If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Are there two distinct and separate particles or is it there's only one particle and its there spin direction (cw or ccw) that causes a neg or pos influence?
Back to the project, if we pulse a large diameter coil with a small diameter coil what would happen the small coil is spinning faster because of its diameter but it would not have as much effect as pulsing a large diameter coil with three small diameter coils.
In normal induction the coils are relatively the same but with this setup the small diameter coils drive the inner large diameter coil.
If used with ac three small coils pulse one direction and three small coils pulse the other.
"By virtue of a certain geometrical forethought... (bees) know that the hexagon is greater than the square and the triangle and will hold more honey for the same expenditure of material in constructing each," wrote a 4th-century Greek geometer, Pappus of Alexandria.
For Charles Darwin, the honeycomb was "absolutely perfect in economising labour and wax."
But how do bees do it?
The answer, according to a new study, is that the cells do not start out as hexagons but as circles.
They gradually form into hexagons by a subtle flow of the wax, which is turned semi-molten by the heat from a special class of worker bee.
The solution is proposed by a trio of scientists in Britain and China, led by Bhushan Karihaloo of Cardiff University.
They looked at what happens after waxy flakes are pulled from the bodies of foraging bees by specialist bees tasked with building the honecomb.
Working furiously, these bees operate side by side in adjacent and opposite circular tubes, which they build around themselves.
They knead the flakes and tamp them into place near the triple junctions of their tiny six-mm (quarter-inch) cylinders.
Heat provided by the workers and the physical properties of the wax then do what's necessary.
At a temperature of around 45 degrees Celsius (113 degrees Fahrenheit), the wax starts to flow slowly as an elastic, viscous liquid.
At the junction, surface tension causes the wax to stretch like toffee. It gradually pops upwards, forming a tiny point that becomes an "angle" of the hexagon.
During the process, the cell's walls are continually stretched. Ultimately, the walls of adjoining cells fuse and become straightened, forming a perfect hexagon.
“Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.
I think the magnetic fields entering and leaving the planet also have an effect on the hot wax
I equated the fields around a coil to gears before but it never occurred to me to us them in ratios, torque and speed, by using small primary's we can speed up the secondary and give it torque as well, this should produce more amperage.
If we reversed it and drove the large coil as the primary and the small coils as the secondary's would we increase voltage, lots to do.
Can we now use the wire sizes to increase amperage in the secondary, driving three coils pulsed in one direction, then a different wire size in the other three coils to increase voltage when driving the other three coils in the other direction.
The best of both principles.......... gears ratios ...........transformer wire ratios
I would imagine the system could be center tapped and ran with the zvs circuit but the frequency would be high, the output would have to be rectified into DC.
you may or may not find this pdf. interesting...phrases like flywheel excitation caught my eye among other things...
few people know who NCC was...many people would relate NCC to Star Trek...
The Van Allen Belts should probably be called the NCC belts.
I suspect Van Allen got the nod because he would have been a better spokesperson than the excitable Greek bearing gifts.
What do you mean about "the electric field of a magnet"? I also got a question, is the working theory of metal detector is based on the "the electric field of a magnet"?
Comment