Philippine inventor Aviso priciples revealed

[sykavy]

In the three videos posted to Youtube, Aviso describes many details of his free energy collecting circuit. In addition to showing a diagram of the circuit, he performs multiple demonstrations of a simple version of it. At one point, he starts to describe what will be happening in the next few weeks in regards to his technology. Near the end of the videos, he outlines a few critical issues he had to work out in order to make his technology work optimally.
Aviso's Free Energy Circuit Revealed

[Farmhand]

Hi sykavy, I seen those video's a while ago, but I can't make out for sure
what he's doing. It looks like he's charging a capacitor to 313v from the
rectified output of the inverter, then using that to pulse a coil. Then my
guess is he returns the current through the coil to the battery. Then "I think"
he leaves the magnetic field collapse in a capacitor charged to over 1000 volts.

Is that what he is doing ?

If the principals are revealed I missed them because I had a lot of trouble
following what was happening in the video.

If he is returning energy to the battery like that I think it will destroy the
battery. Once the final cap is charged and no energy is removed from it, the
circuit serves no purpose.

If he showed it running a load it might mean something, but it's not hard to
charge a cap to 1000 volts from a 300v source or even from a 12 volt source.

Where was he collecting the ambient energy ? And how much did he collect ?

I think with the car, the principal is to charge a cap to HV then run the motor
from the capacitor 1000v positive to the battery positive rather than circuit
ground to return energy to the battery.

Something like I do in this video.
Switchback Drive.wmv - YouTube

I can't say for sure what he is doing but the way I did it in this video shows
how it can be done and it's very efficient, when the motor shaft is loaded
more current circulates but only the heat and sound losses seem to be disapated.

The series batteries can be removed in my setup and just capacitors used
there. I think my setup can do much the same thing as Aviso's but mine was
just an experiment.

Cheers

[Farmhand]

I think his car could be legit for sure.

So I think a similar thing to his car can be accomplished and made very efficient,
especially if computer control systems are used.

The only energy needed is to replace the heat and sound losses and such, this
could be supplied in a number of different ways.

The key is to reduce losses to a point that only a small amount of "top up"
energy is required, that way it is easier to keep the energy level in the system
almost constant.

I just picked up a quad bike to experiment with this type of thing. My plan is
to remove the ICE and try to setup a switchback drive with a battery and caps.

Seems like it can only work, and if that is what Aviso is doing I can see that
his system is legit albeit not that novel.

Cheers

P.S. The only problems i see is high surge currents, if system is started with
the big caps empty . And the battery needs to be kept either giving out
energy or taking energy in not both at once. Out of phase energy return could
work, but I think DC back to the battery better.

It should work the same way as a solar system, in that when there is more
energy from the panel than is being used the battery charges, then if more is
being used than the panel supplies the battery drains. This should work in the
same way.

Regenerative braking can also be implemented, and solar or another energy collection method to top it off.

..

[boguslaw]

Partially you are right. Aviso uses the same method as in Edwin Gray circuit.
It should be thought about this way : when we charge large HV capacitor and discharge into load effect is huge , but the bug lies in charging time. If we could have big HV cap always charged no matter how fast we repeat discharge then we would have Aviso method and Gray method.
Think that way and maybe you/we will find solution ?

[Farmhand]

Partially you are right. Aviso uses the same method as in Edwin Gray circuit.
It should be thought about this way : when we charge large HV capacitor and discharge into load effect is huge , but the bug lies in charging time. If we could have big HV cap always charged no matter how fast we repeat discharge then we would have Aviso method and Gray method.
Think that way and maybe you/we will find solution ?

I've already found my solution. And I am working to implement it. Though it will
take quite some time.

Aviso's car is just efficient, I don't think it is OU.

This is the quadbike I'll use. And I have the system worked out in my head,
I've tested it in small scale and it works to my satisfaction.
More than anything I want the machine to use, so it must be functional for
long periods and usable around the farm.

(the dog won't leave a bike if he thinks he might get a ride )


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Cheers

[mbrownn]

I have watched the video's and listened to the explanations and like you I am not sure of its exact circuit but the principal, I believe, is this.

Taking power from the battery, via an inverter, he charges a capacitor bank. Using a DC motor from a forklift powered with PWM he runs the motor. He has not said directly but I believe he collects the inductive kickback in the capacitor bank in the supply line which provides most of the energy for the next pulse, just as I have suggested in my threads. This would result in very low input required from the battery for subsequent pulses. In addition to this he is coil shorting during the pulse to generate high voltage spikes and collecting this. I do not know if the output from these spikes is charging the battery or being added to the next pulse but his principal is the same as mine.

His Capacitor bank is split in series, maybe one half is charged by the inverter and the other by the inductive kickback

Use high voltage to mitigate the BEMF of the motor and run it under PWM. collect and reuse the inductive kickback for the next pulse with a small top up.

On his car, if he has a small alternator, he will have enough power to not only run the system but recharge the battery.

To recover radiant spikes without effecting the normal running of PWM we can use bucking coil in series with a collector coil wound over the top. On Aviso's car there is a large coil mounted on the back and I believe it has this function, for coil shorting, a bucking coil could serve the same function.

In my opinion, Aviso has built a modern Lockridge device and uses it to power a car.

If the ratio between the motor voltage and his input voltage is too low as I suspect he will need the coil shorting to create the required extra input and I believe this is where his difficulties have been as well as balancing the power to the load. Once the thing is running he could probably take the battery off.

This is the basic circuit I think he is using but I haven't included the coil shorting Circuit Simulator Applet

[sykavy]

to tell you the truth Farmhand I really couldn't follow what he was talking about but I figured some one here could. I should have put that in my post. One reason I thought it was legit is it was sponsored by Sterling Allen.

I think Avisio thinks he can make money from his invention. He is raising funds which is the surest way, but often used my charlatans. If his invention is real he will never make money from it. It has happened too often, from the 100 mile carburetor of the 1920's to the Stan Myers water car.

I think Fee Energy tech will only succeed when it is given away for free. Like John Bedini and Peter Lindemann have been doing for years. Sure they may hold a few secrets for themselves but the basic principles they explain pretty well.

[Farmhand]

mbrownn , I'm not sure that is what he is doing. What does he say he is going to do
with the cap charged to 1000v ? And what is it he is doing that shows he is tapping the ambient ?

I think there is more than one way to do it so I'll do it my way.

I won't be shorting any coils, I'll just use the gating method on a HF transformer,
the pic below is the output from the secondary, in each group there is about
20 individual pulses about 2 us each. The frequency of the groups of pulses
can be changed as well as the number of pulses per group and the PW of
them also if I want. Each pulse is an individual inductive event. So with
groups at 2 Khz and 20 pulses in each group makes an effective frequency of
40 Khz with a 2 us PW at 50 % duty max frequency is 250 Khz I think.

With a good core this works well.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

How do you mean "Coil shorting" generator coils ?

Cheers

[mbrownn]

During the on time of the pulse to the motor he shorts the coil out momentarily with mosfets. this causes a high voltage oscillation in the pulse, I believe he does it 5 times per pulse.

He has shown some things on AC but if he is using an AC motor, the coil shorting will work the same at the top and bottom of the sine wave. Obviously if it is AC it wont be my circuit.

[sykavy]

Doug (Koneheadx) seems to understand what Avisio is doing he mentions him here. Doug is mainly interested in efficiency and recovery OU isn't reall that important to him. I think he thinks it can be done but he wants to be practical and recover energy from standard motors. Pretty interesting stuff
http://www.panaceauniversity.org/BEM...0KoneheadX.pdf

here are some of his famous videos Doug seems to have left the seen his website is down.

OverUnity Pulse Motor - Doug Konzen - YouTube

[Farmhand]

Doug (Koneheadx) seems to understand what Avisio is doing he mentions him here. Doug is mainly interested in efficiency and recovery OU isn't reall that important to him. I think he thinks it can be done but he wants to be practical and recover energy from standard motors. Pretty interesting stuff
http://www.panaceauniversity.org/BEM...0KoneheadX.pdf

here are some of his famous videos Doug seems to have left the seen his website is down.

OverUnity Pulse Motor - Doug Konzen - YouTube

More outlandish claims. He says he calls it an over unity motor. He has a pulse
motor. It's not OU. He is not collecting or recovering BEMF it is the magnetic
field energy he is recovering and it is EMF not BEMF it has it's own BEMF
opposing it.

Just about any pulse motor designed to charge batteries will run faster and
with less current when charging a battery than when not.

They cannot turn much of a generator either because they have very little
torque. I see no proof of any over unity.

In my opinion all credibility is lost with the continued claim he is harnessing
the BEMF and sending it to the battery.

I'll be the first to admit I don't know a whole lot, but I am not claiming OU,
and I don't think i'll lose an argument about the collapsing magnetic field being EMF not BEMF.

That one thing, the BEMF thing is a major stumbling block to understanding
this stuff better. It's important.

Rather than just believe all this stuff we should check things out and verify
what is said.

Cheers

[Farmhand]

Please don't be offended by my comments sykavy. I'll also quickly admit that I
have been "taken in" by these types of claims too. It's not always clear to
see where the problem is. Even many of the people making claims are just
mistaken or excited. I think some do it for other reasons.

Regardless very efficient stuff is very good and I won't be put off
experimenting by anyone but me, but I learned a few lessons which have
accelerated my learning tremendously, and that is to listen, consider but do
not believe without proof, and ask questions of myself first before others.

It is almost impossible to visualise a circuit running without the experience to
know what happens in a given situation/circuit or arrangement, if enough
experiments are done, then by watching a video it can usually be seen something is
amiss when it is.

My belief is to learn from others only what is needed to teach myself. Self
taught lessons are never forgotten.

Cheers

[Tishatang]

Hi All,

I am 99 % certain Aviso has just put into practice the principles laid out by Harold Apsden. Aviso seems to be the only one to experiment with these principles. Apsden has impressive credentials, but was largely shunned by the science community because Apsden did not support Einstein.

The principle is that if you not only short out a cap, but hit it with reverse polarity to make it discharge even quicker, the universe rebounds with a surplus of energy. In other words, one can short a cap and collect energy, but you will not get OU, just recover wasted energy as the cap discharges to zero volts. But, if you give it a jolt of energy to make it discharge even quicker than just simple shorting, you get an anomalous rebound of energy. The cap goes to zero volts and than bounces back up with a recovery voltage from the universe. This is your OU if you can figure out how to collect it.

Apsden laid it all out here in his Berlin Lecture:


BERLIN LECTURE: LECTURE NO. 27

He proposes two asymmetrical cylinder caps, but perhaps rolled foil caps will work having a circular shape seen edgewise as per Aviso.

The proof of this effect of forced rapid cap discharge and recovery was from a Doctorial Thesis in 1967 by Bruce Piggin. See here notes for Berlin Lecture:

ASPDEN NOTES ON BERLIN LECTURE


Aviso is using one pair of caps to reverse discharge the other pair of caps. That is why he has that particular quad cap setup.


Here is Patrick Kelly Guide to Free Energy Chapter that includes Apsden's patent GB 2390941 and an improved model using three element caps.
Yes, an OU patent. I don't think the English Patent Office was about to challenge Apsden, who himself was a patent advisor for IBM.

http://www.free-energy-info.com/Chapter11.pdf

All the science is here to understand the principles involved.

Tishatang