The electric field of a magnet

[nueview]

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ump-water.html

all this should go here as to why it fails.
Martin

[MonsieurM]

Perpetual motion machines (hypothetical ) - YouTube

Awesome vis Dave...amazing workmanship...reproducing all those invention

Thank you...quite inspiring

side note

the last one, I was wondering if we replaced the wooden cubes in the end with magnets ...It would not add more force ..you know adding the pull and push to gravity

[myenergetic]

Hubbard Coil and barbat Patent

@Dave45

Your post # 342 to # 371 I have not given up on the Alfred M. HUBBARD Coil Generator assembly. Here is the setup patented by William BARBAT US Patent Application # 2007/0007844. The link is

William Barbat: Self-Sustaining Electrical Generator; United States Patent Application # 0070007844 Self-Sustaining Electrical Generator

On your Post #416 Ignition Coil oscillator driver circuit, please find attached a draft circuit proposal

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...1&d=1326153706

The second link is for a research paper I read it clarifies the core issue of the thread “Electric field of a magnet” manipulation and efficiency.
Quote” Can Innovative Manipulation of Magnetic Lines of Force Lead to Efficient Electrical Power Generation?”

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...1&d=1326153875

I hope it helps

Regards

JJ

[nueview]

it is now time to build a heavy duty high power static machine.
i know what we are missing the part is defined by tesla and keely as rally.
in short it is the rotational torque.
Martin

[MonsieurM]

I believe it takes rotation in one form or another either mechanical or induced, even in the Hubbard coil there is rotation the coils firing in succession in a circular pattern.
If we take water in a bowl just sitting there its static but if we rotate the bowl we add kinetic energy to the water.
We really dont need torque all we have to do is spin the coil the easiest way possible, high voltage will do it and we can also induce rotation by design.

It kind of makes sense, trying to recreate a sinkhole

[MonsieurM]

Here's a link to Patrick Kelly's work,http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/ btw thank you Patrick its people like you that will change this world for the better.
In chapter five there's info on the tpu and this wiring diagram

looks like a design made to rotate to me
Hook this to the flip flop circuit

resembles this

[MonsieurM]

The Caduceus viewed under different light or perspective

[Dave45]

Hubbard Coil


I had the winding direction of the shorted coil wrong, if we are to collect the field from the shorted coil it must be wound the same as the primary.
I went an picked up the transformer today this thing is huge, cant wait to get into it.

[Dave45]

Hubbard Coil

I think we can use a 1:1 wiring ratio, it just needs to be large enough to handle the amps at the end, and if you really think about it all we need is 12 volts at about 60 amps continuous, at least for a start.
I think by using a 1:1 ratio resonance should be a given, spacing the coils and diameter to length I think it would be wise to look at the golden ratio.
I read somewhere Hubbard said he used to different sized wires in his device, he may have stepped up the voltage some and we could step it up easy enough but we really need amps.
I wonder if we step up then step down the next coil but used the same size wire in both coils would we get a resonant reaction between them or between all six or eight something to think about

[Dave45]

Hubbard Coil

Let me rephrase that if we used say 12 ga. to 16 ga. in the first coil - step up
then used 16 ga. to 12 ga.- step down and alternated this same guage through out the system would we get a resonant reaction between all the coils.

[Dave45]

Iv been thinking of the magnetic model and the electric field that accompanies it
heliospheric current sheet 2001 till 2009 - YouTube
Fibonacci's Fractals - YouTube
We are not the only ones waking up

[Dave45]

JJ do you think we can build the coils with just one winding but say 15 inches in length, by one winding I mean one for the shorted coil, one for the primary, and one for the secondary.
your thoughts would be greatly appreciated
dave

[myenergetic]

Hubbard Coil and barbat Patent

@ Dave45

If you read the second research, paper in my post #418 PPMT test apparatus by Joseph Flynn it clearly demonstrates the gain in total force on the armature pull-off test.

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...d=13261538 75

Quote “The armature pull-off tests that were performed with no magnets, the 1,200 turn coils on and powered and the 0.070 shim produced an average of 3.72 Newton’s of force. The configuration with the magnets, no coils, and the 0.070 shim produced an average of 8.75 Newton’s of force. Therefore, one would think that by adding the two configurations together, that the force would equal 3.72 + 8.75=12.47 Newton’s, but with the two configurations together the pull-off force increased considerably to an average of 22.82 Newton’s. This does not violate the laws of conservation because there are a total of 3 flux-producing sources in the fixture – two magnet stacks and a solenoid.”

In your post #431 The shorted coil magnifier if moved to the exterior can be more effective, as used in Hubbard and Barbat self sustaining generators.

Regards
JJ

[Dave45]

@ Dave45

If you read the second research, paper in my post #418 PPMT test apparatus by Joseph Flynn it clearly demonstrates the gain in total force on the armature pull-off test.

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...d=13261538 75

Quote “The armature pull-off tests that were performed with no magnets, the 1,200 turn coils on and powered and the 0.070 shim produced an average of 3.72 Newton’s of force. The configuration with the magnets, no coils, and the 0.070 shim produced an average of 8.75 Newton’s of force. Therefore, one would think that by adding the two configurations together, that the force would equal 3.72 + 8.75=12.47 Newton’s, but with the two configurations together the pull-off force increased considerably to an average of 22.82 Newton’s. This does not violate the laws of conservation because there are a total of 3 flux-producing sources in the fixture – two magnet stacks and a solenoid.”

In your post #431 The shorted coil magnifier if moved to the exterior can be more effective, as used in Hubbard and Barbat self sustaining generators.

Regards
JJ

Thanks for the heads up, Im going to start building soon there are alot of test that need to be done, some have stated its too complicated but I feel it will be no more complicated than building a pulse motor.
I was thinking about Hubbards coil he had two end caps if the end caps are a ferrous material then this would be a transformer of sorts, closing the magnetic field but allowing it to draw energy into the system.
I dont think it will be that complicated

[myenergetic]

Hubbard Coil and barbat Patent

Quote "
JJ do you think we can build the coils with just one winding but say 15 inches in length, by one winding I mean one for the shorted coil, one for the primary, and one for the secondary.
your thoughts would be greatly appreciated"

@Dave45

In that case we shall be building the "Tesla Kapndz Zilano etc.." series but it requires some adjustment to accommodate the electrostatic charges generated by the magnetic field, a kind of conversion circuit as suggested by Zilano cw ccw secondary circuit.

Dave concept is everything: Hubbard coil works by the principles of micro cyclotron. Where the energy is taped @ moments of basic molecular oscillating frequency resonance (a fractal frequency) as neuview stated, (It is about a scalar wave inducing a charge density and current density having the velocity c even if the charge and the current are not in the same coil,) which coupling of molecules in the coils takes place.

Combining both principles requires some thought it might be hard but not impossible.

Regards
JJ