrong or others will lead to the same conclusion I already had.
I was going to study the original electromagnetism that has 20 equations not four. But, I came up to see this remarkable theory.
Sciences including mathematics are built-on axioms - few rules or laws humans define they hold truth whatsoever. Newton's laws of motion are the axioms. All other laws and theories are based on these. They have been proved over hundreds years. Nobody hardly asked the right question yet even Mr. Einstein.
I just copied context from other forum I posted. It's not my own idea. I studied "Introduction Mechanodynamics" by Ph. M. Kanarev that opens up the reality of free energy device remarkably simple. It's only 14 pages of physics article on Kanarev's web site.
I can't say Newton's laws are wrong. It just has lack of understanding about inertia of matter inherited cause and effect problem. The below is my understanding of the flaws. I like to hear from other members who have independent thinking whether I'm wrong or others will lead to the same conclusion I already had.
How about the destruction of Newton's three laws of motion? What would be the implication? I won't make it long here. Any individuals if they study really hard about Newton's three laws will spot the flaw, which is 'Chicken and egg dilemma' I would call.
Newton's law has causality problem - cause and effect. He defines the 1st law of motion. Without explanation he uses motion as the building block. Then, go on next law of force (F = ma). Force is change of motion (acceleration) on an object of mass m.
And then, the 3rd law of action and reaction.
Simple question "What causes the motion?" The answer is "Force" because we know it instinctively. Then, the force contains "change of motion" within. Change of motion cause motion? it's getting weird.
Next question "How much force a car has moving at 100km/h on highway?"
We know a car is well over one thousand to two thousand tons. Right? Then, it has to have huge force. But the 1st law says there is no external force on an object at constant motion. You can calculate the kinetic energy (0.5 x mass x speed x speed). Energy is scalar quantity that can produce force. Still, I want to know the force of the car. I know the car is moving by internal force - engine. I'm at dead end. LOL
Okay, I go little further. Most cars needs 50hp to reach to 100km/h on highway. It's proven facts by numerous experiments. As a car moves at 100km/h on highway, to maintain its speed only needs 30hp. Where the 20hp goes? Applying this principal on cars will save great amount of fuels for car owners.
Another example, you put a kid on a swing and start push it and realize that the same force will make the seat moves higher and higher as long as you push at the highest point . Theoretically and experimentally you can rotate the kid with one finger. How could it possible? Newton's laws can't explain it.
Newton's law has causality problem - cause and effect. He defines the 1st law of motion. Without explanation he uses motion as the building block. Then, go on next law of force (F = ma). Force is change of motion (acceleration) on an object of mass m.
And then, the 3rd law of action and reaction.
Simple question "What causes the motion?" The answer is "Force" because we know it instinctively. Then, the force contains "change of motion" within. Change of motion cause motion? it's getting weird.
Next question "How much force a car has moving at 100km/h on highway?"
We know a car is well over one thousand to two thousand tons. Right? Then, it has to have huge force. But the 1st law says there is no external force on an object at constant motion. You can calculate the kinetic energy (0.5 x mass x speed x speed). Energy is scalar quantity that can produce force. Still, I want to know the force of the car. I know the car is moving by internal force - engine. I'm at dead end. LOL
Okay, I go little further. Most cars needs 50hp to reach to 100km/h on highway. It's proven facts by numerous experiments. As a car moves at 100km/h on highway, to maintain its speed only needs 30hp. Where the 20hp goes? Applying this principal on cars will save great amount of fuels for car owners.
Another example, you put a kid on a swing and start push it and realize that the same force will make the seat moves higher and higher as long as you push at the highest point . Theoretically and experimentally you can rotate the kid with one finger. How could it possible? Newton's laws can't explain it.
Comment