A couple of points I'd like to clear up for the sake of no misunderstandings,
I have a lot of respect for John Bedini, he has shown us lots of stuff.
Now not necessarily talking about John from here on but inventors and such in
general.
I think for anyone involved in a business to be promoting a product as OU would
be economic suicide. Especially if the business is a partnership or co-op.
It would be impossible to get a patent for a device that is more efficient than
70-80% anyway so selling a product without patent is probably not a good
business idea either, tooling up a plant for an non patented product could be
a waste of money.
I don't see how it would be possible to patent a device that is over 100%
efficient or promote and sell a device as over 100% efficient without a patent
on it.
So there really is no point to people thinking they will have their idea stolen
and patented or to hold out on info on an over 100% efficient device for the
purpose patenting it because it won't happen as far as I can tell. Logically
Cheers
I have a lot of respect for John Bedini, he has shown us lots of stuff.
Now not necessarily talking about John from here on but inventors and such in
general.
I think for anyone involved in a business to be promoting a product as OU would
be economic suicide. Especially if the business is a partnership or co-op.
It would be impossible to get a patent for a device that is more efficient than
70-80% anyway so selling a product without patent is probably not a good
business idea either, tooling up a plant for an non patented product could be
a waste of money.
I don't see how it would be possible to patent a device that is over 100%
efficient or promote and sell a device as over 100% efficient without a patent
on it.
So there really is no point to people thinking they will have their idea stolen
and patented or to hold out on info on an over 100% efficient device for the
purpose patenting it because it won't happen as far as I can tell. Logically
Cheers
Comment