This is the field that transfer's energy from one coil to another
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The electric field of a magnet
Collapse
X
-
Here's a simple experiment take two coils one cw and one ccw, power the ccw from the left and notice the magnetic pole, now power the cw coil from the right and notice the pole. You would think that powering two coils from opposite ends would give opposite poles but it doesnt. A very simple experiment but a very important one.
Ok Utkin and Don Smith show diagrams where one side of the coil is volts and one side amps.
So if north is always amperage and south is always voltage and we pulse the coils from the center as shown, our femf in one coil should be amperage and the femf in the other coil should be voltage.
daveHalf of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes very good article, what amazes me is all the calculations and studying they've done on the magnetic flux but totally leave out or ignore the electric field or A vortex field as its called.
The A vortex field is the energy field its the field that transfer's energy from one coil to another, induction, but is totally ignored, instead they focus on magnetic flux which is the axle that the electric field rotates on.
Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave45 View PostYes very good article, what amazes me is all the calculations and studying they've done on the magnetic flux but totally leave out or ignore the electric field or A vortex field as its called.
The A vortex field is the energy field its the field that transfer's energy from one coil to another, induction, but is totally ignored, instead they focus on magnetic flux which is the axle that the electric field rotates on.
The self serving elite employ 'experts' who have deemed that electron spin/ vortex technologies are to be for *their* secret military energy, weaponry and transport provisions only !
Presently my mind is fascinated by the possibility of phased domain reversal or second harmonic augmentation of fundamental on a per pulse basis.
Could *phonic* core resonance induce domain field spin flips with an associated increasing of the transducible total field energy.
As per the mechanical ~3" long *steel* cored phonic induced field within the Hendershot device and its curious travelling electron speed wave/ delay line 'capacitor', with buzzer amplitude modulation of the tuned flip-flop coil oscillation ?Last edited by GSM; 10-01-2012, 10:08 AM.
Comment
-
this reminded me of your thread: Richard VIALLE's new theory and experiments about negative mass and overunity
maybe something interesting for you
Comment
-
Each figure in the pic shows how the two A vector fields interact, notice the direction of the vector field on each magnet, they are represented as gears, I put an axle in fig 1 an 2 but could also be in 3 and 4, the magnetic field does not turn just the vortex field the magnetic field acts like an axle.
Fig 1 the vector fields are running the same and join.
Fig 2 the vector fields are running opposite and will not join.
Fig 3 the vector fields are running the same and will not join.
Fig 4 the vector fields are running opposite and will join.
I puzzled over this until I represented the mags with gears, then you can see whats happening, fig1 and 2 I understood but 3 and 4 had me puzzled.
Notice in fig 3 the gears cannot turn but in 4 they can.
Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Comment
-
Iv been thinking about the symmetrical version of a magnet verses the asymmetric version.
If a magnet was symmetrical then the spin would be the same on both ends either cw or ccw also one would be moving in and one out.
We can see this is not the case by watching this experiment MAGNETIC VORTEX SPIN DISCOVERY, Sept. 2011, TORNADO UNDERWAT.mp4 - YouTube
one end spins cw and the other ccw both moving away from the magnet, another interesting note if a magnet was symmetrical the energy would move from the wire through the magnet and into the ground and not create a vortex on the other end, and if it did it would be moving into the magnet, a siphoning effect, but we dont see this happening.
Lets look a the asymmetrical version with this version we have fields moving in the opposite direction from the bloch wall out to both ends of the magnet one moves cw and the other ccw, this version fits the experiment, one end would be cw and the other end would be ccw both moving away from the end of the magnet and energy would create the field above the magnet and it would be moving away from the magnet.
Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Comment
-
The energy moving through a magnet is not static, it may be at rest when the magnet is not acted upon, it reaches an equilibrium a balance.
The aether seeks balance if we pull energy from only one side of the magnet we create an imbalance and the aether will add to the magnet to try to reach balance again, if we pull from one side the magnet pulls on the aether but it pulls in two directions from the center out so we have a deficit on one side and a build up on the other, the build up on the other side works like pressure opposing the draw from the aether and limits our ability to draw from the aether.
Our coils have to be wound and powered asymmetrically, we have to move energy out in both directions to stop the opposition and let the energy flow through our system evenly, naturally, then we can open the dam and draw energy at will.Last edited by Dave45; 10-03-2012, 12:08 PM.Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Comment
-
Lets look at the gear analogy again, if we had two gears riding on this gear and we spun the gear it would move both gears feeding energy into both gears the same. If these were fields and we pulled from one side only one would build up excess and one would have a deficit, the one with excess would build up pressure and stop or impede the flow.
Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Comment
-
Using the asymmetric field theory can we understand why ac electricity pushes and pulls
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMR47rWo504Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Comment
Comment