The electric field of a magnet

[Dave45]

Iv thought about using permanent magnets in the system but the problem with that is the permanent magnets have a frequency and we would need to match that frequency, then the system will get complicated.
The simpler the better
dave

I would like to see the results of a pull off test using multiple coils without magnets.

[Dave45]

finding resonance between primary and secondary is a big issue in all the devices, there are alot of theory's, I have a weight scale I bought for weighing precious metals so that is the road I will be taking.
equal mass

[Dave45]

I will be using cw and ccw wound coils but not in one coil set every other primary will be cw and every other will be ccw with the secondary's matching the primary's respectively
in every action there is an equal and opposite reaction so by pulsing the system from the center out we should get an opposite reaction from outside back to the inside this should pull energy into the system.
There are alot of reactions to consider

[Dave45]

Iv thought about the tpu and how its wired to cause rotation, but in this system there's already rotation so I dont think we have to worry about that.

[myenergetic]

Hubbard Coil and barbat Patent

@Dave45

In your post #431 The shorted coil magnifier if moved to the exterior can be more effective, as used in Hubbard and Barbat self sustaining generators

Here is of what i think better

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...1&d=1326290822

For resonance equal mass is away to go

Regards

JJ

[Dave45]

@Dave45

In your post #431 The shorted coil magnifier if moved to the exterior can be more effective, as used in Hubbard and Barbat self sustaining generators

Here is of what i think better

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...1&d=1326290822

For resonance equal mass is away to go

Regards

JJ

I see what your saying JJ thanks I will definitely try that.

[nueview]

guys
i got my static machine up and running yesterday and did some tests i think you got it all wrong even my previous thoughts i am sorry.
i need to put more time in on my own site so may not post as much here as i need to spend more time on other things and want to get my own thoughts in order first.
Martin

[Dave45]

ahh comeon Martin your teasing now, spit it out

[nueview]

ok here goes
how does a static machine develope no voltage even micro volts.
if it is all about dielectric strength.
then is the k factor varied and why
if resistance can be made nothing by process then there is no real dielectric value
how then does charge value multiply.
i can demonstrate every effect of Dr Stiffler with my static machine.
what then is actually going on within a coil of wire and why is it charge driven.
why is the magnetic containment field for charge 90* out 0f phase with the charge.
is it caused by a charge displacement on another charge path.
ok you got it.
Martin

[Dave45]

Good to hear your idea's Martin
I'll think on it

Iv been thinking about a single wire and how the magnetic field combines in a coil. I think there's an electric field circling the wire that does the same thing, If you think about it for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction so when we send an electric field through a wire there has to be an electric field returning, which combines just like the magnetic field in a solenoid coil.

Iv been thinking on this for awhile I think one field runs inside the other, one's angular momentum is cw the other is ccw, if we look at coaxial cable this is the way it works catching both fields and sending one field into ground.

Look at the radio models of the positive and negative charge


as you can see one can run inside the other, now this only happens when the electric field is seperated from the magnetic field.
One radiates, the positive, and the other runs to ground, this is the way an antenna works, I guess one could be considered a hole. I think the positive is the hole.

[Dave45]

One could be considered a photon the other an electron, they run the same way in a magnetic field one enters the north pole and one exits, but the difference is the positive and negative are separated when orbiting a magnetic field line, when stripped from the magnetic field they run one inside the other and the magnetic field orbits them. Its basically just a change up in the way the fields are running with each other they are never truly separated in a circuit, I think they can be separated when broadcasting in our atmosphere, by running one into ground we build up a positive charge that will broadcast.

[Dave45]

Im not sure about which one is running inside and which is running outside I'll have to think on that awhile longer.
This is why a light bulb or motor or anything has to have a return wire it has to be part of the loop, even one wire electricity can be explained like this you are basically sending one into ground or one into the atmosphere, one wire electricity is truly separating the positive from the negative and so is radio broadcasting.

[Dave45]

By broadcasting we are using the earths magnetic field, that shows information can be carried by a magnetic field or I guess we could call it frequency's or vibration what ever we want to call it.
and if a magnetic field can carry information we can use it to heal our bodies.

[Dave45]

If one can be considered current and the other voltage we can see why sometimes we are not completing the loop, we dont need to separate the fields we just need to change there relationship to each other.

[Dave45]

Ed Leedskalnin said we arent using the positive, we are in some applications like radio broadcasting but not in our circuits and the positive builds up and causes heat or lenz.