Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DRJ200 >100% Home CNF reactor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DRJ200 >100% Home CNF reactor

    For this which never ever heard anything about our party main flag, the first polish >100% OU CNF home reactor, please see: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
    It was known for some years that we are unveiling this technology, but even today, after many shows and writings it found no interest, pity.
    Attached Files
    Dr Adolf Nowak
    Reichsleiter
    III Reich Polen
    60-143 Posen Grunewald
    http://3rp.livejournal.com

  • #2
    DRJ600 350% CNF Reactor

    DRJ600 350% CNF reactor
    For more advanced products of our party former: Nikita S. Chruschov Central Institute for Nuclear Technologies please see the link above.
    This CNF reactor is for bigger homes and vast places to heat.
    Although it is the smallest of this series (for show purposes), it can in mixed day/night, 24 H mode up to 4.800 sqm to heat, and this 4x cheaper over gas, coal.
    It can be with engines up to 1-10 MW built to be.
    Its main purpose was as DRJ1000, as steering engine for big space ships and propeling engine for civilian space crafts. The DRJ1000 was first as selfpropeling CNF engine intended, yet it can altogether with thorium atomic reactors to work.
    It was originally 2006 built and hidden in secrecy till this year, only to see effects of DRJ200 impact on crank mentality of jew-o-catholics.
    Its energy of free tachyons (as well as by DRJ200), known also as free gravitons (antigravity), and also neutrino, is on level of 10^24 eV (Yottaelectronovolts).
    Please compare this figure with LHC makes 10^14.
    Sincerely
    Yours
    Arius Adolf Nowak
    NSPAP
    Attached Files
    Dr Adolf Nowak
    Reichsleiter
    III Reich Polen
    60-143 Posen Grunewald
    http://3rp.livejournal.com

    Comment


    • #3
      What

      Do You have something better, maybe?
      Dr Adolf Nowak
      Reichsleiter
      III Reich Polen
      60-143 Posen Grunewald
      http://3rp.livejournal.com

      Comment


      • #4
        No, James L. Griggs extensive research work,
        combined with NASA's help on the bearing issue
        pretty much tops the charts without compare.

        But they are very affordable compared to yours.

        One the size of the model in the fire station video as example,
        would cost well over five to six times more from you
        than a comparable unit if past info-leaks are true.


        And to answer if I have "Something better",
        I search every day for an article I read
        on some physics forum of some university
        that had an "Accident" using sonic mixing.

        EDIT:
        (I failed to indicate it involved sound via Piezo induction, not mechanical means...)

        When I do, I'll post it here,
        the amount of power-to-result
        is the only thing I know that tops this idea.

        Griggs gravitated into using this method (Cavitation)
        as a mixing method to the industrial complex instead sadly...

        Was it known/patented/done before, sure...

        Did he pick up the cavatation (Pipe hammering really...) idea
        and refine it to a commercially-viable application level concept,
        YES, and well thats my point on this onslaught of postings !



        Will you lower your pricing into our stratashphere please ?

        As example for all of us, lets set the criteria as:
        * 1/2-HP electric motor source input
        * 3450-RPM, so 7-10" rotor of course
        * 4-6" width @ 0.09" gap for water just under steam
        (6" width @ 0.09" is pushing it a bit, maybe 5.5" width)

        What price can you offer these (without motor)
        as a delivered cost (averaged) in US dollors ($) ?

        To be clear, I'm not trying to pin you down to an exact number,
        just a number to that us rounded to, say, the nearest $20 figure.
        (Shipping, taxation and/or import duties excluded)

        What I have read from people that have contacted you in the past,
        indicated that these are horribly overpriced for the average person.

        I welcome this oppourtunity to correct this issue if true.

        I would also like to address your use of the "smiley"
        that indicates banging one's head against a wall,
        if that is about bringing a legitimate techonolgy like this
        to market against non-believers in the technology,
        I AGREE

        I already know this works excessively well,
        It's the price to purchase the machined parts,
        or worse yet the completed device as a unit,
        that is the paramount failure of this device.

        Otherwise,
        it would be in every home around the world by now,
        because it HAS already (been) proven to work previously.


        Thanks for clarification
        Last edited by WeThePeople_USA; 10-10-2011, 11:20 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Wait till Lord comes and brings

          My Dear Freund.
          When something cost You too much, all what You have to do, is to pray to Lord and to wait for, as he comes with Your dreams stay true.
          Typisch, katolisch, judisch.
          Dr Adolf Nowak
          Reichsleiter
          III Reich Polen
          60-143 Posen Grunewald
          http://3rp.livejournal.com

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Arius Nowak View Post
            ...When something cost You too much...
            Does it ?

            You didn't tell us all how much yet...

            Comment


            • #7
              Prices

              Prices for CNFHR200 series:
              model year 2008
              engine..heat production.....el. power cons.....eff.total......eff.workhead..Dt/300L...sqm/10H
              kW............kWh....................A.....kWh.... ..............%..............%.................... deg...........m2......
              5.5.........7/7.7...............9.9/12....7.45................94/103.......187.................20/22........280....
              7.5......9.8/10.8............13/16.....10.15..............97/106........192.................28/31........400....
              11......15.4/17..........19.4/23.5...14.6...............105/116.......206.................44/48.5.....620.....
              not serie, smallest 2008 model for comparision
              18.5...27/30.............31.5/39....24.8.................109/120......215..................77/85....1080/1200.
              model year 2011 with new IE2 Siemens engine and isolated workhead
              4.4........5.8...............9.3/10.3.....5.9...................98.............173. .................19.8............230.....
              6.5........9.2.............13.2/14.7.....8.4..................110............188.. ................26.5............360.....
              12.........18.6...........22.5/27.......16.6.................111............205.. ..................53.............750....
              and new 18 kW
              18.......29...............33.5/39........23.5.................123.............215 ...................83...........1.150...

              The 5.5/7.5 CNFHR's were supposed to cost 2.500 EUR (3.400 USD) 11-3.100 EUR (4.200 USD) 18-hand made workhead for comparision 8.500 EUR (11.100 USD)
              The smallest DRJ600.11 350% 12.500 EUR (17.000)
              We don't sell anything today.
              The 2008 models were built for show and test purposes only and to celebrate 90 Geburtstag of our Fuhrer Karl "The Uncle" Wojtyla.
              The test showe clearly that people are not responsible for they behaviour and own future,
              of Jews, only catholics are bigger pigs.
              So mein liebe Freund.
              This all assures mein 40y. thesis, that not only Jews, but also all religion poison is.
              Only by muslim is this something more practical and couraging.
              All others, as well Jew-o-merica is one big piece of ****.
              Verstanden?
              (All clear?)
              Dr Adolf Nowak
              Reichsleiter
              III Reich Polen
              60-143 Posen Grunewald
              http://3rp.livejournal.com

              Comment


              • #8
                DRJ230-340 Home cold nuclear fusion reactor serie.
                In the topic above, You have dates for future, really for 1 home intended CNFHR.
                We have started this 2 years ago. Because of no real interst today in CNFHR, we have put it on shelf. The further developement is not earlier as after 2020y. sugested, even if this termin not to early is?
                Attached Files
                Dr Adolf Nowak
                Reichsleiter
                III Reich Polen
                60-143 Posen Grunewald
                http://3rp.livejournal.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well, at $3,500US for the 5.5KW unit,
                  I'm not surprised, that is way overpriced.

                  Owner supplying the motor themselves,
                  a 5.5KW for $400US to $500US delivered
                  would be more in line with Grigg's prices.

                  Add +$100US for tighter tolorances for steam.


                  Look, we both know the cost isn't the CNC machining,
                  it isn't the billet they are made from either,
                  it is the high-temp ceramic bearings and special seals.

                  And they must be factored in to the
                  TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) of it.

                  These WILL require scheduled rebuilds for
                  bearings and seals at the very least.

                  And have a limited lifespan due to rotor/chamber pitting
                  due to the cavitation damage occurring under normal use.

                  Just look at any propeller for signs of the same damage...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    12 cylinder BMW

                    I'm always saying that 8, or even better 12 cylinder BMW or Mercedes built more heat than our reactors, so i suggest to choose them instead.
                    A tak wogole daj to byl chinski sprzedawca jaj (Or You can try to buy it by China, Volksrepublik).
                    The prices were calculated with production on small, 10 items serie, for most prospective (choosen) peoples.
                    Yet, because of change of diameter of new IE2 Siemens engines line, we can only 9/12 KW engines to mount.
                    Whats more, they are not intended to work on 60 Hz US current.
                    They could simply not only to overheat, but to break down.
                    YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
                    This is a film with a model driven on 3.100 rpms against 2.900 as normal by 50 Hz current.
                    It is already some 8 times louder than by 2.900 rpms.
                    With full 3.500 the noise of nuclear reaction is so loud already, as supersonic fighter flown over Your head.
                    Even this new workhead as on film, is not supposed to flow out all heat produced by 3.100 rpms already. It, the water becomes so explosive already, that there are too many problems to solve.
                    And i think that 9/12 KW reactor which can 3-5 homes to heat (500-750 sqm) with price of 4.400 USD simply the bargain is.
                    And whats to wear. Our can 20 winter saisons to withstand, and when built with special steel, they can on open circuit to work, to produce biological-energetical, cristal like water not only for bath and drinking but also for ecological production of vegetables, without need for chemicals and genetics.
                    And because of power of free neutrinos on 10^24 eV level, it can even heavy ilnesses to cure.
                    So i don't want that, for small amount of money, somebody a Nobel-doctor to do.
                    After tests i say only, that this what Jew-o-bankers had done with WTC and do further with people is very good for our Planete.
                    F.E. i had calculated that, to 2020y. 30% of today living on pooish soil, will simply die from cold, ilnesses, hunger.
                    It is good work of Jew-o-bankers, because without war we get rid of dumbs and catholic pigs without cost.
                    Thanks in advance to Rockeffeler, Rotschild and others.
                    You should know probably that, in XXI century, dumbs, pigs and cattles are of no need already. E'm i right?
                    Dr Adolf Nowak
                    Reichsleiter
                    III Reich Polen
                    60-143 Posen Grunewald
                    http://3rp.livejournal.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Broken english is difficult for me,
                      but I think I see a few things that
                      you are trying to point out to me.



                      1 - humanities (politicians) most horrendous choice of using internal combustion engines to run on gas/oil instead of the original ethanol intended makes them a good "Heater due to the the incredably excessive heat makers/wasters ver...

                      I'll agree with that one.



                      2 - You assert that the implemantation is RPM-specific,
                      hence 50/60-Hz motor choices are a critical decider.

                      OK, I fully agree with that,
                      the population of holes is derived from expected RPM.
                      The exponential square of results makes a 50-Hz unit
                      produce nearly a full magnitude more results and so
                      the same order of magnitude more "Noise" from it.

                      It only becomes more explosive because it was not
                      designed for that RPM band of usage, nothing more.



                      3 - Sadly, this is where the language barrier starts

                      You assert a number value for a division of effective BTU source,
                      against a household count that is inline for homes in a limited climate only.

                      That is something that can be overlooked,
                      you were making an averaged guess against implemtation.

                      Fair enough.

                      But the price cited is astronomical at best,
                      especially considering required maintanence.



                      4 - Quote:
                      "And whats to wear."
                      "Our can 20 winter saisons to withstand, and when built with special steel"

                      Bull$hit, there is not a material known to (non-gov) man that can resist cavitation etching.

                      Honestly, your this nieve ?!

                      Usable force, yes,
                      but there is a "Sacrificial" nature to this your avoiding
                      or just plain ignoring hoping for the best.

                      To not include the fact that pitted rotors,
                      and pitted chamber cylinders need replacement
                      on a scheduled maintenace timeline
                      is just plain wrong.




                      5 - This is where your hitting on a very good idea.

                      You should realize that the purification of water during the process of state-change like liquid to steam is something that should be handled in a closed-loop enviroment.

                      A very small high speed unit with close tolorances
                      should be used SEPERATELY for this purpose !



                      6 - the whole "jewbanker"/"WTC" thing is unwarranted here,
                      please stop being an ass like that, this is not the place for this !
                      Last edited by WeThePeople_USA; 10-15-2011, 05:26 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Comparision.

                        When You are so smart and clever, why please not DIY?
                        Here under, a comparision of various engines producers.
                        In this fall Siemens (S) and Helmke (H) Helmke | Elektrische Maschinen und Antriebe
                        You can observe, how total effectivity of reactor changes with engine quality.
                        Engine........Electrical............Heat.......... ..Effectivity........Effectivity
                        Power........power................production...tot al.................workhead
                        Kw................KwH...................KwH....... ......%.......................%
                        11(S)............14.6....................17....... ..........116.................206
                        11(H)...........14.0....................17........ .........121..................206
                        18.5(S)..........24.8...................31.5...... ........127..................225
                        18.5(H).........23.5....................31.5...... ........134..................225
                        As You see clearly, the total effectivity of DRJ200 reactor, is on internal effectivity
                        of engine dependant.
                        So of this, we have abandoned smaller 5.5-7.5 Kw engines for this serie, and as well, further
                        developement of DRJ350X.
                        It makes no really sence to waste millions and 5-6 years of work to achieve not much better effectivity on small,
                        2-3 Kw engines and with future unit cost even higher than for today 18.5 Kw DRJ200.
                        This is intended for 1.200 sqm to heat, to 3 times cheaper over gas in night mode only.
                        I think that in 2013 time will come for most clever to adopt this.
                        People will have no other choice as to socialize themselves in small communities to cut costs.
                        And for villages and small cities we have already the "space" technology, the DRJ600 ready.
                        For electricity production as well big cities heating reactors by means of CNF, we have another technology.
                        But this lays in secret place, from Cold War Era hidden yet.
                        But time comes for big show.
                        Last edited by Arius Nowak; 10-23-2011, 12:52 PM. Reason: mistakes
                        Dr Adolf Nowak
                        Reichsleiter
                        III Reich Polen
                        60-143 Posen Grunewald
                        http://3rp.livejournal.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          America Banned!

                          As of 11.11.2011 the new regulation for aquire of CNFHR200 will be introduced.
                          From this date, not only US but also Israel citizens will be banned from this possibility.
                          In fall when somebody will undergo check of our party National Cleanity Comission,
                          and will be found as suspect of smuggling the device to previous mentioned countries,
                          he will be shot at place.
                          Underwritten:
                          First Secretary of NSPAP
                          Doctor Y
                          Last edited by Arius Nowak; 11-07-2011, 11:13 PM. Reason: mistakes
                          Dr Adolf Nowak
                          Reichsleiter
                          III Reich Polen
                          60-143 Posen Grunewald
                          http://3rp.livejournal.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Nsbrj2013 (drj200.2013)

                            NSBRJ=National Socialist Biological Nuclear Reactor
                            DRJ200.2008.AVI - YouTube

                            This and next year possible is, a short, 10 unit serie of model 2013 to built.
                            Here are technical specs.
                            S= Siemens, H stays for Helmke engine producer.
                            Engine power
                            [kW ] .... .... ... . ... .... ... . .... ....11.00.... .... ... ....15.00... ... . .... .... 18.50
                            Heat production
                            [kWh ] .... ... ... . .... .... ... .... ...16 .00 ... . ... ... . .22.00 .... ... ... . .. 28.00
                            Electrical power : [kWh ]
                            S/H. .... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ..14.40/14 .00 ... . .19.50/19.00 ...24.50/24.00
                            Heated room: [m 2 ] (by 30/75 kWh norm)
                            ... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .1.300/520 ... . ... 1.800/700 ... .... 2.300 /900
                            Total mass
                            [kG ] .... .... ... .... .... ... . ... .... ..115 ... . .... ... .... ...132 ... ... . ... . ... 150
                            Process efficiency (%)
                            S/H ... . ... . .... ... .... .... .... ... 110/114 ... . .... ..112 /115 ... ... . ...114 /117
                            Mechanical efficiency (%)
                            S/H ... . ... . .... .... ... .... .... .... ..194 /194 ... ... . ... 195 /195 ... . ... ... 201 /201
                            Both engine types are of IE2 /2011 Euronorm.
                            This norm will be valid only through 2013.
                            From 2014 the new IE3 Euronorm for electrical engines goes into live.
                            Engines of this will be some 4- 5x more in price than todays IE2 types.
                            Only to say, small 1 kW engine for wash machine, will cost 1.000 USD, even 3x
                            more than today all the wash machine.
                            Everything will be much, much higher in price than today, even if there will be
                            new money already.

                            It is proposed change ratio 5 EUR: 1 DM.N (German Mark New), but prices for
                            most important raw resources will stay on today level.
                            Only wages go down.

                            Technical datas for engines model 2013 :
                            Engine Siemens (S) /Helmke (H) ... .... ...
                            ... .... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... ..11 kW/400 V ..15 kW/400 V.. . 18.5 kW/400 V
                            Power nominal/real [kW] 50Hz ... .11/8 .25 ... .... 15/ 11. 25 ... . .18 .5 /13 .9
                            Revolutions [rpms/ min.] .... .... ... .. 2. 955 ... .... .... 2. 955.. .... ... 2 .955
                            cos "&" (S )/(H) ... . .... .... .... ... ...0.87/0.90 ... ..0.88/0.90 .... .....0.88/0.91
                            Current by 400V [A] docs/practical
                            Siemens IE2 . .... ... ... . .... .... 20.50 /24. 00 ... ..27.0 /32. 00 ... . .33.5/39.50
                            Helmke IE2 . .... ... .... .... ... .18 .70/ 22.50 .... ...25.10/30.20 ... 30.80/37.50
                            mass [kg] ... .... ... . ... ... . ... . .... .68 .... ... .... .... ... . ..85 ... ... . ... . ... 104
                            Loud level [dB] S/H ... . .... .... ... 70/81 ... . .... .... ... .70/81 ... .... ...70 /81
                            IE2 engines from Siemens make 16x small loudnoise than previous EFF2 (IE 1)
                            class engines.
                            Here old 2007 prototype 5.5 kW engine. DRJ.2007.3gp - YouTube
                            Comparision to experimental 3.100 rpms DRJ350X against standard 2.950 speed:
                            DRJ350X.3gp - YouTube
                            By full 3.500 rpms loudness of nuclear reaction is high as F-16 flying supersonic over ones head (>140 dB).
                            The workhead will be insulated with 10- 15 cm foam to have 99% heat efficiency
                            and to reduce noise of nuclear reaction.
                            The clutch will be for to make distance from engine for it and have better
                            possibility to send workhead alone to proving.
                            Last edited by Arius Nowak; 01-08-2012, 04:33 PM. Reason: corrections
                            Dr Adolf Nowak
                            Reichsleiter
                            III Reich Polen
                            60-143 Posen Grunewald
                            http://3rp.livejournal.com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Comparision to COP.4 ground heat pumps.

                              By the way, i tell You why COP>4 by heat ground pumps stands not much to reality.
                              It is so by (+ ) outer temps only.
                              When making colder weather to (-1 )-( -7 ), they pump 2x less heat and start to
                              take more electrical power as specified.
                              This situation is not so bad yet, it can 1.5 -2 .0 COP achieved to be.
                              Much worser is in situation when temps fall between (- 8) to (-15 ) degs.
                              They loose rapidly on heat efficiency 4x to nominal specs, whats more, engines
                              of compressors can even with more than 100% of mechanical power to work.
                              In such permanent winter conditions it can be 0. 7 (70 %) to 0.8 (80%) achieved.
                              Also not much better over conventional electrical heaters which make about
                              60%.
                              Our DRJ reactors completely of surrounding conditions independent are.
                              It is of internal nuclear reaction which goes with 10.000 .000 degs.
                              It works with specified efficiency in space too, (-273 ) degs.
                              In practice (-15) outer temp is a limit for ground heat pumps.
                              For air once, even small (-) temps are of not good conditions to work.
                              Last edited by Arius Nowak; 01-08-2012, 07:15 PM. Reason: correction
                              Dr Adolf Nowak
                              Reichsleiter
                              III Reich Polen
                              60-143 Posen Grunewald
                              http://3rp.livejournal.com

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X