Tesla / Imhotep Radiant Energy Circuit

[leonof]

Please don't anybody get excited yet, I must do some proper tests first.

No - at the moment I have the bare-bones circuit (2 antenna caps, 2 electrolytic caps, 4 diodes, and 4 short (8-20cm) wires sticking out (ant, gnd, +, -), and they are not connected to anything!

Yes I suppose it could be picking up from anything... like my pc screen even maybe?

For the record, it has just started raining.



Thanks! I'm even more excited now...

Since I last tested, it has risen:
1.118V
1.153V
1.237V max

Rapidly tapping my meter's leads on the contacts seems to yield the biggest voltage....

I am going to connect it to my shuttling circuit a bit later, and see if this voltage is at all usable....

why not try the device in a faraday cage? congratulations

[b_rads]

Thanks for sharing

Please don't anybody get excited yet, I must do some proper tests first.

No - at the moment I have the bare-bones circuit (2 antenna caps, 2 electrolytic caps, 4 diodes, and 4 short (8-20cm) wires sticking out (ant, gnd, +, -), and they are not connected to anything!

(Content Removed)

Highly suggest looking at this vid:
Tesla's Secret Circuit (4 of 4) - YouTube
Also look at @LetsReplicate website
RF Charge Pump | Let's Replicate Free-Energy, Overunity, and Tesla Devices
Thank you for sharing.
Brad S

[LetsReplicate]

Please don't anybody get excited yet, I must do some proper tests first.

Since I last tested, it has risen:
1.118V
1.153V
1.237V max

Rapidly tapping my meter's leads on the contacts seems to yield the biggest voltage....

I am going to connect it to my shuttling circuit a bit later, and see if this voltage is at all usable....

Yes, it should get up to a few volts if it's exposed to florescent light at any distance it seems, one of my bottles reached 20v if the CFL was right beside it, there was still no current there though (not even 10uA through an analog meter). That effect could easily be called induction and I have yet to see any truly magical effects from using an alpha emitter that I could call "defiantly not induction".

With an Alpha emitter, and a 22uH coil on my jar (I have many now, from 6uH to 300uH) when not exposed to a CFL: the voltage is only 10-20mV. This remained true when I placed a "negative ion" magnesium salt lamp beside it too: it uses a small 7watt incandescent and should not cause much RF noise.

...Actually, even if only the wire running from the circuit to the copper plate is exposed to a CFL, the circuit still produces voltage. I am pretty convinced this is just normal induction, because ionization would not be carried 3ft to the bottle only when the wire is directly in front of the light. I'd wager I could put a coil around the bulb and draw more power than I'm getting out of the ion jar so far.

Highly suggest looking at this vid:
Tesla's Secret Circuit (4 of 4) - YouTube
Also look at @LetsReplicate website
RF Charge Pump | Let's Replicate Free-Energy, Overunity, and Tesla Devices
Thank you for sharing.
Brad S

Dianne's construction of the circuit was with only a 5' "straight wire" antenna, and no ground. Using an earth ground and more inductive antenna I was able to get a higher voltage than Dianne, but the calculated power still peaked in the micro watts. It was also determined that inductive pickup on the DMM leads was a large factor in the output.

@b_rads
Thank you for joining the site, and much thanks for spreading the word of our existence. I'm going to be asking Lidmotors, to make a full-through construction of "Penny". I'd rather have the experts doing the demos than doing them myself: theirs always work better.

The voltage transformer on the same page.. Not the current transformer :-)

...that is somewhat more plausible, but you're taking a MASSIVE power loss, and I have some doubts that such little current would work on such an inductive transformer at all. ...and the output would still be heat limited to 300 watts, so the 30 000 watts is still a gross overstatement by several orders of magnitude.

[jimboot]

Started building my ion pump tonight. I already have a similar circuit from a previous exp which scavenges pretty well but I'm only 90' above sea level so I'm hoping that the pump will give me more than just just stray em field pick up. Thanks again Matt. Let me know if you need help withe new site. It's what I do for a day job.

[ciucianebbia]

Vaseline Uranium Glass Marbles

do you think this material is adapted for alpha emission ?
(search on ebay the title for description)

thanx

[mcombatti]

Laws of physics

Build the circuit and test it... As with a bedini.. Radiant energy cannot be measured by known instruments .. Until converted.. I'm not a scientist.. And I don't believe in theories or accepted physics.. Only facts... Ima computer systems engineer.. The linden experiment is missing key components.. It wasn't 700volts as people state.. It was 700 mV... (and baumann was touching the plates (grounding ;-)) Just enough to start resonance... The field between the plates (also not an electret as most people state.. That would have adverse effects) helps when pulsed by the influence machine to shift the magnetic flux just enough to induce a current to flow (multilayered to form an electron cascade generator) .. And because large electrical potential moves to lower potential (like osmosis)..it draws the voltage from the Leyden ion pumps (large canisters on testatica) to the output leads.. (the on/off pulse switch without a sparkgap :-))

Touch a lead when lighting your led in your low power circuit... Or connect only one lead and hold the negative... It still lights and much brighter than when 'ungrounded'.

Even if you see a small amount of power from leads before using pulse... Connect a rechargeable dead AA battery (with a diode) and it'll charge up faster than you think :-)
+ to + and - to -

The circuit uses earths natural RF frequencies and ionization(at a less efficient method)

[mcombatti]

Youtube

If you view YouTube, my friend Paul (inventor3) has a bunch of videos of the circuit before charge pump and did all kinds of tests if you want to view

YouTube search "Free energy from air" .. I think his lowest voltage without the pump was about 30 volts ...

Physics says we cannot create a magnetic field without current.. But the last patent I posted reveals it is possible to create large magnetic fields with just voltage and no current (negligible) :-) lol I hate mathematicians and scientist.. They know what they don't know, and don't know what they think they know.. I was excited to learn einstien was just a quack and e does not = mc2 :-) new physics shows e = 20 something variables .. That's like saying you bake a cake with a pan and oven.. What bout the ingredients?

[leonof]

Your approach is really interesting, I can not wait to experiment, and also provide answers on the device, Roy Meyer, absorber (even if you do not understand how in prison, found radioactive material) spoke of a closely guarded secret to magnetize. I've always seen very close to Roy Meyer and Baumann (curiosity, you managed to reconstruct the Testatika?) (Also apologize for my english: D)

[MonsieurM]

Your circuit maybe acting as what is called a Plasma Antenna...Plasma antenna - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



sorry to jump in...thought the info might interest you

[LetsReplicate]

If you view YouTube, my friend Paul (inventor3) has a bunch of videos of the circuit before charge pump and did all kinds of tests if you want to view

YouTube search "Free energy from air" .. I think his lowest voltage without the pump was about 30 volts ...

Physics says we cannot create a magnetic field without current.. But the last patent I posted reveals it is possible to create large magnetic fields with just voltage and no current (negligible) :-) lol I hate mathematicians and scientist.. They know what they don't know, and don't know what they think they know.. I was excited to learn einstien was just a quack and e does not = mc2 :-) new physics shows e = 20 something variables .. That's like saying you bake a cake with a pan and oven.. What bout the ingredients?

Free energy from air TEST2 - YouTube:"i connect circuit to coils, antenna and ground and get over 60V.(after camer was turned off voltage kept rising to 79.8V and checked current at 75 micro Amps)."

=4.5 mW to 8 mW. I call that realistic: it is about what I'd expect from a radio receiver pre-amp. He is also careful to mention the word "trade off" voltage for current. That is also standard RF inductive pickup: no ions are involved. Voltage is not the same thing as power, and stating voltage without the current is misrepresentation.

...That patent was from the 1980s (reprinted, but not proven in 1999), had they been able to actually prove the effect existed, the device would be commonplace as it should instantly put the power companies out of business. As it stands I believe that the only reason it was a "secret" is so that people can misrepresent it.

I now have 3 bottles connected to the circuit input. When the emitter is inside the most inductive bottle (most choke): no voltage output. If the emitter is switched to lower inductance bottles, the output rises proportional to inductance decreasing. It is higher still when I don't have the emitter in a bottle, and even higher when I unplug the emitter from ground. I'm about to do an experiment with a "dummy emitter" (neodymium magnet of the same size) to see if I get the same results.

I contacted the man who taught me telecommunications. He has been a HAM operator for 30+ years, and IT IS HIS JOB to know EVERYTHING about radio waves. He does not believe the ions will effect the electrical length of the antenna (which is the claim in the patent), and that having a ground plane would work better (as your circuit has neither a ground plane, nor an earth ground). He has also never seen any indication that magnetic fields exist between static, disconnected capacitor plates. So far based on these tests: I'm inclined to agree. He also stated that if you are getting "unrealistically large" power that you might live/work very near high-power lines (it IS illegal to tap 60Hz wirelessly because you are in the near field, draw too much power intentionally and you can cause the entire grid to fail because the grid requires meter feedback for regulation).

If you are ABSOLUTELY certain this works: then I need a picture of your encapsulater with coil inside diameter, length, wire gauge, pitch (spacing) and information on how you connected this to your collection plate (the length of that wire, plate size. height off ground and sea level) If I have those I should be able to replicate it exactly and get the same results as you. If I don't then the effect must be limited to your local environment (like being near a high-power line). I still want you to be right on this because I WANT to see the "legacy of Edison" (power companies) destroyed: and if Telsa could have done it, I'm sure he would have.

Einstein was not 100% correct, but nobody is, he was a human that was subject to the same kind of delusions all humans do. He simplified things mathematically by making assumptions, it turns out that not every assumption is correct, but most of them were "not bad guesses" because it let us an a species correctly predict some sub-atomic reactions. As we progressed passed that and DID sub-atomic experiments, we learned "what ingredients" we needed. Squaring c is the same as multiplying by any "really big number", and that's all he did: say it was a large number and connected it to mass. That basic premise is still true even after the math was proven wrong.

Your circuit maybe acting as what is called a Plasma Antenna...Plasma antenna - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Interesting. Good find, good find! Thank you. =)

[mcombatti]

Ground

Indeed there is a ground connection... The ground runs from inside the tube to the earth... It's not necessary.. Although will increase voltage/current very much. There are two methods to charge the circuit, one is by earth bound RF... The other is by electrostatics (ionization)... Low frequency RF is non ionizing radiation.. Note we are using High Frequency... Which causes ionization quite readily.. Thus why smoke detectors say not to put the radioactive material close to a HF source.. Light is part of the electromagnetic spectrum and is both a wave and particle.. As are all forms of electromagnetism... Six people have wrote already of it functioning as described, and I may not have all answers as to how it works, but it does. Everyone says perpetual motion is impossible, but with a closed horseshoe magnet and two neos you can make a compass spin and spin and spin.. All parts stationary.. If you want the original circuit with non modern parts, lookup patent by hermann plauson (probably won't be in a patent database since it's been censored, but it is on the web in numerous locations), it's more simplistic.. But powered the world fair in Germany in early 1900's. Before trying to figure out why something shouldn't work, try it and try to figure out why it works. If it wasn't something, I wouldn't be wasting my time and energy and $$ here to get nothing out of it and look like an @$$. :-)

Best way to describe how it works is here
Atmospheric electricity - Electric Universe

To save you time of having to search for Herman Plauson,
http://www.nuenergy.org/pdf/plauson1540998.pdf

It works.. Just build it.

[mcombatti]

Plauson

Line 40 (b) describes how the radioactive material increases current and voltage :-)

[importfanatik]

Confused (background in computers, not electronics)

1. I am confused on the tuning aspect. Are there two coils in the circuit?: the RF Choke surrounding the Ion tube, and the tuning coil.?
Or are are they the same thing?
If they are the same, which two capacitors must equal 35 pF assuming the RF choke has an inductance of 24.82 uH?
I have included a picture with two interpretations.
Interpretations.jpg
Which is correct? or if neither, could you clarify further?


2. What do you mean by "Outer Variable Capacitance Dielectric Shield", and what products would you reccomend?


If using a transformer to convert from HV/LC to LV/HC
3. What purpose does the spark gap serve?
4. What type / value of Capacitors should be used for the two transformer capacitors?


If using the "Electron Cascade Amplifier" circuit to convert from HV/LC to LV/HC
5. What type / value of capacitors & resistors should be used?


Output
6. What frequency will be at the output of the transformer?


Thanks

[Farmhand]

Build the circuit and test it... As with a bedini.. Radiant energy cannot be measured by known instruments .. Until converted.. I'm not a scientist.. And I don't believe in theories or accepted physics.. Only facts... Ima computer systems engineer.. The linden experiment is missing key components.. It wasn't 700volts as people state.. It was 700 mV... (and baumann was touching the plates (grounding ;-)) Just enough to start resonance... The field between the plates (also not an electret as most people state.. That would have adverse effects) helps when pulsed by the influence machine to shift the magnetic flux just enough to induce a current to flow (multilayered to form an electron cascade generator) .. And because large electrical potential moves to lower potential (like osmosis)..it draws the voltage from the Leyden ion pumps (large canisters on testatica) to the output leads.. (the on/off pulse switch without a sparkgap :-))

Touch a lead when lighting your led in your low power circuit... Or connect only one lead and hold the negative... It still lights and much brighter than when 'ungrounded'.

Even if you see a small amount of power from leads before using pulse... Connect a rechargeable dead AA battery (with a diode) and it'll charge up faster than you think :-)
+ to + and - to -

The circuit uses earths natural RF frequencies and ionization(at a less efficient method)

If you view YouTube, my friend Paul (inventor3) has a bunch of videos of the circuit before charge pump and did all kinds of tests if you want to view

YouTube search "Free energy from air" .. I think his lowest voltage without the pump was about 30 volts ...

Physics says we cannot create a magnetic field without current.. But the last patent I posted reveals it is possible to create large magnetic fields with just voltage and no current (negligible) :-) lol I hate mathematicians and scientist.. They know what they don't know, and don't know what they think they know.. I was excited to learn einstien was just a quack and e does not = mc2 :-) new physics shows e = 20 something variables .. That's like saying you bake a cake with a pan and oven.. What bout the ingredients?

Hi mcombatti, I'm not really concerned with the technical details unless the
claims made can be validated. I take it you have no intention to do that.
That's ok. But without some kind of proof it's just another bunch of words.

All I ask for is some confirmation of the Kilowatts of power claimed, like a
recent photo or video.

I'm not going to search you tube for your friends video's.

I think if you come to a website for alternative energy and claim Killowatts
from the air you owe us some proof. Something better than go see some guys
video's.

Do you have any proof or not ?

Cheers

[importfanatik]

Tesla Technology And Radioisotopic Energy Generation

So,. just for fun I decided to revisit my "The Free Energy Device" handbook tonight, hoping to refresh my memory on some of Tesla's thoughts on the whole "radiant energy" thing,.
But instead of any of Tesla's articles, there on page 18 & 19, (the first article in the book really) was:
"TESLA TECHNOLOGY AND RADIOISOTOPIC ENERGY GENERATION" !!!!!

This is the only full copy of this document I can find anywhere on the internet.

Your device is clearly taken straight out of this Paul M. Brown fellow's playbook.
The main difference (from what I can see/understand) is that he was using more dangerous forms of alpha and beta emitting isotopes.

Looks like this Paul M. Brown fellow died in 2002

He wrote a patent too and ill bet theres lots more good info there as well:
"Apparatus for Direct Conversion of Radioactive Decay Energy to Electrical Energy," US #4,835,433 (1989)